Scientific Proof of God, A New and Modern Bible, and Coexisting Relations of God and the Universe

Wednesday, August 15, 2007

Crime Against US Citizens

Human rights have been expanding throughout the world because the idea of ‘governing by rulers’ is no longer a godly form of government to build. Perhaps, Plato’s king-philosopher is the only kind of ruling government that will deliver natural freedom. As time passes, a major goal of all humans is to create a society that self-governs, a government of, by, of, and for people. The first modern self-government is the New 1776 Political Experiment of the American colonists.

As man has developed these different societies, undesirable human behaviors also developed. In the ancient period, these behaviors became known as evils. Today, they are known as crimes. Evils (or crimes) are punishable because such behaviors violate the civil laws of these societies. More recently, war crimes and crimes against humanity have led to new laws. Further, the expansion of human rights is leading to new laws and their associated crimes. By expanding rights, people are seeking greater degrees of self_determination.

The New 1776 Political Experiment began with the founding laws of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. Congress also made new laws. Crimes also emerged with the founding and new laws of the USA. One crime was slavery, which violated the Declaration of Independence and its statement --- all Men are created equal. This law was enforced during the Lincoln presidency. Other crimes have occurred against the Unites States and its citizens. But, the laws against these crimes are not enforced by government and its agencies.

Atheism is the most deadly crime against the USA and its citizens because it has turned the thoughts of many fields and citizens away from God. According to the Declaration of Independence and Constitution, atheism is a crime. Yet, this crime is not being enforced by any US government agency. However, since the 1970s, atheism has virtually destroyed every science. It even says that God is not needed to build mathematics. Atheism has also destroyed the arts and sciences related to music, book writing, TV productions, and Hollywood movies. And, it is destroying the Internet. To destroy the sciences, mathematics, music, book publishing, TV, and Hollywood in the same nation is a new crime against humanity.

Action on this new crime against humanity by the US government must become a very high priority.

posted by George Shollenberger @ 12:20 PM  

10 Comments:

  • At 3:08 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    But how are we going to take action against the Atheists? According to the CUNY Religious Identity Survey 0.4% of the American population identifies itself as Atheist. That's 1.2 million people! And that doesn't even count the fence sitters and those who claim "No Religion" (which make up another 13.7% - but perhaps these are the people who can be salvaged?)

    What can we do with all of these criminals? Should they be jailed? Or is it enough to just identify them, like we do with sexual predators?

    It's no good complaining about a problem without offering ideas for a solution!

     

  • At 3:58 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    response to p.hill,

    All statistics today are troublesome. So, other factors must be considered. For instance, we must know how many people actually go to church, temples, and mosques. The rest of the people are thus not interested in God. The rest are thus either atheists or don't admit it. So, many people are either active atheists ot silent atheists. But, we can't put them all in jail. Only a portion of them might have to be controlled. It depends on how tightly the mind of an atheist is being controlled.

    First, a new national goal must be created to influence more and more people to accept their civil responsibilities. This should turn many people to God so they help to develop a more perfect nation. This more perfect Union will be guided by our new knowledge of God. I present some new knowledge in my book.

    Some active atheists can be transformed mentally. But other atheists will be more like enemies of the USA. So, theists might be classified so punishment comes by degrees.

    I understand your closing statement. But, remember that I did not identify the human problem of atheism until August 2, 2007. The solution of any large human problem must be solved by steps.

    The churches, temples, and mosques must be contacted first because I believe that this human problem, when it is being solved, will fill their pews and social interactions.

    The enforcement agency in the State and federal government must be energized first.

     

  • At 10:15 PM, Blogger Dark Childs Rat said…

    Do tell me, where in the Declaration of Independence does it state that Atheism is against the law? I'm pretty sure in the Declaration that is states Freedom of Religion. Atheism is argued as being a form of religion. Why do you hate athiests so much? We tend not to do much that causes much harm, there are of course those who take things too far, just as religious people take things too far. Many hate crimes and acts of violence have been carried out in the name of God. Do not say that atheists are the worst thing in the world. Most atheists beleive that God doesnt exist in a scientific way, not so it gives us a reason to do what we want. Many of us are just as moral as any God fearing individual. Get your facts straight and be a little more open minded, most of us just dont beleive in God, but abide by rules and care about others just as much as anyone else does.

