Love and Its Origin

Love is a widely accepted concept among humans and is sensed among the lower animals and plants. But love has been a difficult concept to define. (click) Further, the origin of love has never been proven by believers in God or by materialists, who say that living things come from nonliving things. In this blog, I will show that love is a relativistic concept. I will also prove its origin.

I say that love is a variable that can grow or fade away. Thus, the true meaning of love never becomes maximum or minimum for people who believe in God and know that God is both absolute maximum and absolute minimum. So love comes in degrees or fades away in degrees. However,when a person says 'I love you,' the meaning of love will be raised to the absolute maximum. This saying cannot be understood exactly because it can raise a question in the mind of the other person. Lifting concepts upwardly so they express absolute maximums, show us that the English language can develop serious communication problems among humans. Other love statements should be developed so that exact truths are expressed.

In materialism, love must have its origin in a Big Bang explosion of a physical particle. I ask materialists to prove this origin. In spiritualism, love must come from God. I prove this origin below.

All things in the universe have their origin in God. So love must have its origin also in God. However, since God is one, God can create only by contracting His essence in a orderly manner to produce the best universe. In my book, I say that God contracts His One, Equality, Union, Infinite, and Indivisible attributes. By using logic, these attributes of God become the following attributes in the universe: many, inequalities, relations, finites, and divisibles. In my website, I added the logical attributes, Independence (God) and dependence (universe). I apply this logic to Gottfried Leibniz's New Science and Monadology that destroys Newton's billiard ball universe. When I considered the concept 'love,' I concluded that God included love in things in the universe when He embodied all monads. But this love is not found in all monads. Love seems to be found only in independent living things that are dependent on each other in nations. In the Bible, love is expressed as 'brotherly love.'

Unless materialists can prove that love has other origins, all nations should reform so that all people will depend each other.

The Human Mind - Two Different Views, IV

If God exists, it is clear that the human mind is not epiphenomena of brain. Instead, the human mind must be a Leibniz monad. When embodied, the human mind is a Leibnizian monad that perceives and can unify and understand perceptions. So, when a Leibnizian human mind is embodied, the brain functions as an organ for the mind. Although we cannot count these Leibnizian minds, God knows them and everything you do.

What happens when a Leibnizian human mind is embodied? In his book on 'Idiota de Mente (The Layman:About Mind), Abaris Books, (Thanslation by Clyde Lee Miller), Nicholas of Cusa says that, when embodied, the human mind becomes the human soul. As a soul, mind functions by measuring and conceiving things with symbols. So, the development of good symbolic languages in a nation will determine exactly the degree of goodness and progress of that nation.

In most nations and in the USA, the continued development of good national symbolic languages have not been occurring (for forty decades in the USA) because many U.S. human souls are measuring and conceiving things wrongly. This development is based on the wrong belief --- that mind is epiphenomena of the brain. So, unless the U.S. change the way they think, the future of the USA does not look good.

The human mind is formed from our national symbolic language. Thus, if our national language becomes worse, our minds get worse. Since feedback exists in the relations between mind and language, good languages will cause people to spiral upwardly whereas bad languages will cause people to spiral downwardly. Since God creates all monads and knows all monads, God knows each person's thoughts and behaviors. So, life after death seems to have only two possible paths --- upwardly or downwardly. I believe that Jesus teaches this human pattern of thought and behavior at Matt. 10:34 and uses the word 'sword.'

The human Mind - Two Different views, III

The two views of the human mind distinguish the materialists from the spiritualists, nonbelievers from believers, and the Big Bang universe from Leibniz's created monads. These two views also distinguish the mechanistic wholes of atheists from the wholes made by God.. In this blog, I focus on these two different wholes. The pic is a whole of a living thing made by God.

Atheists say that a mechanistic whole is equal to the sum of its parts. Its parts are thus countable. For instance, take you home computer apart. You will be able to count the number of parts. But each part is a smaller whole that can be divided into smaller parts. Atheists are smashing the proton into smaller and smaller parts in hopes of finding an indivisible physical thing that has no parts. If such a thing is found, the Big Bang universe would be correct. Humans would not have souls because God would not exist.

On ther other hand, God-made wholes called monads. like God, the monads have no parts. God also makes wholes that have functional parts. These functional parts are all functionally related indivisible monads. Since these indivisible monads are infinite in number, they are not countable.

