Scientific Proof of God, A New and Modern Bible, and Coexisting Relations of God and the Universe

Saturday, October 31, 2009

Making My First Scientific Proof of God Clearer, I

I have come to the conclusion that my scientific proof of God is not clear. Part of this problem is my engineering style of writing and my distrust with the Aristotelian-based English language. And another problem is that a new science will develop from my book. Further, when I started work at the U.S. Department of Justice as an electrical engineer, the justice language was new to me and had to be learned. I also had to read the books of Nicholas of Cusa several times. So, understanding my proof might require a little patience.

In order to develop a scientific proof of God, I sought universal attributes of things in the universe as taught by Paul at Rom. 1:20. Then, by using negative thinking, I connect each universal attribute of the universe logically to the attributes of God because only some attributes of God will participate in God's intelligent design of the universe. I identify four pairs of coexisting opposites as follows: finite/Infinite, many/One, inequality/Equality, and relation/Union. The capitalized words are attributes of God whereas the others are not capitalized because they are effects and are found only in the universe. Since all coexisting opposites can prove that God must exist, I placed the coexisting opposites, finite/Infinite, on page 6,7 and called it the 'first scientific ' and placed the other coexisting opposites in Part IIb, Ch. 1 where I wanted introduce a scientific Trinity to the reader.

I refer to Nicholas of Cusa as the first modern scientist because he allowed me to help him become a modern scientist. He was unable to do it himself because the meaning of the word 'infinite' was vague and the word 'relation' did not even exist yet. Relations appear with Galileo, Leibniz, and the early appearances of functional relations. Further, scientific proofs did not exist in the 15th century. So, my long study of Nicholas of Cusa allowed me to bring new proofs to science.

So there is no question that man has a god. In my book, the proof of God is offered in four different ways. The atheists and logicians reject God because their minds cannot cope with coexisting opposites.

Friday, October 30, 2009

Why Many Physical Scientists Become Atheists

I opened this website in order to teach the complexity of my book on 'The First Scientific Proof of God.' Today, I am in my fourth year of teaching. During this teaching period, I was also able to expand my research effort on the material of my book. In this blog, I will show why physical scientists tend to become atheists.

A fundamental idea of the physical scientist says that the universe is a container. The container of the universe is thus like a glass that can hold water or a brain that can hold mental ideas. Once the idea of a container is locked into the mind of a physical scientist, many other related ideas will soon be added to their minds. Two other major ideas are as follows: (2) closed world and (3) entropy. All three ideas will lead the mind to two more major ideas as follows: (4) completed knowledge and (5) end of world. Once these five ideas are locked into the minds of physical scientists, some religious people will join these physical scientists to watch the death of the universe as they wait for for God to take them either to Heaven or Hell.

Since I concluded that something seems to be wrong about these five ideas, I went into research and found that God and His creatures form a single world and that they do not form a container. Instead of finding a container, I found that God and His creatures are organized, are in each other, are independent things, are functional, and are for the sake of each other. Since God had no beginning and has no end, this single world always existed and has no end. This very different world is found in the 500. B.C. Greek writings of Anaxagoras, the writings of Plato, the teaching of Jesus Christ, the writings of Nicholas of Cusa on 'learned ignorance,' the study of general body extensions by Galileo, the New System of Leibniz, the thoughts of Immanuel Kant and Friedrich Hegel, and the transfinite numbers of Georg Cantor.

It seems clear that the work of physical science on the infinitely large, the infinitely small, and life are becoming more and more irrational as time passes. And it seems as though religions are on the same path.

Thursday, October 29, 2009

Ther Ancient Prophets Are Today's Scientists and Moralists

Today, the increasing knowledge of scientists and moralists is leading to new challenges of teachings in every scripture. These challenges are normal as St. Paul teaches in the Bible. I conclude that that the work of the ancient prophets was not different from the work of today's scientists and moralists. At I Thess. 5:209, Paul says ' Despise not prophesyings' and at the next verse , 5:21, Paul says, 'Prove all things; hold fast that which is good.' These words also say that scriptures are not the words of God.