     

  • At 12:59 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    response to dark childs,

    A belief in atheism is the opposition of a belief in God. In the Declaration of Independence, all positive words that identify God s shows that the USA is a nation under God. The words "Laws of Nature and Nature's God" is an example.

    I have never hated any person. But I do not agree with the ideas of some people. I do not agree with the ideas of many atheists. But I do agree the ideas of some atheists. For instance, your moral ideas are in harmony with my ideas.

    If you scan my blogs from early June 2008 through today, you will learn about a new science known as 'theological science.' I argue that the physical scientists and life scientists are on the wrong path of thought in many ways today because they reject God.

    A nation under God cannot be developed unless people are thinking the same way about an infinite God. My God is really infinite and is the only scientific God. Today the Union is dividing.


    I hope these words will help you understand me and that I am not the person you believe.

    Georeg

     

  • At 3:35 PM, Blogger Dark Childs Rat said…

    My question now is your emphisis on God. Why does beleiving in God make everything absolute, why does having the same God change anything? Religion in my opinion seems to cause nothing more than problems in society. Two people may fight strictly on the fact of what God they beleive in, these people which would otherwise get along well. A unified nation or world is not one that beleives in all the same God but one that tolerates and understands the differences of anothers religion or race and thus grows and develops further instead of fighting for who is right. I would say not to pinpoint Atheists because it is the world as a whole that is a problem, people being intolerant to another. Ive been bad mouthed before for being an atheist yet I havent dont anything wrong, and if I have I learned from it. God, or the disbelief in such is not the problem, human beings just need to learn to get over the differences and get along and work together, not to question so seriously as to why they beleive it. I have a Jewish friend who beleives in Creationism, she has told me flat out not to go into evolution because she doesnt beleive it as I do, I respect that she doesnt want to hear it so I havent tried to say anything to her about it. Its about tolerance, not forcing to change everyones view to beleive in a specific God or ideal. Even if America is "Under God" it doesnt mean that just because you dont beleive in God means your breaking any law. Currently there are plenty of laws that are no longer reinforced because the nation has grown to accept new ideals. They are basically done away but still exist in the books. And even though the Declaration states "Under God" isnt there a separation of Church and State for a reason? In the 1800's when the Declaration was made it was made by men who were very indepth with their beleifs in God, to question putting that statement in wasnt much of a question. They didnt put that in there to say that everyone must beleive or you should be put in jail, but more as a statement. What do you think should happen to me since Im an atheist and have my mind quite made up about God? To have me believe in God you would have to give me undenialbe, testable, evidence or proof and not witness or testemonial. What would you have done to me as I abide by laws just as everyone else does? Dont give atheists a bad name though, there isnt much you find on atheists committing hate crimes or becoming intolerant to all those who love God. If you love God, that fine, that works for you, but for me and 1.2million Americans it doesnt and it should be tolerated just as we tolerate you.

     

  • At 6:17 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    response to dark childs rat,

    I'm sorry that I did not use your whole name on other responses..

    DCR: My question now is your emphisis on God. Why does beleiving in God make everything absolute,

    George: When we seek the origin of all finite things in the universe, we can only accept the origin as an infinite thing, which is God.

    dcr:why does having the same God change anything?

    George: God must be denied all attributes found in the things we discover in thee universe. One of the attributes of all things in the universe is the universal 'change.' Thus, God is not a changing thing. God is a logical and necessary thing.


    dcr: Religion in my opinion seems to cause nothing more than problems in society. Two people may fight strictly on the fact of what God they beleive in, these people which would otherwise get along well.

    George: Religions developed before scientific proofs were offered. This is why religions practice different theoried of God. So, religions will slowly adapt to the proofs of God. Othwerwise, each religion will fade away in a few generations.

