Scientific Proof of God, A New and Modern Bible, and Coexisting Relations of God and the Universe

Friday, September 02, 2011

We Must Develop the Active God


When Moses said that Adam and Eve sinned by taking from the Tree of Knowledge, the Jews and Muslims finlly accepted an inactive God.  This God had a beginning and has an end. Today, the Jews and Muslims believe in this God.

Fourteen years later, a Jew named Jesus went to Greece.  There he learned about an active God that Anaxagoras found. This God had no beginning and has no end. Jesus took this God home, taught this new God, and was killed on the Cross. Because the Christians and the disciples of Jesus never learned about the active God of Jesus and Anaxagoras, Christians still believe today in the inactive God of the Jews.

For fifteen centuries the development of the inactive God ruled because the scribes of New Testament were not intelligent enough to present information on the active God that was developed by Jesus and Anaxagoras. However, in the 15th century, the Middle Ages stopped because Bishop Nicholas of Cusa would work on the active God. See Bk.II, Ch. Five in his book,  'On Learned Ignorance.'  (click)

I continued Cusa's work on the active God with 'The First Scientific Proof of God,' this website, and my knol website. (click)

Now, it is time to develop the active God by the theologians and scientists in every nation.  Without this development, I only see failures of the newly developing democracies.

Interest: (click)

posted by George Shollenberger @ 12:12 PM  

4 Comments:

  • At 1:12 PM, Anonymous David S. Wilkinson said…

    There are numerous references in scripture of the living God. Perhaps you need to give them more credit and consider that they may have insight that you are not privy to.

     

  • At 1:49 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    Response to David S. Wilkinson,

    No, I am dealing with the an active God and its Intelligent Design.

    A livinh God is necessary if living things are created.

    George

     

  • At 12:32 PM, Anonymous David S. Wilkinson said…

    You're focused on the creation aspect and I'm focused on the spiritual. Two parts of a much bigger picture (as you mention in today's blog- 9/3/2011)
    Where your in ideology is focused on creation putting God in everything I am focused on God being spiritually in us.

     

  • At 12:53 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    Response to David S. Wilkinson,

    When you treat God as being 'in' you, if you are a follower of Jesus, you must see the 'inness' as a functional relationship. This is what I am teaching in today's blog.

    All of my functional relationships are spiritual relationships. In other words, one cannot separate science and theology.

    George

     

Post a Comment

<< Home