Scientific Proof of God, A New and Modern Bible, and Coexisting Relations of God and the Universe

Friday, August 31, 2007

A Message to revs. Pike, Williamson, and Milroe, Mary O’Connor, and Greg Martinez

Thanks for your comments on the August 20, 2007 blog where we discussed ‘Negation vs. Logic.' As our discussions progressed, the diversity of our backgrounds caused all of us to come away from this discussion believing that nothing was accomplished with respect to increasing our knowledge of God. But, I believe that new knowledge of God is possible.

In his last communication, Greg Martinez said,

You say, "In other words, if you set out to prove the existence of entity X, you can't use any alleged attributes or qualities of entity X as input in your proof. People have been trying to explain this to you for over a year now, but judging by your answers you just don't seem to get it. I guess that (and the fact that you had never heard of the basic term 'non-sequitur') is why they call your mind untrained and undisciplined." First, I ask, "Is the concept non-sequitur something real?" Google's dictionary, for instance, does not carry the word 'sequitur.'

Second, I showed Greg how my scientific mind works. I say, "To move my mind into ‘the unknown,’ I take something positive with me. How can you take nothing into the unknown? When I take 'finite' with me, my mind has a specific 'beginning.' So, my mind is seeking an end. In this end it is seeking a new positive thing. In this specific beginning, I negate finite. In this beginning, my mind is moving away from finite. To move my mind, I negate finite and reveal not-finite. Not-finite is posited as an infinite thing. This new thing is a real infinity, not a mathematical infinity. This new thing is a positive thing and an end. Now, I can search for more unknowns. This time I will take 'infinite' with me. So I make a new beginning by negating 'infinite.' When infinite is negated, my mind has revealed a new positive thing named 'not-infinite.' (Its name could also be 'not-not-finite.') "

Then, I present a popular example --- how to quit smoking. I say, "if one wants to stop smoking, one must take the concept 'smoking' into the unknown of the smoker's mind. Otherwise, the smoker cannot get his or her mind to negate smoking." A smoker thus stops smoking by creating positive goals and achieving them. As the goals are achieved, smoking dies just like a negated bud dies when the bloom of the plant opens.

Further, I have started to study Friedrich Hegel. First, I will study "Hegel: The Essential Writings"by Frederick G. Weiss ($16) first. Then, I expect to study Hegel’s four writings. Hegel’s own writings will be tough. The writings of Nicholas of Cusa were also tough for me.. But, like my readings of Nicholas, my readings of Hegel will require a triple reading because the ‘symbolic language’ used by the big thinkers are tough and must be mastered first to comprehend their writings correctly. In the Introduction of Weiss’ book, I already learned that Hegel also uses the double negation. His point of departure into the unknown is the beginning and is the ‘negativity of the finite.’ So, at least two independent double negations have been used to find God. Interestingly, Karl Marx rejected Hegel’s double negation. But, Marx used a double negative to present his atheism.

Anonymous Comments

Some time ago I announced that I would not post anonymous comments on this website. I made this announcement because the purpose of this website is to discuss new scientific and theological material. This procedure has worked well. I do read anonymous comments but don’t post them. However, there have been rare exceptions, especially if a comment is dealing with scientific or theological material.

Last evening, I received two anonymous comments. One sought my mailing address. This information is not made available for many reasons. The second comment says that I might be defaming one or more atheists. I do say that thinking about atheism cannot be limited and believe that the practice of atheism can be limited by the US government because the USA is a nation under God. Accordingly, I have asked the US government to confirm these limits. I do not view my thought here as defaming thoughts. It is not my intent to defame any person who participates in the discussions on this website.. Their inputs to these discussion are necessary and too important because this is the only way humans can search for truths. In my search for truths, I openly share my negative opinions about atheism. These opinions are technical, not defaming, opinions. So, if the person who made the second comment provides me with more information on his or her inquiry, I will respond.

Wednesday, August 29, 2007

God’s Warriors by Christiane Amanpour (CNN), VI

Amanpour’s report on God’s Warriors on August 21, 22, and 23, 2007 informed us that two basic religions exist in the Western world. One is fundamental and the other is reforming (or moderate). A fundamental religion will fix the teachings of a religion. These teachings are based literal interpretations of scriptures. A reforming religion allows the religious teachings to change based on new interpretations of scriptures.

However, I conclude that a third basic religion is developing now. This religion will unify Science and Scriptures. I believe that this third religion will develop properly in the USA because the US Declaration of Independence is a law and mandates two basic laws --- the Laws of Nature and the Laws of Nature’s God. These basic laws deal respectively with natural philosophy and moral philosophy. The Laws of Nature will guide the development of all scientific endeavors whereas the Laws of Nature’s God will guide moralists. The Laws of Nature reveals Gods intelligent design whereas the Laws of Nature's God will reveal man's freedom and natural rights

Since, the Laws of Nature are the same in all nations, these laws will be the same for all religions. Unfortunately, the Laws of Nature’s God are not sought the same way in all nations because morals are assumed to be originated in cultural differences rather than God. So, the Laws of Nature’s God will not be the same in all religions. Here is the major problem in the field of religion.

The completed infinity of God will bring many new members to the third religion because the completed infinity of God rejects the idea that God is ‘in’ created things. A monotheistic God cannot be divided into parts or be exhausted. So, God will not be found in any finite thing. Thus, contrary to many religious teachings, God does not inspire scribes through His Spirit. But, God is not isolated. God is very active in the world He created. There are ways that God is able to know us, help us, and save us. In Part IIc of my book, I discuss these complex ways.

Tuesday, August 28, 2007

God’s Warriors by Christiane Amanpour (CNN), V

Amanpour’s report on God’s Warriors on August 21, 22, and 23, 2007 did not inform us about those warriors who view God’s infinity as a completed infinity. I did not expect her to deal with this subject because she had many other subjects to cover. So, let me discuss this subject in more detail here.

Currently, religions speak of an infinite God, but do not speak of God’s infinity as a completed infinity. So, today’s religions accept God’s infinity as the mathematical infinity, which is an indeterminate or uncompleted infinity. They accept this wrong infinity because mathematicians (and scientists) do not speak of a completed infinity. Thus, many scientists and mathematicians reject God, even though all sciences are failing today.

To my knowledge, only one religion is investigating the concept of infinity. This religion is the Catholic Church. This investigation was initiated by Pope Benedict. Earlier the Vatican said that science has a place in the church (AP, 11/04/05). I conclude that Benedict’s work is the continuation of the work of Pope John Paul II, who linked the Catholic Church to the field of science firmly by his 1992 apology of the imprisonment of Galileo.

The connection of all religions to science is necessary to stop the wars in our world. The earlier the connection of all religions is made, the earlier will today’s wars stop. And, if my proof of God becomes widelys accepted, the earlier the connection will be made between all sciences and all religions. It is now clear that the separation of State and Religion must be maintaind by a nation until Science and Religion have been unified worldwide.

Monday, August 27, 2007

God’s Warriors by Christiane Amanpour (CNN), IV

Amanpour’s report on God’s Warriors on August 21, 22, and 23, 2007 informed us that the Muslims are building democratic republics throughout the Middle East. These democratic republics are similar to the US democratic republic in that a monotheistic God, human liberty, and self-government are common to both. One difference is that a Muslim republic has only one religion, Islam, whereas the US republic tolerates all religions. A second difference is that social activities in a Muslim republic are more limited compared to the laissez-faire activities in the US republic. A third difference is the increased materialism of the US republic and the increased spiritualism of the Muslim republic. Increased materialism will place money above God whereas increased spiritualism will place God above money. Interestingly, both republics originate in the works of Moses in the first five books of the Old Testament. Judaism, Christianity, and Islam have thus developed together for a long time but have also become separated in recent times.

I conclude that the cause of their separation has occurred because these religions are not progressing properly. Without developing scientifically, today’s religions do not know the real God that today’s science is revealing. The point is that all of man’s knowledge cannot be extracted from past scriptures. Some of the truths in scriptures are lasting whereas others have short lives. Today’s science books are today’s scriptures. They have some lasting scientific truths. But, some of these truths will soon fade away. This is how man’s knowledge grows and how our consciousness is lifted to higher levels.