In Ch. 6, p. of 'Galileo Galilei, His Life and Work' by R. J. Seeger Galileo tells us that a geometrical line can be extended only with an infinite number of empty spaces and that gold is made up of an infinite number of indivisible parts. The monads thus seem to function much like geometrical points and the real numbers in mathematics

For those scientists who accept God, I conclude that scientific progress will successful with research on monads and investigating those monadic functional relations that man is able to know. I say this because God's personal active functions seem to be are hidden and cannot be known, as Nicholas of Cusa taught.

The Human Mind - Two Different Views, II

When five atheists submitted Amazon reviews of my book, The First Scientific Proof of God, their reviews told potential buyers that my brain is confused because I do not produce normal mental epiphenomena in my brain. For instance, one of these atheists said 'George Shollenberger manages to break the record of the number of non-sequiturs per page and to present it as a proof of the existence of God. So be warned: this book lacks everything that is commonly considered to be essential to any proof: logic, scientific rigor and common sense."

Such words can come only from different atheistic persons such as logicians, evolutionists, medical doctors, psychologists, materialists, etc. Such atheists believe that all human are machines, which are known only with logical reasoning. Thus, they believe that human behaviors can be predicted. These atheists also expect to produce artificial humans since they also believe that humans come from nonliving things. But predictions mean that humans are not free and are not independent things. The rejection of God is thus normal for the atheist. But atheists have a deep mental problem. Their minds are ignorant of symbolic languages. For instance, they are ignorant of Plato's negative, which allowed me to already find six attributes of God that connects God to the universe logically where He functions.

This ignorance is also noticed when an natheist says that all symbol have exact meanings. However, exact meanings of symbols can be found only in the physical sciences where the meanings of symbols are determined by proven physical laws. This is why physical laws are widely accepted. However, only theoretical laws have been found among living things. To find and prove laws among living things might not not be possible if man is free and independent and if God is able to intervene into all things.

Readers can be thankful that my book has been filled with non sequiturs. With my words, humans are free and independent My words also prove that God exists and intervenes.

The Human Mind - Two Different Views, I

Today, two different views of the human mind exist. In one view, materialists logicians, evolutionists, and other theists say that the human mind is a part of the brain and is called 'epiphenomena.' of the brain. Since they say that all things in the universe are mechanisms, the universe comes to an end. Since some religions (e.g., Catholic Church) say that the universe comes to an end, they must believe that the human mind is epiphenomena of the brain.

The second view of the human mind is discovered by Nicholas of Cusa. And Gottfried Leibniz incorporated this view of the human mind into the 'all is one' theory of the universe. In Leibniz's 'all is one' theory, God's mind is contracted and produces an infinite number of minds that Leibniz calls monads. Among this infinity of minds are an infinite number of human minds. These human minds are different from all other minds because they can measure all things that God creates and are the only minds that can reason. Only those people who say that the universe is eternal will agree with this second view of the human mind.

All high performance writers over the last 2500 years have taught the 'all is one' theory. Since Jesus Christ taught the 'all is one' theory, I ask, "Why do Christians and Muslims say that a created universe comes to an end?"

The Ugly English Language and Its Promotion by Atheists, Logicians, Evolutionists, Materialists and The Reason Project

The writings of Nicholas of Cusa reveal problems we have with the English language. These problems were detected first by Immanuel Kant who tried to unify the thoughts of the empiricists in England and the rationalists on the Continent. Kant's failure slowed the field of philosophy until Friedrich Hegel began to think dialectically and many linguists of the 1920s concluded that sense data are primarily symbolic. But in the 15th century Cusa already knew the problem of symbols and used the certainty of mathematics to explain truths.

St. Paul' suggestion in Rom. 1:20 will place us on better path of thought that is necessary to help correct any national language. However, the writings on the subject of 'all is one' by Anaxagorax, Jesus Christ, Nicholas of Cusa, Galileo, Leibniz, Kant, and Hegel will correct any national language immediately.

Some people do not accept God and the ‘all is one’ teaching. They are atheists, logicians, evolutionists, materialists, and supporters of The reason Project.. Their minds need to be opened to the two steps above.

