Teachings:The First Scientific Proof of God

No New Blogs

2012-01-22T19:45:00.000-05:00

George will be on vacation for awhile.

The Real God of Jesus Christ

2012-01-21T11:57:00.000-05:00

The real God of Jesus Christ was not the God of the Jews. Thus, Jesus recognized that the God of the Jews had a weakness. Judas did not recognize this weakness. This is why Judas betrayed Jesus and Jesus was murdered on a cross by the Jews.The real God of Jesus Christ is the God of all creatures because God made and maintain them.

Since the God of Jesus is active and holds an Intelligent Design of the Universe that has no end, the God of the Jews must be inactive because the Jewish God created a universe that comes to an end.

The active God of Jesus provides a continuous life to all living things forever. But the inactive God of the Jews can only provide a continuous life to some living things. Thus, the God of the Jews is weak and can exhaust Himself and things.

As seen, the good/evil dualism of the Jews limits the Jewish God. I conclude that this dualism was rejected by Jesus. That Jesus asked Judas to betray him so that he could fulfill a biblical statement would indicate that Jesus was insane. Jesus was not insane. The problem Jesus had with Judas was that Judas did not know what Jesus meant when Jesus said at John 14:20, 'I am in the Father, and ye in me, and I in you.' This statement was not understood by any Christians until the 15th century.

Authorities Are Dynamic, Not Static

2012-01-20T14:04:00.001-05:00

In nations, authorities form the laws of a nation. In the USA, the authorities of the Declaration of Independence (DOI) and the Constitution formed the first laws of the body of the United Stats. Within the DOI, two authorities exist. The first authority, which is found in the first two paragraphs, forms John Locke's Society. The second authority, in the remaining words, gives the Society the right to go to war against England. Then, within the Constitution, only one authority exists. This authority forms John Locke's Government.

Obviously, the ungodly minds of U.S. citizens and politicians are ruining the USA. But foreign citizens and politicians are also ruining nations.

However, the ungodly minds of some citizens are also ruining the field of religion. For example, in the first century of A.D., Christians made a new religion based on the authorities (or teachings) of Jesus. After the death of Jesus, the twelve disciples of Jesus became the authorities of Christianity. In time, Peter became known as the highest disciple. This authority of Peter, eventually led to new authorities given to Popes, saints, priests, cardinals, and bishop. All of these Christian authorities led to 'cannon laws,' which allowed the molestation of children by any authority. (click)

The meaning of all Christian authorities above do not change if one worships an inactive God. But if one worships an active God, molestation and other Christian attributes will change and becomes unlawful because the universe never ends.

As I have taught about an active God, teachers (like Jesus) will always be teaching unskilled students. However, since all human knowledge is dynamic and cannot be completed, teachers will always learn new ideas. The Vatican wants to freeze all Christian authorities. This Vatican thought is wrong.

I say that all authorities are dynamic.

It Is Time for People to Turn Away From Religions

2012-01-19T10:03:00.001-05:00

In yesterday's blog, I show that God is indivisible and has no parts. So, any person or religion will be wrong if they say that Jesus is the Son of God. They will also be wrong if they say that Jesus is Lord, and that Jesus was resurrected. Like other systems of justice, Jesus was murdered, left his body parts, and was reborn often.

In the Gospel of St. John, at verse 14:20, one must conclude that Jesus is not God, not the Son of God, and not a Lord. But Jesus was special because he was one of those 'big thinkers' throughout history who developed new scientific research results about an active God and taught it.

People and religions, who do not accept the words above about Jesus, are turning their minds away from science, the only field of thought that can produce truths. The mystery of truths is not held by any religion. This mystery does not even exist. Truths are infinite in number. Accordingly, we can know some truths. But only God can know truths that we can never know. Thus, if a religion does not want to unify science and theology, its people should walk away from that religion. Like Jesus did, one can then develop self knowledge about an active God.

A Detailed Proof That An Inactive God Is False

2012-01-18T16:11:00.000-05:00

Today, we are living in period in which people are trying to determine whether God exists or does not exist. This is not a scientific question because a thing that does not exist cannot be proven scientifically.

Thus, some people, who don't care about gaining knowledge, will likely become an atheist. The other people, if they are open-minded, might be able to use their general thoughts to determine whether God is inactive or active. In this blog, I will try to help those people who are open minded, are non-scientists, but have questions that science can answer.

With idolatry, God does not exists because it followers say that God terraformed himself into things. So, idolatry had to be challenged and it was Abraham who determined that God exists and is One. His monotheism was the first step toward the truths of God. In order to find more truths about God, the meaning of word 'one' can be connected to counting words, such as two, three, four, etc. Or the word 'one' can be connected to related words such as parts, wholes, etc..

If I use the word 'parts,' the word one either has no parts or has parts. If God has no parts, we can't add a relational truth to God's one. The Jews and Christians say that God has a Son (or Lord). Thus, they are saying that God has parts. This saying is false because only things in the universe has parts.

The Jewish and Christianity belief that God has parts was been challenged ever since 500 B.C. when Anaxagoras found that God One has no parts. The greatest challenge against the belief of the Jews and Christians came from Jesus, who learned and taught that God's One has no parts.

When Jesus taught that God has no parts, a skilled scientist will understand the teaching of Jesus. Such a scientist will say that Jesus also taught that God acted and creates the Universe. But only a very good scientist will say that God's One never changes. This scientist will also say that God can act and did act by using his own 'non-exhaustible attributes' to form a universe that changes and never ends.

On reading, I suggest 'The Gnostic Gospels' by Elaine Pagels. This book will be helpful to scientists and non-sientists.

Some More on 'The Two Gods and the Voting of the U.S. Presidency

2012-01-17T19:47:00.000-05:00

Since I found scientific differences between between an inactive God and an active God about two years ago, I have been able to distinguish better the Republicans and Democrats because the Republicans, seem to think like theologians who teach an inactive God, and the Democrats, seem to think like theologians who teach an active God.

I am able to separate the Republicans and Democrats because an inactive and active God are opposing concepts and cannot coexist at any time. Thus, only one God exists.

On the 1/16/12 post, I said that the minds of Republicans and Democrats do not think the same way on the concept of freedom. Republicans see freedom as a concept of humans whereas freedom is only an absolute concept of God, who has no cause. Since humans are created by God, humans are caused and thus can only have relative freedoms.

The concepts "free enterprise' and 'free market' will be found in the mind of Republicans and in some Democrats. But many Democrats will limit Free enterprise and the free market. I will agree with these many Democrats.

The meanings of words such as 'freedom' are troublesome in all nations because the national languages of every nation can never be completed or perfected. Thus, I believe that the Republican and Democrats in the USA are unable to compromise different ideas because they do not know how to develop precise meanings of national symbolic languages.

More on 'The Two Gods and the Voting of the U.S. Presidency'

2012-01-17T12:02:00.007-05:00

The debates between the Republicans and President Obama this year will not involve the true active God because the Republican candidates and President Obama attend a religion that teaches the false inactive God.

Therefore, I say that the U.S. government will not turn the people of the USA toward an active God before five more years pass and the people will debate the inactive God vs. the active God.

Five Republican candidates still exist. The religions of these Republicans are as follows:

Newt Gingrich: Catholic Church
Ron Paul: Baptist Church
Rick Perry:United Methodist Church
Mitt Romney: Mormon Church (Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints)
Rick Santorum; Catholic Church

The religion that President Obama attends is the United Church of Christ

The Two Gods and the Voting of the U.S. Presidency

2012-01-16T16:56:00.001-05:00

The forthcoming voting of the U.S. presidency in 2012 is very clear with respect to to my research on two Gods, the inactive God and the active God. As I continue to say, the inactive God is false and the active God is true.

My research says that the Republican candidates will support the false inactive God whereas the Presidential Obama will support the true active God.

The most powerful idea that lures the Republican candidates to the inactive God is freedom. Since the greatest freedom will be found in God, the freedom in a human is limited. The Republicans have not shown me how this limit is managed by government.

On the other hand, the most powerful idea that lures President Obama to the active God is also freedom. But Obama shows me that he is able to manage the limit of freedom, when he uses laws in the Declaration of Independence and uses the statement -- all Men are created equal.

With an active God, all people are equal. But in an inactive God, to humans, anything goes.

News: CBS-TV (60 Minutes)

2012-01-15T22:42:00.000-05:00

Tonight, 60 Minutes reported the mental abilities and the autism of Jake. (click) Since Jake's mental abilities are increasing rapidly and his autism is going away, I give my explanation of Jake's experiences.

I say that Jake died on a different planet, which has developed people who are advanced mentally. Since indivisible Spirits do not die, after his death, Jake's Spirit entered the 'dark matter' where he can be reborn and receive a new body from his Father and Mother on planet earth so that the mental abilities of the people on planet earth grows. This theory by me is consistent with an active God and His Intelligent Design.

More on the Debates Between an Inactive God and an Active God

2012-01-15T14:06:00.000-05:00

Today, the difference between an inactive God and an active God is still unclear because the fields of science and theology were not distinguished by our colleges and universities. Science and theology became even more confusing after colleges and universities advertised their nonsectarian positions.

Some years ago, I discussed the word 'nonsectarian' with the President of John Hopkins University (JHU). I told him that colleges and universities can study theology without violating the nonsectarian promise. I said that 'theory' and 'practice' are two unique concepts that are separated in every field of thought. So, I said that colleges and universities can develop theories about an inactive God and an active God without stepping on the feet of any religion. He agreed.

However, scientists and theologians are not coming together in colleges and universities. Instead, some scientists reject God without any scientific proof that God does not exist. And most theologians at colleges and universities are serving specific religions without studying the progress of those scientists, like me, who do believe in God. For instance, I have proven scientifically that the inactive God is false and that the active God is true.

Theologians will make scientific errors if science and theology are not unified. I already found a major error of Professor Bart D. Ehrman of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. This error is found in his work on the life of Judas Iscariot. In Ch. Sixteen The Gospel of Judas, of Herbert Krosney's book (click), Ehrman says,

Jesus is an eternal figure; he is part of the higher God, he is greater than and separate from man, he is eternal.

My theory of God says that God in One and has no parts. Ehrman's error supports the inactive God of Judaism and Christianity and thus rejects my theory of an active God and the Oneness of God.

Our Debates Between an Inactive God and an Active God

2012-01-14T12:55:00.000-05:00

At this time, people throughout the world are trying to distinguish the inactive God and the active God clearly. I believe that people began to distinguish these two gods in 2000 when a young newspaper, Science & Theology News, began to report the togetherness of science and theology. But, on July 31, 2006, this newspaper had to close because it had insufficient support.

Fortunately, when this newspaper closed, my book, The First Scientific Proof of God, appeared in June of 2006. This book recovered the loss of this newspaper because it unifies science and theology. However, I did not stop the research on this unification. I continued this research on this website. On this website, I eventually found that God is active.

Today, many religious leaders are not interested in unifying science and theology. Such a leader teaches theology, not science, and teaches the inactive God. Instead of opening science,non-scientific leaders teach its followers that they have one life in this dying universe but can live forever in God's heaven after death if they are good. These non-scientific leaders are found in Judaism and Western Christian churches.

Religious leaders can become scientific. They can also unify science and theology. For instance, a scientist knows that God has no heaven. Heavens will be found only in the evening sky of the universe. So, if a person wants to live forever, an inactive God must be rejected and an active God must be accepted. With an active God, every human being receives a new and better life by being reborn in a universe that is not dying. To make sure that this new life is better, we must make all nations democracies.

Instead of finding the active God and building democracies, the Jews and Western world Christians have accepted the inactive God. This acceptance can lead only to wars, riches, and poverty.

Developing Knowledge of One World With An Active God

2012-01-13T12:47:00.003-05:00

The last ancient person, who was developing knowledge of an active God, was Muhammad. The development of this knowledge stopped when Mahammad died and his followers and crafty Jewsmade the Qur'an and started the religion called 'Islam.' This error can be corrected by Muslims and Eastern Christians.

After Muhammad, the further development of knowledge about an active God had to wait for the 14th century Rennaissnce. During this period the Eastern Christians would inform Westerners about Plato's Dialogues. With Plato's dialogues, Nicholas of Cusa would produce the book, 'On Learned Ignorance.'(Click) This book says that human knowledge cannot be completed because God is beyond all opposites. Since God is beyond all opposits, we can must connect God to the universe with the attributes of God and the attributes of creatures. For instance God and the universe can be connected with the pair of opposites, 'infinite' and 'finite.' (e.g., one God is infinite and all creatures are finite). We find these opposites by studying the finite things in the universe, as suggested by Paul at Rom. 1:20, and determine whether a concept in the universe will coexist with its opposite as an attribute of Godt.

Beyond the work of Cusa on an active God, I found knowledge about an active God in the work of Galileo, Johannes Kepler, Gotrried Leibniz, Immanuel Kant, Friedrich Hegel, Pierre-Louis Moreau de Maupetuis, Ben Franklin, Bernhard Riemann, Georg Cantor, Ernst Cassirer, Susanne Langer , Kenneth Burke, and Lyndon LaRouche.

The Streams of Thoughts of An Inactive God and An Active God

2012-01-12T13:51:00.004-05:00

The historical appearances of personalities, scriptures, and religions show the two different streams of thought on the subjects of (1) an inactive God and (2) an active God.

Inactive God
Abraham
Religion (Judaism)
Moses
Old Testament

Active God
Anaxagoras
Plato
Alexander the Great
Jesus

Inactive God
New Testament
Religion (Christianity)

Active God
Eastern Christianity

Inactive God
Werstern Christianity

Active God
Muhammad

Inactive God
Qur'an
Religion (Islam)
Catholic Christianity
Protestant Christianity

Active God
Nicholas of Cusa
Galileo
Kepler

lf one studies the personalities, scriptures, and religions of the inactive God, one learns that all thoughts are focused only on the good/evil dualism, morals, and the end of the universe. And if one studies the personalities, scriptures, and religions of the active God, one learns that all thoughts are focused only on knowledge, laws of nature, and the endlessness of the universe.

In one looks at the contents of each different God, one learns that the Qur'an scripture switched the thoughts of Muhammad from an active God to an inactive God when the Islam religion was created. This switch isolated all Eastern Christians from other Christians.

In the column of an active God, I dded Galileo because his book, 'Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences,' confirms an active God. In this book, Galileo proves that all created things by God have an infinite number of infinitesimal parts. So when the Vatican rejected the Copernicus Revolution and imprisoned Galileo, the Vatican rejected both of Galileo's New Sciences. The Vatican apologized its rejection of the Copernicus Revolution but it has not apologized the second science. If the Vatican apologizes the second science, the catholic church must turn their thoughts to an active God.

The Use of Poor Scriptures by Ignorant Leaders

2012-01-11T13:51:00.001-05:00

I say that all scriptures are made by humans and are not the words of God. I conclude that God created humans with intelligence and made us 'little Gods' so that we would be free to develop own lives, roads, homes, etc.