In his work, Nicholas of Cusa investigates the maximum of man’s knowledge. He found that the absolute maximum is also the absolute minimum. Since all opposites coincide in God, Nicholas finds that God in absolutely maximum and absolutely minimum. So, man’s knowledge is relativistic and has no end. So, science and scriptures work together, just like a water pump works to supply drinking water for a town of people. Science pumps knowledge out of the minds of scientists. This new knowledge is added to the existing knowledge of man.

Thus, today’s religions must pump the real truths out of their current scriptures. Then, new scriptures must be made with the new and current truths. This teaching is a daily effort at home, at school, and at work. This is the way I see the knowledge-building relationships among all sciences and all religions.

Sunday, August 26, 2007

God’s Warriors by Christiane Amanpour (CNN), III

This is the third blog on Amanpour’s report on God’s Warriors on August 21, 22, and 23, 2007. Her report makes me wonder about the future of the warriors of God and what the warriors of the religions of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam will be talking about thousands of years from now. Certainly, if these religions only studying their own scriptures and never study science, they will be arguing the same subjects forever and will be at war forever. So, I hope that all religions will open their minds soon to modern science and other scriptures.

Opening one’s mind beyond scriptures to the truths of science is important. Opening one’s mind to science is necessary because a monotheistic God cannot talk to someone in our finite world from His infinite world. The modern truth about God is that God has no telephone or discursive language. Based on the infinity of a monotheistic God, one can question the religious teaching that scriptural words have been communicated by God to man. If one accepts the completed infinity of a monotheistic God, a person might conclude that scriptural words are man-made and reflect only man’s knowledge about God at the time that a specific scripture was made.

I investigated the conclusion about man-made scriptures. As a Christian, I focused my investigation on the New Testament. My investigation is found in my book and concludes that the words in the New Testament have a divine origin. They have a divine origin because the ideas formed in the New Testament are highly futuristic. Further, these words are usually well beyond man’s thoughts at that time.

My earlier research on a monotheistic God did conclude that a modern monotheistic God is active and must thus appear in our finite world. Such appearances overcome the inability of God to communicate to us from His infinite world. God's appearance in our world also allows God's intelligent design to include freedom in His endless creation. The purpose of God's appearance is to teach man about the futuristic nature of the endless universe that God created for us. So, I conclude that the New Testament is a futuristic and divine scripture. Hopefully, other religions investigate their scriptures also because my research on a monotheistic God is consistent with the endless appearances of God in our endless world.

Saturday, August 25, 2007

God’s Warriors by Christiane Amanpour (CNN), II

Yesterday, I discussed Amanpour’s three reports on God’s Warriors on August 21, 22, and 23, 2007. In this discussion, I concluded that these warriors are confusing the Western world religions --- Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. I concluded that these confusions are caused by modern man’s development of new knowledge about a monotheistic God. We now know that only two worlds exist - God’s world and the universe. We also know that both are endless. One must thus ask new questions, for instance, ‘what really happens to a person after death.’

The popular teaching of ‘after life’ is that after death a person passes onto a higher world called Heaven or a lower world called Hell. This teaching about Heaven can be questioned because only God can live in the higher world. The teaching about Hell can also be questioned because a world lower than the world in which we live does not exist. Further, there is no world in between God’s world and the world in which we live. So, the teaching that God will reward and punish people can also be questioned.

My scientific proof of God explains the origin of all finite things we will find in the universe. The answer is that they have their origin in a monotheistic God whose infinity is determinate. God’s infinity is not the indeterminate infinity used by scientists and mathematicians to find the finite things in the universe. Judaism, Christianity, and Islam must learn about God infinity and the impact of God’s infinity on the universe and our lives.

In general, I believe that these three religions are becoming confused because they are paying attention to the ancient seekers of truth such as Moses but are not paying attention to the modern seekers of truth such as Nicholas of Cusa.

Friday, August 24, 2007

God’s Warriors by Christiane Amanpour (CNN), I

I hope you had a chance to watch Amanpour’s three reports on God’s Warriors on August 21, 22, and 23, 2007. I conclude that these warriors are confusing the Western world religions --- Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. These warriors are unaware that they are teaching falsities about God. False teachings are leading to the mass murder of people in all three religions. Based on what I heard in her reports, I now conclude that these murders will not stop unless the new information in my book about God is communicated to these warriors.

While all of these warriors seem to understand that God is one, none of them understand other truths that are now known about a monotheistic God. For instance, we now know that the infinity of a monotheistic God is a completed infinity. Scriptures do not reveal the nature of this infinity. And this completed infinity has never been known by most scientists. The completed infinity is new. Thus, this infinity will shake the thoughts in the temples, churches, and mosques violently.

The completed infinity distinguishes God completely from the universe. It is thus true that a higher world exists beyond the universe. This higher world is the world in which God is. Since it is impossible for any finite thing to be in God’s infinite world, after life is a subject that must be rethought. The completed infinity also tells us that God and the universe have always been together. The universe thus had no beginning in time and thus cannot have an end. So, God is active forever, which means that we are here forever. As seen, the discovery of God’s completed infinity reveals many new truths.

I thus ask, "How can these warriors continue to murder humans, when they know very few truths about God?" Anyway, aren't these murders a crime against humanity? If so, they should be brought to the attention of the International Criminal Court. (click)

Wednesday, August 22, 2007

Atheism Is Destroying the US Fields of Science and Mathematics

As I said in my August 2, 2007 blog, atheism began to grow in the USA when Madalyn Murray O’ Hair won her Supreme Court case to remove prayers from public schools. This decision was in favor of the Constitution and the separation of State and Religion as mandated but was against the mandates we find in the Declaration of Independence on God. Since then, many US citizens, especially those in the newer generations, became atheists.

Young atheists, who became scientists and mathematicians, thought that they could develop new sciences and mathematics. They saw it as a ‘piece of cake,’ even saying that science would be completed soon. This kind of thinking became serious in the 1970s, after the US landed on the moon. Many of these new atheists contributed to the progress of the USA by transferring the new technologies of the space program to our citizens. This transfer peaked in the late 1980s with the Internet and personal computers. At the same time, other atheists sought government funds for godless research projects. They sought such funds because government agencies thought that God-research projects could not be funded by government. This is an error. While the Constitution separates State and Religion, it does not separate State and God. The concepts, religion and God, do not have the same meaning. So the US government has been thus violating the Declaration of Independence ever since the Dred Scott Supreme Court decision in 1857.

Today, scientists and mathematicians say that they can develop new sciences and mathematics without God. I have tried to inform them that God is necessary to build knowledge in all fields of thought. (See my Amazon book reviews on the books published on godless projects.) (click) Their error is proven by their failures to produce any major new science projects, ever since our retired scientists and mathematicians learned how to land on the moon. Essentially, the fields of science and mathematics in the USA are being destroyed by atheism.

Monday, August 20, 2007

Atheists Seem to be Very Active Criminals in the USA. When Will They be Caught?

In my hometown newspaper today, I saw two atheistic reports. One says "Scientists can’t define life, but they can tinker with it." The other report is a sidebar and says "Success to create life likely in 3 to 10 years.’ In a nation under God, this article is ‘sales material.’ In a nation under God, man-made life is impossible.

Such reports can be found in the newspapers and magazines of the USA over the last forty years. Such articles show how people have been seeking funds from the US government and do receive taxpayer funds with ease from the many agencies that exist in the US government.

These agencies are authorized by the US government to fund atheistic projects but are not allowed to fund theistic projects. Theistic projects are not authorized because the Constitution separates State and Religion. Yet, the US government does fund atheistic projects, even thought the USA is a nation under God, as mandated in the Declaration of Independence. So, even though the USA was founded as a nation under God, the people who work in the US government do not enforce the nation’s obedience to God. By not enforcing the mandate of the Declaration of Independence, the US government promotes atheism and it growth.

When will atheism be removed from the USA? It seems that the US government has removed God from the USA while simultaneously allowing atheism to flourish. How can the US government secure the citizens of the USA by allowing atheism to exist and sell it?

