Do Atheists Believe That the World Was Made at Their Birth?
My answer to this question is is ‘yes’ because many atheists seem to be ignorant of the history of the United Sates and the link of the founding of the United States to the work of Moses. Although all people must die, the thoughts of people do not die. For instance, in his review of my book, the atheist, J. Casador of Las Cruces, NM says,
"It appears the he takes notable names from the past scientific community and long dead philosophers and mixes their theories and ideas up with Christian Bible passages to produce a body of knowledge that lacks any reasoning."
Atheists are unaware of man’s long and continuous search for liberty through developments such as (1) the Hebrew Commonwealth, (2) Plato’s republic with a philosopher/king, (3) the liberation of nations by Alexander the Great, (4) the formation of civil liberty laws by Solon and Lycurgus, (5) and the development of different republics in Greece, Rome, Venice, Holland and England, and (6) the New 1776 Political Experiment of the United states of America.
It is clear that Casador never read my book because I unify theology and science using the works of Abraham, Moses, Plato, Aristotle, Jesus Christ, Nicholas of Cusa, Gottfried Leibniz, Georg Cantor, and other modern scientists. This unification makes new knowledge available on God’s intelligent design and the creation. My unification of theology and science connect to the New 1776 Political Experiment of the United States and allows me to suggest a new world peace.
Obviously, the review of my book by Casador has nothing to do with the contents of my book. Thus, Casador’s recommendation, "I would not recommend this book to anyone. You would have better luck attempting to prove any gods existence staring directly into the sun," is dishonest.
"It appears the he takes notable names from the past scientific community and long dead philosophers and mixes their theories and ideas up with Christian Bible passages to produce a body of knowledge that lacks any reasoning."
Atheists are unaware of man’s long and continuous search for liberty through developments such as (1) the Hebrew Commonwealth, (2) Plato’s republic with a philosopher/king, (3) the liberation of nations by Alexander the Great, (4) the formation of civil liberty laws by Solon and Lycurgus, (5) and the development of different republics in Greece, Rome, Venice, Holland and England, and (6) the New 1776 Political Experiment of the United states of America.
It is clear that Casador never read my book because I unify theology and science using the works of Abraham, Moses, Plato, Aristotle, Jesus Christ, Nicholas of Cusa, Gottfried Leibniz, Georg Cantor, and other modern scientists. This unification makes new knowledge available on God’s intelligent design and the creation. My unification of theology and science connect to the New 1776 Political Experiment of the United States and allows me to suggest a new world peace.
Obviously, the review of my book by Casador has nothing to do with the contents of my book. Thus, Casador’s recommendation, "I would not recommend this book to anyone. You would have better luck attempting to prove any gods existence staring directly into the sun," is dishonest.
posted by George Shollenberger @ 12:45 PM
6 Comments:
At 1:50 PM,
Anonymous said…
Mister Shollenberger, you really are one of a kind. You are so incredibly full of yourself that any criticism of your book only seems to blind you with rage instead of entering the intellectual parts (if any) of your brain.
The stress in Mr. Casador's is not on all those notable names, it is on you producing "a body of knowledge that lacks any reasoning".
That is what every sensible person has been accusing you of since you published your book. No proper reasoning, no logic. That is why your book isn't selling. By not using logic anyone can reach whatever conclusion they like. Just like you did.
At 6:14 PM,
George Shollenberger said…
response to marc pellegrini,
Since I believe in spirits, I should be one of a kind. But all other things, including Casador, are also one of a kind because no two identical things will be found in a created world.
I am not filled with myself and do not reject criticism. Criticism is a healthy environmmnet in which to live by any thinker.
But you already misjudged me, just as Casador misjudged my book. Casador could not read my book so he became a liar instead.
Where do I do not use reasoning in my book? Tell Mr. Casador to identify my lack or lacks of reasoning.
One cannot publish falsities about a person freely in the USA. This is why one cannot yell fire in a theater unless a fire actually exists. Apparently, Mr. Casador does not know the laws in the USA. But a citizen is not excused for not knowing a law. A criminal is a criminal.