    This is why religions don't like my website or read my book. But I have lots of patience.

    dcr: A unified nation or world is not one that beleives in all the same God but one that tolerates and understands the differences of anothers religion or race and thus grows and develops further instead of fighting for who is right.

    George: Religions must tolerate other religions because the word religion means 'the practice of a theory of God.' Scientists are truth seekers. They cannot accept just any theory. Scientists must prove and falsified every theory of God until God cannot be disproved falsified.

    dcr: I would say not to pinpoint Atheists because it is the world as a whole that is a problem, people being intolerant to another. Ive been bad mouthed before for being an atheist yet I havent dont anything wrong, and if I have I learned from it. God, or the disbelief in such is not the problem, human beings just need to learn to get over the differences and get along and work together, not to question so seriously as to why they beleive it.

    George: You have problems as an atheist because over 85% of US citizens believe in Godc. As religions adapt to the scientific proofs of God, people will solve your problem. Have patient and stick with your proven beliefs. At the same time you must nor close your mind to those well developed proofs of God. My proof of God is the strongest proof to date.

    dcr:I have a Jewish friend who beleives in Creationism, she has told me flat out not to go into evolution because she doesnt beleive it as I do, I respect that she doesnt want to hear it so I havent tried to say anything to her about it. Its about tolerance, not forcing to change everyones view to beleive in a specific God or ideal.


    George: I reject evolution but not because of the Creationism in which she believes.

    dcr: Even if America is "Under God" it doesnt mean that just because you dont beleive in God means your breaking any law.

    George; I disagree. All citizens mut obey all US laws. One can reject a law by one's mind. But one cannot act against any US law.

    dcr: Currently there are plenty of laws that are no longer reinforced because the nation has grown to accept new ideals. They are basically done away but still exist in the books.

    George: The development and acceptence of new ideas are necessary. But God never changes. This is why the USA will never change the Laws of Nature and Nature's God as the Declaration mandates.


    dcr: And even though the Declaration states "Under God" isnt there a separation of Church and State for a reason?

    George: the separation of Church and State does not separate God and State. God and Religion are concepts that have two different meanings.


    dcr: In the 1800's when the Declaration was made it was made by men who were very indepth with their beleifs in God, to question putting that statement in wasnt much of a question. They didnt put that in there to say that everyone must beleive or you should be put in jail, but more as a statement.

    George: The founding statements are the laws of the land until amended. The founders did not add God to the founding documents just as a filler. The concept of freedom has its origin only in God. Without God, man only has an arbitrary form of freedom. Arbitrary freedoms are given by godless people who govern. You will not like to live in a godless nation.

    cdr:What do you think should happen to me since Im an atheist and have my mind quite made up about God? To have me believe in God you would have to give me undenialbe, testable, evidence or proof and not witness or testemonial.

    George: My book and website do not use testimals and witnesses. All of my work is scientific/theological.

    cdr: What would you have done to me as I abide by laws just as everyone else does? Dont give atheists a bad name though, there isnt much you find on atheists committing hate crimes or becoming intolerant to all those who love God. If you love God, that fine, that works for you, but for me and 1.2million Americans it doesnt and it should be tolerated just as we tolerate you.

    George: I will never stop commenting on the ideas of atheists and theists. The atheists are not big enough in size to cause any cultural problems or destroy the USA. But the USA is now turning back and toward God. Atheism is not powerful enough to stop this turn and not powerful enough to remove God from the USA. This is because many atheistic ideas are false.

     