Negation vs. Logic

This response by me below to Rev. Edward Pike on the August 19, 2007 blog on the subject "Rebellion to Tyrants is Obedience to God" could be helpful to others who might miss Pike’s comment,

My Response
When my mind leaves the universe, it enters God's world. My mind can work this way because all things in the universe have a common attribute. The common attribute is the symbol "finite." To enter God's world, I begin my thinking about God by thinking about this symbol.

Plato taught us how to use the symbol 'not' correctly in his Sophist at 257b. To use the symbol 'not,' Plato says that 'not' takes our mind to something different, not to something contrary. If "not" moved the mind to something contrary, a logical relation would be created. Logic cannot lead our minds to God.

I use the symbols "not" as Plato teaches because the symbol "not" leads the mind to positive things rather than contrary things. So, when I use the symbol "not", I am using a process that God wants us to use in our minds. This process in our mind is known as "negation." So, when I bring the symbol "not" and the symbol "finite" together, I create a third symbol. It is written as not_finite. Here is the origin of the new word we write as "infinite." Since this new word is something positive, we can create logical thoughts. For instance, the symbol infinite and finite allow us to form a pair of logically related opposites. As seen, the process of negation must precede all logical thinking. Atheists think about logic first and do not think about God at all.

The third symbol is a completed infinity. Since it is a positive thing, it is an attribute of God. This third symbol is not identical to the infinity used by scientists and mathematics. The infinity they use is a bad or mathematical infinity. Scientists and mathematicians use uncompleted infinities and should be called 'finite infinities."

To reveal God, my mind must rise to the highest level of thought. I rise to this level by negating all finite and all infinite things. This second or double negation reveals God. Nicholas of Cusa, Hegel, and I thus see God as "the coincidence of all opposites."

As you see, God creates the universe out of nothing. Also notice that the universe consists of a set of positive wholes. This set of wholes and the nature of its changes is the intelligent design of God. My modern creation theory is thus our best knowledge of God's intelligent design at this time.

Sunday, August 19, 2007

Rebellion To Tyrants Is Obedience To God

The title of this blog is found on the reverse side of the seal of the United States of America. This seal was ordered by the founders on July 4, 1776, the same day that the Declaration of Independence was signed, printed, and issued. These words mean that the USA will obey God, will not be ruled by any human, and will be self-governed. This self-government is a government of the people, by the people, and for the people.

The USA founding was guided by the first self-government, which was created by Moses. See "The Origin Of Republican Form of Government In The United States Of America" (1926) by Oscar S. Straus (Kessinger Publisher. (click) This work of Moses is known today as the Hebrew Commonwealth and is described in the first five books of the Old Testament. The Jews made a major error in developing this self-government by allowing kings to rule them.

The USA is also making errors in the development of its self-government. The first error by government was to authorize slavery. I argue that other errors are occurring. These errors of government are atheism, abortion, political parties, laissez-faire economics, free trade, wealth accumulations, land management, and debt management. Other major government errors today are found in government funding of godless sciences such as medical research, big bang theory, string theory and Darwin’s evolution. Government is also funding godless mathematics. Government is also making errors because it does not consider God, and new knowledge of God, in any of its agencies.

Since the USA is a nation under God, atheism is an inappropriate philosophy. Thus, atheism cannot be practiced. Further, in the USA, State and Religion are separated. This means that governmnet cannot establish a State religion. But separation also means that government, and
all citizens, must tolerate all religions. Accordingly, the activities for atheism by the atheist, Sam Harris, seems illegal. His idea of building a foundation for the Darwinist and atheist, Richard Dawkins, also seems illegal. Further, Harris' book on a "Letter to a Christian Nation' also seems unconstitutionsl because he is not tolerating Christianity. He says, on p. ix, that he wants to demolish the intellectual and morals pretensions of Christianity.

Saturday, August 18, 2007

Do Atheists Believe That the World Was Made at Their Birth?

My answer to this question is is ‘yes’ because many atheists seem to be ignorant of the history of the United Sates and the link of the founding of the United States to the work of Moses. Although all people must die, the thoughts of people do not die. For instance, in his review of my book, the atheist, J. Casador of Las Cruces, NM says,

"It appears the he takes notable names from the past scientific community and long dead philosophers and mixes their theories and ideas up with Christian Bible passages to produce a body of knowledge that lacks any reasoning."

Atheists are unaware of man’s long and continuous search for liberty through developments such as (1) the Hebrew Commonwealth, (2) Plato’s republic with a philosopher/king, (3) the liberation of nations by Alexander the Great, (4) the formation of civil liberty laws by Solon and Lycurgus, (5) and the development of different republics in Greece, Rome, Venice, Holland and England, and (6) the New 1776 Political Experiment of the United states of America.

It is clear that Casador never read my book because I unify theology and science using the works of Abraham, Moses, Plato, Aristotle, Jesus Christ, Nicholas of Cusa, Gottfried Leibniz, Georg Cantor, and other modern scientists. This unification makes new knowledge available on God’s intelligent design and the creation. My unification of theology and science connect to the New 1776 Political Experiment of the United States and allows me to suggest a new world peace.

Obviously, the review of my book by Casador has nothing to do with the contents of my book. Thus, Casador’s recommendation, "I would not recommend this book to anyone. You would have better luck attempting to prove any gods existence staring directly into the sun," is dishonest.

Friday, August 17, 2007

Table of Contents of "The First Scientific Proof of God"

Part I - A New Story on Knowledge
Chapter 1:The First Scientific Proof of God’s Existence
Chapter 2:Two Basic Tools of Knowledge
Chapter 3:Knowledge Begins With Mythical Cultures
Chapter 4:Knowledge Becomes Formal
Chapter 5:The Problem of Knowledge in the Physical and Life Sciences
Chapter 6:Seeking Truths
Relative and Absolute Truths
Using Opposites (or Dipolar Concepts)
Are Absolute Truths Found in Scriptures?

Part IIa - Nicholas of Cusa: The First Modern Scientist
Chapter 1:The False Good/Evil Religious Dualism
Chapter 2:The True Religious Dualism
Chapter 3:An Introduction to Nicholas of Cusa
Chapter 4:A Critique of Positive Theology
Chapter 5:Two Major Ideas in Negative Theology
God Is Maximum and Minium
Images of God
Chapter 6:The Art of Conjecturing
Conjecture on Numbers
Conjecture on Actual/Possible
Conjecture On the Not-Other
Chapter 7:The Aftermath of Nicholas of Cusa

Part IIb -The Trinity, Holy Ghost and Jesus Christ
Chapter 1:The Trinity: A Tool of Our Minds
Chapter 2:The Holy Ghost
Chapter 3: Jesus Christ
A World Class Teacher
The Cycles of Christ’s Work
Christ’s Mind is Divine
Scientific Evidence of the Divinity of Christ
Jesus Taught the Cause of Crime

Part IIc - God and Man Communications
Chapter 1:The Problem of Communications
Chapter 2:Three Ways God and Man Communicate

Part III - On World Theories
Chapter 1:Introduction to World Theories
Chapter 2:World Theories in the Field of Physics
Chapter 3:Biological Evolutionary Theory

Part IV - God’s Intelligent Design
Chapter 1:Moses, Plato, Leibniz, and Georg Cantor
Gottfried Leibniz and Monadology
Georg Cantor and the Transfinite Numbers
Chapter 2:Man’s Past Is a Path to Hell
Chapter 3:Conceiving God’s Intelligent Design
Chapter 4:Adjusting All Nations to God’s Intelligent Design

Reviews of My Book by Five Atheists

Book reviews by five atheists of my book, ---The First Scientific Proof of God --- are shown below. These book reviews are found at I show these reviews here so you can compare the contents of these reviews easily with the Table of Contents of my book, which I present in the blog above. According to Amazon's review guidelines, a book review is expected to address the contents of a book. Amazon did remove the reviews of Bask, utahrc, and bookjunky. But these three atheists resubmitted their reviews. These resubmissions frustrated Amazon because its cost of reviewing book reviews became too high after Amazon's book sales grew. So, Amazon no longer previews the book reviews that it advertises for sales. The atheists are thus taking advantage of this weakness in the Amazon book review process. Note. The atheists also vote for each other's book review.