In my book on the proof of God, I discuss the human problems that ignorant scriptures develop. See Part I, Ch.6. (click) Below, I discuss a very large human problem that some scriptures have produced.

From the time of Anaxagoras at 500 B.C. through Muhammad's death at 632 A.D., the people of the Western world opened their minds to the true and active God for 1132 years. However, from the time of Abraham (at 1812 B.C.) to 500 B.C. and from the time from Muhammad's death at 632 A.D. to 2012 A.D., the people in the Western world closed their minds on the active God and worshipped the false and inactive God for 2902 years.

Thus, for roughly 4000 years, about 75% of the Western world people were enslaved to a false and inactive God by ignorant leaders. And, about 25% of the Western world people have been freed to a true and active God by intelligent leaders.

When Gottfried Leibniz was asked by the Pope to study the God of the Chinese, Leibniz said that the God of the Chinese is the same God as his God. Leibniz's work on his 'Monadology' shows us that Leibniz's God is an active God. Since the USA has authorized atheism, the USA no longer follows any God. So, I detect the development of a new USA/China problem soon.

More On the Beginning of Christianity and the Last Real Christian Church

2012-01-10T11:41:00.000-05:00

This blog continues the blog of yesterday.

Yesterday, I said that Church of the East is aligned to the works of Anaxagoras, Plato, Alexander the Great, Nestorianism, Nestorius, and the teachings of Jesus, who is not the Son of God. It is thus clear that this Eastern church does believe in the God of Anaxagoras, the God of Plato, the God of Alexander the Great, and the God of Jesus. Thus, the Church of the East was also the church of Muhammad when he died, since he was a follower of Nestorius and Jesus.

However, after Muhammad died, his relatives and some crafty Jews formed a new religion by making a new scripture. This new scripture is the Qur'an. (In my discussion of the problems of scriptures, I report these crafty Jews on p. 77 of my book on 'The First Scientific Proof of God.')

As I said before, teachers are always wiser than their students. This is why I say that the gospels of the New Testament are filled with errors about Jesus and his teachings. The same kind of errors must be expected in the Qur'an by Muhammad's relatives and these crafty Jews.

The potential errors in the Qur'an are great because the Qur'an turned the followers of Muhammad away from teachings of Muhammad, the teachings of Jesus and the God of Anaxagoras. These errors were great because a new religion was formed and was aligned to the God of the Jewish Pharisees.

The formation of Islam with the Qur'an scripture is a religious disaster because the God of Anaxagoras and Muhammad are the same God but are very different than the God of the Jewish Pharisees.

I conclude that the Muslims and all Western Christian churches have developed a problem with God because they are teaching the God of the Jewish Pharisees. This Jewish God has a universe that ends.

The Beginning of Christianity and the Last Real Christian Church

2012-01-09T13:29:00.002-05:00

I say that Christianity began in Greece with the thoughts of Anaxagoras (500-.428 B.C.).(click) He spoke of God as the 'all-containing One' and spoke of God's creation as 'each thing in each thing.' Since the God of Anaxagoras is active, the God of the Old Testament was being challenged.

At this time, the eastern people of Mediterranean Sea were fighting against oligarchism and slavery. To help them, Plato (427-347 B.C.) produced many dialogues. The Parmenides and Timaeus dialogues confirmed the God of Anaxagoras. And Plato's political dialogues guided the thoughts of Alexander the Great, who freed these eastern people from oligarchism.(click). So the God of Anaxagoras was ready to become the God of all people.

I conclude that Jesus was teaching the God of Anaxagoras. I also believe that Jesus moved to Greece, some time after age 12, and learned about the God of Anaxagoras from the Neoplatonists. Further, I say that some of the Neoplatonists still exist today in those Eastern Christian churches.

One is the Church of the East, which is associated with Nestorianism. This church was advanced by Nestorius, Patriarch of Constantinople from 428 – 431. It emphasizes the disunion between the human and divine natures of Jesus. (Nestorius and his doctrine were condemned at the First Council of Ephesus in 431.)

However, many followers of this Christian church relocated to Persia and became affiliated with the local Christian community there. Today, Persia is Iran, which has a small number of Christians and many Muslims. It seems that these Iranian Christians worship the last true Christian church.

To be continued.

When I Pray (to God), I Reason Perceptions Such As 'All Rights'

2012-01-08T15:45:00.002-05:00

After the USA became a new nation in 1776, Abe Lincoln became the first President to say that the the Declaration of Independence (DOI) is part of the body of U.S. laws. Many people say that Lincoln went to war to save the Union and end slavery.(click) But I say that Lincoln's mind was focused on higher ideas --- the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the social contract theory of Locke.

In 2011, historians said, "while slavery and its various and multifaceted discontents were the primary cause of disunion, it was disunion itself that sparked the Civil War."(click)

I believe that Lincoln's mind also saved the following DOI statements: Laws of Nature's God and all Men are created equal. Both statements define all U.S. rights: (1) the Rights of the People, which come from God; (2) the Rights of the federal government, which come from the People; and (3) the Rights of the States, which come from the federal government.

I believe that Unions are not understood by humans because they can't find God. They can't find God because our perceiving abilities are too weak to sense an infinite God. To find God and understand Unions, a person must lift their mind upwardly to higher and higher lines of reasoning. If you reason, God knows you because your mind's lines of reasoning are unifying your perceptions. When you reason your perceptions, you are praying to God mentally.

So, here is some reasoning information about Unions that humans have created for God. The Union of the USA was identified in the first statement of the DOI by the founders as 'the People.' The Union of the USA was identified again as 'the People' in the first statement of the Preamble of the Constitution. This statement says, 'We the People of the United States, in order to form a more perfect Union,...'

Laws of an Activee God Should Be Allowed in the USA and Should Also Be Allowed in Other Nations

2012-01-07T12:49:00.000-05:00

When the founders of the USA made the Declaration of Independence, they said, 'When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

The above words mean that all declared U.S. laws are based on the God of all Americans. Thus, the Laws of Nature means God's Intelligent Design of the universe and the Laws of Nature's God means God's moral laws of humans. Since the God of all Americans is active and the universe never ends, all laws of the Gods of the Jews, Christians, and Muslims must be rejected if they accept an inactive God.

Since Jews and Muslims accept an inactive God, the laws of Judaism (Old Testament) and the laws of Islam (Shariah) cannot be allowed in America. However, my research says that the Christian God is active. So, Christian laws could be allowed in America if Christians accept (1) the Intelligent Design of an active God and (2) the moral laws of an active God.

The U.S. Supreme Court Must Change

2012-01-06T12:16:00.000-05:00

In the USA, the positions of the U.S. Supreme Court has been filled Court with lawyers ever since 1776. However, this long arrangement has lost its effectiveness because man has proven in 2006 that God is active. This active God and His universe forms one world and thus has no end. Since this proof is scientific, the Supreme Court positions must be filled with scientists and moralists instead of lawyers.

The scientific and moral errors of the U.S. Supreme Court are huge and significant. For instance, this Court has ruled in favor of atheism and abortion. It also ruled that Declaration of Independence (DOI) is not a law, as the Constitution is. This ruling about the DOI removed God from the USA and eliminated the social contract theory of John Locke, which connects the private and public sectors of the USA.

The Supreme Court ruling on the DOI removed the following DOI statement from the USA: Law of Nature and of Nature's God. This statement said that Laws of Nature are scientific laws that come from God's Intelligent Design and that Laws of Nature's God are moral laws that come from God and do not come from the government or the people.

The Supreme Court ruling on the DOI also removed the following DOI statement from the USA: all Men are created equal. This statement is a moral law (or a Law of Nature's God). This statement makes all nations on planet earth equal. This statement assures that all people, after death, will be reborn again in a godly nation.

I hope that all democracies take heed to the problem of the U.S. Supreme Court that I discuss on this blog.

Adding John Locke's Social Contract Theory to a Democracy

2012-01-05T11:33:00.000-05:00

Nations that are developing new democracies can use words in the U.S. Declaration of Independence (DOI) to add John Locke's social contract theory to the new democracy. The U.S. founders installed Locke's theory in the U.S. democracy on July 4, 1776 when they prepared the DOI. Locke's theory is the first two paragraphs of the DOI. I show these two paragraphs below.

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States.

At this time, these two paragraphs are not effective in the U.S. democracy because the U.S. Supreme Court ruled wrongly that the DOI was only an authority to go to war against England. This Supreme Court error thus removed Locke's theory, God, and other important laws from the USA. For example, the statement, 'all men are created equal' is a proven act of God. But this godly act has been removed in the USA!!!

The development of democracies will not be effective unless the national language of a democracy is perfected.

News: Iowa's Republican Presidential Results

2012-01-04T15:55:00.001-05:00

Yesterday, the people of the U.S State of Iowa voted mostly for three major Republican candidates --- Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum, and Ron PaulL This voting is the first step to remove President Barack Obama from the White House.

When he went to the White House, President Obama has tried continuously to make U.S. citizens equal in different ways. Since these three candidates will not try to make U.S. citizens equal at all, a Republican win will cause the USA to return to the ugly and godless U.S. democracy.

Theophanes or Little Gods

2012-01-04T12:45:00.001-05:00

In Judaism and Christianity, the concept 'theophany' means a variable manifestation of a Deity. (click) An example in Judaism is the appearance of an angel to Moses through a burning bush. And an example in Christianity is the appearance of Jesus through the Virgin Mary. I reject these examples.

In Part IIa, Ch. 2 of my book on The First Scientific Proof of God, I discuss the manifestation of a 'little God' on page 85. There, I say 'God could not give himself to the universe partially or diminishedly.' This is true because God is absolute and cannot create things from nothing by dividing Himself into parts or by reducing Himself to smaller things.

In order to understand how God creates, man must identify the attributes of God and connect them to the universe with opposing attributes of the universe. So, when I found that God has the attributes of One, Equality, and Union, I act as a 'little God' and connect God to the universe with the opposing universals many, inequality, and relation on page 128 of my book. I also say that only humans can act as 'little Gods.' For this reason I speak of 'big thinkers' and place Jesus and other humans into a higher group of humans.

In yesterday's blog, I say that the concept 'equality' is found only in God. So, all humans are equal because all of them are 'little Gods.' In my book, I also speak of the divinity of humans such as Jesus because all big thinkers might be called 'little divine Gods.

I conclude that many religious leaders are power-seekers. To maintain power, they do not develop many 'little Gods.' Islam fundamentalism and the Christian Vatican are examples of power-seekers.

How Can the Equality of Humans Become Real?

2012-01-03T12:52:00.001-05:00

Today, U.S. Syndicated Columnist, Charles Krauthammer asks, 'Are We Alone in the Universe?' After identifying the research data about life on other planets, he concludes that only politics can answer such a question. I agree with Krauthammer because only politics can answer the question, 'How Can the Equality of Humans Become Real?'

Accordingly, all nations must become democracies before the equality of humans will become real and before we learn whether we live alone in the universe.

While democracies are increasing in numbers, the new democracies are not developing properly. One improper development of a new democracy is the absence of a godly social contract theory. I say that this theory was developed only by John Locke of England.

Locke's theory is not perfect because he suggests land ownership of the people. I say that land and and minerals must be owned only by Locke's 'Government' because land and minerals must be shared equally by all humans. Locke's theory has two parts, 'Society' and 'Government.' Today, Society is called 'private sector' and Government is called 'public sector.'

A democracy can be destroyed easily if the public sector is destroyed. This sector was destroyed in the USA when the U.S. Declaration of Independence (DOI) was interpreted wrongly by the U.S. Supreme Court only as an authority to go to war against England on July 4, 1776. The first two paragraphs of the DOI created Locke's 'Society', which in the USA is a 'society under God.'

So, if humans want to make the equality of humans a reality, a democracy must include a private and public sector. These two sectors are unified and cause a democracy to move forward into the unknown. To stabilize a democracy is to destroy it.

We Must Develop a New Form of Human Life

2012-01-02T15:29:00.001-05:00

After people developed a belief and faith in God, power-seeking leaders identified many different theologies, built a religion, and built places for worship. In 2012, it is now time to agree that only one God exists, that only one religion exists, and that prayer can occur at any time and place.

If all people on this planet make this change now, the people in all nations must become equal. This equality must occur because after death every human being will be reborn and will not be reborn at the same place. This rebirth is necessary because life-after-death cannot occur in God, as many religions teach, because God is one and thus has no parts. It seems that the religions of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam did not know this fact.

The minds of the people in these three religions are clearly degenerating because science is not being applied. For instance, (1) Judaism still teaches an inactive God; (2) Christianity still teaches about the Virgin Mary an the savior of Jesus; and, (3) Islam still teaches the submission of the human mind to the will of God.

If this new form of human life is not developed with democracies, wars on this planet cannot be stopped. My new human life will build peace and will prevent all these wars..

The End of 2011

2011-12-31T11:45:00.000-05:00

In yesterday's blog, I identified all gospels that provide information about the sayings of Jesus. This information began to appear 25 years after the death of Jesus with the Gospel of Thomas and ended 90 years after the death of Jesus with the Gospel According to St. John in the New Testament.

The above blogging information confirms that my 2006 book on 'The First Scientific Proof of God' is the most advanced book in the world on the subject of God and the universe. This information and my book shows that the world has no end. The sayings of Jesus and my book also shows that Jesus was a scientist and was not the only begotten Son of God. Accordingly, I say that all humans are divine because they reason and can also become wise.

As the year 2011 comes to an end, the nations throughout the world must change based on my book and the sayings of Jesus. Since the readers of my blogs are growing, this change might has already begun.(All Blogs) and (Monthly Blogs)

Happy New Year 2012, George

The Gospel of Thomas Says that the World Has No End

2011-12-30T14:55:00.001-05:00

The oldest Gospel According to John appeared about 90 years after the death of Jesus. Earlier, the Gospel According to Matthew and Luke appeared 80-90 years after the death of Jesus. Still earlier, the Gospel According to Mark appeared 70 years after the death of Jesus. Because these disciples are students of Jesus, I conclude that these four Gospels cannot be accepted by humans as full truths.

I believe that more truths about the sayings of Jesus will be found in the letters of Paul because these letters appeared only 50 years after the death of Jesus. Further, in The Lost Gospel Q (click) , which appeared 25 years after the death of Jesus, could have more truths about the sayings of Jesus.

However, in 1945 at Egypt, The Gospel of Thomas was found. (click) Thomas, who is thought to be the brother of Jesus, presents many scientific sayings of Jesus. The Introduction says that Thomas performs no physical miracles, reveals no fulfillment of prophesy, announces no apocalyptic kingdom about to disrupt the world order, and dies for no one's sins. Instead, Thomas dispenses insight from the bubbling spring of wisdom and critiques the end of the world. The words of Thomas are saying that the world has no end

My theory of an active God and the Gospel of Thomas should be studied by every family in the world.