Leibniz's Universe, III

Newton 's universe has a discontinuous God who creates the universe and then pulls out. The Newton universe is a mechanical thing that comes to an end. This universe is taught by the Catholic church, Protestant churches, Jewish synagogues, and Muslim mosques. Materialists also teach this universe but say that it was created by a Big Bang thing. Opposed to this mechanical universe is Leibniz's universe that has an active God who created the universe but also guides the universe forever. In this blog, I discuss Leibniz's active God.

Leibniz views God as necessary being. He says, ' Thus God is the only primitive unit or the only original simple substance, of which all the created or derivative monads are the products, born, so to speak, every moment by continual fulgurations from the divinity, and limited by the capacities of creatures, to which limitation is essential.' Leibniz is thus saying that God acts continually after he creates the monads and organizes them into one universe.

Leibniz says that when a monad influences another monad, the influence is an intervention of God's reasoning into the universe. God can intervene into the universe because all monads are mirrors of the universe. The intervention of God into the universe means that the universe is not a mechanism, which comes to an end. Instead, Leibniz's universe is guided by God forever and has no end.

The above religions and materialists are unable to recognize an active God because they are not identifying God's attributes, as Paul suggested in Rom. 1:20. By knowing only a few attributes of God, one can begin to connect God to the attributes of created things and the monads.

Monads are created by God when God contracts some of His perfect attributes. These contracted attributes form an infinite number of different monads that have a different purpose or function in the universe. Since the attributes of the monads are not perfect, the monads form imperfect things such as clouds, trees, dogs, humans, etc. Thus when God intervenes, He causes changes in the monads so the universe is always the best universe.

I often say that the Declaration of Independence is an important document because it connects God's perfect attribute of Independence to all U.S. citizens who must depend on each other to build the best nation. Today, the USA and all other nations are lost.

Leibniz's Universe, II

The infinite number of Leibniz's monads can be represented by Georg Cantor's first number class, N1. This first class is the aggregate of the finite whole numbers 1, 2, 3, .......v... The set of all monads are thus said to be denumerable because they are equivalent to the set of integers. This first number class is followed by Cantor's second number class, N2. This second number class contains all rational and irrational numbers. The set of all rational and irrational numbers is not denumerable because these numbers are not countable and produce continua of geometrical things.

So, after God acts to create the indivisible monads, God acts to creates all divisible/geometrical things by relating the monads to each other. Since all independent monads depend on each other, each monad is 'in' all other monads. This means that each monad is functionally related to all other monads. This is the initial state of Leibniz's universe and is what astronauts and materialists calls 'dark matter.'

To study divisible/geometrical things, materialists reject God and view the universe as a container for all things. The container is a spacetime structure. Since spacetime has a beginning and end, the universe had a beginning with a Big Bang explosion and has an end with a heat death. Since proved scientifically that God exists of this belief, I rejected the universe of materialism and accepted Leibniz's universe.

Since all independent monads are functionally related to each other and depend on each other, Leibniz's universe is not a container. For this reason, Leibniz defines space as the order of co-existences and time as an order of successation. The universe had no beginning because the monads were always one in God. The universe also has no end because God is eternal. Thus, there is no end to the monads unless God destroys them. Since all monads can change internally, all monads exist in Leibniz's space and pass into new successations as internal changes are made.

Leibniz's Universe, I

The universe proposed by the field of physics is known as the Big Bang theory. Biologists add Darwin's evolutionary theory to this physical theory. At this time, our physicists have not found anyway to construct their universe. To my knowledge, the only alternative to these physical/biological theories was offered by Gottfried Leibniz three hundred years ago. In my book, The First Scientific Proof of God, I presented a general view of Leibniz's universe as an alternative to the Big Bang theory. In this blog, I show in more detail how Leibniz constructed the universe with monads.

In my book, I call Leibniz's monads spiritual atoms because I want to speak of the monads as Spirits or spiritual atoms. With this change, I can also speak of God as the Holy Spirit, who is the creator of all Spirits. Philosophically, the Holy Spirit and all created Spirits are substances that have predicates. The Holy Spirit and all created Spirits are thus 'independent things' that have attributes. However, the independence of the Holy Spirit is absolute. Later, I show why the independence of all created spirits is relativistic.