The imprisonment of Galileo and the burnings of Bruno and others at the stake as heretics by the Roman church was thus inconsistent with the natural development of sciences and morals by man. These burnings were murders. Further, since Jesus Christ was a prophet and thus a normal human being, his death on the Cross must also be viewed as murder. I wonder how many wars today are really murders caused by fundamental religions. Furthermore, the development of intellectual power over people by any leaders must always be seen as immoral acts.

Tuesday, October 27, 2009

My Two Views of Christianity

During my life, I experienced two different kinds of Christianity, mystified and demystified. As a baby, I was baptized in a German town at a Lutheran church. Searching for Easter eggs as a child and playing a role in a Christmas play was a common activity. I eventually earned the job of counting the nickels and pennies at Sunday school. By earning this job, I was able to keep my nickel and used it to win money on pinball machines. By age fourteen, I had become a member of the church but also became a very good basketball player. By age eighteen,I was honored by the State of Pennsylvania in basketball and enlisted in the Army to become a radio technician. In Germany, I maintained radios and entertained the U.S. troops playing basketball. After my military years, I sought a higher education and became an electrical engineer.

Until I became fifty years old, Christianity and the universe were mysteries. During this period, the church was only a place where money is collected, just as the government collects taxes. Then, in 1979, I was introduced to the 15th century writings of Nicholas of Cusa. This introduction encouraged me to begin a new research project. This project became a twenty-five year study of the writings of many personalities. This study removed the mysteries of the universe and all religions. These demystifications finally led to my 2006 book, 'The First Scientific Proof of God.'

I conclude that non scientific Christians have mystified all of the scientific teachings of Jesus. These mysteries allowed Christianity to equate Jesus to the incomprehensive God where Jesus and his mother can be worshipped. This action is evil. This evilness is known by all Muslims and explain why Muslim's call Christians infidels.

The writings of St. Paul and St. John show any scientist that Jesus studied the 500 year-old writings of the Greeks. One mystified scientific teaching of Jesus is at John 14:20. By demystifying this teaching , one learns that the universe is not a container. This means that all created things and God are functionally related and thus form a single world. Unfortunately, this mystified scientific teaching has forced materialists into atheism. There is no question that Jesus was the greatest scientist who I studied.

I conclude that the growth of Christianity has misled many uneducated people throughout the world. I also conclude that the mystifications of Christianity has led to many unnecessary wars.

My Scientific Proof of God Reveals Errors in the Fields of Science, Theology, and Religion

In my last blog, I explained in detail the first scientific proof of God. Based on this explanation, I conclude that my book could now be the most important scientific and theological book in the world today. I was unaware of this importance when I published my book in 2006. After I opened this teaching website and developed hundreds of blogs on the subjects of science, theology, and religion, I learned of the importance of my book because the fields of science, theology, and religions have developed very serious troubles and are now causing new levels of hatred among humans that have never seen before. So, in this blog I want to discuss these unnecessary causes.

On the field of science, there was no need for colleges and universities to remove God from their courses in order to advertise their institution as 'nonsectarian.' Since the USA is a nation under God, colleges and universities can and should teach all different theories on God and will not step into the field of religion. Religions come into existence in order to practice specific theory of God. By not distinguishing the field of theology from the field of religion, U.S. colleges and universities removed God from the field of education. Since theology was separated wrongly from science by U.S. colleges and universities, many U.S. scientists turned toward materialism and atheism and now violate the U.S. founding documents.

On the field of religion, there was no need for any religion to lure members by telling them that a scripture is produced by God. Our modern theories of God show that all scriptures are produced by humans who have a great desire to develop theories of God. Judaism is thus wrong to say that God inspired Old Testament scribes and that God gives land to followers. Christianity is also wrong to say that Jesus Christ is the only son of God. As Muslims and modern theology say, Jesus was created by God just like other humans are created. My research shows that many teachings of Jesus can be connected to the science of the Greeks as far back as 500 years before the life of jesus. By casting scriptures into concrete by teaching that scriptures are the word of God, the field of religion is impeding the progress and real development of man. Further, religions still teach that after life exists either in Heaven or Hell. This teaching is false. But today, this false teaching has allowed the production of human bombs. Based on the U.S. founding documents, religious toleration must be limited to reason and scientific proofs.