All Revelations From God Are False

2011-12-28T13:21:00.003-05:00

In religions, the word revelation means God's disclosure of words to humans in a surprising way. Revelations are found in the Bible. (Click). The first five books in the Old Testament is thought to be written by God through Moses. And revelations are found in the New Testament. The major revelation is found in the Book of Revelation. In this book, thoughts come from God through the dream of Saint John. Based on these revelations, the end is apocalyptic and is the ultimate destiny of the world. (Click)

Although these revelations have already been criticized by many people, my rejections of these revelations will only expand the changes that humans must make on this planet. For instance, the discovery in 1945 of The Gospel of Thomas at Nag Hamnadi in Upper Egypt tells us that revelations in the Old and New Testament are false.(Click)

My research on Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John concludes that these disciples did not understand the active God that Jesus learned in Greece from Platonists. There, Jesus learned that God and a Universe are one. Plato shows this one world in his Parmenides dialogue. To teach the oneness of God and His Universe to the Jews, at John 14:20 Jesus says that 'I am in my Father, and ye in me, and I in you.' The meaning of this statement of Jesus remained unknown until the 15th century when Nicholas of Cusa spoke of 'Each thing in each thing' in Bk. II, Ch.Five of his book On Learned Ignorance. (click)

But the Vatican did not develop the statement of Cusa. Instead, five hundred years had to pass. Then, in 2006, my book on The First Scientific Proof of God said precisely what Jesus was trying to teach to the Jews over 2000 years ago.

It is time for Jews and Christians to recognize that the Bible has major problems.

More About Mount Athos

2011-12-26T21:01:00.004-05:00

In scriptures, religions develop a system of symbols. These symbols are given meaning so that students know how to understand God with words. But a system of symbols is more different than the monks at Mount Athos think.

The fields of religions lure members to the meanings of religious words so that more people give money to religions, such as the religion at Mount Athos. But this flow of money can develop human problems. For instance, the religious symbols developed by the monks at Mount Athos say that they will live with God in Heaven after death. Today, these symbols are false because an infinite God has no place in which Spirits or humans can live.

Tonight, a person said that the monks at Athos are free to communicate their own symbols to God. I disagreed with this statement because all symbols developed by humans have different meanings. Since humans can only improve the meanings of symbols over time, humans can never develop a true system of symbols. This is why the development of national lnguage is very difficult and never perfect.

So, the symbols used by the monks at Mount Athos are never perfect and can only be improved.

Mount Athos

2011-12-26T11:06:00.000-05:00

Last evening, CBS-TV presented a '60 Minutes' story about Mount Athos, which is the Eastern Orthodox Christian Church in Greece.(click) If you want to hear this story, (Click).

Yesterday, I say that the New Testament is filled with errors made by the disciples of Jesus. My study indicates that Jesus tried to teach the disciples his new theory of an active God. But his teachings were not successful. In 15th century, Nicholas of Cusa learned how Jesus was teaching his active God. But, in the 60 Minutes story, we are told that the monks at Mount Athos say that they communicate the words of Jesus in the New Testament to God all day long. Since the monks do not seem to know anything about the active God of Jesus, they seem have a major problem in their communications with God.

The monks at Mount Athos do not allow females. Instead, they store the skulls of all dead monks because they expect to live in the heaven of God. Since God is One and Infinite, there is no heaven at God's place. Different heavens can be seen only if a finite human is living on a planet.

I conclude that the Christian teachings at Mount Athos are terrible.

It Is Time to Reveal the Real Truths About Jesus

2011-12-25T12:09:00.000-05:00

All scriptures are man made. Accordingly, all scriptures are filled with errors because man's mind is always reasoning and cannot find any precise truths about God.

So, when the Jews did not understand the new active God that Jesus was teaching, they had the Romans hang Jesus on the Cross. This act of the Romans and Jews was a crime and did not save Christians because the new God that Jesus had been teaching is still unknown today.

A teacher, for instance, a teacher such as Jesus, is not able to teach students perfectly. So, after Jesus died, Matthew, Mark, Luke and John made four gospels based on what they learned from Jesus. But they never learned everything that Jesus knew. So they filled the New Testament with errors about the new active God that Jesus had been taught.

So, the Old Testament, New Testament, and the Qur'an must be restudied and compared with the truths that Jesus taught about an active God and the truths that I have identified about an active God and His Intelligent Design.

Today is a day the reminds us of the work of Jesus. On this day, I also remind people --- of the crime that the Romans and Jews committed against Jesus long ago. This crime stopped man's learning about an active God. But this ugly crime also stopped the development of reason and freedom for fifteen centuries with Aristotle's logic.

Should Money Determine Life? or Should Life Determine Money?

2011-12-24T12:05:00.003-05:00

The relationship between life and money has not always been a reality. We know that a relationship between life and money developed only after the population of humans increased and forced humans to live in nations.

In Ch. 24 of Matthew, Jesus tell us that our sun will darken soon. When this happens, the stars in evening skies will begin to tell us that planet earth is becoming too hot and will soon fall into the sun as fuel. So, before planet earth falls into the sun, the living people must begin to move to a new planet.

During the trip to this new planet, life and money will lose their relationship because the economy on the trip and the economy on the new planet will be fixed because the moving people had to learn that God created all people equally. At this time, too few humans have learned that God did create all people equally.

Recently, my local newspaper carried a Letter to the Editor. This letter shows that people are not learning the equality of humans. For example, the person said,

'Count your blessings if you have food in the refrigerator, cloths on your back, a roof overhead, and a place to sleep. You are richer than 75 percent of the world.' Or, 'If you have money in the bank, in your wallet, and spare change in a dish someplace, you are among the top 8 percent the world's wealthy.'

To learn the equality of humans, we must stop forcing money to determine life and force life to determine money.

How We Can Understand God and His Intelligent Design

2011-12-23T08:04:00.002-05:00

In Ch. Two of His book 'On Learned Ignorance' Nicholas of Cusa found that the greatest thing, which we call God, is absolute maximum and absolute minimum.(click) Then, in Ch. Three, Cusa shows us that the precise truth of God is incompresensible. However, at Rom. 1:20, Paul told us that the invisible things of God are seen clearly, being understood by the things that God made.

When a person uses Plato's negative (Sophist at 257b) and Paul's suggestion, this person rises above logic and begins to reason. So, non sequiturs and caricatures have become my major tools for developing lines of reasoning about an active God and His Intelligent Design.

Non sequiturs appear when I use different pairs of opposites in order to connect God functionally to the universe. For instance, I use the pair of opposites, One-many. The capitalized 'One' belongs to God and 'many' belongs to all things in the universe. I expand the connections of God and the universe by adding two more pairs of opposites, Equality-inequality and Union-relations. Then, a trinity has been formed. Since these six concepts coexist, I am beginning to understand God and His Intelligent Design of the universe.

Caricatures appeared first in Italy in 1772. (click) At that time, caricatures of politicians were made with cartoons. A caricature of a burlesque was also made at a trial. In today's newspapers, we find many caricatures of our politicians and bankers.

A caricature develops when I use the pair of opposites, Infinite-finite. These two concepts also coexist. When One is also viewed as an Infinite thing, the Infinite thing has no parts. However, all finite things in the universe have an infinite number of parts. Galileo found that all bodies in the universe are built up of an infinite number of indivisibles. So the Infinite-finite pair of opposites give us a very good understanding of God and His creation.

Since I am using precise opposing concepte to connect an infinite thing to all finite things, I say that my proof of God and the universe is scientific..

Going Beyond Popper

2011-12-22T12:28:00.003-05:00

I published 'The First Scientific Proof of God' in June of 2006. Immediately, five U.S. atheists attacked it saying that my book is filled with non sequiturs. (click) In 2009, Dr. Stephen Smith of the University of California read my book. He rejected the reviews of the atheists.

In his review of my book, Smith says,

Shollenberger rightly concludes that the many finite expressions of plurality are connected to the infinite, and this is his proof of God.

This is a philosophic proof, but is it a scientific proof? Science has drifted into philosophy, and it finds itself unable to stay as a pure activity as Popper demanded. And so Shollenberger`s proof can be seen as scientific in that all evidence must make sense within the unifying presence, and because science necessarily drifts into philosophy for big questions about what is beyond caricature (infinite). When science is limited to empiricism and existentialism, science can only test theories that permit predictions (that necessarily make a caricature of their subject). The caricature-giver is beyond Popper`s science.(meaning of caricature)

When I say that God is active, I say that God made things for the universe. Thus, God made one world. This single world has a higher world and a lower world. The higher world is God and has no parts. The lower world has an infinite number things, which cannot be counted. The parts of each thing are infinite in number and cannot also be counted. This world thus had no beginning and has no end. Since, my scientific thoughts cannot be completed, I am going beyond Popper, as Smith noticed.

The Project Reason of Sam Harris,et al

2011-12-21T14:02:00.004-05:00

In the 12/20/11 blog, I speak about the universe that an active God creates. This universe has no end and thus raises our reasoning abilities to higher and higher thoughts. I say that Plato teaches this reasoning ability.

The opposition to this teaching of Plato is a new 'Project Reason' that was founded recently by Sam Harris of the USA. (click) This new reasoning project says that its purpose is to spread science and secular values. (click)

The new project reason is luring atheists and religious people. The atheists and religious people say that the universe comes to an end. This universe came from a Big Bang thing and moves like the billiard ball theories of Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein. The religious people also believe that God exists and has a Heaven for them. This God is thus inactive and has become the God of all Jews, many Christians, and some Muslims.

The secular values of this reasoning project come from the cultures of Darwin's evolutionary theory. So this project is changing the the USA and is destroying the rights that come from an active God.

I say that this new reasoning project is false. I also say that this project is confusing the minds of humans; is dividing religions; is changing political thoughts; and is confusing Supreme Court decisions.

The most readers in the first ten nations: (click)

My Book on 'The First Scientific Proof of God' Has Become an 'eBook'

2011-12-20T19:36:00.002-05:00

Technology in the USA has moved forward again. This year technology has changed the way people read books. Today, technology converts paper books to eBooks and reduce the cost of books to readers significantly.

My scientific book on God and the Universe is 'The First Scientific Proof of God.' Recently, it has become an eBook. It is now available from Kindle through the eBook store of amazon.com. (click)

Lords Do Not Exist in Democracies or in an Eternal Universe

2011-12-20T08:41:00.000-05:00

Religious scriptures speak about lords. In religious scriptures, a lord mean God, Jesus, or persons who have an Authority. But lords do not appear in an eternal world, which has an active God and Intelligent Design, and has no end.

Lords appear in scriptures if a religion focuses the human mind on logical thinking. An example of logical thinking is the 'good/evil' dualism.(See Part IIa, Ch.1) Although Aristotle is known as the Father of logic, Moses used the good/evil dualism earlier to describe wrongly the dual life of Adam and Eve.

Plato's mind went beyond Aristotle's logical thoughts.In his Sophist at 257b Plato says, When we speak of ‘that which is not,’ it seems that we do not mean something contrary to what exists but only something that is different. This statement of Plato is the teaching of reasoning.

If one follows the suggestion of Plato,' we can say that something different exists beyond all finite things. This first different thing is called not finite. In time, this different thing was named 'infinite.' But things other than finite things exist in the universe. Thus, by negating not finite, we capture all other things in the universe and name this second thing as the not not finite thing. This second thing is an active God that creates things for the universe.

We cannot know the not not finite thing, which is God. But we can know God's attributes by learning the realities of the universe. Since the attributes of God are infinite in number, human life will never end.

It is now clear that lords do not exist in a world created by an active God.

Identifying Truths in a Democracy, Eternal Universe, and an Active God

2011-12-19T12:03:00.002-05:00

Science is a well known field of truths. Its truths are identified with the scientific method.(click) At this time, the scientific method has four steps:

1. Observation and description of a phenomenon or group of phenomena.

2. Formulation of an hypothesis to explain the phenomena. In physics, the hypothesis often takes the form of a causal mechanism or a mathematical relation.

3. Use of the hypothesis to predict the existence of other phenomena, or to predict quantitatively the results of new observations.

4. Performance of experimental tests of the predictions by several independent experimenters and properly performed experiments.

However, the scientific method is completed by using these four steps only if the universe has no God and the universe had a beginning and has an end.

But if an active God exists and has an Intelligent Design of the universe, God and the universe had no beginning and God and the universe will have no end. If an active God exists, the scientific method of truths will require more than four steps because living things exist and they will always find higher and higher truths. Thus, a new scientific method must be developed if God is active.

In the Western world, the Jews, Christians, and Muslims say that religions are also fields of truths. They say that their scriptures, that is, the Old Testament, New Testament, and the Qur'an, are true because God made the scriptures. However, I found errors in these three scriptures.

So I say that all scriptures are man-made. I also say that religions must use the newly developing scientific method in order to identify truths in their scriptures.

XII. A 2011 Smmary of the U.S. Democracy

2011-12-18T10:06:00.000-05:00

There is no reason for Jews, Christians, and Muslims to be separated. Instead, they should be good friends in all ways.

In this blog, I show that the scriptures of the Jews, Christians, and Muslims are out-dated because I say that the Old Testament, the New Testament, and the Qur'an hold false statements about God. In the Middle East, some of these statements are now causing wars, terrorism, and the development of new democracies. I don't believe that these human behaviors are natural. They view them as unnatural behaviors because the scriptures of the Jews, Christians, and Muslims are becoming questionable and error-prone.

For example, a false statement in the Old Testament says that that humans were perfect at first and became sinners. However, this statement is false because only God is perfect. Also, a false statement in the New Testament says that Jesus is the Son of God. But this statement is false because a created finite thing cannot be or become an infinite God. And, a false statement in the Qur'an says that only God knows the meaning of the letters in words. This statement is false because science found that human languages can know the attributes of God.

I believe that Jews and Christians are separated because Jews did not understand the new teachings of Jesus about an active God. Thus, the Jews of today still worship an inactive God. Muslims were separated from Christians because Muhammad was a follower of Nestorius, who taught Muhammad that Jesus was great but was not the Son of God. Muslims are also separated from Jews because Jews say that an inactive God can be understood. Yet Muslims say that we cannot know anything about God.

I say that the the scriptures of the Jews, Christians, and Muslims hold many errors. As time passes, all scriptures become older. If religions do not incorporate new scientific truths in them. I say that aging scriptures only degenerate the minds of humans.

It is time for all religions to say that only one God exist. The next step to define this God is simple.

XI. A 2011 Smmary of the U.S. Democracy

2011-12-17T11:19:00.002-05:00

In yesterday's blog, I say that the Qur'an was made by the followers of Muhammad after Muhammad died. I also said that New Testament was made by the disciples of Jesus after Jesus died on the Cross. Thus, the Qur'an and the New Testament can have errors because they Qur'an were not madc by Muhammad and the New Testament was not made by Jesus.