In God, all possible Spirits are enfolded as 'one.' In God, these possible Spirits can thus be modeled with a single geometrical point. All possible Spirits are unfolded and are distinguished from each other and God when the 'one' is contracted by finitude and plurality. This contraction process is an act of God that unfolds all actual Spirits. All actual Spirits are modeled differently. Their model is a set of different geometrical points that are infinite in number. Note. Actual Spirits can be created and destroyed only by God. Since God is eternal, all actual Spirits are immortal.

Inside each created Spirit we find an organization as if it is like a godly machine. Each created Spirit is also organized differently. All created Spirits can be called irreducible complexities because they are organized by contracted essential attributes of God. Since the universe is always in motion, each created Spirit will change continually. Since nothing outside of a created Spirit can change it, each created Spirit must possess a principle of change. Each created Spirit must have a unity within a plurality. This plurality is formed by passing states of change. Each created Spirit can produce changes by perceiving these passing states. By perceiving, a Spirit can change. But, the independence of all created Spirits is relativistic and is limited by our perceiving ability.

Since the universe is not a container, each created Spirit depends on the natural changes of all other Spirits. For example, we depend on the rain gutters of our homes, that is, that they do not rust for many years. And we depend on all other Spirits to drive safely and behave.

Recovering the USA From Our Highly Irrational Damages

When I finalized my book on 'The First Scientific Proof of God," I had conducted research of the work of Gottfried Leibniz and had decided to include his work on monads in my thoughts permanently. I only changed the word 'monad' to 'spiritual atom' to distinguish the monad from the physical atom of physicists. In my book, I told the reader that the spiritual atoms are indivisible and immortal. The indivisible spiritual atom form every divisible things that form the universe.

After my book was published, I knew that I had to teach my book because it is new and very different compared to the thoughts on the universe held by our materialists. So, to help my teaching, I continued my research. Eventually, I began to do research on the history of the founding of the USA and the contents of the Declaration of Independence (DOI) and the Constitution. Eventually, I wrote a letter to Senator Rockefeller and told him that the Declaration of Independence is more than an authority to go to war against England. But the Senator told me that our lawyers do not view the DOI as a law. The lawyers are wrong as I show below.

My research says that the first two paragraphs of the DOI defines the USA, in general, as a nation under God. My research also says that the DOI and the Constitution form the social contract theory developed by England's John Locke. Locke's social contract has two distinct parts. One part is Society. It was named in the DOI as The United States of America. The other part is Government. It has become known as a representative government. This two-party social contract in the USA is the self-government developed by the ancient Jews.

Clearly, the colonists wanted to create a self-government. But the colonists reasoned their creativity. First, they developed a Society of independent spiritual atoms. Simultaneously, they developed a Government dependent on all spiritual atomss. God created creatures and the universe the same way. First, God developed a Set of independent spiritual atoms. And simultaneously, God developed a Universe dependent on all spiritual atoms.

As seen, the founders of the USA were following God as suggested by Gottfried Leibniz. It is time to recover the highly irrational damages that we have caused.

How The United States of America Is Being Destroyed

In yesterday's blog, I show that God's absolute independence is the origin of all divisible things in the universe. These divisible things are organized things of all kinds and include organized of people we call nations. So, when the founders of the USA prepared the Declaration of Independence to organize the colonists, they were guided by the work of God and His intelligent design.

Unfortunately, after the founders passed on, The United States of America began to change in negative ways. As time passed, some people turned away from God. Other people not only turned away from God but lost some of their morals and developed evil and criminal behaviors. By turning away from God, the USA became an organization that no longer expects people to 'depend' on each other. With this loss of 'dependence,' all people in the USA automatically lost the 'independence' they received from God. This double loss is an example of how coexisting opposites function in a human mind.

Below, I show some of the causal factors of change. I also identify the American presidents who tried to turn this ugly change around.

Change, Cause, and Effect

1.Change: The development of a private national government (lobbyists and a middle/rich classes): Cause: First owners of initial businesses and industries and first owners of shipping for purpose of free trade grow without limit or regulation. Effect: National wealth begins to accumulate in fewer and fewer people.

2.Change: The removal of prayers from public schools and a ruling in favor of abortion by the Supreme Court. Cause: The rise of atheism. Effect: Religions lose many members and the morality of the people degenerates.

3. Change: The fields of mathematics and science turn away from God. Cause: Most mathematicians and scientists cannot find God. Effect: The worldwide ranking of U.S. mathematics and science is lowered drastically.

