Scientific Proof of God, A New and Modern Bible, and Coexisting Relations of God and the Universe

Monday, November 30, 2009

Indivisibles, II

At Rom. 1:20, St Paul says that invisible things of God are clearly seen, being understood by the things God made. So, if man senses phenomena of things and defines the phenomena precisely, attributes of God are revealed by negating the phenomena. For instance, when I sensed that the phenomena all things are finite, I negated finite and learned that God has an positive attribute we call not-finite (or infinite). This learning was reported on page 6 my book, 'The First Scientific Proof of God" So with sensual data and Plato's negative, modern man found that God does exist.

Now, when things in the universe are examined in detail, my senses also tell me that things can be divided into parts. With this simple examination of things in the universe, I came to the conclusion that every thing in the universe must be divisible because the atom cannot be found. Then, by negating the word 'divisible,' I learned that God has another positive attribute we call not-divisible (or indivisible). This learning was reported on page 248 of my book. I assume that the word 'indivisible' might have helped Abraham reject idolatry and accept monotheism. Certainly, Abraham made a great advancement for man.

Interestingly, early Christians spoke of God as Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. At 325 AD,, Christians changed and spoke of God as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Then, in the 15th century, Nicholas of Cusa changed the non scientific phrase Father, Son and Holy Spirit to the scientific phrase 'One,Equality, and Union.' With this scientific phrase, I connected God to the universe logically with the phrase 'many,inequality, and relation.' (See pages 124-127 of my book.). When the words 'many, inequality, and relation' are separated and negated, three more attributes of God (One, Equality, and Union) are found. So, the Christian Trinity is not God. The Christian Trinity only identifies three more attributes of God.

Saturday, November 28, 2009

Indivisibles, I

Pics of Nicholas of Cusa, Galileo Galilei, and Gottfried Leibniz

The U.S. Supreme Court is lost. In The Judge Journal (Summer 1985), PA Supreme Court Judge, Edmund B. Spaeth, Jr. asked, "Where is the High Court Heading?" He recommended that judges engage with citizens in Socratic dialogues. I agree with Spaeth because judges are not prepared to make judgments alone. No field of thought has, or can develop, all knowledge. So the field of law cannot make correct judgements without using knowledge developed by other fields of thought. Without dialogues, judges can be expected to make make many errors. One error of the Supreme Court is the ruling that says that the Declaration of Independence is not a law. This error has divided the nation into believers and non believers of God.

Just like the U.S. Founding Documents have not been interpreted properly by U.S. lawyers and the U.S. Supreme Court, 'indivisibles' were not interpreted properly by religions and the field of mathematics after they appeared. History shows that indivisibles were developed only by a few personalities and their followers. The personalities are Nicholas of Cusa, Galileo Galilei, and Gottfried Leibniz. Since the thoughts of Cusa and Galileo were being judged by the Roman church, only Leibniz was able to rise above the Roman church and develop indivisibles. However, the institutions of education in the USA have brought only Leibniz's infinitesimal calculus into high schools, colleges, and universities.

After studying the work of Cusa, I recognized the important work of Leibniz on indivisibles. So when I found that the existence of God can be proven scientifically, I wrote my first book, "The First Scientific Proof of God," In this book, I included information on Nicholas of Cusa and Galileo in Part IIa. And I included the work of Leibniz on indivisibles in Part IV.

However, soon after my book appeared on the Internet Amazon bookstore, five atheists submitted book reviews that assassinate my character and rejected the proof of God. They did not understand my method of proof. They did not understand Plato's negative and had no comments on my discussion on Cusa, Galileo, or Leibniz. Their unfair book reviews were removed by Amazon because their reviews did not follow bookstore review guidelines. But these atheists continued to resubmit their same book reviews. On the third resubmissions, the bookstore gave up due to increased personal costs. But this evil practice of atheism seems to be unlawful because atheists are not tolerating religions. Because of this evil practice of atheism, the work of Leibniz on indivisibles in my book is being hidden again. Earlier Leibniz's work was hidden by the materialists and Newtonians for four centuries.

It is time for citizens to take a deeper look at what is happening in the fields of education, mathematics, and science in the USA.

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Connecting Nicholas of Cusa, Gottfried Leibniz, and the Founders of the USA to Jesus Christ and Greek Thinking in 500 B.C.