As one can see in the Table of Contents of my book, all five book reviews have nothing to do with the contents of my book. The purpose of these atheistic book reviews was only to stop the propagation of this important book to Americans. So, US government and citizens must become aware of the games that US atheists are playing. They do not tolerate religions at all. And, they hate scientists like me who are conducting research on the theory of God and a theory that could unite theology and science.

All five atheists seemed to have motives other than reviewing the contents of my book. But, I have learned recently that the practice of atheism is unlawful in the USA. So, their book reviews might be viewed as criminal activities by the Department of Justice. We will see.

Garbage, Mull and more Mull, June 28, 2007
By J. Casador (Las Cruces, NM United States)
I found this book has a paucity of anything scientific. It lacks any scientific evidence, supporting data, let alone PROOF of anything. It appears the he takes notable names from the past scientific community and long dead philosophers and mixes there theories and ideas up with Christian Bible passages to produce a body of knowledge that lacks any reasoning.

I would not recommend this book to anyone. You would have better luck attempting to prove any gods existence staring directly into the sun.

Not even wrong, June 2, 2007
By G. klooster "TheOne" (Europe)
The Austrian physicist Wolfgang Pauli once said that certain theories or theses are so unclearly presented as to be untestable or unevaluatable, and thus not properly belonging within the realm of science, even though posing as such. They are worse than wrong because they can not be proven wrong. Famously, he once said of such an unclear paper: "It is not even wrong." (source: wikipedia)

The First Scientific Proof of God fits this description perfectly: while citing the names of numerous real scientists and philosophers, George Shollenberger manages to break the record of the number of non-sequiturs per page and to present it as a proof of the existence of God.

So be warned: this book lacks everything that is commonly considered to be essential to any proof: logic, scientific rigor and common sense.

No proof, no science, no logic, May 20, 2007
By Dauby Bask
This must be one of the strangest books I have ever read - and one of the worst. Although I don't hold a belief in any deity, alleged proofs of the existence of the Christian God have always interested me because they are at least a rational, philosophical attempt at explaining the supernatural. Some of these proofs have been rather sophisticated, like Aquinas' cosmological argument, while others fail to meet even the lowest standard of logic. Needless to say, Mr. Shollenberger's book falls in the latter category.

Unlike what one might have expected, his book doesn't contain a long series of arguments which towards the last few chapters lead up to only one possible conclusion: God exists. Quite the contrary, the First Scientific Proof of God (for some reason Mr. Shollenberger always capitalizes these words) is already delivered on page 6 (Part I, Chapter 1) and is very short:

"Using the symbols, finite and infinite, God's existence can be expressed with the following statement: all finite things are originated by an infinite thing. This statement contains sense-data which means 'all finite things.' And, this sense-data is explained by the theory -- all finite things are originated by an infinite thing. God's existence is proven if God is that infinite thing. This data and theory satisfy the two-step method of proof known as the scientific method of proof. The proof that God is that infinite thing uses the dictionary definition of the symbols, finite and infinite, and rejects the use of the mathematical indefinite in determining the meaning of the infinite in the above statement."

The density of non-sequiturs is so high and the assertions are so outlandish as to boggle the mind. Why would all finite things have to be originated by an infinite thing? Who says that the word sense-data means all finite things? What does Mr. Shollenberger mean by saying that "this sense-data is explained by the theory -- all finite things are originated by an infinite thing"? Doesn't he understand that he presupposes what he sets out to prove by writing "God's existence is proven if God is that infinite thing"? Etcetera etcetera.

All these questions remain unanswered in his book. Mr. Shollenberger doesn't have a high opinion of logic. He claims to have risen above it; otherwise he wouldn't have been able to deliver his proof. So much for its alleged scientific qualities... He doesn't seem aware of the huge epistemological problems that arise when one, whether consciously or not, abandons the use of logic. How can we gauge the validity of a philosophical or scientific claim without the use of logic?

Among all his other highly peculiar claims, one definitely stands out: in the first part of his book he asserts that there are two symbolic languages: scientific languages and talk languages. If I understand him correctly (which is very difficult due to his lack of logical skills and his many grammar and spelling mistakes), he seems to think that scientists use a language that is completely different from our everyday language. Unfortunately, he doesn't give so much as a hint as to the nature of these differences.

Furthermore, he claims that the English language is poor compared to the German language, because it is weakened by "Aristotle logic" and affects the human mind negatively, and that the German language is strong thanks to Plato's use of logic. Again, no examples whatsoever are given to illustrate these bizarre claims.

I'll leave it at this. Anyone interested in the wondrous workings of the human mind should by all means buy Mr, Shollenberger's 'proof'. I will consider it a valuable contribution to my collection of books on the flat earth, shape-shifting reptiles and Atlantis.

Awful, May 14, 2007
By utahrc
This book is very poorly written, with grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors so pervasive as to distract from whatever point he may be trying to make. This is ironic given one of the primary premises of the book is that human language is incapable of adequately communicating certain concepts. The author's obvious lack of language skill should make anyone question his qualification to criticize language.

His claim on having a "scientific proof of God" requires that science be redefined as something which no scientist would recognize. Indeed, the author believes that all fields of science and mathematics have to change once exposed to this book. As with the claim about language, this claim is rather dubious given his obvious deficiency of knowledge about science or mathematics as presently practiced.

Badly written pseudoscience, July 22, 2006
By bookjunky
This is badly-written pseudoscience composed with a complete disdain for the scientific process. No peer reviews of this work exist. The "proof" consists of assertion piled upon assertion with no actual scientific process to back it up, relying instead on ancient philosophers and the Bible. Even creationists and Christians would have to find this "support" embarrassing. Don't waste your money on this.

Wednesday, August 15, 2007

Crime Against US Citizens

Human rights have been expanding throughout the world because the idea of ‘governing by rulers’ is no longer a godly form of government to build. Perhaps, Plato’s king-philosopher is the only kind of ruling government that will deliver natural freedom. As time passes, a major goal of all humans is to create a society that self-governs, a government of, by, of, and for people. The first modern self-government is the New 1776 Political Experiment of the American colonists.

As man has developed these different societies, undesirable human behaviors also developed. In the ancient period, these behaviors became known as evils. Today, they are known as crimes. Evils (or crimes) are punishable because such behaviors violate the civil laws of these societies. More recently, war crimes and crimes against humanity have led to new laws. Further, the expansion of human rights is leading to new laws and their associated crimes. By expanding rights, people are seeking greater degrees of self_determination.

The New 1776 Political Experiment began with the founding laws of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. Congress also made new laws. Crimes also emerged with the founding and new laws of the USA. One crime was slavery, which violated the Declaration of Independence and its statement --- all Men are created equal. This law was enforced during the Lincoln presidency. Other crimes have occurred against the Unites States and its citizens. But, the laws against these crimes are not enforced by government and its agencies.

Atheism is the most deadly crime against the USA and its citizens because it has turned the thoughts of many fields and citizens away from God. According to the Declaration of Independence and Constitution, atheism is a crime. Yet, this crime is not being enforced by any US government agency. However, since the 1970s, atheism has virtually destroyed every science. It even says that God is not needed to build mathematics. Atheism has also destroyed the arts and sciences related to music, book writing, TV productions, and Hollywood movies. And, it is destroying the Internet. To destroy the sciences, mathematics, music, book publishing, TV, and Hollywood in the same nation is a new crime against humanity.

Action on this new crime against humanity by the US government must become a very high priority.

Sunday, August 12, 2007

Crimes Against the United States

As the blogger of this website, on August 2, 2007 I began to discuss the United States since its beginning on July 4, 1776. In these discussions, I speak of this new nation as the New 1776 Political Experiment. This experiment develops a nation of self-governing citizens who are expected to form a more perfect Union under God.

In 1980, in the search for the root cause of crime at the US Department of Justice, I increased my participation in the development of the new experiment in my private life by studying the 15th century negative theology of Nicholas of Cusa. This study led to many new studies over a 25-year period. In June 2006, I published my study results in a book --- The First Scientific Proof of God: Reveals God’s Intelligent Design and a Modern Creation Theory.