American Presidents

1. President Abraham Lincoln: Saved the Declaration of Independence and the Union against the Southern States with the Civil War.

2. President Franklin D. Roosevelt: Saved the Union from the 1930 depression and wars against Japan and Germany.

3. President John F. Kennedy: Saved the Union against the Cold War with the Moon Landing program.

4. President Richard Nixon: Tried to save the Union with the first major social initiatives.

Indivisibles, III

The purpose of the U. S. Declaration of Independence can be understood only if if one knows the history of indivisibles. It is obvious that U.S. lawyers and the judges of U.S. Supreme Court do not know this history. Their lack of knowledge explains the ugly error that they have made about the legal position of the Declaration of Independence. This error gave powers to the U.S. government that Locke's social contract denies. As a result of this error, they have weakened the power of the 'one People' while simultaneously removing the independence of each U.S. citizen. The Declaration of Independence is a comprehensive law of the USA. It was not merely an authority to go to war against England.

Only if one studies the history of indivisibles can one identify the purpose our founders had in mind when they preparing the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776 and have it printed the next day. So, let me describe this history.

When man searches and finds for phenomena in the things that God created as St. Paul taught at Rom. 1:20, man's knowledge of God's Intelligent Design of the universe has increased. However, finding this knowledge can never be completed because God's attributes are infinite in number. So, making such searches will never end.

In my latest searches for phenomena in things of the universe, five phenomena were found. In the search today a sixth phenomenon found in all divisible things in the universe. This phenomenon is described as 'dependence.' This phenomenon is found in all divisible things because they have parts that work together. So, each part can be said to depend on each other. Dependence is also found among people. For instance, the earliest small social units and the later larger social units in Greece (e.g., Sparta) were organizations of people who depended on each other.

When dependence is negated, like other phenomena have been negated, the word 'independence' appears in our minds where we treat it as another attribute of God. Like all other attributes of of God, God must contract His independence by finitude in order for the 'contracted independence' to be 'in' any indivisible things before they actually become divisible things. So, before any divisible things can appear in the universe with a body, God must makes all 'indivisibles' that are also 'independent.' Thus, our founders were aware of exactly what they were doing. It is unfortunate that many Americans do not understand what this nation is all about.

Indivisibles, II

At Rom. 1:20, St Paul says that invisible things of God are clearly seen, being understood by the things God made. So, if man senses phenomena of things and defines the phenomena precisely, attributes of God are revealed by negating the phenomena. For instance, when I sensed that the phenomena all things are finite, I negated finite and learned that God has an positive attribute we call not-finite (or infinite). This learning was reported on page 6 my book, 'The First Scientific Proof of God" So with sensual data and Plato's negative, modern man found that God does exist.

Now, when things in the universe are examined in detail, my senses also tell me that things can be divided into parts. With this simple examination of things in the universe, I came to the conclusion that every thing in the universe must be divisible because the atom cannot be found. Then, by negating the word 'divisible,' I learned that God has another positive attribute we call not-divisible (or indivisible). This learning was reported on page 248 of my book. I assume that the word 'indivisible' might have helped Abraham reject idolatry and accept monotheism. Certainly, Abraham made a great advancement for man.

Interestingly, early Christians spoke of God as Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. At 325 AD,, Christians changed and spoke of God as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Then, in the 15th century, Nicholas of Cusa changed the non scientific phrase Father, Son and Holy Spirit to the scientific phrase 'One,Equality, and Union.' With this scientific phrase, I connected God to the universe logically with the phrase 'many,inequality, and relation.' (See pages 124-127 of my book.). When the words 'many, inequality, and relation' are separated and negated, three more attributes of God (One, Equality, and Union) are found. So, the Christian Trinity is not God. The Christian Trinity only identifies three more attributes of God.

Indivisibles, I

Pics of Nicholas of Cusa, Galileo Galilei, and Gottfried Leibniz

The U.S. Supreme Court is lost. In The Judge Journal (Summer 1985), PA Supreme Court Judge, Edmund B. Spaeth, Jr. asked, "Where is the High Court Heading?" He recommended that judges engage with citizens in Socratic dialogues. I agree with Spaeth because judges are not prepared to make judgments alone. No field of thought has, or can develop, all knowledge. So the field of law cannot make correct judgements without using knowledge developed by other fields of thought. Without dialogues, judges can be expected to make make many errors. One error of the Supreme Court is the ruling that says that the Declaration of Independence is not a law. This error has divided the nation into believers and non believers of God.

