As a Word, Freedom Has a Loose Meaning
After my book on"The First Scientific Proof of God" was published in 2006, scientists, mathematicians, logi
cians, psychologists, and atheists challenged me and the thoughts in my book. They argued for over a year. Bu they did not win anything because my proof of God is based on science rather than the Bible. Then, when The Project Reason was launched in 2009, I was challenged by this reasoning project because it supported the ungodly ideas of materialism, evolution, atheism and secular morals. Then, during Amazon.com discussions on materialism, evolution, atheism, and logic, the Jews challenged me because the God I proved is active and the Jewish God (deism) is inactive.
Why did these challenges fail? They failed because the meaning of 'freedom' is too loose. The freedom that comes from an infinite and active God is finite. Since this freedom from God is finite, this freedom is limited. It is limited because the freedom of an active God is unlimited or absolute. According, the freedom from an active God is a variable. So, when the U.S. Supreme Court limited the freedom of yelling 'fire' in a theater when no fire exists, this court ruling was based on a God who creates variable finite things.
Now, look at the challenges of materialists, mathematicians, evolutionists , logicians, and atheists. They say that God does not exist. But they cannot prove that God does not exist because 'non existing' things cannot be proven by science. But these challenges do not say that freedom is finite. Nor do they say that freedom is a variable. Instead, they say that freedom is an absolute. What is an absolute other than God? If the inactive God of the Jews is absolute, how can freedom also be absolute?
These challenges become troublesome when the atheists, materialists, evolutionists, mathematicians, and psychologists say that the universe only has mechanisms. When these people say that the universe is made only of mechanisms, they are saying that humans are mechanisms, have no freedom, and are slaves.
It is time to tighten up the loose meaning of freedom and many other words. The U.S. national language is highly flawed and is causing problems with the development of the human mind.
It should be obvious that freedom exists in a nation only if an active God is included in that nation. Since the meaning of the word 'freedom' is too loose, the people of the USA have been separated from God by the English language.
cians, psychologists, and atheists challenged me and the thoughts in my book. They argued for over a year. Bu they did not win anything because my proof of God is based on science rather than the Bible. Then, when The Project Reason was launched in 2009, I was challenged by this reasoning project because it supported the ungodly ideas of materialism, evolution, atheism and secular morals. Then, during Amazon.com discussions on materialism, evolution, atheism, and logic, the Jews challenged me because the God I proved is active and the Jewish God (deism) is inactive.Why did these challenges fail? They failed because the meaning of 'freedom' is too loose. The freedom that comes from an infinite and active God is finite. Since this freedom from God is finite, this freedom is limited. It is limited because the freedom of an active God is unlimited or absolute. According, the freedom from an active God is a variable. So, when the U.S. Supreme Court limited the freedom of yelling 'fire' in a theater when no fire exists, this court ruling was based on a God who creates variable finite things.
Now, look at the challenges of materialists, mathematicians, evolutionists , logicians, and atheists. They say that God does not exist. But they cannot prove that God does not exist because 'non existing' things cannot be proven by science. But these challenges do not say that freedom is finite. Nor do they say that freedom is a variable. Instead, they say that freedom is an absolute. What is an absolute other than God? If the inactive God of the Jews is absolute, how can freedom also be absolute?
These challenges become troublesome when the atheists, materialists, evolutionists, mathematicians, and psychologists say that the universe only has mechanisms. When these people say that the universe is made only of mechanisms, they are saying that humans are mechanisms, have no freedom, and are slaves.
It is time to tighten up the loose meaning of freedom and many other words. The U.S. national language is highly flawed and is causing problems with the development of the human mind.
It should be obvious that freedom exists in a nation only if an active God is included in that nation. Since the meaning of the word 'freedom' is too loose, the people of the USA have been separated from God by the English language.
posted by George Shollenberger @ 5:59 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home