  • At 9:39 PM, Blogger Dark Childs Rat said…

    Question: Why do you think that atheists if grown in numbers will destroy the US? The only thing that might be "destroyed" is the simple phrase "Under God" in nation wide statements. But sure you dont beleive us to be archaic and without thought of moral. I do not judge who I vote for because of their religious beleifs but how they will help the nation as a whole. What Im trying to attempt is to educate and possibly have you come to an understanding that atheists arent bad. We simply beleive differently, tolerate and love those of religions (we can love, its is quite possible that it is a human/species thing and not due to God) I do not have a clue as how you can give undeniable truth to an omniscent being that no one can see or actually hear. No one can pierce the heavens and ask God himself, or give reputable data that anyone can figure out and place in a joural. The scientific method for proving anything is to place a hypothesis and test it until it becomes a theory/truth. How does one disprove or prove something that may or may not exist? Trying to disprove God is a worthless effort as you cant disprove an existance that might not exist. But you cant really prove either (at least at the moment) that an omniscent being exists in the sky/everywhere. Why is it so hard, that if God does exist, that he created everyone the way they are and why judge them differently? Why does everyone have to make things black and white. I do not intentend to sway your mind about beleiving in God, I just want you to know that atheists arent that bad. Do I fully beleive in what science is doing? No, in fact Im finding science to be a nusance to society in ways. Science cant fix all problems, I used to be on medications for depression and anxiety for most of my life. I have in the last year stopped using medications and Im fine, I find life to be more amazing than before. Science is not a cure all, it just tries to explain things, explain them in a clearer way than any Bible can. The Bible is full of different interpretations, any interpretation could be the correct one, but no one is sure which one is correct. Even from one single religion-the religion Jesus created, there are so many deviations of the same religion and even though they beleive in the same God, same Jesus, they dont agree on the same principals that the Bible mentions. I live in a family that beleives in some form of God (basically the Catholic God), I love them all the same, I dont care what religion a person has as long as everyone can accept everyone. If you must attack atheists then you should add in addition to your claims that all hindus, buddhists, anyone that beleives in non-catholic/christian God(s) should not be allowed. In a place trying to be more tolerant, why exclude? In all honesty anyone could do away with the small phrase "Under God" yet as a whole, as the main principals of the Declaration state, things will remain the same. God or Godless, it does not determine whether a person is bad or good, their actions determine such. Not all atheists agree with all scientists. For me, my main question is what started the movement of the first atoms to cause the cataclysmic event of the universe(or universes) to exist. Why did the first movement occur? But no one can answer that question. And either way, when the world dies or the sun dies, what will it matter? If we all eventually end up in heaven or a nonexistance, why will this small matter mean? Its even possible that the US will not exist as a country in the next couple hundred years, we are still a new nation its still very possible we will cause our own destruction. We can work to try to prevent that, but there is no garuntee. Life is life, undetermined factors can change anything.

     

  • At 11:36 AM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    response to dark childs rat,
    Dcr: Why do you think that atheists if grown ...
    George: Can you complete this question for me?

    dcr: Why do you think that atheists if grown in numbers will destroy the US? The only thing that might be "destroyed" is the simple phrase "Under God" in nation wide statements.
    George: The USA would no longer be the Society that was founded.

    dcr: But sure you don’t believe us to be archaic and without thought of moral.
    George: Atheism is a modern belief and has morals.

    dcr: I do not judge who I vote for because of their religious beliefs but how they will help the nation as a whole. What I’m trying to attempt is to educate and possibly have you come to an understanding that atheists aren’t bad. We simply believe differently, tolerate and love those of religions (we can love, its is quite possible that it is a human/species thing and not due to God).
    George: Good and bad, right and wrong, and true and false are concepts that have different meanings among people when unproven. I never judge a person unless I have a proof.

    dcr: I do not have a clue as how you can give undeniable truth to an omniscient being that no one can see or actually hear.
    George: One can see God with an eye of the mind. This other eye is known as reasoning.

    dcr: No one can pierce the heavens and ask God himself, or give reputable data that anyone can figure out and place in a journal.
    George: If all finite things in the universe are from God, you can investigate these things and gain many different understandings of God and his creation.

    dcr: The scientific method for proving anything is to place a hypothesis and test it until it becomes a theory/truth.
    George: Theories and truths can only be improved. There is only one truth— God.

    dcr: How does one disprove or prove something that may or may not exist?
    George: With reasoning.

    dcr: Trying to disprove God is a worthless effort as you cant disprove an existence that might not exist. But you cant really prove either (at least at the moment) that an omniscient being exists in the sky/everywhere.