Just like the U.S. Founding Documents have not been interpreted properly by U.S. lawyers and the U.S. Supreme Court, 'indivisibles' were not interpreted properly by religions and the field of mathematics after they appeared. History shows that indivisibles were developed only by a few personalities and their followers. The personalities are Nicholas of Cusa, Galileo Galilei, and Gottfried Leibniz. Since the thoughts of Cusa and Galileo were being judged by the Roman church, only Leibniz was able to rise above the Roman church and develop indivisibles. However, the institutions of education in the USA have brought only Leibniz's infinitesimal calculus into high schools, colleges, and universities.

After studying the work of Cusa, I recognized the important work of Leibniz on indivisibles. So when I found that the existence of God can be proven scientifically, I wrote my first book, "The First Scientific Proof of God," In this book, I included information on Nicholas of Cusa and Galileo in Part IIa. And I included the work of Leibniz on indivisibles in Part IV.

However, soon after my book appeared on the Internet Amazon bookstore, five atheists submitted book reviews that assassinate my character and rejected the proof of God. They did not understand my method of proof. They did not understand Plato's negative and had no comments on my discussion on Cusa, Galileo, or Leibniz. Their unfair book reviews were removed by Amazon because their reviews did not follow bookstore review guidelines. But these atheists continued to resubmit their same book reviews. On the third resubmissions, the bookstore gave up due to increased personal costs. But this evil practice of atheism seems to be unlawful because atheists are not tolerating religions. Because of this evil practice of atheism, the work of Leibniz on indivisibles in my book is being hidden again. Earlier Leibniz's work was hidden by the materialists and Newtonians for four centuries.

It is time for citizens to take a deeper look at what is happening in the fields of education, mathematics, and science in the USA.

Connecting Nicholas of Cusa, Gottfried Leibniz, and the Founders of the USA to Jesus Christ and Greek Thinking in 500 B.C.

One can connect the negative theology of Nicholas of Cusa to the New System, Monadology, and infinitesimal calculus of Gottfried Leibniz. These thoughts of Cusa and Leibniz can then be connected to the thoughts of the founders of the USA and the Laws of Nature and Nature's God, which are found in the U.S. Declaration of Independence. However, the thoughts of these modern thinkers can be connected also to the ancient teachings of Jesus Christ and to he 500 B.C. Greek teaching of Anaxagoras. These modern and ancient connections prove that knowledge of a monotheistic God and the universe has been progressing scientifically for over 2500 years and that free nations under a monotheistic God would eventually emerge, as the USA did in 1776. In this blog, I will present this common thread.

Give Anaxagoras credit for developing the idea of Parmenides who said "All is One." (click) The 'All in One' idea is repeated by Jesus Christ in John 14:20 as '".. I am in the Father, and ye in me, and I in you." In Bk.II, Ch. Five of his book 'On Learned Ignorance,' Nicholas of Cusa expands the 'All in One' idea with the words 'Each thing is in each thing' and the words "From Book One it is evident that God is in all things in a such way that all things are in Him." If each thing in the universe is divisible and originate from an indivisible God, each thing in the universe has an infinite number of indivisible parts.

I am unable to connect Cusa directly to Gottrried Leibniz (1646-1716). However, I conclude that Leibniz could have learned about Cusa's indivisibles through the thinking of Galileo, who knew about Cusa's work. Anyway, Cusa's indivisibles are found in Leibniz's New System, which opposes Newton's billiard ball universe. In No.56 of Leibniz's Monadology, he says that every thing is connected to alll other things. Cusa's indivisibles are also found in Leibniz's infinitesimal calculus and the true atom defined in his book on 'Monadology.' The use of Cusa's indivisibles are found by Galileo;s thoughts on the extension of bodies. These connections set the stage for the development of functional relations in the field of mathematics.