In the Old Testament Moses says that the first humans, Adam and Eve, were perfect and became imperfect (sinners) when they began to build knowledge (or ate from the Tree of Knowledge). So Moses was incorrect to say that humans were created as perfect human beings.

Accordingly, when nations build democracies, the Bible and Qur'an, or any other scripture, cannot be used to guide the development of a democracy because all scriptures are only history books and can hold many errors.

Further, the Bible and the Qur'an do not identify any social contract theory. So, building a nation based only the Bible or the Qur'an will fail. Thus, I say that a democracy should have a two-party social contract. The two-party social contract of John Locke is excellent because it has a 'Society' (the private sector) and 'Government' (the public sector). In the USA, the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution create these two sectors. If the two sectors are designed properly, so they become related functionally (or work together), the life of the people of a democracy will become futuristic and very happy. And, if all democracies develop in similar ways, the life after death of every person on this planet will become nearly perfect.

X. A 2011 Smmary of the U.S. Democracy

2011-12-16T13:51:00.000-05:00

If an active God and His Intelligent Design is a part of all democracies, some teachings of Jesus will also be a part of all democracies. Thus, Jesus will not be a part of all democracies as God because God is an infinite thing and Jesus was a finite human thing. The truths about God as an infinite thing is found in the U.S. Declaration of Indeendence.

I say that the teaching of some Christians about God have been wrong ever since 325 A.D. Later, other Christians changed their religion from 'Christianity' to 'Islam' based on the teachings of Muhammad. But, I say that this change led to very poor thinking because this change was not made by Muhammad. The change was made by followers of Muhammad after Muhammad died. Since followers of teachers can never teach the material of any teacher, the teachings of Muhammad in the Qur'an will be flawed severely by the followers of Muhammad. Such severe flaws by the disciples of Jesus will also be found in the New Testament. Let me show how flaws appear in the Qur'an.

The change to Islam produced a scripture called the Qur'an. Since Muhammad was a follower Jesus and the teachings of Jesus are very new, I conclude that the new teachings of Jesus about an active God will not be found in the Qur'an. For this reason, I conclude that the Qur'an teaches about an inactive God, which is the God of the Jews. Here are the flaws that were made by Muhammad's followers.

Since Jews, Christians, and Muslims teach the same inactive God, all three religions have the same God. Thus, the 9/11 event should never happened. And, the Jews, Christians, and Muslims should be very friendly.

Thus, the answer to world peace is held in the flaws of the scriptures of these three religions and either the theory of an inactive God or the theory of an active God.

IX. A 2011 Smmary of the U.S. Democracy

2011-12-15T10:43:00.001-05:00

Yesterday's blog identifies two opposing universes. On one universe, CERN speaks about a God particle and a universe that ends. On the other universe, I speak about indivisibles, divisibles, an active God, and a universe that has no end.

These two opposing worlds are not considered in the U.S. democracy, even though the U.S. founders started the U.S. democracy with an active God and His Intelligent Design of the universe. This start was presented in the Declaration of Independence (DOI). But after the Kennedy assassination, the development of the U.S. democracy was no longer guided by the first two paragraphs of the DOI. Without the God in the DOI, the citizens of the USA had to obey the arbitrary moral standards made by Congress. Beyond these man-made standards, U.S. citizens began to determine their own morals.

After the loss of the God defined by the DOI, atheism appeared. and only 50% of the U.S. citizens still believed that a man and woman will meet in Heaven and will live together forever after death. Since the other 50% do not agree with this belief, these other people seek more divorces and more same-sex marriages.

But raising children by same-sex partners or divorcees are problematic. Building rich families of children by grand-parents are also problematic. For instance, if all people are reborn after death and are reborn in any nation, raising children for other nations or building rich families in a nation makes no sense. To solve such problems, an active God must be included in the development of all democracies because this God also establishes all of the morals we need.

Thus, I say that a democracy cannot be built without accepting and understanding an active God and His Intelligent Design. Accepting CERN's God particle and accepting the physicist's universe are the result of irrational thinking.

VIII A 2011 Smmary of the U.S. Democracy

2011-12-14T13:09:00.002-05:00

In this summary of the U.S. democracy, I will distinguish my thoughts on atoms from the thoughts of many physicists today.

Physicists at CERN (near Geneva) say that they might find an elusive sub atom particle. This particle was theorized in the 1950s by British physicist, Peter Higgs. This particle is known as the Higgs boson but is also called the 'God particle.' The Higgs boson could explain why the fundamental particles in matter have mass. The physicists expect to give us an answer in one year.

I report this information so that non-physicists understand the impact of the success or failure of this CERN experiment.

If the CERN experiment is successful, the matter of the universe is 'physical' and was either created by an inactive God or made by a Big Bang thing. Since this universe is finite, it comes to an end. Since all things are mechanical, all things, including humans, are not free and have no life after death.

If this physical experiment fails, I offer an answer with my research on the U.S. democracy. In the U.S. democray, I say that the matter of the universe is either 'indivisible' or 'divisible.' An active God and His Intelligent Design create an infinite number of immortal indivisible things. These indivisible things become dark matter. An active God and His Intelligent Design organize all indivisible things so that divisible things become light matter. This light matter is given imperceptible motions by an active God and His Intelligent Design. This universe has no end. Only humans, animals, and plants have different degrees of freedom and have life after death.(See the freedom of the birds)

In one year, I say that these physicists will fail and will think about my universe and active God.

VII A 2011 Smmary of the U.S. Democracy

2011-12-13T14:42:00.002-05:00

Words that define any democracy are problematic because all 'symbols' (or words) are imprecise. The symbols (or words) found in a scripture thus have the same language problems. Since every nation develops a national language by using symbols, the development of a democracy can develop problems and dictators quickly.

Since the U.S. democracy has also been developed with symbols, the U.S. democracy has developed many errors. For instance, the first paragraph of the Declaration of Independence (DOI) has been interpreted badly by Congress, the White House, and the Supreme Court. (See First Two Paragraphs) In the first paragraph, the DOI says that 'the People' are entilled to the 'Law of Nature and Nature's God.' This phrse means that the founders said that an active God exists and created all humans. The remaining paragraphs have no errors because these paragraphs only authorized the Revolutionary War against England.

The second paragraph of the DOI has developed many problems. The DOI says,

We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by the Creator with certain unaalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. (click)

In the DOI, Ben Franklin and John Adams did a good job to correct the words that Thomas Jefferson used. It is clear that these corrections came from the work of Leibniz on his theory of God. (click)

Thus, I say that the DOI and the Constitution are working together and say that the USA is a nation under an active God. These two documents also say that all humans are created equal by God. This equality means that God expects the lives of all humans to be as equal as possible.

VI. A 2011 Smmary of the U.S. Democracy

2011-12-12T20:09:00.001-05:00

On the 2011 Summary of the U.S. Democracy yesterday, I said that the U.S. conservatives promote States Rights. They want State Rights because they do not want the Union to become socialistic.

However, if the Union is to be perfected, as the U.S. Constitution demands, the development of socialism cannot be impeded. Man has always developed social projects. Examples are roads, bridges, hospitals, sewers, reservoirs, etc. Thus, to perfect a Union of people, we must measure all new changes relativistically because the only perfect standard is God.

Today, the U.S. Republicans and Democrats are debating 'jobs for U.S. people.' The Democrats say that U.S. jobs should be created by lowering the wealth of the the top rich class by increasing their taxes. But the Republicans reject this Democratic proposal and say that the jobs should be created by increasing the wealth of businesses, which reduces business taxes.

The relationship between the increased taxes of the rich class and the U.S. jobs is precise. But the relationship between reduced business taxes and the U.S. jobs is unknown.

Measuring relationships between realities is the right way to develop a democracy under God.

Interest: (click)

V. A 2011 Smmary of the U.S. Democracy

2011-12-12T12:21:00.001-05:00

To build the U.S. democracy, the founders issued the Declaration of Independence in 1776 and became Locke's Society. At the same time, the Second Continental Congress became Locke's Government and functioned as the federal government until 1788, when the Constitution became Locke's Government.(click)

In 1788, the Preamble of the Constitution said, 'We the People of the United States, in order to form a more perfect Union, establish ....' After the presidency of John Q. Adams ended in 1829, the words 'to form a more perfect Union' were no longer heard. Instead, the concept 'State Rights' were heard from mouths of President Andrew Jackson, Vice President John Calhoun, the plantation owners of the South, and the textile producers of England. Obviously, the U.S. Civil War, U.S. slavery, U.S. successions, and Lincoln's assassination were just around the corner.

In the USA today, the call for State Rights is promoted by the conservatives, the Republican party, and the rich class. To them, 'all unions must die.' Next year, President Obama and the Republican presidential candidate might have a hot debate on State Rights

In a democracy, the people must love all unions because all rights are given to humans by God. In a nation, the state and local governments have no rights. If state and local governments have rights, the were received only from the people through the federal government.

IV. A 2011 Smmary of the U.S. Democracy

2011-12-11T12:03:00.002-05:00

To build the U.S. democracy, Ben Franklin had extracted new thoughts from Europe. From England, came the social contract theory of Locke (click); from France, came science and the geometry of Descartes; and from Germany, came the monadology and a new space-time of Leibniz.

But after Locke's social contract theory was eliminated by U.S. lawyers, the thoughts of Franklin from Europe would float away quickly . Without Franklin' new thoughts, a functional democracy would not develop as I show below

For example, after 1776, land no longer functions for a democracy. Instead, land became an economic thing that can be owned and sold without building something on the land. Locke was thus wrong on the subject of land. However, prior to 1776, the British colonists could not use land unless a home, business, school, etc. was added to the land and became functional for a democracy. So, before 1776 it seems that the British leaders were building a godly democracy in their colonies. So, the Revolutionary War might have been wrong to God

Building a godly democracy or building an economy is as different as night or day. Building a democracy will move all people toward a God that can be understood but can't be known. On the other hand, building a economy can produce more and more wealth but can't understand God.

III. A 2011 Smmary of the U.S. Democracy

2011-12-10T12:36:00.003-05:00

The failures of the first world democracy of the USA are numerous. In this blog, I will identify some of these failures so that other democracies can avoid them.

I believe that some democracies in the Middle East might follow the U.S. failure because Iraq made a constitutional law, which identifies Locke's Government but made no law, which identifies Locke's Society. (click) Today, Locke's Government is called the 'public sector.' And Locke's Society is called the 'private sector.' Thus, to build Locke's social contract theory into a democracy, two laws must be developed so that the public and private sectors are related functionally and work together.

A democracy becomes functional only if scientific and moral laws are defined by the public sector (Government) and the private sector (Society). The U.S, Congress has never developed these two laws because the U.S. lawyers limited the Declaration of Independence (DOI) to a war authority. Yet, in the DOI, the colonists identified these two laws with the following phrase: 'Laws of Nature and Nature's God.' The Laws of Nature and the Laws of Nature's God are the laws of Intelligent Design of an active God.

If the Laws of Nature and Nature's God are not defining an active God and His universe, a democracy will develop arbitrary scientific laws and arbitrary human rights. Arbitrary science and arbitrary rights are signs of a failed democracy. The USA has never built a democracy because its people turned their mind either to atheism or to an inactive God and never turned their minds to an active God.

II.A 2011 Smmary of the U.S. Democracy

2011-12-09T19:40:00.002-05:00

On July 4, 1776, the USA became the first democracy in the world. This first democracy was identified with two laws that were made by the thirteen colonists. The first law is defined in the Declaration of Independence. It defines Society and is the first part of John Locke's two-party social contract theory. The second law is defined in the Constitution. It defines Government and is the second party of John Locke's theory.(click)

The U.S. democracy is destroying itself because U.S. lawyers say wrongly that the Declaration of Independence is not a law of the body of U.S. laws. In response to my letter on this subject, Senator Rockefeller said, 'The Declaration of Independence is not considered law in the same sense that the Constitution is considered law.' These words of U.S. lawyers and Senator Rockefeller destroy the U.S. democracy because they eliminate the social contract theory of John Locke.

In the USA, we see that a democracy can be destroyed simply by the way people think and use words wrongly. U.S. lawyers are obviously unfamiliar with the three major social contract theories that became available before 1776.

Abe Lincoln tried to save the Declaration of Independence as a law with the Civil War. But he was assassinated. So I believe that some U.S. citizens helped to destroy the Declaration of Independence.

I. A 2011 Smmary of God and the Universe

2011-12-09T11:00:00.001-05:00

Many religions exist because different religions argue that different gods exist. But I continue to say that only one God exists and that this God acts eternally through an Intelligent Design of the universe. I also say that all scriptures are man-made and contain many false statements.

I say that all children are reborn continually after death. Thus, God has no heaven where married people can live together eternally. God has no heaven because God is infinite and cannot hold any finite things such as human beings. Humans can live only in the universe that God made. But God did create finite heavens because we can see them in the evening sky when we stand on planet earth or stand on another planet. Accordingly, there is no heaven that is called Hell.

All cultures are man-made. So, Hitler was wrong to speak of anti-Semitism and Jews are wrong to speak of Judaism. All children come from the same active God. They come from God as a Spirit and are given a body from a father and mother. The fathers, mothers, and teachers are expected to raise children in a godly manner. As fathers and mothers become old, the children and government must care for their dying father and mother them until they pass on and are reborn again. This process of human life, which has no end, is a continuous drama among humans.

Families and bloodlines do not exist. Accordingly, Darwin's evolutionary theory is false. Accordingly, developing wealth and receiving inheritances are the ungodly result of man-made money systems.

Can We End Income Inequality?

2011-12-08T10:56:00.000-05:00

In yesterday's blog, Walter Williams, a U.S. syndicated columnist, asked the question, 'Can we end income equality.' My answer to the question of Williams is, 'Since all attributes of an active God are equal. we must identify God's attributes in order to determine the functional relations of the different equalities in our universe.'

In my book on 'The First Scientific Proof o God,' I identify three attributes of God on pages 124-129. There, I identify three attributes of God as One, Equality, and Union. These three attributes of God had been identified in the 15th century by Nicholas of Cusa. (To distinguish God's attributes from the attributes of the universe, I capitalize the word if it belongs to God.)

With these three attributes of God, I use logical thinking on page 128 to identify specific attributes of the universe. God's attributes thus tell us that the universe has three attributes --- many, different, and relation. Before connecting these three attributes of God to the universe, on page 6 of my book, I connected God's acts of creation to the universe with the symbols, Infinite and finite.
Later, I also connected God to the universe with the attributes, Indivisible and divisibles, and the attributes, Independence and dependencies. (See 9/4/10 blog.)

Thus, if God and the universe are connected as I say, ending income inequality is possible only if money and wealth are removed from the universe.

More On Walter E. Williams, Syndicated Columnist

2011-12-07T12:10:00.000-05:00

Last week, Williams wondered whether the people of a free nation should condemn the rich for producing big profits and then use low cost labor to clean their home and iron their clothing.