This book is very advanced and speeds the development of the new experiment. It presents a scientific proof of God and new spiritual atoms for use by scientists and theologians. The book also shows government how to propagate the new experiment to all nations. It can unify religions, prevent wars, bring the Iraq War to an end, and can end terrorism and crimes.

However, the information in my book is not being communicated to the US government or to US citizens because atheists interfered with the free propagation of this book in the US economy. The motive of this interference is to destroy the belief in God in the USA so that atheism and Darwinism will increase. Based on my experience with atheists, I conducted research on the laws of the USA and concluded that all practices of atheism in the USA are crimes against the United States of America.

The practice of atheism in the USA has not only affected the propagation of valuable information in my book. Atheists are have had negative effects on all physical sciences and life sciences. The progress of these sciences are essentially stopped. Atheists are having negative effects on many other fields of thought such as the field of entertainment. If allowed to continue, atheists could end the New 1776 Political Experiment and transform the United States into a godless nation in which human rights are man-made.

If you are aware of other atheistic practices against the United States, you, or your organization, you should contact the Attorney General of the US Department of Justice. Please feel to use or reference to my discussions beginning on August 2, 2007 on the history and developoment of United States.

Saturday, August 11, 2007

The Origin of Republican Form of Government in the United States of America

The title of this blog is also the title of a 150-page ($15.61) book from Its author is Oscar S.. Straus. The Introduction is by Emile de Laveleye. Its date in 1926 . I recommend that thus book be read by every American since it explains the origin of the American revolution and the connection of the United States to teachings in the Bible.

The US revolution was not the first in the world. It was preceded by the Revolution of 1688 in England and revolutions in Greece, Rome, Carthage, Switzerland, and Holland. The purpose of the 1688 revolution in England was to secure definite constitutional rights for the English people. The American revolution was initiated because the people in England had more rights than England’s government gave the American colonists.

The American colonists sought ‘equal rights,’ the same rights that English citizens received. Interestingly, the idea of equal rights is originated in the Bible. It is found in the teaching that all men descended from Adam and Eve. This teaching says that all men are free, equal, and brothers. This biblical teaching is found in the Declaration of Independence in the statement ‘that all Men are created equal.

Thus, the American colonists had to create a ‘new society’ and a ‘new government.’ Nothing else was new in the American revolution. The inclusion of God in the Declaration of Independence and the constitution was thus not new. The USA is just another nation under God. For thus reason, the practice of atheism is the USA and all of the preceding revolutions are illegal.

Clearly, God and freedom are inseparable ideas in any advancing nation. Thus, a godless world consisting of free humans is an irrational thought. A godless world is a pure machine that has no living things. Atheism is thus illegal in a godly nation for rational reasons.

Friday, August 10, 2007

Society and Government Were Not Distinguished Properly by the US Supreme Court

A society is a voluntary association of individuals who have common ends. Societies are natural things because man cannot live alone without the security furnished by a society. It was correct to say long ago that man is a ‘social animal.’ At this time, every society needs a government. Unfortunately, the current needs for governments cause some people to conclude that society and government are the same thing. This is not true.

In his Common Sense, Thomas Paine says, ‘Some writers have so confounded society with government, as to leave little or no distinction between them; whereas they are not only different, but have different origins. Society is produced by our wants and government by our wickedness; the former promotes our happiness positively by uniting our affections, the latter negatively by restraining our vices. The one encourages intercourse whereas the other creates distinctions. The first is a patron, the last a punisher. Society in every state is a blessing, but government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil, ..." Paine concludes that humans must surrender part of their property to government for security means only because evils exist. It thus follows that if evils are reduced dramatically, societies will require reduced governments. And, if evils are eliminated, government will not be necessary.

Clearly, society and government are distinct things. This is why the founders made the ‘USA society’ with the Declaration of Independence and the ‘USA society’ made the US government with the Constitution. It should also be clear that the Declaration of Independence is the highest law in the body of US laws.

When the US Supreme Court does not use the Declaration of Independence in its judicial decisions, the ‘USA society’ cannot perfect itself or help other nations. By not causing the USA society to perfect itself, the US government became more and more evil itself. A growing spiral of evilness seems to be occurring in the US government. A feedback of evilness, from the US government to the US citizens, might thus be predictable.

Thursday, August 09, 2007

The New 1776 Political Experiment and Civil Responsibilities

On July 20, 1969, the first generation astronauts landed on the moon. Last evening, a new generation of astronauts were boosted into space. This trip into space required improvements in rocket booster and the spacecraft so that the astronauts would be returned to planet earth safely with certainty. This landing, these space trips, and such improvements are part of the continuous development of the founding of the USA and the New 1776 Political Experiment, which is defined by the Declaration of Independence and Constitution. Obviously, during their lives, all US citizens are part of this continuous development of the USA. This development will form a more perfect Union as mandated in the Preamble of the Constitution. So, all US citizens have civil responsibilities to the USA. Stated differently, the USA is neither a ‘free for all’ nation nor a ‘laissez-faire’ nation.

However, the development of the New 1776 Political Experiment has been corrupted by rulings of the US Supreme Court. As a result of these rulings, freedom has expanded to the point where citizens no longer accept any civil responsibilities. Many of them do not even obey US laws. Because their unawareness of the New 1776 Political Experiment and unawareness of the nature of the USA, as defined in the Declaration, these irresponsible citizens feel free to live a life of their personal choice.

Because of these corrupted rulings and the expansion of freedom, some citizens have chosen the useless life of crime, alcoholism, prostitution, or gambling while other citizens have chosen the useless life of atheism, abortion, wealth, homosexuality, or immoralities. Further, many of our new scientists had become atheists in the 1970s and had chosen a life that has no God. Today, we are receiving bad news about the failures of their costly scientific projects. Rejecting God and practicing the opposite, atheism, is an outright violation of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. Unfortunately, these corrupt Supreme Court rulings have also forced some citizens into undesirable lives such as poverty, disability, and mental illness. To say that all men are created equal does not mean thatt all men are created with choices. It is not true that some men are created slaves or created poor people.

Fortunately, many citizens know that life in the New 1776 Political Experiment is not a matter of free choices. These citizens recognize this truth and have chosen a life of responsibility by becoming educated, finding useful careers, serving the government, or serving the USA militarily.

Isn’t it time for the US Supreme Court to be reformed and irresponsible citizens to accept their civil responsibilities?

Wednesday, August 08, 2007

The New 1776 Political Experiment, What It Is, and Why the US Supreme Court Doesn't Understand It

The phrase "New 1776 Political Experiment" was created by me to help people understand the actions that the American colonists had taken in 1776 to separate the American colony from Great Britain. This separation required war. Thus, the Revolutionary War had to be initiated and was authorized by the colonists with the Declaration of Independence.

However, the Declaration of Independence had another purpose. Unfortunately, US lawyers and judges at the US Supreme Court do not seem to understand this other purpose. The other purpose had to define the political system that could develop a perfect form of ' freedom' for its citizens. Long before 1776, England's John Locke had distinguished man's social freedom from man's natural freedom. Of these two forms of freedom, man's natural freedom is greatest but offers no protection of life. On the other hand, social freedom is reduced but provides it people protection with laws and law enforcement. Today, different nations provide different degrees of social freedom for their citizens.

To prevent the ruling by dictators, monarchies, or oligarchies, the American colonists decided to replace the old dualism, ruled/ruler, with Locke's the new dualism, governed/governing. The new dualism is a 'self-governing' system in which the people of a nation self-governs. Locke's new dualism originates in the development of social contract theory. His social contract theory requires two contracts. The first agreement is between 'all of the people' of a nation. This agreement creates 'society' (or the governed) and is defined in the Declaration of Independence. The second agreement creates 'government' (or the governing) and is defined by the Constitution.

The US Supreme Court is making major mistakes because it does not seem to understand the New 1776 Political Experiment. For instance, the Court does not understand that the the first paragraph, the second paragraph, and the last sentence in the Declaration of Independence defines the first agreement among 'all of the people.' Since the colonists created a society under God, the mistakes of the Court have confused the people unnecessarily. People must accept the natural fact that 'all people make mistakes.' All people must learn to admit their errors so that others can forgive them and move forward.

