A Challenge to Nancy Murphy’s Contributions to the 1998 Book, "What Happened to the Soul?"

The 1998 book has nine contributors. Four are from Fuller Theological Seminary at Pasadena, California. One purpose of Fuller’s Christian evangelical institution is to reform the anti-intellectual and anti social behaviors of the fundamental religions. One of Fuller’s contributors is Nancy Murphy. She rejects God’s intelligent design!!! But, she accepts evolution!!! However, Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, says that not all thinkers at Fuller reject intelligent design and accept evolution, (click)

Although Murphy is saving the soul, her rejection of intelligent design and the acceptance of evolution are inconsistent with her effort to save the soul. If, Murphy had studied the works of Nicholas of Cusa, in 1998 she would have not rejected God’s intelligent design and would not have accepted Darwin’s biological evolution. Further, if she read my 2006 book and its scientific proof of God, she would have learned that the 15th century work of Cusa has been expanded considerably and that Christians are not developing as Jesus Christ teaches. Apparently, today’s Christians are not being informed properly. Just as scientists have found modern science, there is also a modern theology. Don’t Christian theologians know this fact?

Murphy’s thoughts on the soul are great. But, her thoughts on philosophy and theology can be challenged.