The fields of science, theology, and religion must return to the 1950's to rethink and remake the last 60 years. Take drugs and inflation away first.

Sunday, October 25, 2009

A Report on Reviews of My Book, The First Scientific Proof of God

On the bookstore of, five atheistic reviews of my book (The First Scientific Proof of God) rejected my proof of God because all of these reviewers do not believe in God. Thus, the reviews of these atheists are thus useless to the reader. The sixth review of my book was offered by Dr. Stephen Smith. His review is useful to readers because he read the book completely and presented a very detailed review. (click)

Dr. Smith's review says that my proof of God's existence is not the first literal proof of God's existence because Hegel writes often about the infinite and provides a strong argument for Hegel's 'ontological proof of God.' Hegel's ontological proof of God is important for a scientist whose mind is focused of 'things' (or objects) and their phenomena.

As a scientist, my proof of God focuses on the incomprehensive God and God's attributes. This incomprehensive God was found by Nicholas of Cusa when he found that the greatest knowledge is both 'maximum' and ''minimum' and that man's knowledge must be 'relativistic.' Since an incomprehensive God never changes, a scientist must focus on God's act of creation. So, my focus is on the science of God's Intelligent Design of the universe. This science was known by Paul at Rom. 1:20 of the Bible.

By using Rom. 1:20 and the evening sky, I concluded that all things in the universe must be 'finite.' Then, I concluded that this universal such attribute must originate from something not-finite (or infinite). Since the concept 'infinite' is not equated to God, I concluded that the infinite must be one of an endless number of attributes of God.

If one continues to use Rom. 1:20, other universal attributes will appear. Then, by negating these other universal attributes, new attributes of God will be identified. So, when I say that my book identifies 'The First Scientific Proof of God,' I am telling the truth.

With the scientific method I use, I say that a scientist will increase his or her understandings of God. By gaining knowledge of God's attributes by negating the universals in the things in the universe scientists will moralize themselves because all of God's attributes are 'good.'

My book is thus a science book that applies to all fields of thought that will connect God's attributes to all universal attributes of things in the universe. I also connect the general attributes of God --- one, equality, and union --- logically to the general attributes of things in the universes --- many, inequalities, and relations. With these general attributes, I can show that Trinity of Christianity is scientific.

Saturday, October 24, 2009

The Security of the USA is Being Reduced by the Poor Performance of U.S. Government

President Adams, the second president of the United States, was the first to express his concern about the accumulation of wealth by business and industry owners. These owners became known as federalists. These federalists were perfecting the Union as the Constitution requires in the Preamble and as Alexander Hamilton suggested. Interestingly, Thomas Jefferson thought that the USA might develop the USA into a nation of farmers.

To limit the accumulations of wealth by the federalists, Adams organized a group of anti-federalists. However, all of the founders would soon pass on. Abe Lincoln followed the founders closely to perfect the Union by industrializing the South and building the West with homesteader incentives. Today, it seems that Roosevelt, Kennedy, and Nixon would become the only other presidents who would develop major efforts to perfect the Union. All of these major presidential efforts had something in common in that they stabilize the productions and jobs of U.S. business and industry. Unfortunately, all other presidents would cause all owners of U.S. businesses and industries to produce only things that can be sold.

The history of the U.S. presidencies informs us of a dangerous U.S. security problem. Instead of stabilizing the development of the USA by continually making it more perfect, the U.S. government has chose to stabilize the U.S. money system by building inflation into the U.s. economy This form of stabilization serves only bankers and does not serve the Union and its people. It is also not possible to perfect a nation by the U.S. government when the U.S. business and industry is forced to depend only on the production things to sell in a free enterprise.

Since 'the people' have given the U.S. government its rights in exchange for security, it is time to build the USA as required by the founding documents. This building must be a permanent activity so that business and industry and their employees have a long and beautiful life without periods of unemployment. I suggest that the U.S. banking system be limited to local banking systems and that forming a more perfect Union be the responsibility to the national government with a taxing system. This means no more pork.