This week, Williams wonders whether the people of a free nation can end income inequality. This inequality of the rich in the USA is currently being produced, for example, by the big producers of 'Harry Potter' movies and books or by the big producers of Walmart revenues for the Walton family.

I say that Williams and other free people will never answer such wonderments until they find and understand the true and active God. This God, for instance, does not create families or money.

Two Infinities Exist

2011-12-06T11:30:00.003-05:00

When Christians are taught that the Virgin Mary received the body and soul in heaven, this teaching is wrong because it is inconsistent with two different infinities, which were found and identified by the fields of theology and mathematics. The theologians found that God has one infinity. And mathematics found that many different infinities exist among the finite things of the universe.

The infinity of God is identical to all other attributes of God. Then, when God acts to create the universe, finite-infinite things appear as mathematical infinities. An example is the number 3.14... . This number is a finite-infinite number and is used to construct all finite circles. The precision of a circle improves as more numbers are added to the numbers 3.14.

In his 1883 paper on 'Grundlagen,' Georg Cantor speaks of two different infinities also. Cantor says that the infinity of God is the determinate genuine-infinite. The other infinities in the universe are non-genuine-infinities and present themselves as variables.

Since the Virgin Mary was a human being before the birth of Jesus, it is not possible for here to enter the world of God or heaven. She can't enter the world of God because God is that world and God has no heaven. The only heavens are the stars that one can see by standing on a planet. So, neither Mary nor Jesus are divine human beings. They are natural human beings like us.

These two infinities mean that God exists, is active, and creates. They mean that God creates a universe that have a higher and lower world that have no ends. Obviously, atheism and the Big Bang are false theories.

The Virgin Mary And Son of God Are False

2011-12-05T11:50:00.001-05:00

In yesterday's blog, the Vatican tells us that the field of 'science' has a place in the church.' But the Vatican has never opened its mind to my scientific research, which is being read by many people worldwide.

I believe that the Vatican is not opening its mind to my work because my research says that God is an active God. On the other hand, the Vatican says that God is the inactive God of the Jews and Christians. Accepting an active God requires one to accept the 'Intelligent Design.' But the inactive God of the Jews and Christian requires one to accept 'Darwin's Evolutionary Theory.

At verse 1:37, Luke says that an inactive God can cause all possibilities. So, Christians say that the Virgin Mary received body and soul directly in heaven without dying. So, Christians also say that the Virgin Mary gave life to Jesus as the only begotten Son of God.

However, when I develop knowledge of an active God, I say that God does not change. But I say that an unchanging God is able to act and does create the universe., which is the best universe. When the best universe is formed, all possibilities of God becom e limited and become the best of all universes.

I say that this best universe is eternal. My reserch of Jesus says that Jesus taught this best universe. So I reject the inactive God of Jews and Christians. I also reject the science of the Vatican and Darwin's Evolutionary theory. My research seeks knowledge of the 'intelligent design' of an active God.

I do not believe that the Vatican will ever open its science because its science is wrong. So, I don't expect churchs to ever openot their minds to my science of an active God.

The Minds of Jews and Christians Are Closed.

2011-12-04T11:18:00.001-05:00

Yesterday's blog says that God is the only thing whose freedom is maximum, pure, and absolute. In that blog we also learn that the freedoms of all other things are limited in different ways. These other things are (1) humans, (2) animals, (3) plants, and (3) mechanical things. Thus, it is now clear that the minds of humans are highly confused about the world in which we live. Humans are also confused about animals and plants . On the other hand, humans have developed lots of knowledge about mechanical things.

The most confused human beings are those people who do not understand the mind that God gave them and how God expects their mind to function. Nor do these confused people understand the different minds of animals, plants, and mechanical things and how God expects these minds to function.

In the Western world, the most confused humans are Christians and Jews, who use their mind mostly to learn the Bible. When taught, they learn that God has a Heaven in which they expect to live after death. They also learn that God has a Son. However, these two ancient teachings of the Bible are being challenged by the modern minds of humans. Because of these challenges, the world has stopped and wars are forming.

On Nov. 4, 2005, the Vatican said that 'science' has a place in the church.' My research on Jesus says that most teachings of Jesus are scientific. My research also says that God is infinite. It is time for Christians to open their minds.

More Thoughts on Freedom

2011-12-03T12:14:00.001-05:00

At the U.S. Department of Justice in the 1980s, I concluded that one cause of crime is the national language of a nation As my thoughts expanded, I also concluded that the national languages of all nations cannot be perfected or completed, that is, one at a time. In this blog I want to teach our current knowledge of human freedom so that people in all nations use this word correctly.

My thoughts of freedom in my mind began with the freedom of God. My mind concluded immediately that the greatest freedom will be found in the greatest thing we call God. And, if other things exist, I conclude that these other things cannot hold the greatest freedom. So, with the greatest freedom, my mind is able to distinguish all other things from God.

The group of all atheistic scientists, many medical doctors, and many conservatives say that all other things are called mechanisms, which can be predicted. Thus, all atheistic scientists are saying that God is false and that evolutionary theory is true. So, these scientists believe that some people are born as criminals. Some of these medical doctors and conservatives will accept God, bu agree with the atheists that evolutionary theory is true. Accordingly, the minds of this group of people are very confused.

To eliminate the confusion of this group, I say that among all other things, some of the other things are free whereas some of the other things are unfree. The free other things are formed by all unconfused humans, all unconfused animals, and all unconfused plants. The unfree other things are mechanisms that have confused minds. Gottfried Leibniz speaks of these confused minds in his paper on Monadology.

Thus, as the intelligence of a human, an animal, or a plant increased, the freedom of that human, animal, and plant increased. The sequence of unfolding indivisible things, that is, (1) unfree things, (2) plants, (3) animals, and (4) humans, in God's creation, was stated correctly by Moses in the Genesis.

Thus, human freedom depends on the intelligence of a person.

World Money Systems

2011-12-02T12:11:00.000-05:00

Again, euro money has become unstable and is oscillating, for example, around the U. S. dollars.(click) At this time, euro money has become unstable in Greece.

However, I say that a money system for a free market economy can never be stabilized. I also say that a stabilized money system cannot be made to develop socialism. The only stabilized money system that can be built will be found in the sound understanding of an active God that I am developing on this website. This understanding was expressed on the pyramid of the U.S. dollar. (click)

To stabilize a money system, I say that the people of a nation must first become godly thinkers. Then, they must become workers of godly social projects and explorers of the cosmos and its infrastructures. Love, full employment, and simple human life will achieve the goals of a highly stabilized money system.

The International Monetary Fund Slows the Development of Democracies

2011-12-01T10:35:00.004-05:00

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) is an organization of 187 countries, working to foster global monetary cooperation, secure financial stability, facilitate international trade, promote high employment and sustainable economic growth, and reduce poverty around the world.(click) I conclude that the IMF program and its money system slows the development of democracies.

A nation cannot build a democracy by using a world money system because all nations build democracies differently and at different speeds. Thus, I say that natural minerals, such as gold, silver, etc., should not be used as the standard for a world money system. Since all natural minerals are made by God, all natural minerals should be bartered among democracies.

Thus, I say that building a democracy by a nation must be based on that nation's money system and its standard. Since God made all lands and minerals, bartering among democracies must be established so that all democratic people are treated equally. Rapidly developing democracies should thus become models rather than leaders.

When the private money system of a developing democracy has been created, the government of this nation can develop a system of full employment, a system of futuristic programs, and a system of natural human life. These systems are necessary because I say that a person will likely be reborn again after death in a different nation.

Unless one studies the theories of 'God' and 'life after death,' my thinking in this blog will not be understood.

Crime Prevention

2011-11-30T11:50:00.000-05:00

When working at the U.S. Department of Justice, I and a few associates discussed the possibility of conducting research on white collar crime and government crime. We floated this possibility but received no interest. Bu I believe that all kinds of research must be conducted in any nation in order to build a democracy. By conducting all crimes, crime prevention wii appear and will grow.

In the USA today, research on government crime is not possible because the 'agency head' of all agencies of the executive branch of the U.S. government is determined by the U.S. President. Unfortunately, the agency head is often a person who has no experience on the subject of the agency. Thus,. government crime in nations that are building a democracy will exist until experienced and honest people become the permanent heads of every government agencies. These permanent agency heads are really necessary because building a democracy requires lots of futuristic thinking in each agency of a government.

On white collar crime, I believe that this form of crime exists in most nations. Crime appears when its people are told that a democracy is defined wrongly as a 'free society.' People do not realize that a free society cannot be defined unless God and God's absoluteness is rejected. But if God is rejected, the national language and the minds of it people will degenerate and lead to atheism, greed, and crime. So, white collar crime can be eliminated only by accepting God and perfecting the symbolic languages of a democracy.

With a well developing democracy, all forms of crime will decrease and open the possibility of developing the paradise I have discussed earlier.

Walter E. Williams, Syndicated Columnist

2011-11-29T11:35:00.003-05:00

In my local newspaper last Sunday, William E. Williams of Mason University defended the conservative movement, the high rich class, and the Republican party. His article asks, 'Should the rich be condemned?

Williams calls the USA a 'free society.' This phrase is wrong because only God has a freedom that is absolute. The people in any nation are never absolutely free. Th Preamble of the U.S. Constitution says, We the People of the United States, in order to form a more perfect Union, ...' These words are saying that the USA was founded as a 'perfecting society. Thus the USA is not a free society. So, the rich classes in the USA must be eliminated by Congress, the President, and the Supreme Court.

Williams was correct to say that the first rich class was developed by inventors and mass producers. But he does not say that the rich class in the USA was also developed by the early 'Big Families' such as the Astor family. These Big Families developed national banks and are passing their wealth over to their children, who become wealthy without earning it. But inheritances assume that families have bloodlines. Bloodlines is a false theory because I say that evolutionary theory is false. The purpose of human families is only to raise the spiritual children of an active God.

Williams does not talk about one-company-towns, cancer, crime, drug use, poor U.S. education, gays, bullies, child molestation, the Appalachian Area, unemployment, infrastructures, stimulus, etc. Williams only wants to defend the mass producers and the unearned wealth of the mass producing families.

Current Interests: (click)

The Free World Market Economy is Leading ther People of all Nations Into Hell

2011-11-28T12:20:00.003-05:00

Yesterday I said that Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are leading free people into Hell. Today, I amplify yesterday's statement by saying that the free world market will also lead free people into Hell. Let me explain this thought.

In the USA, the free world market is supported mostly by the conservative Republican party. To win the biggest wealth in the free world market, the republicans must reduce the U.S. government budget so that the taxes of U.S. free traders can be reduced. This tax reduction allow free traders to become wealthy. But this thinking is old and outdated.

The outdated thinking of a free world market is connected to the period of the first inventors. They appeared when the industrial revolution began. An example is Thomas Edison, who invented the light bulb and became rich. However, most inventors work at the large companies today with other scientists. There, the inventor is forced to turn all inventions over to the company. So, most inventors can no longer become rich. Today, richness is an ungodly thought. It is ungodly because richness is possible only by stockholders, the CEO, and friends of the CEO.

In the 1950s and 1960s, as an inventor for digital telemetry, I was a conservative thinker. After I learned that the conservative thinker does not understand an active God, I became an independent U.S. voter in the 1970s. Building a paradise and building welth cannot be related to an active God.

Judaism, Christianity, and Islam Are Leading Their People Into Hell

2011-11-27T12:32:00.001-05:00

After Abraham rejected idolatry, in 500 BC. Anaxagoras found a new alternative to idolatry. (God and Universe are one) Plato confirmed this finding with his Parmenides Dialogue.(One and Other are one) The Gospel of St. John indicates that Jesus studied this Greek alternative after age12 and began to teach this alternative at age 30 to Jews.

However, the Bible did not unify the Old Testament and the New Testament. They are too different because the Jewish God is inactive whereas the Christan God is active. Thus, when the Qur'an was made, three very different religions were cast into concrete. Thus, when the logic of Aristotle was accepted by the Roman courts, these three religions controlled the Middle Ages for fifteen centuries. The Middle Age was ended by the great work of Nicholas of Cusa.

However, six centuries have now passed since Cusa ended the awful Middle Ages. At this time, these three Western religions are not changing the concrete on which they stand. But all three religions are bbeginning to lose members because their scriptures are being challenged. This loss is forming a non-religion called atheism. If this loss continues to grow, the people of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam will be pushed into Hell, which is the dark matter..

Nicholas of Cusa (1401-1464)

2011-11-26T13:11:00.009-05:00

Nicholas of Cusa was born in Germany. He studied at Pudua University in Italy and produced his first major book 'On Learned Ignorance' in1440. (click) I studied Cusa's book and summarized his works in my book on 'The First Scientific Proof of God.' (click) The first real review of my scientific book was made by Dr. Stephen Smith of the University of California. All other reviews of my book were by atheists who reject God and didn't even read it.

Now, if you study Cusa's book or my book, you will learn that Cusa was the first modern scientist. I also say that Anaxagoras and Plato were the first ancient scientists. I also studied the New Testament and conclude that Jesus was the last ancient scientist because he became a follower of Anaxagoras and Plato. Thus, the purpose of Jesus was not to redeem people. Instead, Jesus was teaching a new God, an active God. Jesus was thus murdured by the Jews for teaching the active God theory and rejecting the inactive God theory of the Jews.

Thus, Copernicus (1473--1543) was not the first person to say that that the planet earth was not the center of the universe.(See Cusa's book in Bk. II, Ch.Eleven) Cusa was the first to say that God was the center of all things in the universe. And Galileo (1564--1642), because he taught at Pudau University, knew Cusa's works and called Cusa 'the learned doctor.' (See first two pages of Ch. II) So, Galileo was not the first modern scientist, as today's scientists say.

At Cusa's time, people were being burned at stake because the Vatican taught that the earth is the center of the universe. But in his work, Cusa found that the universe did not have a center and circumference.(See Bk.II, Chs. ten and eleven in the book 'On Learned Ignornce') To save himself from the stake, I conclude that Cusa wrote Bk. III in his book 'On Learned Ignorance.' Bk. III of this book lifts Jesus up to the 'Son of God. Since Bk. I, Ch. One tells us that Cusa knows that finite and infinite things cannot be compared, I conclude that Cusa ran away fro the Popes and returned to Germany in order to save himself from the stake.

Since Cusa's book 'On Learned Ignorance' was published in 1440 an didn't reach the USA until 1981, theVatican silenced Cusa's works for 581 years. This is how ungodly people develop religious powers. I concludee that the USA should support the God of the Vatican and the God of the Jews.

The Big Bang Theory Is False

2011-11-25T16:26:00.000-05:00

On page 6 of my book, 'The First Scientific Proof of God,' I say that 'all finite things are originated by an infinite thing.' In this statement, I can say that all finite things are eternal because an infinite thing is God, who is eternal. On the other hand, physical scientists say that 'all finite things are originated by a Big Bang thing.'