Tuesday, August 07, 2007

US Students Notice the Dishonesty in the US Supreme Court

Article IV, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution states, “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature can-not be convened) against domestic Violence.”

This provision, known as the guarantee clause, is attributed to James Madison. It has not been widely interpreted. Scholars think it ensures that each state be run as a representative democracy, as opposed to a monarchy (run by a king or queen) or a dictatorship (where one individual or group of individuals controls the government).

Courts however have been reluctant to specify what exactly a republican form of government means, leaving that decision exclusively to Congress. (Click)

The above Supreme Court decision says that it does not known anything about the New 1776 Political Experiment. Without this knowledge, the US Supreme Court transformed the United States from the Lockean social contract 'civil society' to the Lockean social contract 'political society.' This transformation returns the USA to the ruled/ruler dualism and destroys the governed/governing dualism, which is a self-government.

See,, The United States Constitution, what it says, what it means, A Hip Pocket Guide (Oxford University Press) .

The New 1776 Political Experiment in the USA Has Been Destroyed by the US Supreme Court

My research on "The Declaration of Independence and the New 1776 Political Experiment" (my August 2, 2007 blog) has led me to learn more about the history of government. My research is now focused on the phrase --- republican form of government. (click), (Click) , (Click), (click), (Click) This phrase is found in the US Constitution Article IV, Section 4. It says, "The United States shall guarantee to every State in the Union a Republican Form of Government, ..." A recent book can be found on on "The Origin of Republican Form of Government in the United States." (Click)

I conclude that the concept ‘Republican Form of Government’ is identical to the concept ‘New 1776 Political Experiment’ in my August 2nd blog. If my conclusion is correct, the Declaration of Independence has authorities well beyond the authority of starting the Revolutionary War as I said in this blog. So, Abe Lincoln was thus correct when he in questioned the US Supreme Court Dred Scott decision to make slavery legal. The Dred Scott decision was a big mistake of the US Supreme Court.

It is clear that the US Supreme Court did not interpret the Declaration of Independence clause ‘that all Men are created equal’ properly on the Dred Scott decision. But, how many decisions has the Supreme Court made by not considered other statements in the Declaration of Independence? For instance, the Roe v. Wade decision in favor of abortion violates the same clause in the Declaration of Independence.

Clearly, the US Supreme has been legislating rather than judging for a long time. However, by legislating and not considering other clauses of the Declaration of Independence, it is now clear that the Supreme Court has removed God from the USA, destroyed the republican form of government, destroyed the New 1776 Political Experiment, and destroying our freedom. The US Supreme Court is a disaster. Apparently, the development of the New 1776 Political Experiment has met with many scoundrels. (Click) The US Supreme Court seems to be like today's forms of terrorism.

Sunday, August 05, 2007

Enforcing the US Declaration of Independence

In the August 2, 2007 blog on the Declaration of Independence and the New 1776 Political Experiment, I concluded that the practice of atheism in the USA is illegal. Then, in the August 4, 2007 blog, I brought to your attention words of President Abe Lincoln on the purpose of Declaration of Independence and how the Declaration was misinterpreted by the 1857 Supreme Court decision on Dred Scott. This blog shows that the illegal practice of atheism was enforced for the first time when Lincoln initiated the Civil War to deny slavery.

On August 2, 2007, I sent my thoughts on "The Declaration of Independence and the New 1776 Political Experiment’ also to President Bush, Chief Justice Roberts, my two Senators, Byrd and Rockefeller, and my Representative, Capito. Hopefully, they act to correct the errors associated with the past law enforcement of the Declaration of Independence. Perhaps, a special enforcement agency might be necessary.

Atheism seems to be practiced illegally more often than people realize today. I believe that atheistic practices have much to do with the general degeneration of morals in the USA. For instance, in my efforts to develop new knowledge about God and of God’s existence, a small group of atheists impeded my efforts to propagate this new knowledge to other Americans. These atheists did not obey corporate decisions and did not prove that my proof of God was false. Atheists also seem to be impeding the flow of new knowledge about God into the public schools. So, US citizens must begin to report all violations of the Declaration of Independence by atheists.

Remember that human freedom is not absolute. Our freedom is something that can increase and grows only through civil laws.

Saturday, August 04, 2007

The Declaration of Independence Does Have Purposes Beyond Authorizing the Revolutionary War

Below are Abe Lincoln’s words on the purpose of the Declaration of Independence (In the Dred Scott Decision and the Declaration of Independence)

Abe Lincoln said,
I have now briefly expressed my view of the meaning and object of that part of the Declaration of Independence which declares that "all men are created equal."

Now let us hear Judge Douglas" view of the same subject, as I find it in the printed report of his late speech. Here it is:

No man can vindicate the character, motives, and conduct of the signers of the Declaration of Independence except upon the hypothesis that they referred to the white race alone, and not to the African, when they declared all men to have been created equal; that they were speaking of British subjects on this continent being equal to British subjects born and residing in Great Britain; that they were entitled to the same inalienable rights, and among them were enumerated life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The Declaration was adopted for the purpose of justifying the colonists in the eyes of the civilized world in withdrawing their allegiance from the British Crown and dissolving their connection with the mother country.

My good friends, read that carefully over some leisure hour and ponder well upon it; see what a mere wreck__mangled ruin__it makes of our once glorious Declaration.

"They were speaking of British subjects on this continent being equal to British subjects born and residing in Great Britain!" Why, according to this, not only Negroes but white people outside of Great Britain and America were not spoken of in that instrument. The English, Irish, and Scotch, along with white Americans, were included, to be sure, but the French, Germans, and other white people of the world are all gone to pot along with the judge"s inferior races! I had thought the Declaration promised something better than the condition of British subjects; but no, it only meant that we should be equal to them in their own oppressed and unequal condition. According to that, it gave no promise that, having kicked off the king and lords of Great Britain, we should not at once be saddled with a king and lords of our own.

I had thought the Declaration contemplated the progressive improvement in the condition of all men everywhere; but no, it merely "was adopted for the purpose of justifying the colonists in the eyes of the civilized world in withdrawing their allegiance from the British Crown and dissolving their connection with the mother country." Why, that object having been effected some eighty years ago, the Declaration is of no practical use now: mere rubbish, old wadding left to rot on the battlefield after the victory is won.

Thursday, August 02, 2007

On the Declaration of Independence Below

I worked on the posting below when I took some rest this summer. It is an important blog because it confirms what many other people have been saying --- that the US Supreme Court has changed its function in the US governmnet from 'judging' to 'legislating.'

This blog information has been also sent to the President, Congress, and the Supreme Court. Since I expect this blog to raise many comments, I will not do any new posting this summer.

The Declaration of Independence and the New 1776 Political Experiment

When the USA was founded in 1776, a new political experiment was installed. This new experiment originated in England by John Locke. His work developed a social contract theory. His new experiment would change the old ruled/ruler political dualism to the new governed/governing dualism. The new dualism focuses on increasing the freedom of man through laws. To create the new dualism, two social contracts had to be created. The first contract defined ‘the governed’ in the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776. The second contract defined ‘the governing’ in the Articles of Confederation on July 9, 1776, which was improved with the Constitution in 1787.
Unfortunately, the new dualism is not developing properly in the USA because the function of Declaration of Independence was thought not to have any future purposes after it authorized the Revolutionary War. The author corrects this thought.

I. The Declaration of Independence: A Letter to the Editor

Below is a Letter to the Editor of The Journal, Martinsburg, WV on mistakes that the US Government is making at the Supreme Court on ruling, which eliminate the Declaration of Independence from the body of US laws. The letter was published on July 25, 2007.

Supreme Court Ruling a Mistake.
The US Supreme Court ruled that the Declaration of Independence is not a law. This rule is an error.

The USA is a new political experiment and became ‘the governed vs. the governing.’ The old political philosophy was known as ‘the ruled vs. the rulers.’ In his social contract theory, John Locke identified this new experiment as a civil society. His social contract theory is found in his "The Second Treatise of Government" and requires two contracts. The first was identified in the US Declaration of Independence. It is an agreement among the governed States. This contract creates Locke’s ‘society.’ The second was identified in the US Constitution. This is an agreement between the governed and the governing and creates Locke’s ‘government.’