It took me 25 years to do the reasearch for my book. Do you think a person can read and understand my book in a few hours? My book is a monster to comprehend. I do not expect book reviews from real theologians andscientists for several years. Thus Casador is showing me that he is neither a theologian nor a scientist.
I view Casador's kind of book review as a crime against the humans of the United States. Casador offers more than an opinion of my book. He is trying to stop me from selling my book and trying to stop people from receiving my information.
A crime against the US citizens (and I am one of them) must be brought to the attention of the criminal court by the victim. I am thus acting as a good citizen to show that Casador's kind of book review is unlawful in a civil society such as the USA.
No US citizen has an absolute level of freedom.
Your support of his book review indicates that you would violate the same law. The USA is a nation under God and the law.
At 5:44 AM,
Anonymous said…
"Where do I do not use reasoning in my book? Tell Mr. Casador to identify my lack or lacks of reasoning."
Don't act as if you don't know what Mr. Casador is referring to. The lack of reasoning pervades your book. You constantly draw conclusions that defy logic; these are the infamous non-sequiturs, a term you quite amazingly had never heard of before.
When asked why you keep drawing all those false conclusions, you say that you have risen above logic. What you don't seem to understand is that anything goes once you leave logic behind you. Literally anything can be 'proven' in that place above logic. 2+2=5? No problem? Planet Earth rests on three gigantic turtles? Of course! Spiritual atoms? Why not!
You wrote: "It took me 25 years to do the reasearch for my book. Do you think a person can read and understand my book in a few hours? My book is a monster to comprehend."
So the people who according to you have already read your book and told you they understood it must be lying. I mean, you don't even expect real theologians and scientists to be able to write a review on it for several years.
Finally, one last puzzling quote from you: "One cannot publish falsities about a person freely in the USA. This is why one cannot yell fire in a theater unless a fire actually exists." What on earth has yelling fire in a theatre got to do with publishing falsities about someone? Is it a compulsion of yours never to make sense at all?
At 11:17 AM,
George Shollenberger said…
marc pellegrini,
You fail to show any error in reasoning in my. Stop generalizing. Keep the concept of non sequiturs in your own mind and keep it out of other people's minds.
Since you never think about God and God creted the universe, your mind must be filled with confusions upon confusions. God cannot be known or rejected with logic.
Only friends have contacted me about the book. The person who voted against Bask has not contacted me. I know that many people are reading my book. And I know they are having difficulty with negative theology (Nicholas of Cusa), Cantor, and spiritual atoms. It took me years to comprehend Cusa because Americans have an Aristotelian logical mindset. Look at my reviews of Amazon books. Only the atheists reject my reviews.
I made the statement about the fire to inform you that human freedom is not absolute. Atheists believe that they are absolutely free. I got news for you and you atheistic friends on the subject of freedom.
Expect me to end my conversations with you. I choose not to waste my time with atheists.
At 1:12 PM,
Anonymous said…
I am quite sorry to inform you, but publishing falsities in the United States is not strictly illegal, but only when the person being falsified receives serious harm from said falsities. Therefore it is only a person very misinformed about law who would claim that Mr. Casador is, in fact a criminal. Also, as a recommendation is a thing of pure opinion, it is impossible to prove it "dishonest." It is possible that you might say it is unwarranted, or uncalled for, but he simply said that people of a like mind to him should not read the book, as they will not find it informative. You probably should, in fact, thank Mr. Casador for limiting the group of people who will read your book and give negitive reviews, thus increasing the total number of copies sold. One bad review does practically nothing to convince a potential buyer when faced with several good ones. Thousands of bad reviews, however, will have a drastically different effect.
At 6:42 AM,
George Shollenberger said…
response to Mark C
Your line of reasoning is inappropriate in a developing nation. We can't allow virtual children to make reviews of books that are below the knowing abilities of the author. None of these atheists know what I am writing about. Nor do we want US citizens to be guided by the book reviews of atheists.
For your information, I prove that the US is a nation under God at the 10/11/07 blog. So, atheists are becoming more and more like the communists during WWII. Beware of atheistic conspiracies because they might be unlawful. One is not excused for not knowing the laws of the USA.
I urge you to turn 180 degrees away from atheism before your good math is transformed into bad math.
Post a Comment
<< Home