Theological Science and God’s Infinity
In his 15th century inquiry into the maximum of knowledge, Nicholas of Cusa concluded that any inquiry must begin with a comparative relation. He thus concludes that the infinite, qua infinite, is unknown for it escapes all comparative relation. Accordingly, the meaning of the symbol ‘infinite’ changes from a variable to a constant (or a noun) in the 15th century. Friedrich Hegel and Georg Cantor agree with this change and also say that two infinities, a good infinity and bad infinity, are in practical uses. The good infinity is viewed as an attribute of God whereas the bad infinity is viewed as an attribute of finite things. The good infinity is applied to a perfect or complete thing whereas the bad infinity is applied to imperfect or uncompleted things. I use both infinities, when I connect God to the universe logically. I make this connection on page 6 of my book by saying that ‘all finite things are originated by an infinite thing.
Today, atheists are rejecting the connection I describe by submitting negative book reviews on my book to Amazon.com. They take this position because they believe that the good infinity does not exist. Thus, they also reject the works of Cusa, Hegel, and Cantor. Among these atheists are many atheistic physical scientists and life scientists. Atheists also reject the existence of an ‘intelligent design’ of the universe and also promote the teaching of Darwin’s biological evolutionary theory in public schools.
People must decide whether the believers or non believers are correct because both cannot be true.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home