Religious Efforts to Unify Science and Religion Are Too Slow
On 9/16/07 I posted a blog on the subject, "Religious Mysteries Come and Go." Ther
e, I said that religious mysteries do not remain forever. So, I concluded that I must treat religion as a science and treat religious mysteries merely as scientific ‘unknowns.’ I also said the separation between Religion and Science must be overcome and that this separation is being mended by the Roman Catholic Church. I recognized this new light of the Roman Catholic Church because Pope John Paul II had apologized for Galileo’s imprisonment and because Pope Benedict seemed to be continuing John Paul’s thoughts.
After the assassination of my character by Patty Mortimer and Donald Miller recently, it is obvious to me that the new light of the Roman Catholic Church, including the new lights of Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict, is not guiding some members of the Roman Catholic church. Yet, the US press has told me often that the theological and religious thought of Pope Benedict, I, and other scientists are consistence. Apparently, Patty, Donald, and the American Cusanus Society are not informed of the lights of today’s Catholicism when they read my material.
The Roman Catholic Church and other religions are advancing in their effort to reunite Science and Religion. But, the same effort by scientists is much faster, as the blogs on my website and my book show. So, churches, temples, and mosques must speed up their effort on this reunification. Otherwise, their members will continue to assassinate the characters of scientists wrongly. The character assassination of any scientist, theologian, or religious leader is not the way to reunify Science and Religion.
e, I said that religious mysteries do not remain forever. So, I concluded that I must treat religion as a science and treat religious mysteries merely as scientific ‘unknowns.’ I also said the separation between Religion and Science must be overcome and that this separation is being mended by the Roman Catholic Church. I recognized this new light of the Roman Catholic Church because Pope John Paul II had apologized for Galileo’s imprisonment and because Pope Benedict seemed to be continuing John Paul’s thoughts.After the assassination of my character by Patty Mortimer and Donald Miller recently, it is obvious to me that the new light of the Roman Catholic Church, including the new lights of Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict, is not guiding some members of the Roman Catholic church. Yet, the US press has told me often that the theological and religious thought of Pope Benedict, I, and other scientists are consistence. Apparently, Patty, Donald, and the American Cusanus Society are not informed of the lights of today’s Catholicism when they read my material.
The Roman Catholic Church and other religions are advancing in their effort to reunite Science and Religion. But, the same effort by scientists is much faster, as the blogs on my website and my book show. So, churches, temples, and mosques must speed up their effort on this reunification. Otherwise, their members will continue to assassinate the characters of scientists wrongly. The character assassination of any scientist, theologian, or religious leader is not the way to reunify Science and Religion.
posted by George Shollenberger @ 3:08 PM
2 Comments:
At 4:11 PM,
Anonymous said…
Stop whining and stop playing the martyr, Mr. Shollenberger, you sound like a little child.
There is a pattern here. People ask you a question about one of the many mistakes and inconsistencies on your blog, and instead of giving them a concise response you adopt the arrogant teaching mode and start lecturing them about God and Plato and humans living on other planets.
Besides, your paranoia prevents you from taking any critical remark seriously and makes you think everybody is trying to 'assassinate your character'.
But your worst trait is your dishonesty. Just one example: right after your book was published reviewers at the amazon site expressed their amazement over the amount of non sequiturs it includes. You got mad, telling them that you had never heard of the concept and more or less accusing them of inventing it.
Yet about a year later you wrote this to Mr. Stephen Black (who by the way is one of the nicest people I am blessed to know): "The statement "God is said to be caused by phenomena" is an ancient non sequitur. Don't many non sequiturs exist in every life science today? (...) They [logicians] will also be shocked to learn that our world is always filled with non sequiturs."
So now all of a sudden you do recognize that this logical fallacy exists. Why, you even quote an 'ancient example' of it. But did you ever apologize to those reviewers for your snide and incredulous remarks about this concept? No!
You are paranoid, pompous, dumb and dishonest. First cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye.
Jeremiah Gilmore
At 5:48 PM,
George Shollenberger said…
response to Jerermiah Gilmore,
You got on your soal box to express no scientific proofs at all. Until you want to talk about modern science and truths, I have nothing to say to your rather ignorant comment.
I posted your comment only because I want the real people people to see the stink that is exprssed on the Internet.
George
Post a Comment
<< Home