Locke’s ‘society’ and ‘government’ came into existence together and form a whole, which is an indivisible Union. In the new experiment, all US citizens in the ‘society’ share their God-given rights with the ‘government.’ In Section 87 of the Treatise, Locke says, ‘Those who are united into one body and have a common established law and judicature to appeal to, with authority to decide controversies between them and punish offenders, are in civil society one with another; ..."

By excluding the first contract from the body of US laws, the Supreme Court destroyed the ‘society.’ Essentially, its error destroyed the new experiment and caused the USA to return to the old political philosophy, ‘the ruled vs. the ruler’ The new rulers are Washington lobbyists and career Washington representatives. Without this error, the USA was founded as "an indivisible nation under God."

II. The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution Are Partners in the New Political Experiment

A new political experiment was installed in the USA by the founders in 1776. Politically, this experiment was expected to eliminate all world rulers by developing a civil society and a self- government in the USA. The founders expected this experiment to be installed in all nations throughout the world. To install this experiment in the American colony, the Revolutionary War with England had to be authorized and won. Before the war, the colonists studied the available social contract theories in the Western world and decided to install the social contract theory of England’s John Locke. This social contract theory uses two contracts. One contract created (1) a society with the Declaration of Independence. With the second contract, the new society created (2) a self-government with the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution. However, the Declaration of Independence, which authorized the Revolutionary War and defined the new society, was never included in the body of US laws by the Supreme court. This was a drastic judicial error, as this paper will show.

One purpose of the Declaration of Independence was to justify the colonists for withdrawing their allegiance from the British Crown and dissolving their connection with England. But, the Declaration had a second purpose. The second purpose was to define the new society, which is part of Locke’s social contract and the new political experiment. The Declaration did function as the authority to initiate the Revolutionary War against England. However, the sentences in the first and second paragraph and final sentence of the Declaration were not part of the Declaration’s authorization of war and the authorities of the future. They defined the new ‘society.’ Clearly, the Declaration should have been included in the body of US laws because it includes mandates that apply to the future of the USA and its new political experiment.

The Declaration was used in future governmental actions. For instance, the Lincoln administration protected the Union by denying States from seceding. The statement ‘all men are created equal,’ in the second paragraph of the Declaration, led to the Civil War after the Dred Scott Supreme Court decision legalized slavery in 1857. But, the US Supreme Court never had the authority to legalize slavery. The Declaration might have been used in different ways by the US government after Lincoln’s assassination. However, the Declaration does give ‘the governed’ and ‘the governing’ other authorities. For instance, US citizens and the US government can authorize unalienable rights, research for new knowledge of God, research to determine Laws of Nature and Laws of Nature’s God, and changes or abolishing the government. Thus, the Declaration is not dead, repealed, or burned in the circle file of the Archive in Washington. Thus, the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution are One and are thus endless partners.

Locke’s social contract theory uses two social contracts to form a Lockean civil society. The US civil society began to develop with the Lee Resolution on June 7, 1776. On July 4, 1776. Locke’s ‘society’ came into existence with the document, "A Declaration by The Representatives of the United States of America, In General Congress, Assembled" and after it was prepared, debated, and agreed upon. This document became known as the Declaration of Independence. The second social contract brought Locke’s ‘government’ into existence when the same Representatives prepared the Articles of Confederation on July 9, 1776 and improved it by preparing the Constitution in 1787. As seen, the Declaration is not merely a part of the body of US laws. It is the first of two laws.

The governed, which became the Lockean society, could not be eliminated because ‘what has become the governed’ and ‘what has become the governing’ were united and forms the Union. The Union was necessary because the two Lockean social contracts had to coexist and be unified with a spiritual glue that connects ‘the governed’ and ‘the governing.’ By not including the Declaration in the body of US laws is equivalent to throwing the first social contract into a ‘circle file’ and burning it.

The elimination of the Declaration of Independence from the body of US laws essentially destroyed the new political experiment. Without both Lockean social contracts, the three branches of the US government did not function for the new experiment correctly. Instead, they became three separated powers. Instead of developing these branches into a functionally related governing activity, the Congress became a special interest political activity and the President and the Supreme Court became legislators. Without the Declaration, these branches were unable to respond to man’s increasing knowledge about God and his universe.
Without the Declaration, the US government transformed the USA from a Lockean civil society to a Lockean political society. With a political society, the human rights we receive from God were replaced by political rights. What became politically right (or wrong) caused the rights of ‘the governed’ to become arbitrary rights. With arbitrary rights, the USA was forced to return to the arbitrary rights of England’s parliament. This return caused the Revolutionary War to lose its important history.

Without the Declaration, new and unwanted human behaviors appeared. Examples are atheism, drug use, abortion, and stranger-to-stranger crimes. Many of these new behaviors did not emerge until after WWII. For instance, many new atheists emerged after WWII. They deny God, which divide the USA. Also, they do not believe in religions, the existence of spiritual beings, and the existence of things created out of nothing. Yet, we now know that ‘matter’ is formed from spiritual atoms, not physical atoms. The spiritual atoms are Spirits that come from an infinite God. This new knowledge of mine is beginning to convince more scientists that a godless universe will never be found.

At our founder’s time, God’s existence and God’s non existence were not proven. So, when the founders created the new political experience, they decided to accept God as a reality. Their decision to accept God was a good one because many scientific proofs of God’s existence are appearing in books and on the Internet. Unfortunately, the elimination of the Declaration of Independence from the body of US laws is causing the USA to become inconsistent with man’s new knowledge.

III. All US Citizens Must Become Involved in the New Political Experiment

A Lockean civil society cannot be built with a silent society because new knowledge must be developed constantly to make the new political experiment successful. A civil society, for instance, must measure the success of the new experiment. The Constitutional mandates this measurement in the Preamble. There, ‘the governed’ and ‘the governing’ are told ‘to form a more perfect Union.’ This mandate unified ‘the governed’ and ‘the governing’ and thus unifies the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. Scientifically, this measuring standard is a perfect thing. Since God is the only perfect thing in the world, the measuring standard of progress on the new experiment is God. So, both ‘the governed’ and ‘the governing’ must work together to measure the progress of the new experiment and to remain their awareness of newly developed knowledge about God. God-related research projects are thus required by ‘the governed’ and ‘the governing’ while maintaining the separation between ‘the governing’ and all religions.

The new experiment made sound gains after WWII and when the educational level of Americans was lifted by the GI Bill of Rights. This educational growth set the stage for the space program, man’s landing on the moon, and the availability of high technologies for all fields of thought and practices. This remarkable success created a level of human freedom never experienced on this planet before. However, without the Declaration, progress in the new experiment would be impeded by youth of the new generation, who deny God and do not accept civil responsibilities. Their lack of responsibility is seen with development of a drug culture in the early 1960s and the high crime rates in 1968. By 1970, an increasing number of atheists would appear in the workplace because discussions of God had been removed from most US educational systems. Without the Declaration and without the teaching of God, many scientists became atheists and would seek knowledge of a godless universe. However, by 2006, they would admit failure.

Knowing about the drug and crime problems of the 1960s, by the 1980s, as a professional staff member of the National Institute of Justice, I was searching for the root causes of crime. This search ended in the early years of the new millennium after I studied the New Testament and Jesus Christ. In this study, I found that Jesus spoke of the root cause of crime as I did in the late 1980s. Deeper studies of Jesus led me to conclude that Jesus was a divine being.

With this agreement on crime and 25 years of research to report, last June I published a book. The title is "The First Scientific Proof of God"and was published by I present a scientific proof of God in Part I, Ch 1. This proof can be falsified if particle physicists prove that the Yang-Mills theory is false. This theory in the field of physics says that physical particles are not free. Thus, unless scientists can prove that free physical particles exist, my proof of God’s existence is proven. This book presents new knowledge on God’s intelligent design and a new and modern creation theory. Since I discuss many complex subjects in my book, I also teach the book on a Google blogger website at I also unify theology and science and unify the great works of Moses, Plato, Jesus Christ, Nicholas of Cusa, Gottfried Leibniz, and Georg Cantor. Currently, I am conducting new research on the dialectics and phenomenology of Spirits by Friedrich Hegel.