Friday, October 23, 2009

Other Ways the Security of the USA Is Being Reduced

Many citizens have never read and studied the two founding documents of the United States, which are the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. Thus, these citizens, who includes those citizens who function in the three branches of the U.S. government, might not know that the Declaration of Independence has defined all U.S. citizens as a 'Union.' These citizens might also not know that the Constitution requires the U.S. government 'to form a more perfect Union.' So, since July 4, 1776 the perfections of the USA should have been measured scientifically by the only perfection standard, who is God. And, since July 4, 1776, every U.S. citizen should know that the USA is 'a nation under God'' because the first two paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence defined 'The United States of America' as a nation under God.

Because many U.S. citizens are unfamiliar with the U.S. founding documents, the can compromise the security of the United States. Thus, beyond the security effects of practicing atheism, other behaviors of Americans can affect the rights that U.S. citizens had to give to the U.S. government in exchange for increased security.

One of these other wrong citizen behaviors is abortion because the Declaration of Independence says that all Men are created equal. Since a conceived child is a human being, abortion violates the founding document of the USA. Another wrong citizen behavior is the U.S. economic policy that produces health care for some citizens, but not for all citizens. This is the behavior of the U.S. Congress, who violates its own law. When the U.S. Supreme Court says that the Declaration of independence is not a law, it behaves wrongly and violates the founding documents. Crime is a wrong behavior and violates the founding documents and other specific laws. When a child matures and does not become educated, that person is behaving wrongly and violates the founding documents because the Union must be perfected continually to maintain the Union.

Feel free to add to my list with your comments so that the U.S. government can reform and correct itself.

Many wrong U.S. citizen behaviors seem to originate from the idea that all U.S. citizens are absolutely free. Humans are not absolutes. God is the only absolute, as defined in the U.S. founding documents.

Tuesday, October 20, 2009

Unifying Capitalism and Socialism Functionally

Capitalism has many meanings. (click) I accept the following meaning: an economic system in which wealth, and the means of producing wealth, are privately owned. Today, capitalism is better known as free enterprise or free market economy. Henry Carey, an economic consultant to Abe Lincoln, spoke of capitalism as the British System of Economics.

Socialism also has many definitions. (click) Since none of these meanings fit my unification of science and theology, I add to this list of definitions the following meaning: socialism is all of the infrastructures that man has produced for a more perfect life for all. This meaning thus distinguishes the physical world and the spiritual world.

To me, capitalism and socialism are functionally related and thus work together in order to form a more perfect Union, as the Preamble of the Constitution requires.

In his book on "The Unity of Law," Carey says that capitalism alone subjects the human mind to matter and subjugates labor to capital. This might have been true if capitalism was an absolute term at his time. Carey favored the American System of Economics because it has moral, opens man's mind to God'' creations, and prevents the development of brutish human behaviors and a class of poor people.

Following the assassination of Lincoln, capitalism became an absolute term primarily because a large amount of capital had been accumulated by a small number of people. However, with WWII and the space program, many new infrastructures for life appeared nationally. Unfortunately, three fields of thought could destroy the necessary relations between capitalism and socialism because they reject God and view life as something physical rather than spiritual. These three fields are as follows: (1) materialism, (2 ) evolution, and (3) atheism.'

Monday, October 19, 2009

The Meanings of Socialism and Capitalism Are Changing

In his most recent article, as a member of Creaters Syndicate, Mark Shields shows that the meanings of 'socialism' and 'capitalism' are changing and becoming more confused. Thus, when the linguists discovered , in the 1920s, that sensual-data are primarily symbolic, it is certain that they found a truth about human life. Since the meanings of symbols used by humans for communications are never exact, materialism and atheism must be false and human life must be endless.

Shields says, " The anger rises. The fury rages at a new economic order that rules our lives. American capitalism has now been redefined to mean the freedom of the rich to reap enormous rewards if the risks they take do work out and --- more importantly --- if these risks do not work out, for everybody else to bail out the rich." So the meanings of socialism and capitalism are being redefined only in favor for the rich.