England's Queen Anne and her grandmother, Sophie, wanted Leibniz to become Prime Minister. Had Leibniz received this position, the U.S. Revolutionary War would not have happened, Americans would be speaking German, and Cusa's book On Learned Ignorance would be a common book in the USA in the early 1700s.. Instead, Christian Wolff (1679-1756) and Ben Franklin's European assignments made sure that the phrase 'Laws of Nature and Nature's God" were included in the Declaration of Independence. The rejection of the divinity of Jesus Christ by Franklin is a sign that Ben participated in the heated debates between the Newtonians and Leibniz. Franknin's statement at the signing of the Declaration of Independence --- We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately -- is an indicator that the founders knew the 'all is one' theory. These debates continue yet today between materialists and spiritualists. Only the personalities and philosophical names have changed.

In closing, I noticed that Immanuel Kant shows his sensitive to the '"All in One" idea in his "Critique of Pure Reason' in the Preface to Second Edition. There, Kant talks about 'organized bodies' sayings, "... every member exists for every other, and all for the sake of each other, so that no principle can safely be taken in any one relation, unless it has been investigated in the entirety of its relations to the whole employment of pure reason."

The Big Bang Theory and Ancestoral Theory Are Troublesome

In his book 'On Learned Ignorance,' Nicholas of Cusa (center pic) says that a maximum or minimum, which is contracted to finite things, cannot exist apart from God, who is the Absolute Maximum and Absolute Minimum. So although God is incomprehensible, we know that all things found in the universe never exist apart from God. The assertion that all things in the universe came from a big bang physical thing is thus false. And it is false that all living things come from ancestors as evolutionists say. It is unfortunate that most physical scientists and biologists are unfamiliar with Cusa's book. But Cusa's book can be copied out of the Internet. (click)

Since no two identical things exist in the universe, all things found in the universe are numbered. At Matt. 10:30, Jesus Christ also said, "But the very hairs on your head are numbered." So all things in the universe are numbered things. Since these numbered things are never identical, all things are different.e. However, all of these different things can be classified into species. But these species are limited because no thing in the universe can become 'absolute maximum' or 'absolute minimum' because only God is absolute maximum and absolute minimum. These limits form a continuum of genera or numbered things in the universe.

I conclude that lots of time and money are being wasted on wrong theories by physical scientists, biologists, politicians, and educators in every nation. With this huge waste, the new generations of humans could become very troublesome because the true science is being lost. To prevent this possible trouble, the people in every nation should investigate the truths in Cusa's book now. In general, Cusa challenges those humans who say that human knowledge has an end and can thus be completed. He challenges these same Cusa saying that some knowledge will always remain unknown to man.

The Universe As Seen By Nicholas of Cusa, I

After reading the book 'On Learned Ignorance' (De Docta Ignorantia) in 1980, I concluded that its author was the first modern scientist. The author of this book is Bishop Nicholas of Cusa (1401-1464). He was a German of the Roman Church. I suggest that this book be copied out of the Internet. (click) What a great gift this book would be during the Holidays. In time, I expect this book to be found among the scriptures in the home of every nation. The pic is Cusa.

In Bk. II, Ch. Eleven of his book 'On Learned Ignorance,' Cusa says, "Therefore, the earth, which cannot be the center, cannot be devoid of all motion. Indeed, it is even necessary that the earth be moved in such a way that it could be moved infinitely less. Therefore, just as the earth is not the center of the world, so the sphere of the fixed stare is not the circumference ..."

Based on the above words of Cusa, Nicolaus Copernicus (1473-1543) and Galileo Galilei (1564-1642) were not the first and second to conclude that the fixed stars are in motion. Let's look at some interesting histories.

Cusa studied at Padua; later Galileo taught at Padua; Kepler recognized Cusa's discovery of God's absolute maximum and absolute minimum; and Galileo expressed deep interest in Kepler's work. I thus conclude that Galileo had some access to the thoughts of Cusa in the book "On Learned Ignorance." Further, on p.26 of 'The Crime of Galileo' by Giorgio de Santillana, we find that Galileo accepted the concept of imperceptiblis motus spoken by Cusa. Galileo seems to confirm the existence of indivisibles at Job 26:7. Furthermore, in Ch. 6 of 'Galileo Galilei, his life and his works' by Raymond J. Seeger, Galileo spoke of an infinite number of indivisibles that could form a continuous quanty. In Seeger's book, Galileo says that indivisibles can expand into very large spaces without introducing a finite number of empty spaces (vacuums).

Based on the information above, today's scientists seem to be on the wrong path of thought.