One can connect the negative theology of Nicholas of Cusa to the New System, Monadology, and infinitesimal calculus of Gottfried Leibniz. These thoughts of Cusa and Leibniz can then be connected to the thoughts of the founders of the USA and the Laws of Nature and Nature's God, which are found in the U.S. Declaration of Independence. However, the thoughts of these modern thinkers can be connected also to the ancient teachings of Jesus Christ and to he 500 B.C. Greek teaching of Anaxagoras. These modern and ancient connections prove that knowledge of a monotheistic God and the universe has been progressing scientifically for over 2500 years and that free nations under a monotheistic God would eventually emerge, as the USA did in 1776. In this blog, I will present this common thread.

Give Anaxagoras credit for developing the idea of Parmenides who said "All is One." (click) The 'All in One' idea is repeated by Jesus Christ in John 14:20 as '".. I am in the Father, and ye in me, and I in you." In Bk.II, Ch. Five of his book 'On Learned Ignorance,' Nicholas of Cusa expands the 'All in One' idea with the words 'Each thing is in each thing' and the words "From Book One it is evident that God is in all things in a such way that all things are in Him." If each thing in the universe is divisible and originate from an indivisible God, each thing in the universe has an infinite number of indivisible parts.

I am unable to connect Cusa directly to Gottrried Leibniz (1646-1716). However, I conclude that Leibniz could have learned about Cusa's indivisibles through the thinking of Galileo, who knew about Cusa's work. Anyway, Cusa's indivisibles are found in Leibniz's New System, which opposes Newton's billiard ball universe. In No.56 of Leibniz's Monadology, he says that every thing is connected to alll other things. Cusa's indivisibles are also found in Leibniz's infinitesimal calculus and the true atom defined in his book on 'Monadology.' The use of Cusa's indivisibles are found by Galileo;s thoughts on the extension of bodies. These connections set the stage for the development of functional relations in the field of mathematics.
England's Queen Anne and her grandmother, Sophie, wanted Leibniz to become Prime Minister. Had Leibniz received this position, the U.S. Revolutionary War would not have happened, Americans would be speaking German, and Cusa's book On Learned Ignorance would be a common book in the USA in the early 1700s.. Instead, Christian Wolff (1679-1756) and Ben Franklin's European assignments made sure that the phrase 'Laws of Nature and Nature's God" were included in the Declaration of Independence. The rejection of the divinity of Jesus Christ by Franklin is a sign that Ben participated in the heated debates between the Newtonians and Leibniz. Franknin's statement at the signing of the Declaration of Independence --- We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately -- is an indicator that the founders knew the 'all is one' theory. These debates continue yet today between materialists and spiritualists. Only the personalities and philosophical names have changed.

In closing, I noticed that Immanuel Kant shows his sensitive to the '"All in One" idea in his "Critique of Pure Reason' in the Preface to Second Edition. There, Kant talks about 'organized bodies' sayings, "... every member exists for every other, and all for the sake of each other, so that no principle can safely be taken in any one relation, unless it has been investigated in the entirety of its relations to the whole employment of pure reason."

Monday, November 23, 2009

The Big Bang Theory and Ancestoral Theory Are Troublesome

In his book 'On Learned Ignorance,' Nicholas of Cusa (center pic) says that a maximum or minimum, which is contracted to finite things, cannot exist apart from God, who is the Absolute Maximum and Absolute Minimum. So although God is incomprehensible, we know that all things found in the universe never exist apart from God. The assertion that all things in the universe came from a big bang physical thing is thus false. And it is false that all living things come from ancestors as evolutionists say. It is unfortunate that most physical scientists and biologists are unfamiliar with Cusa's book. But Cusa's book can be copied out of the Internet. (click)

Since no two identical things exist in the universe, all things found in the universe are numbered. At Matt. 10:30, Jesus Christ also said, "But the very hairs on your head are numbered." So all things in the universe are numbered things. Since these numbered things are never identical, all things are different.e. However, all of these different things can be classified into species. But these species are limited because no thing in the universe can become 'absolute maximum' or 'absolute minimum' because only God is absolute maximum and absolute minimum. These limits form a continuum of genera or numbered things in the universe.

I conclude that lots of time and money are being wasted on wrong theories by physical scientists, biologists, politicians, and educators in every nation. With this huge waste, the new generations of humans could become very troublesome because the true science is being lost. To prevent this possible trouble, the people in every nation should investigate the truths in Cusa's book now. In general, Cusa challenges those humans who say that human knowledge has an end and can thus be completed. He challenges these same Cusa saying that some knowledge will always remain unknown to man.

Saturday, November 21, 2009

The Universe As Seen By Nicholas of Cusa, I

After reading the book 'On Learned Ignorance' (De Docta Ignorantia) in 1980, I concluded that its author was the first modern scientist. The author of this book is Bishop Nicholas of Cusa (1401-1464). He was a German of the Roman Church. I suggest that this book be copied out of the Internet. (click) What a great gift this book would be during the Holidays. In time, I expect this book to be found among the scriptures in the home of every nation. The pic is Cusa.