Kenneth Burke challenged the Hoover administration on the accurate meanings of economic symbols ,after the depression began in 1929. Since President Hoover was a mechanical engineer and believed that the nature of humans are like the nature of machines, Hoover thought that the U..S. economy obeys laws and would make a self-recovery. Hoover and his economists were wrong. Unfortunately, many U.S. economists, and universities, and colleges still teach that the U.S. economy can be controlled by economic factors such as inflation, real unemployment rates , cycles, etc. These factors do not function as necessary factors in a godly economic whole and thus do not represent economic truths.

When will the are people of the world recognize that only a few rich and powerful people are needed to control nations, even free ones.

Saturday, October 17, 2009

Judaism, Christianity, and Islam Are Ready Intellectually to Form a New Religion

Since Judaism, Christianity, and Islam worship the same God, they have the ability to form a new religion, which would have very similar social relations and very similar futuristic goals. At this time, their ability to form this new religion is being prevented by their different scientific views of God. The scientific view of these religions are different because no religion, to my knowledge has unified the fields of theology and science. Further, the failures of materialism and atheism are becoming clear. Thus, the time to make this new religion real is 'now."

The unification of theology and science began in the Science & Theology News at the end of the 20th century. My own effort to unify these two fields of thought began on this website on June 6, 2008. Over a hundred blogs were written through January 19, 2009. Below are some unified ideas that have been developed by me et al.

(1) infallibility would be recognized as a false religious teaching.

(2) life-after-death would be recognized as a true scientific teaching;.

(3) God and the universe would be recognized scientifically and theologically as a single world, which has has no end.

(4) God would be recognized as an infinite thing. As an infinite thing, God would be recognized as a creator who creates finite finite things,. These finite things form one universe.

(5) All things would be recognized as functional things. All things form a single world.

(6) All finite things would be recognized divisible things , which are formed from indivisible atoms called souls. These souls are immortal: Since they are atoms, no two souls can be identical.

(7) Some immortal souls would be recognized as dominating souls. These dominating souls are embodied with non-dominating souls and form all finite things. Since the life of finite things are limited, dominating souls are continually embodied after death.

(8) God would be recognized as a thing of wisdom and possesses all know;ledge.

(9) All humans would be recognized as things that have the potential to develop self-knowledge. Since humans cannot develop all knowledge, human life never ends..

Friday, October 16, 2009

Questioning the Togetherness of Judaism and Christianity

For many centuries, the togetherness of Judaism and Christianity was viewed to be close enough to be spoken of as 'Judeo-Christian' and as a 'revealed religion.' (click) However, with the emergence of modern science, a good scientist will notice that these two religions might be very different.

I noticed this difference in the book "God According to God" by Gerald L. Schroeder, a physicist from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He is a materialist. but is not an atheist. In general, he accepts these phenomena: God, God's wisdom, the big bang creation of energy, matter, life, brain, and mind. He this believes in evolution and that living thing come from the nonliving things. The universe diminishes its entropy, it ends. His Old Testament research says that God is learning how to relate to the tragedies of the creation.

The most powerful teaching of Jesus Christ and his modem followers is found in my book on 'The First Scientific Proof of God. It can be found in the New Testament at John 14:20 and was taught in Greece ( long before Jesus was born) by Anaxagoras who taught that 'each thing is in each thing.' Thus God will be found in all finite things , all finite things will be found in God, and each finite thing will be found in each other finite thing. This major teaching of Jesus was unknown until modern science and mathematics began to develop functional relations. These functional relations infoms science that the universe is not a container. The powerful teaching of Jesus unites one infinite God with all finite creatures and forms a single world that has no end. The 'matter' or thus world is indivisible spiritual atoms, which are irreducible. They organize all finite, divisible creatures.

As seen, Schroeder's Judaism and Christianity have very few thoughts in common. The lack of common thoughts are explained because materialism is a false theory. But when are Jews and Christians going to get together to discuss the new Christian knowledge, which appeared only after modren science emerged?

Monday, October 12, 2009

The American Way is Fading Away But Can Be Recovered, If We Change

After Americans landed on the moon in the late 1960s, the American Way began to lose its direction into the future. This future had been described clearly in the Preamble of the Constitution by the founders. They said, "We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, ...". With these words, the USA became a progressive nation under God. However, this futuristic aspect of the USA can be reignited simply by promoting the constitutional words of 'forming a more perfect Union.'

