Uniting Science and Religion Is Not a Simple Job in the USA or Other Nations
Now that God has been proven by the powerful scientific method of proof, ancient scriptures (e.g., the Bible) will increasingly become less important to our lives. This change can be expected because science will increase its contribution significantly to the theory of God and the practices of religions. This means that churches, synagogues, mosques, and theologians must become familiar with science, its method of research, and its method of reporting. At the same time, scientists must become familiar with theology, its method of research, and its method of reporting.
Since all fields of thought will always be error prone and no field of thought can end their errors, conferences are needed to bring science and theology together where they can begin to admit their errors and learn each other’s method. of research, thoughts, and reporting method. These fields of thought might stall the beginning of such conferences because they became enemies centuries ago, I encourage the US government to establish and manage these conferences until the conferences come into existence, and progress, themselves.
Since all fields of thought will always be error prone and no field of thought can end their errors, conferences are needed to bring science and theology together where they can begin to admit their errors and learn each other’s method. of research, thoughts, and reporting method. These fields of thought might stall the beginning of such conferences because they became enemies centuries ago, I encourage the US government to establish and manage these conferences until the conferences come into existence, and progress, themselves.
posted by George Shollenberger @ 7:19 PM
12 Comments:
At 12:44 AM,
Anonymous said…
Please read this on the non-existence of the soul and respond: Ghost in the machine
At 2:51 PM,
George Shollenberger said…
To agony beetle:
You should consider to drop your support of atheism because 'The First Scientific Proof of God' came out in late June. It is important for you to consider this recent proof because your research path can already be questioned and judged as waste of time and money.
To say that mind is a metaphysical aspects of brain is to say that man is not free but governed by brain. But, what is governing brain, electrochemicals as you say? But, this is not possible because physical atoms have never been found. So, out of what fundamental substance are electrochemicals formed?
My book says that all things in the universe are formed our of spiritual atoms that come from God.
Your research progect has many questions that have no answers. This is why solutions to cancer are not being found. You seem to be misled by the Big Bang theory and its supporting atheists.
At 9:59 PM,
Anonymous said…
Either you did not read the complete article or the import was lost on you. I have not seen any indication of a proof of god on your blog and I most certainly would not waste my money on a book that sounds like horsepucky. Where the hell is a spiritual atom? You claim there's no such thing as a physical atom but show me a spiritual atom. It's just your assumption that everything starts with God. No proof, no evidence.
"Solutions" to cancer and other diseases are being found every day. But what has that to do with spiritual or physical atoms, or the existence or nonexistence of a soul? Your assertions are consistently baseless and meaningless.
At 9:45 AM,
George Shollenberger said…
Response to agony beetle:
The new book, "The First Scientific Proof of God' is available on Internet book stores and will soon be available in other book stores such as Border's. THIS IS A SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD. Since when can scientific proofs be called 'horsepucky'? Read the proof before making claims.
I read your artile far enough to conclude that it is purely atheistic, like evolutionary theory, the Big bang theory, liberal culturalism, etc.
The spiritual atom appeared in the early years of the 18th century in the writings of the famous person, Gotfried Ieibniz. He died soon after he developed his monadology, which was too complex for the scientists of his time. I bring his monadology into our period of life. Leibniz called them monads. I call them 'spiritual atoms.'
I make no assumption that everything starts with God. I prove scientifically that everything starts with God.
Too many cancer patients are dying unnecessarily. This high death rate is breaking up families unnaturally and too early. The cause of this unnatural death rate is caused by the atheistic research of the medical field.
The scientific proof of God outdates all fields of science including the medical field.
Incidently, I am a scientist.
At 11:45 PM,
Anonymous said…
A strange scientist who claims there is no proof for physical atoms.
http://education.jlab.org/qa/history_04.html
At 9:30 AM,
George Shollenberger said…
Response to anonymous.