But this Big Bang thing is not an infinite thing. So, the physical scientists have made an error of thought or a contradiction. In order to eliminate this error, these scientists can only say that 'some finite things are originated by a finite Big Bang thing.' When the physical scientists correct this contradiction, they are forced to say that all universes originated by a Big Bang thing have a 'beginning and end.' By saying that a Big Bang thing produces a universe that has 'a beginning and an end, these physicists were forced to reject God and propose the theory that many universes have existed since time = 0 and then died.

Nicholas of Cusa uses the circle in order to to model God. He says that God is represented by a circle's center and circumference. See Bk. II, Ch.. Eleven, 'On Learned Ignorance) Cusa also shows that God is absolutely maximum (e.g., circle circumference) and absolutely minimum (e.g., circle's center point. (See Bk. I, Ch. Four, 'On Learned Ignorance')

Thus, physical scientists are saying that our universe was not created by God. Instead, they say that a Big Bang physical thing and that our universe will die just as earlier universes died.

These scientists will spend billions of dollars of U.S.government funds to prove that Nicholas of Cusa and I are wrong and to prove that many dead universes exist. They can never prove that these universes exist because God is at the center and circumference of all finite things in our universe. These scientists cannot see, measure, or understand this God. See Bk. II, Ch.. Eleven, 'On Learned Ignorance)

Immigration is a Godly Act of a Developing Nation

2011-11-23T16:26:00.004-05:00

In the debate last Tuesday evening, eight Republican presidential candidates in the USA discussed the security of the USA and the immigration problem of Mexicans into the USA. I conclude that Newt Gingrich gave the only godly propoosal to solve the immigration problem from Mexicans.

Like many other nations, Mexico is degenerating. Nations degenerate as a result of different reasons. The cause of Mexico's degeneration is a war on drugs.(click) Because of this war, Mexico is not developing a democracy. Because of this war, Mexico has no God. The people of Mexico are losing their liberty and education.

The USA is helping Mexico to win this war by eliminating the production of drugs in Afganistan. Eighty percent (80% ) of the drugs in the world are produced there. There, militaries are securing the people of Afganistan so they can learn and produce only useful products for themselves and others.

Since some Mexican families came to the USA long ago, Newt Gingrich says that these families should be allowed to stay in the USA. I agree. But I believe that my active God will also agree. I conclude that the proposals of the other seven Republican presidential candidates were poor and not godly.

If the people of all nations consider God in every political proposal that they develop, I believe that our lives after death could only be great.

Interest: (click)

Why the U.S. Congress Does Not Work

2011-11-22T15:49:00.003-05:00

After hearing the words of Grover Norquist on the '60 Minutes' program, it is now clear to me why the U.S. Congress is not working the way the U.S. representative form of government is expected to work for all U.S. citizens.

I conclude that the representative form of government in the USA lost its way of working for 'all U.S. citizens' because some of the rich citizens in the USA wanted to 'seek and hold' new political power in the USA through the Republican party. By seeking and holding this new power, Norquist and these rich citizens expect to reduce their taxing and change the USA to Reaganism and the 19th century culture when the 'big families' held most of the U.S. money.

But this change will never work because the life of people under God is not static. The life of people is always dynamic and futuristic. So, the work and thinking of Norquist and these rich people are godless and irrational.

The senators and representatives must turn their interactions away from all lobbyists. Then, they must open their offices to their local citizens. We must destroy lobbyism.

More On Grover Norquist

2011-11-22T12:59:00.000-05:00

I have given more thought to the subject of how citizen Grover Norquist interacts with the U.S. democracy and creates power over the senators and representatives of U.S. Congress. I conclude that the creation of power is criminal.

When I was a member of the research staff of the National Justice Institute of the U.S. Department of Justice, the staff wanted to conduct research on white collar and government crime. Unfortunately, both subjects were denied by the agency head. So, I believe that the exectutive branch of the U.S. government will never do crime research on itself until a law authorizes this research.

So, if democracies are to be perfected throughout the world, free humans must conduct private research if crime on a democracy is to be detected and eliminated. Since the USA has a representative form of government, a citizen is authorized to interact only with two senators and one house representative.

In the CBS '60 Minutes' program, we learn that Norquist is a lobbyist and interacts with many senators and house representatives.(See how Norquist interacts) Is this citizen interaction criminal? I believe it is because he is violateing the U.S. Constitution and the U.S. democracy.

It seem that Norquist might have interacted into the debt proplem of the USA.

CBS News: About Grover Norquist

2011-11-21T13:17:00.001-05:00

Last evening '60 Minutes' talked with Grover Norquist, a man who holds powers over members of the U.S. Congress. I believe that Norquist's power is trying to change the way the US. Congress works. If this change occurs, the U.S. Congress will no longer function in rational ways.

The purpose of Norquist's power is to reduce the taxes of U.S. businesses so that the world market for U.S. traders increase their profits. For this reason, Norquist is active over the GOP members of the U.S. 'Special Deficit-reduction Supercommittee,' which comes to an end this Wednesday.

Norquist's power seems to be absolute. His power is thus criminal because the power of a single citizen is not authorized by the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution. Even the three branches of the U.S. government have no absolute power.

A new law must be made by Congress to limit the power of all citizens.

Our World Economists and Leaders Are Ungodly

2011-11-21T11:29:00.001-05:00

Some humans believe that scriptures are true and complete. So they will not think about making a paradise on planet earth because, after death, they expect to go to a paradise where God is. But a paradise for us does not exist in God because God is 'One' and has no parts.

The pic on the right expresses the dreams of these people. But their dreams are hiding facts about God because God gave all humans the ability to make very beautiful things.

Man can make beautiful things, as the pic below shows.

God also gave us other abilities. So, we ca go beyond making a paradise for us on planet earth. For instance, in the 1960s, astronauts landed on the moon. Soon, astronauts will land on planet Mars to see whether humans, animals and plants can live there after our planet dies and is absorbed by our sun. If we cannot live on Mars, our astronauts must find a new planetary system that God made for us.

Unfortunately, the world economists and dictatorial leaders are ungodly because they are not interested in making a paradise in every nation. Nor are these economists and leaders interested in going to planet Mars and searching for new planetary systems. All they want to do is to gain riches and make slaves out of humans.

In order to change the thoughts of these economists and leaders, our young children are at work. I thank these children.

We Can Make a Paradise

2011-11-20T12:44:00.001-05:00

When a person dies, I conclude that this person becomes part of the dark matter that surrounds the planets of our sun and becomes part of the dark matter of another planetary system when our sun darkens as Jesus described in Ch. 24 of Matthew of the New Testament. Based on this conclusion, I say that this person will be born again on planet earth in an unpredictable nation.

So, terrorism, wars, nuclear rockets, different religions, dictators, fascists, unemployment, economic inflation, child molestation, uneducated children, family poverty, rich classes, crime, drug use, different nations, etc. should not exist. Essentially, all nations must treat all new births equally

In order to treat all new births equally, we must recognize that 'the paradise of life' is possible on every planet. But we don't recognize the possibility of this paradise for two reasons: (1) atheists and deists do not recognize an active God and His Intelligent Design of the universe and (2) people, who recognize an active God, hang onto the content of ancient scriptures and do not recognize that modern science is slowly out-dating them.

We must raise all children properly. Then we must give our children the real life of a paradise. Then, old children must be cared as they age and prepare to be born again.

Some Ownerships Are Ungodly

2011-11-19T11:03:00.001-05:00

All land and minerals were made by God. Thus,, land and minerals cannot be owned by any person or organization of people. Before the colonists went to war against England, colonists could have land, but could not own it, and colonists could mine minerals, but could not own the land. For instance, the governors of New York, Pennsylvania, and Virginia held these laws firmly.

So , when the colonists went to war against England, the colonists accepted the social contract theory of John Locke. Unfortunately, Locke's theory says that free people must own land. I conclude that this ownership was a major error of Locke's social contract theory because U.S. people are allowed to buy and sell land in order to make land and mineral profits.

Today, land and mineral ownerships are ruining all nations. For example, in the USA I learned that a chicken producing corporation reduced its taxes in order to increase profits and purchase a mountain so he and friends could relax and play poker. The mountain never produced any chickens. Today's country clubs and inheritances are also created by increased profits and reducing taxes by businesses.

Owing things that that were made by God are inconsistent with God's Intelligent Design.

The Real Meaning of 'Profit'

2011-11-18T22:13:00.000-05:00

The true meaning of 'profit' is unknown by most people because they seek riches and want 'more and more profits' as time passes. On the Internet, the word profit is defined as 'a financial benefit that is realized when the amount of revenue gained from a business activity exceeds the expenses, costs and taxes needed to sustain the activity. Any profit that is gained goes to the business's owners, who may or may not decide to spend it. (click) I disagree with this definition because profits must serve the people of a nation.

When I worked at the U.S. Department of Justice, I included the word 'profit' in a new system that would use public and private sector organizations in order to save the U.S. police from criminals who use guns. The police are saved with 'kevlar vests.' In the first field tests during the Christmas season in the early 1970s, the heart of a Seattle police was hit by a criminal's bullet. He was saved. As seen, profit applies only to private organizations.

After this Seattle event, a gentleman came to my office in order to talk about this system. Because I said that 'profit' means 'a cost of doing business,' he said that many governmental personnel and businesses do not think this way.

Profit is a cost of doing business. It is a cost because it s needed f'or new research and the development of new products.' My definition of profit belongs only to the American System of Economics. (click) The meaning of 'profit for owners or stockholders' is used in the British System of Economics by U.S. economists and the U.S. government.

The definition of 'profit' has been changing over time. Rather than only heaving labor and factory costs in the 1950s, today's costs have increased to pay for owner bonus,costs, CEO costs, personal bonus costs, lawyer costs stockholder costs, insurance costs, and inflation costs.. These new costs might explain most of the growth of debt in the USA.

Human Knowledge Is Always Incomplete

2011-11-18T10:40:00.000-05:00

The Bible and the Qur'an have fooled many people. People were fooled because eternal life after death does occurs in the heavens of the universe and does not occur in the high heaven of God or in the low heavens of Devils. People were fooled because all scriptures are man-made and hold few truths and many opinions and theories.

Thus, all of us are living in a world of questions. But Nicholas of Cusa told us that some questions cannot be answered or understood. (See Bk. II, Ch. Four and Five of 'On Learned Ignorance') So, atheistic scientists are wrong when they say that human knowledge can be completed. They also say that the 'Incompleteness Theory' of Kurt Godel is false.(click)

We are unable to answer the question, 'Where will we live after we die?' If we are reborn again on planet earth until the sun darkens and absorbs planet earth, we need to act properly in every new life after death so that each of our lives are good and never become bad.

At this time, no person is acting properly in every new life after death. All humans on planet earth are acting improperly because nations and their leaders are not working together to build democracies. To make life good for all people immediately, today's nations must get together now and throw their war machines away.

Making the Best Life For All People

2011-11-17T11:41:00.000-05:00

Yesterday, a group of millionaires came to Washington to tell the U.S. government that they want to be taxed more. Since many conservatives did not agree with the request of these millionaires, it is clear that many U.S. conservatives are fascists as Lyndon LaRouche said in yesterday's blog. But I go further by saying that most fascists are also atheists because they have no God.

I say that the life of a fascist is not very different than the life of a non-fascist because both will be reborn again and raised in different nations. For this reason, I say that nations should not be operated by fascists because being reborn again must occur in very similar nations. When the U.S. founders said that 'all Men are created equal' in U.S. Declaration of Independence, they had developed an understanding of an active God.

My active God did not give or promise any land to any person or culture, as the Moses said at Gen. 15:18. Nor did God give or promise minerals to any person or culture. Land and minerals are infrastructure for all humans, animals, and plants.

To make the best life for all people, the people are the only real forces that can produce it. The group of millionaires above seem to be listening to my active God.

The LaRouche Economy vs.Today's World Economies

2011-11-16T14:52:00.002-05:00

The LaRouche/Riemann economy and today's world economies are as different an the night and day. They are different because the economy of LaRouche and Riemann is always driving a nation into the future, as the U.S. founders said in the Constitution and requires federal government to form a more perfect Union. This economy is also consistent with an active God, who is eternal, made the best of all universes, and has no reason to end the universe.

Today's world economies are unlike the economy of LaRouche and Riemann because many people in the world still believe that they are reborn again in the Heaven of God. But I show that God does not exist in any heaven. The heavens that God and we can see are in our finite universe. So, many people want an economy that gives them mlives of riches. This economy aligns to the godless world of atheism or the deism of an inactive God. LaRouche believes that the USA is turning to fascism.

So, the economy of LaRouche and Riemann must be used if it is true that people are reborn again by an active God. And today's world economies must be used if theism and deisms are true.

In the U.S. today, most presidential Republican candidates are fighting for the economy for atheism and deism. It seems that the exception is Rick Santorum, a catholic from Pennsylvania who wants to eliminate the poverty of the poor class. On the other hand, President Obama will be fighting for the economy of LaRouche and Riemann, even though he didnt study the LaRpuche/Riemann economy. Obama's stimulation work indicates that some work in a nation produces infrastructures and does not always produce profits.

It is thus time to unify the national works on infrastructures and profits.

Lyndon LaRouche

2011-11-15T18:10:00.001-05:00

I listened to some of the excellent teachings of Lyndon LaRouche in the early 1980s.(click) When I learned about the book of Nicholas of Cusa on 'On Learned Ignorance,' (click) I turned my attention to Germany's Cusa's works, which are very new.

After listening to the words of Lyndon LaRouche on his new economic system based on the fundamental geometry of Bernhard Riemann, I concluded that the very rich people of the world are trying to achieve control of all nations with their money system, which is based on minerals such are silver and gold. Today's debts of nations are showing that this money system no longer work.

I conclude that it is time for the leaders of all nations to examine the new LaRouche/Riemann economy. This economy builds the economy of any nation because they always grow, just as humans, animals, and plants grow. Depressions and unemploymentp are not possible in this new form of economy.

I Am a Very Different Scientist

2011-11-15T12:50:00.000-05:00

Prior to 1981, if I talked to a U.S. scientist, all U.S. scientists would be able to speak about Galileo's works, but could not say anything about Nicholas of Cusa and his 1440 scientific book 'On Learned Ignorance.' So, from 1440 to 1981, Cusa's major scientific book stayed amongEuropean scientists and led U.S. scientists into Hell.

As a scientist from John Hopkins University, I was saved from a ride to Hell because a group of people led by Lyndon LaRouche told me about Cusa's major book in 1981. Cusa's book opened my mind and caused me to study this book and many other books until 2006 when I wrote my first book on 'The First Scientific Proof of God.'

In 1983, the American Cusanus Society (ACS) was founded. (click) The ACS asked to review my book. But it didn't review it because the ACS is a catholic organization and my scientific book is challenging the ACS and all religions.