At the same time, the USA began to lose its God. This God was described by the founders in the first two paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence. This loss began to develop soon after the U.S. Supreme Court removed prayer from the public schools in 1967. However, since God is described by theologies (or by theories), prayers express theologies or theories and do not express a specific practicing religion, the Supreme Court ruled wrongly in 1967.

It seems clear that the American Way can be recovered quickly if the Constitution is applied, as stated, and the Supreme Court rules in favor of expressing theologies, or theories of God, on public properties.

Sunday, October 11, 2009

Socialism in the USA

The meaning if the term 'socialism' has been defined many different ways today on television and newspapers. Socialism is often identified with communism and Marxism.

Walter E. Williams. is a writer of the Creators Syndicate and teaches economics at Mason University. Today, he gives his meaning of socialism in my local newspaper. In his article, he identifies many leaders of socialism, such as Fidel Castro, Stalin, Mussolini, Moa Tsetung, ... etc. Williams says, "There's little, no distinction between Nazism, socialism. "Williams is wrong because it is clear that he misinterprets the U.S. founding documents.

As a free market economist, Williams does not interpret the Declaration of Independence and U.S. Constitution honestly. In the Preamble of the Constitution, the founders said, "We the People of the United States, in order to form a more perfect Union, .......: And in the Declaration of Independence, the founders said, ...."all Men are created equal, ..."

In the USA, socialism means "to form a more perfect Union for all Men." Clearly, Williams is dishonest and appears to be a writer for the wealth class of people in the USA.

Saturday, October 10, 2009

NASA's Moon Shot on October 9, 2009 Raises Questions to the Materialists and Atheists

Yesterday, NASA sent an exploding physical object to the moon to determine whether the moon has water. When this object hit the moon and exploded there was no sign of a plane of dust or pulverized water ice. The mmaterialists and atheists must explain this unexpected result and how this result agrees with the billiard ball theory of Isaac Newton, the big bang theory, and Darwin's evolutionary theory.

As a believer in the existence of God, I say that the moon functions as an infrastructure of our solar system and protects all life on planet earth against free force asteroids and their physical material . Accordingly, I say that the moon is part of God's Intelligent Design of the universe.

Friday, October 09, 2009

Atheism: Does It Affect the Security of the USA?

A science under God is different than a science under atheism. Because these two different sciences produce different scientific results, one wonders whether the practices of atheism are weakening the security of the USA or the security of any other godly nation

Was the USA founded as a nation under God? The founders of the USA were not ignorant on this question because they knew the status of knowledge in England and Europe in 1776. For instance, they knew that God and atheism had not been proven yet. So, to build the USA in 1776, the U.S. founders decided to build a nation under God instead of a nation under atheism. In 1776, the founders also knew that a perfect religion had not been found. So, when they built the USA, they prevented government from establishing a religion. This action was sound because a perfect religion has not been found today. So, the USA became a nation under God in 1776. It willl remain this way until atheism is proven. Today, atheism has never been proven. But today God has been proven.

Any scientist will notice how the founders made the USA a nation under God. First, they made the USA obey the social contract of John Locke. Locke’s contract has two organizations --- Society and Government. These two organizations are united by two founding documents and form a single nation named 'The United States of America.'

The Society is constructed by the first two paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence. These words made the Society ‘one People’ under God. Then, the founders made Locke's Government using the Constitution. God became functional in the USA in the Preamble of the Constitution. God becomes functional using the phrase, 'in Order to form a more perfect Union.' Science requires a standard that can measure the phenomena of everything in the universe. The phrase, 'a more perfect Union,' means that the phenomena of the Union are imperfect. The only standard for measuring the phenomena of a perfecting Union is a perfect God, who is the origin of the universe.

Many different U.S. laws can be and are violated by people. If one practices atheism today in the USA, U.S. laws will be also be violated. Since atheism has no standard to measure the perfection of the Union and atheism is not interested in perfecting the USA, won’t atheism weaken the development and security of the USA?