The web you recommended to me is the Jefferson Lab, which is a science education web. I clicked onto 'All About Atoms'. This teaching is outdated because the atoms discussed are chemicals, not atoms. The chemicals were split by smashers long ago.
As I said, physicists have still not found a physical atom, which is an 'indivisible' thing by definition. Currently, they are trying to find the physical atom in string theories.
My bet is that they will never find any physical atoms because my scientific proof of God is too powerful.
At 10:04 PM,
Anonymous said…
And your evidence is...oh yeah, in the book. Evidence for physical atoms is considered overwhelming by the scientific community.
"In the early years of the twentieth century, atoms were still theoretical entities. Strong circumstantial evidence suggested that atoms existed, but no one had ever actually seen an atom. Today, we can not only "see" individual atoms on surfaces- we can also move them from place to place, and build things from them. The strongest evidence for the reality of atoms comes from scanning tunneling microscopy, studies of Brownian motion, and by the remarkably good agreement for experimental estimates of Avogadro's Number."
Oh well, that's just one of those science teaching kind of sites. No use looking there for any factual information. No, we'll just have to wait for your book to make it all clear. If only you could get it into the hands of someone who could prove those spiritual atoms in a lab or devise some kind of empirical test.
What is really weird is that on the one hand you castigate science and on the other hand you have written a book about the SCIENTIFIC PROOF of your deity. Does that seem like a disconnect to you? Probably not, since you seem to be able to reconcile all kinds of incompatibilities and contradictions. The problem with doing that is that, eventually, you lose touch with reality.
At 11:27 AM,
George Shollenberger said…
Response to agony beetle.
My theory of spiritual atoms is found in a book, 'The First Scientific Proof of God.' However, thetheory of atomic strings is also found in books. I purchased them. What are you looking for, a freeby from me?
At one time, chenicals were also thought to be atoms by an overwhelming number of scientists. Then, these same scientists went back to the drawing board again after the atom smashers divided the chemicals.
If a physical atom is indivisible, how is it sensed?
An atom can be modeled by a geometrical point, which cannot be sensed. A geometrical point becomes known, for instance, by two intersecting lines.
A spiritual atom is indivisible. Otherwise, it would be something physical and sensible. A spiritual atom is not sensible. A spiritual atom is sensed only by the 'eye of the mind.'
There is no contradiction in my scientific proof of God. But, the Big Bang theory has a big contradiction.
To destroy God, physicists also say that living things come from nonliving things. How long must we wait for them to prove this irrational theory? And, how long are we to wait for biologists to prove the irrational theory of evolution?
Why are you trying to destroy the theory of God merely by offering other theoies that have not been proven?
At 6:43 AM,
George Shollenberger said…
Response to anonymous.
Thanks because I am trying to inform all sciences and all religions that we have more than a few problems but can solve them if we are willing to open our minds and make changes.
At 3:24 PM,
Anonymous said…
A spiritual atom is not sensible. A spiritual atom is sensed only by the 'eye of the mind.'
So you have no proof, other than your "idea" that such a thing would be good and necesary. No math, no experiments, nothing that would qualify as scientific.
At 8:04 AM,
George Shollenberger said…
Response to anonymous.
You act as an empiricist and do not seem to understand the two sides of the scientific method. One side identifies the sensible data and the other side identifies the theory that explains the sensible data. Your error is thinking that the theory must be mathematical. The theory side is 'symbolic.' Mathematical theories are only one form of symbolic languages that man can develop.
No theory in the scientific method can be sensed. A matheematical theory cannot be sensed. And, a physical atom, if one could be found, is also not sensible. Spiritual atoms are not sensible.
When scientists equate mind to brain, they throw away all theories in the scientific method other tham mathematical theories. Who has the authority to throw away half of the world?
You do not seem to understand metaphysics.
In Part I of my book,'The First Scientific Proof of God,' I discuss the scientific method in detail.
My scientific proof of God is as solid as gold.
At 10:50 AM,
Anonymous said…
Great site lots of usefull infomation here.
»
Post a Comment
<< Home