The new political experiment is missing out on the development of new knowledge about God. For an example, the15th century theologian, Nicholas of Cusa, and the 18th century philosopher, Friedrich Hegel, have developed a new view of God. This view says that God unifies all opposites. In the founding documents of the USA, one can find such opposites. For instance, the opposites, permanence and change, explains the new experiment clearer. Permanence applies to unchanging society of ‘the governed,’ whereas change applies to the changing amendments of ‘the governing.’ Such opposites tell us that the Declaration and the Constitution are coexisting opposites, ‘the governed’ and ‘the governing.

Coexisting opposites have different meanings because they are different essences. Their meanings are understood correctly using both/and reasoning because they coexist. Independence and dependence form another coexisting pair of opposites. Independence is something that God gives to all created things. With independence, we can perceive and distinguish created things and build knowledge about them. On the other hand, dependence is something that belongs to God. The colonists expressed their dependence on God in the last statement of the Declaration, "And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor."

Declaring independence for any nation is a scientific thought and act. Independence is indeed a sound scientific word because it can reveal many new truths. It is a universal’ that is found in all created things in the universe. Since all created things are formed by spiritual atoms, all spiritual atoms and all things are independent but also depend on God for their independence. The spiritual atoms are Spirits. They are our souls. Spirits combine so they produce a continuous flow of wholes, such as hydrogen, steel, trees, rocks, animals and humans, to the universe. The independence of a Spirit is never lost, even if it is dissolved with other Spirits and form something whole for the universe. Learn this beautiful process of Spirits by watching how clouds live together. With the independence that God gives atoms and wholes, our senses cannot perceive the atoms because they are indivisible. But, with God’s independence, we can perceive the wholes, which are divisible. Our lives depend on the independence we receive from God. Otherwise, we would merely be a part of a huge nonliving mechanical universe.
The independence received from God gives each created whole a particular content. The contents of a thing tell us ‘what is.’ The Declaration of Independence also created a whole with contents. The contents tells us ‘what the US society is.’ The Constitution also created a whole with contents. The contents tell us ‘what the US government is.’

In the mental world of humans, independence means ‘rights.’ So, just as God gives all humans essential contents, God also gives all humans essential rights. These rights are called unalienable rights. We must search for these rights by building knowledge about God. The Declaration tells us that we will find these rights and will build knowledge if we find the Laws of Nature and the Laws of Nature’s God. These words, which are found in the first and second paragraph of the Declaration of Independence, are critical to the success of the new US experiment.

In the second paragraph of the Declaration, the founders tell us, "That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness." These words say that ‘the governed’ is sovereign and is the authority over ‘the governing’ organization. Here are reasons why the Declaration should not have been removed from the body of US laws.

IV. The Practice of Atheism is Not Legal in the USA

The Declaration of Independence became an official document of the Congress of the United States of America on July 4, 1776. Thus, the US government could interpret this document after 1776 but could not change or abolish it. Thus, only Representatives of ‘one people’ could change or abolish the Declaration of Independence. Accordingly, the Declaration of Independence is, and always was, a law of the USA. Since all US citizens must know and obey all laws of the USA, no citizen can violate the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, or any other law created by Congress. Violators can thus be punished.

Crimes have been committed against the new political experiment. The first crime against the new experiment was the Dred Scott decision of the US Supreme Court. This decision led to the Civil War. A second crime occurred in 1925. In his trial, John T. Scopes was charged with teaching Darwin's theory of evolution. The Tennessee law, which recognizes the divine mandates of the Declaration of Independence, declared unlawful the teaching of any doctrine denying the divine creation of man. The judge ruled out any test of the law's constitutionality. But, the state Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the 1925 law. However, the Tennessee law was repealed in 1967. Note. This law was repealed after the American Theists organization was founded by Madalyn Murray O!Hair in 1963.

Other crimes began to develop in 1963. However, these crimes are not detected as crimes because violations of our founding documents are not enforced as other congressional laws are enforced by organized law enforcement agencies. These crimes are committed by atheists who want to increase the political power of atheism. This crime against the new experiment emerged after the US Supreme Court ruled in favor of the effort of Madalyn Murray O’ Hair to remove prayers from American schools in 1963. The O’ Hair decision is similar to the Dred Scott decision, which legalized slavery. In the Dred Scott decision the Declaration of Independence was used by the Supreme Court but was misinterpreted by the Court. In the O’ Hair decision, the Declaration of Independence was not even used. In the O’ Hair decision, the Supreme Court justices made atheism legal. The Court had no authority to make atheism legal.. Only ‘the governed’ has such a authority. But this Court decision gave the Court legislating authority, which the Court does not have.

The Declaration and the Constitution do not authorize atheism. The USA has no law of any kind that authorizes the practice of atheism. Having doubts about God is thinking not a practice of atheism. All atheistic practices are illegal and must be punished. In my experiences with atheists, atheists generally show no interest in developing knowledge of God. If they did express interests in God they would find God and would not be atheists. But, a nation under God cannot beg citizens to be believers. Every family in a civil society has personal and social responsibilities. They are also responsible for developing knowledge needed by a godly nation. With respect to prayers, my research on God/man communications shows that God and man do not talk together on a telephone but do exchange information. Thus, praying might be one way that man furnishes human information to a wise God.

Because of the Supreme Court ruling in favor of atheism, O!Hair built the American Atheists to protect the civil rights of nonbelievers. However, the rights of an atheist are arbitrary and are not in accordance with the Declaration. It thus seems that the American Civil Liberty Union (ACLU) might be a criminal organization whose purpose is to destroy the new political experiment and our beautiful Lockean civil society.

In a nation under God, it is not wrong to display on public land some samples of man’s progress in increasing his knowledge. Such samples can teach the youth of a nation about the continual needs for theological and scientific progress. If a nation displays military statues, political leaders, technical advances, etc. in a public park, it is also right to display theological advances such as the Ten Commandments.

A more recent violation of the Declaration might have occurred when a group of atheists conspired to stop the propagation of my book. This book is propagated in order to teach new knowledge about God, theology, and science. Some of them began to stop the propagation of my book only one month after it was published in June 2006. Their effort was also aimed at assassinating my character.

Atheism seemed to have caused the US drug culture in the 1960s and the appearance of crack cocaine in 1985. Atheism also seemed to influence our nation’s young scientists, our nation’s new intellectuals, and our nation’s new Hollywood celebrities. Atheism also seems to explain the recent reduction of US morals. These reduced morals can be seen in movies and TV prime time sitcoms, on the Internet (pornography and child molestation), the appearance of new prostitution brothels, casinos, etc. But atheism wilt fade away completely soon because three atheistic theories (evolution theory, big bang theory, and string theory) are failing. The truth about atheism is very clear, The truth about atheism is that the practice of atheism was never legal in the USA. Thus, the illegal practices must be eliminated immediately Otherwise, the new political experiment will never develop and the true freedom of US citizens will never be achieved.

V. Closing Statements

In 1776, the colonists became active players in a new political experiment under God. The colonists practiced the belief in God. This practice has never been changed and can be changed only by ‘the governed.’ Further, the governed’ did no authorize atheism in the Declaration of Independence. So, the practice of atheism in the USA is a violation of law. A federal agency must thus be created to detect and punish the practice of atheism. To make the new political experiment a success, the Declaration must be returned to its natural place, where our founders had put it. If the Declaration is returned to its natural place, the USA will become beautiful and will develop many friends throughout the world. But, if the Declaration is not returned to its natural place, the future of the USA will become ugly and highly unpredictable. Without the Declaration and without success with the new political experiment, I predict higher crime rates, continued reduction of US and world morals, and a major failure of all sciences. I believe that all wars in recent times were caused by the US Supreme Court misinterpretations of the 1776 event and the divine purpose of the Declaration of Independence.

Appendix: The Declaration of Independence

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. —— That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, —— That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. —— Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly f irmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:
For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies
For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.
He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. —— And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.