    George: A person’s proof of God must include faith because human knowledge can never be completed.

    dcr: Why is it so hard, that if God does exist, that he created everyone the way they are and why judge them differently?
    George: God gives us potentials. What we become is up to us, not God. God does not judge us.

    dcr: Why does everyone have to make things black and white.
    George: Dialecticians do not make things black and white. Non dialecticians and logicians try toe make things black and white because they never learn how to think dialectically.

    dcr: I do not intend to sway your mind about believing in God, I just want you to know that atheists aren’t that bad. Do I fully believe in what science is doing? No, in fact I’m finding science to be a nuisance to society in ways. Science cant fix all problems, I used to be on medications for depression and anxiety for most of my life. I have in the last year stopped using medications and I’m fine, I find life to be more amazing than before. Science is not a cure all, it just tries to explain things, explain them in a clearer way than any Bible can.
    George: Science is seeking ways to prove that all human knowledge can be found and completed. Only God is a completed thing. Good that you got off of the medications. Your success might be explained by your inquiries into truths..

    dcr The Bible is full of different interpretations, any interpretation could be the correct one, but no one is sure which one is correct. Even from one single religion-the religion Jesus created, there are so many deviations of the same religion and even though they believe in the same God, same Jesus, they don’t agree on the same principals that the Bible mentions. I live in a family that believes in some form of God (basically the Catholic God), I love them all the same, I don’t care what religion a person has as long as everyone can accept everyone.
    George: Your attitude toward other people is great and godly.

    dcr: If you must attack atheists then you should add in addition to your claims that all Hindus, Buddhists, anyone that believes in non-Catholic/Christian God(s) should not be allowed. In a place trying to be more tolerant, why exclude?
    George: I attack atheists because they are not proving that God does not exist . I also attack religions when they teach falsities.

    dcr: In all honesty anyone could do away with the small phrase "Under God" yet as a whole, as the main principals of the Declaration state, things will remain the same. God or Godless, it does not determine whether a person is bad or good, their actions determine such.
    George: As time passes and science learns more about the things that God created, the separation between atheism and theism will be huge and will lead to a civil war.

    dcr: Not all atheists agree with all scientists. For me, my main question is what started the movement of the first atoms to cause the cataclysmic event of the universe(or universes) to exist. Why did the first movement occur? But no one can answer that question. And either way, when the world dies or the sun dies, what will it matter?
    George: If a person concludes that God exists, that person’s world changes considerably. For instance, that person will concluder the universe has no end and that reincarnation is a reality. To me, the present and future of each and every person becomes very important.

    dcr: If we all eventually end up in heaven or a non existence, why will this small matter mean? Its even possible that the US will not exist as a country in the next couple hundred years, we are still a new nation its still very possible we will cause our own destruction. We can work to try to prevent that, but there is no guarantee. Life is life, undetermined factors can change anything.
    George: I believe that your final thoughts are remnants of the period when you were using medications.

     

  • At 11:33 AM, Blogger Dark Childs Rat said…

    One final question.
    What if God didn't exist (in speculation) and all that you have stated because null and void. Where does that leave you? Perhaps if your "sight" of God has been nothing more than a delusion. Would your world as you know it be for nothing? There is no proof that God exists, children see and believe in nonexistant beings and claim them to be as real as you or me. Perhaps your belief is quite similar to that of a childs beliefs. Simply put-Keep your mind open, perhaps you've been wrong. Dont state you know of such things when in reality there is no proof. To me, I dont believe God exists, but if I am given a proof that I can fully grasp with my own testing which wouldnt have me change my beliefs before hand, then yes Id admit I was wrong. Beleif and knowning fully are two different things. You believe, therefore you feel as though you know.

     

  • At 1:59 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    response to dark childs rat,

    Didn't you read my book?

    "The First Scientific Proof of God" was published in June 2006. This proof is not child's work. This proof is real stuff that atheists have tried to defeat for over two years, but can't.

    I suggest that you read by blog today. It discusses the talk you and I are having.

    This blog is serious talk to every US citizen because trouble is coming to you, me, and every other US citizen..

    George

     

Post a Comment

<< Home