The Two-fold Nature of the Scientific Method of Proof
Most scientists and theologians are unaware that the scientific method of proof is two-folded. This lack of awareness has prevented them from proving scientifically that God exists. This unawareness has thus caused many mathematicians and scientists to become atheists. Here, I show the two-foldedness of the scientific method and how it can be use by mind.
Up to this time, the scientific method has been viewed by scientists as a method to prove physical laws. To me, these laws are defining the nonliving infrastructure of life. But, unfortunately, the possibility of proving spiritual laws of life has not been considered by many people. The physical laws are sought by physical scientists using three pairs of coexisting concepts. These pairs are: (1) the pair known as ‘cause’ and ‘effect,’ (2) the pair known as ‘theory’ and ‘phenomena,’ or (3) the pair known as ‘theory’ and ‘sensual data. These pairs coexist, are not excluded middle opposites, and do not express a logical relationship. These coexisting concepts give meaning to the following early 20th century statement — no facts are theory neutral. Thus, when a person speaks only of facts, facts, facts, ... etc., as many evolutionists do, that person is developing an empirical science, which is a pseudoscience called a one-third or two-third science because reasoning, feelings, and the senses form a unity known as mind.
The spiritual side of the scientific method is constructed to understand God and life. But, theologians and life scientists are unaware of this side of the scientific method. The spiritual side of the scientific method is constructed with the general concepts known as ‘theory’ and ‘practice.’ Other pairs such as purpose/practice and purpose/‘function can be used. For instance, a medical theory can lead to a functional and purposive medical practices. The spiritual side of the scientific method can be seen only by the eye of the mind. This eye is not developed by the minds of atheists, perhaps because they do not distinguish mind from brain and mind from body.
When the eye of the mind sees the side used by physical scientists, it sees all nonliving things in the universe as finite things, which form the infrastructure of life. And, when the eye of the mind sees the spiritual side of the scientific method, the eye can see infinitesimal living spirits (spiritual atoms), their different organizations, their unproven laws, and the nonliving infrastructure that support them. Then, when the eye seeks a deeper understanding, the eye of the mind can seek the origin of all nonliving and living things. The eye does this by negating all of these two kinds of things. Negation produces the well-known pair of concepts known as ‘infinite ’ and ‘finite.’ Mathematical physicists model the concept infinite as an infinite series such as 1, 2, 3, ..etc. This series says that any finite infinite thing is indeterminate. With this mathematical infinite, God cannot be known. This is why atheism has taken control of the physical sciences. Since many life scientists are followers of the physical sciences, a rather large group of atheists exists in the science in general.
In my scientific proof of God, I argue that all nonliving and living things are finite things. They can never be originated by a finite thing, otherwise, a finite thing must originate itself. A finite thing that originates itself has never been found. Thus, to find the originating thing of all finite nonliving and living things, I negate all finite things. This negation reveals a unique pair of determinate concepts known as ‘infinite’ and ‘finite. This pair says that the originating thing is a determinate infinite thing. This determinate thing is different from any finite thing. It is also in a higher world compared to our finite universe. And, it exists beyond all opposing concepts. This infinite thing is God. Since infinite and finite coexist, God and all finite things are eternal partners Obviously the proof of God and this partnership cannot be known with logical reasoning.
Up to this time, the scientific method has been viewed by scientists as a method to prove physical laws. To me, these laws are defining the nonliving infrastructure of life. But, unfortunately, the possibility of proving spiritual laws of life has not been considered by many people. The physical laws are sought by physical scientists using three pairs of coexisting concepts. These pairs are: (1) the pair known as ‘cause’ and ‘effect,’ (2) the pair known as ‘theory’ and ‘phenomena,’ or (3) the pair known as ‘theory’ and ‘sensual data. These pairs coexist, are not excluded middle opposites, and do not express a logical relationship. These coexisting concepts give meaning to the following early 20th century statement — no facts are theory neutral. Thus, when a person speaks only of facts, facts, facts, ... etc., as many evolutionists do, that person is developing an empirical science, which is a pseudoscience called a one-third or two-third science because reasoning, feelings, and the senses form a unity known as mind.
The spiritual side of the scientific method is constructed to understand God and life. But, theologians and life scientists are unaware of this side of the scientific method. The spiritual side of the scientific method is constructed with the general concepts known as ‘theory’ and ‘practice.’ Other pairs such as purpose/practice and purpose/‘function can be used. For instance, a medical theory can lead to a functional and purposive medical practices. The spiritual side of the scientific method can be seen only by the eye of the mind. This eye is not developed by the minds of atheists, perhaps because they do not distinguish mind from brain and mind from body.
When the eye of the mind sees the side used by physical scientists, it sees all nonliving things in the universe as finite things, which form the infrastructure of life. And, when the eye of the mind sees the spiritual side of the scientific method, the eye can see infinitesimal living spirits (spiritual atoms), their different organizations, their unproven laws, and the nonliving infrastructure that support them. Then, when the eye seeks a deeper understanding, the eye of the mind can seek the origin of all nonliving and living things. The eye does this by negating all of these two kinds of things. Negation produces the well-known pair of concepts known as ‘infinite ’ and ‘finite.’ Mathematical physicists model the concept infinite as an infinite series such as 1, 2, 3, ..etc. This series says that any finite infinite thing is indeterminate. With this mathematical infinite, God cannot be known. This is why atheism has taken control of the physical sciences. Since many life scientists are followers of the physical sciences, a rather large group of atheists exists in the science in general.
In my scientific proof of God, I argue that all nonliving and living things are finite things. They can never be originated by a finite thing, otherwise, a finite thing must originate itself. A finite thing that originates itself has never been found. Thus, to find the originating thing of all finite nonliving and living things, I negate all finite things. This negation reveals a unique pair of determinate concepts known as ‘infinite’ and ‘finite. This pair says that the originating thing is a determinate infinite thing. This determinate thing is different from any finite thing. It is also in a higher world compared to our finite universe. And, it exists beyond all opposing concepts. This infinite thing is God. Since infinite and finite coexist, God and all finite things are eternal partners Obviously the proof of God and this partnership cannot be known with logical reasoning.
posted by George Shollenberger @ 6:32 PM
2 Comments:
At 1:56 AM,
Anonymous said…
Nice idea with this site its better than most of the rubbish I come across.
»
At 9:36 AM,
George Shollenberger said…
Thank you. The topic is new and important to all mature people.
Post a Comment
<< Home