In Bk. II, Ch. Eleven of his book 'On Learned Ignorance,' Cusa says, "Therefore, the earth, which cannot be the center, cannot be devoid of all motion. Indeed, it is even necessary that the earth be moved in such a way that it could be moved infinitely less. Therefore, just as the earth is not the center of the world, so the sphere of the fixed stare is not the circumference ..."

Based on the above words of Cusa, Nicolaus Copernicus (1473-1543) and Galileo Galilei (1564-1642) were not the first and second to conclude that the fixed stars are in motion. Let's look at some interesting histories.

Cusa studied at Padua; later Galileo taught at Padua; Kepler recognized Cusa's discovery of God's absolute maximum and absolute minimum; and Galileo expressed deep interest in Kepler's work. I thus conclude that Galileo had some access to the thoughts of Cusa in the book "On Learned Ignorance." Further, on p.26 of 'The Crime of Galileo' by Giorgio de Santillana, we find that Galileo accepted the concept of imperceptiblis motus spoken by Cusa. Galileo seems to confirm the existence of indivisibles at Job 26:7. Furthermore, in Ch. 6 of 'Galileo Galilei, his life and his works' by Raymond J. Seeger, Galileo spoke of an infinite number of indivisibles that could form a continuous quanty. In Seeger's book, Galileo says that indivisibles can expand into very large spaces without introducing a finite number of empty spaces (vacuums).

Based on the information above, today's scientists seem to be on the wrong path of thought.

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Laws of Nature and Nature's God and the Supreme Court, II

When the U.S. Supreme Court interpreted the Declaration of Independence only as an authority to go to war with England, it destroyed the future nation that the colonists expected to develop. Because of this Supreme Court error, the Revolutionary War was fought in vain by many colonists who lost their lives. Yet the first two paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence were discussed in detail by many colonists, were improved by Ben Franklin and John Adams, and were debated before the 'Committee of the Whole' before approving it. When these two paragraphs lost their purposes in the founding documents, the USA would become a very different nation. In this blog. I discuss a few drastic changes that have caused by this Supreme Court error.

First, the phrase 'one People' in the Declaration, which is defined as 'Union' in the Preamble of the Constitution, is lost. This loss transferred sovereignty from the 'one People' to Government. This loss also eliminates Locke's concept of Society, and reduces Locke's two-party social contract to one party, Government. Essentially, Locke's social contract was totally destroyed by the Supreme Court. Yet, all intelligent colonists were followers of Locke's social contract theory.

Second, in the Declaration, only one part of the phrase 'Laws of Nature and Nature's God' is lost. Only the Laws of Nature's God are lost because Laws of Nature are natural and apply to all sciences. The loss of the 'Laws of Nature's God' removes God's morals from the USA. Essentially, the loss of God's morals returned the USA to the arbitrary laws of England's Parliament. The Revolutionary War was really lost because the U.S. Congress is free to make arbitrary laws. By eliminating the Laws of Nature's God, the people of the USA became free to live immorally.

Third, in the Declaration, the phrase 'all Men are created equal' is lost. With this loss, slavery was rationalized by people of the USA until Abe Lincoln acted. But slavery hangs on. For instance, the Supreme Court has made another error because it has ruled in favor of abortion, after it decided that not all Men are created equal.

Fourth, in the Declaration, the unalienable Rights have been lost. Without inalienable Rights. all rights in the USA are either Bill of Rights or arbitrary rights defined by Congress. Yet, man's inalienable rights can be defined only by God and the Laws of Nature's God. The Laws of Nature's God can be identified only by knowing what God created. This knowledge is available to man only if man studies and defines what God made. At Rom. 1:20, St. Paul made the same suggestion.

I say that the people of the USA will never build the nation expected by our colonists unless the Supreme Court is reformed drastically.

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

Laws of Nature and Nature's God and the Supreme Court, I

The U.S. Supreme Court does not make any rulings based on the U.S. Declaration of Independence because the Court says that the Declaration of Independence was only an authority to go to war against England if England started the war. England did start the Revolutionary War , lost the war, and signed The Treaty of Paris on 9/3/1783.

However, if one studies the social contract theory of John Locke in his book on ," The Second Treatise of Government," Locke's social contract has two parties, Society and Government. So two founding documents exist in a new nation. One is the Declaration of Independence and defines Society. The first two paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence defines Society and the remaining words authorize war with England. The second founding document defines the Second Continental Congress, the Articles of Confederation, and finally the U.S. Constitution. As time passed, these three organizations were defining Government.