Accordingly, today's U.S. scientists have gone to the dark matter of Hell or will be going there because they do not consider God or consider God as being inactive. A scientist who accepts this God is a deist. A deist rejects the Intelligent Design of an active God and accepts evolutionary theory. Thus, a U.S. deist accepts the 'Law of Nature' in the Declaration of Independence (DOI) and rejects the 'Laws of Nature's God' in the DOI. So, the deist and atheist say that morals come from past cultures, not from the Laws of Nature's God.

As seen, I am a very different scientist.

Connecting Galileo to the Works of Nicholas of Cusa

2011-11-14T11:15:00.001-05:00

In the 15th century, Nicholas of Cusa (1401-1464) anticipated the Copernican Revolution. He anticipated this revolution because he had found that the God is beyond all opposites (e.g., rest and motion) and thus that God has the two following attributes: absolute maximum and absolute minimum.(Bk.I, Ch.4 of 'On Learned Ignorance')

Cusa also anticipated the Two New Sciences of Galileo because some kind of progressive motions of the universe were admissible by Cusa. For instance, Cusa shows shows that the center and circumference of the universe is in motion. Thus the center and circumference of the universe are found nowhere. (Bk. II, Ch 11 of 'On Learned Ignorance') So, the motions of the universe have no end. This endlessness implies that the life of a person is a continuum filled with different dramas.

Since all created things have imperceptible motions, I say that Galileo learned about the motion of indivisibles and divisibles from Cusa. I say this because Cusa attended at Pudua University in Italy and Galileo taught there and had access to Cusa's work. My saying is confirmed in first two pages of Ch. II of Giorgio de Santillana's 1955 book on 'The Crime of Galileo.' (click)

Because of the above connections between Nicholas of Cusa and Galileo, I say that modern science really began in the 15th century with the thoughts of Cusa.

Interests: (click)

Ungodly Scientists Hide the Work of Scientists Other Than Galileo

2011-11-13T12:40:00.001-05:00

In yesterday's blog, I show that Galileo's work on 'indivisibles' have been hidden for a long time by the world's ungodly scientists. In the USA, I believe that most of these ungodly scientists are found in colleges and universities that do not teach the two major theories of a God (inactive and active).

It is important to teach new students about these two major theories because both Gods are infinite and must use indivisibles and divisibles to create a universe. Since these infinite Gods creates a finite universe, a God must use a contraction process. In his book On Learned Ignorance (click), Nicholas of Cusa tells us that God creates things by using His own 'attributes.' For instance, God contracts His Oneness by plurality in order to create all indivisibles. And God contracts His Infinity by finitude in order to create all divisibles. So, when God creates, God creates a plurality of indivisible things first. Then God creates a a finitude of divisible things next.

But other scientific works on indivisibles and divisibles have been hidden by these ungodly scientists.. Following Galileo, we find that the concepts of indivisibles were applied by Gottfried Leibniz. Leibniz uses indivisibles in his paper on Monadology.(click) And Leibniz uses divisibles in his infinitesimal calculus, which is taught is every high school today.

Following Leibniz, we find that the concepts of indivisibles are applied by Bernhard Riemann (1826-1866) in his paper, On the Hypotheses Which Lie At the Foundation of Geometry. (click)In Riemann's paper, Bertrand Russell learned that all geometries in the universe begin with indivisibles and are then studied as geometrical divisibles with the integration of Leibniz's calculus. This is why Russell wrote against Christianity.

Following Riemann, we find indivisibles being used in the field of mathematics by Georg Cantor (1845-1918). His major work is found in his 1883 paper on Grundlandlagen.(click)

Finally, the concepts indivisible and divisible will be found very often in my book, The First Scientific Proof of God . I use them because they are the major concepts in the creation of the universe by an active God.

It is time for ungodly scientists to open their eyes and minds to all of these works.

Today's Ungodly Scientista Are Hiding the Indivisibles of Galileo

2011-11-12T14:28:00.003-05:00

Galileo (1564-1642) gave birth to modern science according to Stephen Hawking. And Albert Einstein called Galileo the father of modern science. But Hawking and today's atheistic scientists do not talk about indivisibles, which appeared in the 15th century works of Nicholas of Cusa and Galileo. So let me get these scientists awake.

In 1632, Galileo wrote Dialogues Concerning the Two Chief World Syatems. This book defends the heliocentrism of Copernicus, which inquisitors rejected because it violated the Bible. In 1638, while under house arrest, Galileo published the Discourses and Mathematical Demonstrations Relating to Two New Sciences in Holland, which was outside the jurisdiction of the Inquisition. This book contains Galileo's scientific work on indivisibles, which are found in the first chapter (Day One) of the book on Two New Sciences.

Now, I ask today's sleeping scientists, 'why are you not using the science of indivisibles in Galileo's first chapter' of his Two New Sciences. It is clear that these scientists are sleeping because they only sense things and can't reason indivisible things.

In 1966, Raymond J. Seeger of the U.S. National Science Foundation tried to get these scientists awake with the book, Galileo, Galilei, hos life and his works. (Published by Pergamon Press.) In chapter 6, Seege tells scientists that Galileo was really writing working on 'Continua-Mathematical and Physical.' Seeger's 6th chapter is an extraction of pages 24-34 of Galileo's book on Two New Sciences. On page 62 of Seegers book, Galileo says:

I pass now to another consideration. Since lines and all continuous quantities are divisible into parts which are themselves divisible without end. I do not see how it is possible to avoid the consideration that these lines are built up of an infinite number of indivisible quantities because a division and subdivision which can be carried on indefinitely presupposes that the parts are infinite in number, otherwise the subdivision would reach an end; and if the parts are infinite in number, we must conclude that they are not finite in size, because an infinite number of finite quantities would give an infinite magnitude. And thus we have a continuous quantity built up of an infinite number of indivisibles.

It is time to teach scientists how to reason with an active God. At the same time we must reject the The Reason Project, which was found in the USA by Sam Harris.

Who is Selling Abortions

2011-11-11T12:41:00.000-05:00

Abortion is an act against the work of an active God, who created the universe. But abortion is only like today's economy because it has sales persons. These sales persons are atheists, evolutionists, and many doctors who reject God.

These sales persons reject God because they are poor students of the history of science. Had they been a good student of Galileo, for instance, they would never reject God and would reject evolutionary theory and abortion immediately.

To accept God, one must read only pages 24-34 of the 'First Day chapter' in Galileo's book on 'Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences.'

On p. 25, one will learn that gold is made up of an infinite number of indivisible parts. These simple words tell us that God creates all things in the universe by making an infinite number of indivisibles first. In my book, I call these indivisibles spiritual atoms. Thus, gold is one of the divisible things that God creates after He makes the spiritual atoms.

To create a person, God also uses the spiritual atoms that he made. However, creating a person by God is very different than creating gold for us. Since gold doesn't walk, perceive, etc., as humans do, the infinite number of parts of gold will be understood easier than the infinite number of parts of a person.

The atheists, evolutionists, and atheistic doctors believe that all wholes in the universe have a countable number of parts. But Galileo proves that all wholes in the universe have an infinite number of parts. Thus, when atheists, evolutionists, and atheistic doctors begin to name the parts of the human body, they run into problems because they can't know all of the parts.

It is time to change the way people understand things and each other. Also,we can't allow men and women to kill persons that God created. Since our God is active, people must begin to understand what an active God really means.

Aborting a Person

2011-11-10T00:28:00.001-05:00

The anti-abortion “personhood’ measure on the ballot in Mississippi failed to win on Tuesday evening. Had this measure been won, a new nationwide dialogue on abortion would open and this State would have become the first state to define a fertilized egg as a person.

The measure was supported by Republicans and Democrats. This measure was tried before in Colorado in 2008 and 2010. There, voters rejected it more than two-to-one both times. Analysts are now seeking the reasons for the collapse of an initiative that seemed a sure thing just a few weeks ago.

Opponents say that this measure would criminalize birth control, affect in vitro fertilization practices, and force doctors to decline to provide pregnant cancer patients with chemotherapy.

The supporters believe that a fertilized egg is a human being endowed with rights. Ethical, medical, theological, libertarian, and metaphysical persons say that that this belief is a preposterous proposition.

I say that a fertilized egg is a human being because it is a whole that was created by an active God. This whole contains an infinite and uncountable number of indivisible parts. An active God creates all things in the universe the same way. Instantly, God creates an infinite number of different indivisible things. All of these indivisibles are immortal and form the dark matter. Then, God creates the universe (or light matter) by functionally relating each indivisible thing to all other indivisible things. These functional relations give each indivisible thing a body (or infrastructure). When God gives bodies to all indivisibles, an infinite number of mortal divisible things exist and form the first phase of the universe..

All persons thus begin as indivisible things and become living divisible things. At death, a person becomes a part of the dark matter again where God can recreate that person again, and again, .....

So, when humans make a fertilized egg, an active God is involved.

In the USA, National Goals Were Replaced by Lobbying Firms

2011-11-09T13:27:00.001-05:00

National goals are necessary if the government of a democracy makee all people equal. This equality of humans became a requirement in the Declaration of Independence (DOI) of the USA and should become a requirement in the democracy of all nations. But the U.S. government never developed the equality of its people, as the DOI says.

Equality was destroyed in the USA when Congress and the White House did not make any laws that governed the lobbying organizations. (click) Instead of making laws that would function properly, Congress and the White House gave every lobbying organizations a freedom that is absolute or unlimited. Here is another example of how U.S. Congress and the White House do not consider the existence and acts of our God and that only God's freedom is absolute and unlimited.

When I worked in Washington, DC, I gained experience on how large corporations and small companies influence the U.S. government. The day of the lobbyist of a large corporation usually begins at 11 o'clock in the morning to pickup the governmental person or persons. At noon, this group enters a good restaurant to eat, drink, and discuss a specific subject. At 3 o'clock the lobbyist pays the check and the day ends

The large lobbying organization is usually filled with high cost men because the subjects are usually about technologies. The small lobbying firms operate similarly. The small lobbying firms are usually filled with a CEO, a male lawyer, and many low cost females.

Essentially, the lobbying organizations in Washington, DC have gained unlimited control of the U.S. government. Thus, I believe that the U.S. government is open to the people of the USA only through Google and Yahoo websites anymore.

Why National Goals Are Not Developing in Any Nation

2011-11-08T12:54:00.003-05:00

Today, some specific goals are being sought by all all nations. For instance, in the USA, new goals in education exist because U.S. children are no longer ranked high in science and mathematics. Hwever, at this time, I do not know of any nation that is developing long term national goals.

National goals do not appear in any nation yet because bankers, economists, leaders, and wealthy people do not consider God in their thoughts. Their thought prevent the developments of all nations under God. Such a development did not occur in the USA even after the colonists founded a nation under God in 1776. This development did not occur because U.S. citizens placed their freedom above God. Here again, humans are making errors because they don't understand the philosophy of symbolism.

When we use our language to describe God, we must distinguish God from us because God is an infinite thing whereas we are finite things. For instance, when we use the word 'freedom,' we can say that God is absolutely free. When we make this statement, we must say that we are relatively free. So, humans are never absolutely free. In the USA, this is why we are not free to say 'Fire' in a theater.

When people know that our freedom is limited, they will learn that we must develop national goals now. We can't wait for planet earth to die before we start to make national goals.

Perceiving

2011-11-07T12:14:00.005-05:00

In yesterday's blog I said that God exists and acts. On the existence and action of all other things, I conclude that humans are the closest image of God because they must guide the life of all living things.

When I found that God created indivisible things for the universe, the work of Gottfried Leibniz on monadology influenced me. (click) Leibniz convinced me that some indivisible things are able to perceive things clearly whereas other indivisible things perceive poorly or cannot perceive at all.

Eventually, I rejected Darwin evolutionary theory and developed my own theory of perceiving as follows: (1) that humans perceive enough to define all goals of human life; (2) that animals and plants will perceive enough to function for humans; and (3) that all nonliving things (e.g., a block of steel) will not perceive at all.

Since God created all indivisible things, God can act to perceive the perceptions of any indivisible thing. Accordingly, I say that God is acting continually on the indivisibles. Since goal seeking work is not very popular work on planet earth, I conclude that God is very active with us. Perhaps, it is time to establish some godly goals

Non-believers Don't Understand God's Existence and Actions

2011-11-06T12:57:00.000-05:00

Believers in God began to decrease after the Big Bang theory was anounced and indicated that the universe had a beginning.(click) On God, the Big Bang theorists ask the following qustions:

Is there a master Architect out there? We know that this universe had a beginning. Was God the "First Cause"?

My answers to these questions are as follows: God exists and acts. God's existence means that God always existed and will never change. God's actions mean that God's actions exist and can be changed by God.

Accordingly, I say that God and the universe form a single world. Since God originated the universe, I say that God and the universe have no beginning or end. This single world of things coexist because God is infinite and all things in the universe are finite.

Many religions teach people that they can live with God after they die. This is not possible because God is one and infinite. This is why God gave us many freedoms. Since people are reborn again, it is important that all nations make their people equal. If this equality does not become real, I believe that God will act accordingly.

Wealth Only Produces Ungodly Power

2011-11-04T10:15:00.001-05:00

If one believes in an active God and knows God's Intelligent Design of the Universe, the wealth of a nation is distributed equally to all citizens and the personal wealth of a citizen is non-existence when a citizen passes on. So, no inheritances can occur.

A Nation's wealth defined above agrees with the words found in the Declaration of Independence. There, the U.S. founders say, "We hold theses Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, ..." President Lincoln created the U.S. Civil War to defend this self-evident statement.

When God creates, indivisibles are formed first. An indivisible is one, has no parts, and function differently. Among these indivisibles will all humans be found. Now, when a human is created by God, one 'male human divisible' becomes functionally related to all other indivisibles. These functional relations give this one male human being a body. Females are created the same way. This example also shows that God is active.

Some people believe that wealth of a nation should be concentrated to a few people. These people seek power because they do not understand God and God's Intelligent Design. There are many paradises as Jesus teaches. At this time, no paradise will be found on this planet.

The Wealth of a Nation and Personal Wealth

2011-11-03T13:43:00.006-05:00

The wealth of a nation was presented first by Scotland's social philosopher, Adam Smith (1723-1790). He is the author of 'An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth Of Nations (1776).' To Smith, wealth grows as a result of self-interest, competition, etc. Smith's book led to capitalism. (click) But due to the disaster of the U.S. economy, new books on wealth are found. One book is 'The Real Wealth of Nations' by Riane Eisler. (click)

Personal wealth occurs two ways. One wealth can grow through capitalism and the help of services, for example, aid from SEI (click) or Employee Assistance click). The other way to grow wealth is to inherit.

However, growing a national wealth or growing personal wealth with capitalism are not aligned to the Intelligent Design of an active God. If all capital is aligned to God's Intelligent Design, capitalism is expected to produce more and more social needs. As these needs grow, the wealth of all human grows.