Thursday, October 08, 2009

Health Care Has Problems

Former President Clinton and Dr. Francis Collins say that the DNA code is the language of God. Such a statement can be questioned because God is incomprehensible. We are limited (1) to knowing God’s existence and (2) gaining understandings of God.

Nicholas of Cusa discovered that God unifies many opposing concepts. For instance, he found that God is both maximum and minimum in all ways. So we can use the center and circumference of a circle to represent God. Our universe must then exist in between the center and circumference of a circle.

Other opposing concepts help us to gain understandings of God. For instance, I found that the concepts infinite and finite distinguish God from the universe in my scientific proof of God. The concepts identity and difference also help us distinguish God from the universe. Thus, identities will be found only in God and differences will be found only in the universe.

When the concepts identity and difference are applied, we find that DNA structures are not identical. Since no two things in the universe are identical, we must conclude that no two DNA structures are the same, that no two twin humans exist, that the same pill does not work for all humans, etc. Obviously, the way health care is given to us must be rethought by the U.S. government, our doctors, and the National Institutes of Health.

Wednesday, October 07, 2009

My Participation on The Reason Project

I have been making comments on on The Reason Project on the Internet. (click) Iam participating on this project as a defender of god against materialism and atheism and to defend the U.S. Declaration of Independence, to defend its first two paragraph, which defines the Union of all U.S. citizens, and to connect the Declaration of independence to the U.S. Constitution, as required by the two-party social contract of John Locke.

One series of comments dealt with the question "What should science do? Sam Harris v. Philip Ball." My personal participationn began with comment 145 and ended at comment 335. (click) As you will see, materialists and atheists seek full control of the discussion. of this question.

A second series of comments dealt with "The Strange Case of Francis Collins," who is being considered as the new leader of the National Institutes of Health. My personal participationn began with comment 228 and many comments are still being enteredg today. (click) As you will see, materialists and atheists also seek full control of the discussion of this case.

These two series are recorded in The Reason project and have recorded the most comments by far because of my activity to defend God and because I offer the first scientific proof of God. (click)

Monday, October 05, 2009

A Message From Sir James Jeans (Extracted from Anonymous comment in last blog)

Sir James Jeans, a physicist and mathematician who worked with astronomer Edwin Hubble (who discovered that our universe is expanding and was honored several years ago in having a well-known space telescope named after him), said, “The universe begins to look more like a great thought than a great machine. Mind no longer appears as an accidental intruder into the realm of matter; we are beginning to suspect that we ought rather to hail it as the creator and governor of the realm of matter….We discover that the universe shows evidence of a designing or controlling power that has something in common with our own individual minds….”

More and more information is being received at this website on the world in which we live. Certainly, this increasing information is lowering the human intererst in materialism and atheism. Instead, people are becoming more interested in God and the creation.

Friday, October 02, 2009

Important News

On the nightly TV news last evening and on the front page of most newspapers today, the remains of a female human being, Arti, was reported. This finding was made in Ethiopia, Africa and is said to be 4.4 million years old. I say that these paleontologists and anthropologists are on the wrong path of thought because they assume that materialism, atheism, evolutionary theory, and the big bang theory are true. But these assumptions are not only false. These assumptions also violate the U.S. founding documents.

On page 20 of my 2006 book, "The First Scientific Proof of God," I say that man has been developing symbolic languages for at least 4.4 million years. I conclude that the development of symbolic languages would not have been possible if humans had not been created by God with the ability to walk upright and God had given all humans a vocal tract that is consistent with the development symbolic languages and knowledge.

My conclusion above allowed me to agreed with the thoughts of Edmund Crelin (1923-2004) (click) and his 1987 book on "The Human Vocal Tract: Atonomy, Function, Development, and Evolution." (click)

Today’s paleontologists assume that humans and chimpanzees split from the last common ancestor (LCA) seven million years ago. They assume that these splits are caused by DNA changes. According to today’s cosmologists, the first common ancestor of everything is assumed to be a single big bang physical particle that explodes. None of these ungodly assumptions can be proven!!!! So, why are such assumptions accepted when the USA was founded as a nation under God.