When Adam Smith became a deist, he accepted an inactive God and created an economy and capitalism that will never work scientifically. A deist is always forced to create words that are hard to give meanings

Only Real Scientists Can Lead Our Democracies

2011-11-02T17:52:00.001-05:00

Although I said in my last blog that leaders of democracies should come from the school of business management, I believe that these leaders should also be real (hard and soft) scientist, who have prepared themselves to build a democracy.

Today, a few hard and soft scientists exist. I am one of them. But I did not go to the school of business management. However, after I retired in 1994, I did develop knowledge of a democracy. When I learned it, I was too old to become a leader. So it is important to develop young leaders who prepared for congressional work, good presidents, and strong justices..

Real hard and soft scientists must become leaders of every democracy because 'all' written documents, including founding documents and scriptures, are filled with the symbols that are part of the national language of some nation. Since the meanings of symbols must identified and interpreted, if you are not a real hard and soft scientist, you will not produce good interpretations of any documents.

For example, in the New Testament at John 10:30, Jesus says 'I and the Father are one.' A non-scientists would say that God has parts, a Son, and that God is creator and creature. But a scientist will say that God is not a creator and a creature because God is a 'pure one' that has no parts.

So, all nations must be careful about documents because a national symbolic language of any document is not perfect.

Developing Democracies Everywhere

2011-11-01T15:21:00.002-05:00

In the USA, the People and its government do not know how to develop a democracy. The People are unable to know what a democracy is because (1) their major political parties are separated too far and could develop an ugly logic in politics; (2) their Congress has become dysfunctional; (3) their social projects have been stopped and Congress might not authorize such projects again; (4) they do not know or understand an active God; and (5) religions still teach that life after death is possible only with God in Heaven.

Since 'business' forms one of the largest group of effective people in the USA, it could influence greatly the development of the U.S. democracy. So, I suggest that 'schools of business management' (click) at colleges and universities be expanded so that new students study democracies and become new leaders. If the school of business management is expanded, foreign students could be invited in order to make sure that all democracies become identical throughout the world.

Today, democracies are developing throughout the world. As democracies increase in number, peace moves forward and decreases the wars that we must avoid. New 'leaders in democracy' are necessary because the parts of a 'democracy' must be reasoned and can be found only with causes and effects.

A Democracy Must Serve All of Its People and All of Its Infrastructures

2011-10-31T13:16:00.001-05:00

After ten years of developing high technologies that landed us on the moon, the U.S. democracy, the military economy of WWII and these high technologies brought some progress. Today, we see that two-thirds of the national wealth went to 10% of the households. And that one-third of the national wealth went to 90% of the households.

To study the above results in detail, see Kennickell, Arthur B. and R. Louise Woodburn (April 1992), "Estimation of Household net Worth Using Model-based and Design-based Weights" and Kennick ell, Arthur B., Douglas A. McManus, and R. Louise Woodburn (March 1996) "Weighting Design for the 1992 Survey of Consumer Finances," Washington, D.C., Federal Reserve System.

However, the results above do not serve all people of the democracy that the founders created in the U.S. Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution.

From the 1970s to the Obama administration, Nixon and the democrats tried to change the distribution of this national wealth so that the USA would maintain its democracy. But the republicans would continually reverse these changes, during the presidencies of Reagan and the Bushes, by increasing the top wealthy class from 1% to 2 %.

The argument of the republicans says that wealthy investors are needed in order to operate a money-based, low-debt economy. But this argument has changed the USA from a democracy to an oligarchy/plutocracy. (click)

However, this form of change from democracy to oligarchy/plutocracy by the republicans is quiet because it impacts the general development of the USA. Republicans are quiet because investors do not invest in infrastructures such as roads, bridges, schools, parks, etc. because infrastructures do not produce profits for investors. To republicans, infrastructure are thus losses.

Today's republican candidates are focusing mostly on taxes and the limits of government. The people of the USA are not going to accept their narrow view of the USA. So these candidates better prepare to explain how they expect to serve all Americans and how they expect to develop infrastructures throughout the USA.

Getting Rid of All Money

2011-10-30T12:37:00.000-05:00

Human life was focusd on money when the first leaders needed an army and farmers to secure a king or dictator. Unfortunately, this form of human life led only to slavery.

To free these slaves, the first democracy appeared in the USA. There, human life turned to farming and small businesses. This life was good for religious people because they believed that they would go to Heaven where they woul live with God. Today, we know that this belief wis false.

When the Preamble of the Constitution said that the Union must be perfected, many American builders responded by developing the States with a national money system. But non-builders do not develop the States when they build something in the USA with our national money system and build it for another nation.

To throw all money away, all nations might first consider the use of a private money system. Such a system can build anything and will never have any debts or any unemployment. Perhaps, private money is the first step of eventually throwing all money away. If we made the decision to build a spacecraft that will take all of us to live on another planet, I believe that money will no longer be found in any nation because humans will have found the absolute truth of love.

The Democracy of the USA Was Changed by the U.S. Supreme Court

2011-10-29T12:24:00.007-05:00

When the U.S. colonists decided to free themselves from England, they issued the Declaration of Independence (DOI) on July 4, 1776. The first two paragraphs of this founding document authorizes the social contract theory of John Locke. This theory defines two social parties ---Society and Government.(click) Today, Society is called 'private sector' and Government is called 'public sector.' However, any good scientist will see that these two parties will work together only if they become 'functionally related.' The other remaining words in the DOI authorize war against England.

In a 3/25/08 letter to me from Senator John D. Rockefeller IV, he says,

'While the Declaration of Independence is not considered law in the same sense that the Constitution is considered law, through the nation's history, it has been looked upon by the Supreme Court in order to frame the historical content of legal and constitutional issues. Additionally, the Constitution embodies the ideas of the Declaration of Independence by outlining our form of government and preserving the freedoms which we all hold so dear."

As seen, in Rockefeller's words, the U.S. Supreme Court is not relating Locke's Society and Government functionally.

Apparently, the early Supreme Court justices did not relate functionally Locke's Society and Government. Because these justices did not relate Society and Government, Locke's social contract theory was never installed in the USA. Here is the origin of all political forces that focused U.S. life on money. It is clear to me that more scientists must serve the Supreme Court.

Today's protests against Wall Street are thus appropriate.

Money Causes a Problem for Consciousness

2011-10-27T12:41:00.002-05:00

Today, more and more people say that UFOs have visited our planet. I have never seen a UFO. But I believe in them because my theory of this world says that human life in the best of all worlds will never end. Since life never ends, every human will actually visit other planets.

Most people do not believe in UFOs because their consciousness is not developing many sensual facts, reasons, and intuitions. But we can't blame citizens for not developing their consciousness. Instead, our political leaders and economists must be blamed for impeding the development of human consciousness.

The leaders and economists on this planet have focused human minds on money. They like money, because it grows and can create classes of humans such as poor, medium, and rich. If this focus never changes, the end of planet earth will finally end and all humans on planet earth will suffer greatly, as Jesus said. (See Ch. 24 of Matthew in the New Testament.)

So, money and its creation of classes cause a problem in the consciousness of every human who is reborn again. We must change our foces of life.

Interest:(click)

Being Reborn Again in a Godly Democracy

2011-10-26T15:47:00.003-05:00

'Being Reborn Again' is a law that can be found in God's Intelligent Design. In God's Intelligent Design this law governs all of the indivisible things that God creates. These indivisibles are one and, like God, have no parts. Only the divisible things that God create have parts such as skin, bones, heart, bloodlines, etc..

Since democracy is also a law found in God's Intelligent Design, the law of 'Being Reborn Again,' and the law of Democracy are related and thus work together to form the best of all worlds that God created. Since all laws in God's Intelligent Design produce the best of all worlds, Darwin's Evolutionary theory must be rejected by all democracies.

In the U.S. Declaration of Independence, one learns that 'all Men are created equal.' And in the Preamble of the U.S. Constitution, one also learns that the Union must be perfected continually. So, in the democracy of the USA, the consciousness of all U.S. children must be developed properly and all children must behave lawfully as they grow.

When a child grows up, the conscious child must participate in the development of the democracy. As a participant becomes older and can no longer participate, these aged children must be 'cared for' properly until death occurs.

If a nation does not develop a democracy, as defined by God's Intelligent Design, the consciousness of its people will not develop properly. At this time, the USA is developing an economy but is not developing its democracy. This explains why the consciousness of U.S. children and workers is degenerating.

Interest: (click)

Even More On 'Being Reborn Again'

2011-10-25T11:33:00.001-05:00

When I joined the U.S. Department of Justice in 1971, as a 'hard scientist' on the moon landing program, I had the chance to work with 'soft scientists.' With them, two different views of the world was held. After I retired in 1994, I began to unify the thoughts of the hard and soft scientists based on the world of God and the Universe and man's life and rebirth.

Anselm's theology says that God is a perfect being. (click) If God is perfect, the Universe that God created is the 'best of all universes.' However, if this best of all worlds has free things, the best of all worlds also has free things that are conscious (click) and are able to function as continuous developers of this best of all worlds. This best world explains why God gave all humans a life that continues after death.

In the New Testament, at Matt. 5:19, Jesus tells us that life continues at kingdoms that have different heavens. These kingdoms are planets on which humans can see signs in these heavens by looking at the evening sky after the sun goes down. These kingdoms and heavens vary. The kingdoms vary from least kingdoms to great kingdoms. And the signs in each heaven vary from kingdom to kingdom. Planet earth is one of these kingdoms. And the Big Dipper is one sign in the heaven of planet earth.

I conclude that the growth of consciousness determines the 'being reborn again' continuous path of all people.

Interest: (click)

Monday Morning Weekly World Interests

2011-10-24T16:15:00.002-05:00

(click)

More On "Being Reborn Again"'

2011-10-24T11:36:00.001-05:00

Being reborn again is a requirement of the theory of the endless world of 'God and the Universe.' This world was developed by ancient scientists such as Anaxagorax, Plato, and Jesus. Since the teachings of Jesus on this theory were interpreted by Western Christians poorly, the theory of this endless world didn't begin to develop until the 15th century.

Being reborn again is also a requirement of the theory of a world in which the universe ends. This world is accepted by those religions, which develop a theory of eschatology (click), or by religious physicists, who develop the cosmological ideas of Albert Einstein.

Those people who accept the the endless world will reject the religious theory that the universe comes to the end. However, being reborn again in God's world is not possible scientifically because God's world is one and thus has no parts. Accordingly, only God can exist in a world that has no parts.

Being born again can occur only in a world that has parts.This 'world of parts' has parts that form things. To build this 'world of things,' God created 'indivisible things' and 'divisible things.' The indivisible thing are immortal and the divisible things are mortal. So indivisible things are the only things that are reborn again, again, ......

Interest: (click)

Being Reborn Again

2011-10-22T12:40:00.007-05:00

The world of 'God and the Universe' was born in Greece by Anaxagoras and Plato. To build this universe, potential indivisible things were created and unfolded by God. Then, God put these things together by relating them functionally to each other. These functional relations form many different divisible things. Thse things and relation form the Universe. All of thes divisible thing have a purpose in God's Intelligent Design..

Since the Universe has space and time, I conclude that the work of Gottfried Leibniz is correct. He says that space and time are purely relative. Space is defined as the order of co-existences whereas time is defined as the order of successions. The co-existences are the divisible things that I identified above. So, the Universe that God made can be understood only by the geometry that was defined in the paper 'On the Hypotheses Which Lie at the Foundation of Geometry' by Bernhard Riemann.

God began to build the Universe with divisible things that are non-living. Until live-able planets were formed, divisible/living things would exist in the dark matter that surrounds the live-able planets. When a planet has made a place for living things, divisible/living things will begin to appear on that planet.

All divisible things (trees, coal, stones, mountains humans, dogs, suns, etc.) must pass on. Since all indivisible things are immortal, they are reborn after they pass on as a functional divisible thing. So, I say that humans will be reborn on the planet on which the death occurred until that planet is absorbed by the sun. Since God does not create nations, it is likely that people will not be reborn in the same nation. The exception would be a great gift from God.

It seems that the U.S. founders knew the the 'reborn problem' because they included the statement 'all Men are created equal' in the Declaration of Independence. Since 'being reborn' is a gift of God, all nations and all people should be equal.

Interest: Sunday: (click)

The Second Coming of Jesus Christ

2011-10-21T12:45:00.001-05:00

The single and eternal world of 'God and the Universe,' which was identified first by Anaxagorax and Plato, was detected by Jesus and taught. When Jesus taught this new world, he taught that each thing, including God, are 'in' each other.
Because logic gained control over the minds of the people of the Western world during the Middle Ages, the New Testament teachings of Jesus about 'God and the Universe' were interpreted poorly by Christians and their leaders. Unfortunately, many of these misinterpretations are taught widely today. One misinterpretation is 'the second coming of Jesus Christ.'

Since Jesus is not both a creator and creature, the second coming of Jesus Christ is a false statement. (for example) In the world of 'God and the Universe' all humans are reborn after death with a new and different body. The rebirth of Jesus with a new and different body has occurred often after his murder on the Cross.

When the teachings of Jesus are studied by me, I conclude that most of the teachings of Jesus are scientific and will not be understood by non-scientists.

Interest: (click)

More On the Subject of 'Creator and Creature'

2011-10-20T10:52:00.009-05:00

In yesterday's blog, I showed that a finite creature, such as Jesus, cannot be or become an infinite creator. This statement is true because a creator cannot be compared with a creature.

Thus, a human can only be an image of God and cannot see God clearly as Paul teaches at Rom. 1:20. Further, on p. 6 of my' book on 'The First Scientific Proof of God,' I also say say that an infinite thing is the origin of all finite things. So, it is very clear that a finite creature, such as Jesus, is a creature and can never become a creator.

Other facts tells us that Jesus is not creator and creature. For instance, in Ch. Two of Bk. 1 of his book 'On Learned Ignorance,' Nicholas of Cusa seeks the true meaning of the word 'maximum.' (click) This word can be applied only to a 'greatest thing' because we conclude immediately that a greatest thing can never change or lose its greatness. So, we recognize immediately that a greatest thing is an 'absolute' and is absolutely minimum and absolutely maximum. A greatest thing is God and creator and can never change or lose its greatness. Thus, a greatest thing can never be a creature. Western Christians must fix this ugly error.

In this chapter, Nicholas of Cusa also noticed that two 'contracted maximums' exist. Contracted maximums come from the greatest thing or God. They come when things appear as many finite pluralities in the universe. One of these two maximums is the 'universe.' The other maximum is the 'goals of the universe.' Since the universe is eternal, both of these maximums are never attained because life never in the universe never ends. Here we see the truth and reality of the 'mathematical infinity.'

It should bcoming clear that there is only one God and only one religion.

Interest: (click)