It is important that the U.S. Supreme Court correct its great error because the declaration of Independence includes the important phrase --- Laws of Nature and Nature's God. The Laws of Nature are the subject of the creatures that God acts to make. The Laws of Nature's God are the subject of God's morals. God's morals are found in the act of God that unifies the creatures. To find the unity of creatures, we must find the attributes that God uses to unify the creatures. At this time, I have found five attributes of God --- One, Equality, Union, Infinite, and Indivisible.

Clearly, religions, materialists, and atheists are lost.

Monday, November 16, 2009

Nicholas of Cusa and Christanity

I am glad to see that sales of my book on 'The First Scientific Proof of God' is increasing and that people are beginning to study the book of Nicholas of Cusa, 'On Learned Ignorance.' I suggest that readers also scan the comments on the 11/11/09 blog on 'Learning One's Ignorance.' These comments will explain the negatively infinite of God and the privately infinite of the universe. These different infinities get us closer to the transfinite numbers of Georg Cantor. Since more and more people are studying the books I suggest, I want to discuss the problem of Christianity because it is not progressing scientifically. The pic on the left is Nicholas of Cusa.

The Christian churches of today are trying to regain the power they lost over the last forty years to new organizations such as the New Thought and New Age. To regain power, Christian churches are teachings mostly moral behaviors and do not teach the great scientific teachings of Jesus Christ. The problem of teaching the scientific sayings of Jesus is that the Pope, most priests ,and most preachers are not scientists. And if a Christian teacher is a scientists, this scientist has become an outdated materialist. After the loss of members, Christians started to follow political organizations. In the USA, they became associated mostly with atheistic or atheistic-like organizations such as conservatives, capitalists, materialists, and Darwinists.

Christians seem to be improving the teaching of Jesus Christ's scientific teachings when new translations of the writings of Nicholas of Cusa were made by Dr. Jasper Hopkins of Minnesota. Then, the American Cusanus Society (ACS) was organized by the Catholic church. This society allows one to copy out writings of Nicholas of Cusa on the Internet. (click)

However, one must be careful when working with the ACS and the Catholic church because both the Vatican and the ACS are power-seeking organizations. With six Catholic judges now sitting in the U.S. Supreme Court, the USA could change and cause the USA to the wrong way because the Vatican and ACS teach that the universe will come to an apocalyptic end, just as materialists say that the universe will end in a heat death called entropy.

The people of the USA must stop Christianity and especially the Catholic church because the universe and life have no end.

Thursday, November 12, 2009

Understanding God and His Universe

Since God is incomprehensible, most believers say that they can gain understandings about God. In his "Critique of Pure Reason," Immanuel Kant says that our understandings produce reasoned concepts that originate in the senses where intuition and thought begin. And his "Phenomenology of Spirit," Friedrich Hegel says that our understandings also have a force. Today, we read about 'Understanding by Design' (UbD) in the field of education. (click)

Note. The understandings of Kant and Hegel deal with the things that God made and that the UbD deals with the understandings that man has already found about some of the things made by God.

At Rom. 1:20, Paul said, "For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power, and Godhead; so are without excuse." So, ever since the time of Abraham, who rejected idolatry and identified the Onassis of God, man has only sought the understandings of God by studying what God made.

In 1967, when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled to remove prayers from public schools, the high Court authorized atheism to be practiced in the USA. Over the last forty-two years, the practice of atheism has lured more and U.S. scientists and mathematicians away from God with the result that man's understandings have been focused, no longer on the things that God made, but on the universe. But, the Supreme Court ruling did not only take God away from our scientists and mathematicians. This same court took God away from all U.S. citizens because U.S. lawyers argue that the Declaration of Independence was only a declaration of war. Their argunent is a major error. The truth is that the first two paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence install John Locke's social contract. And these paragraphs identify 'The United States of America' as a nation under God. The remaining words in the Declaration of Independence form a second authority, the authority to go to war against England, but only if England starts the war.

U.S. scientists and mathematicians must act so they can return to God and continue the work of understanding the things that God made. Further, I say that the practice of atheism is unlawful in the USA.

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

Learning One's Ignorance

In the 4th century B.C., Plato asked, 'What is Knowledge?' This question has never been answered. But, Plato's question might be answered in the current debates between the believers in God and the non believers

In my last blog, I show that Nicholas of Cusa divided knowledge into two classes as follows: (1) the knowledge of God and (2) the knowledge of man. Cusa discovered God's knowledge, which is 'absolute' and never changes. He also found that God's knowledge is absolutely maximum and absolutely minimum. By finding God's knowledge, Cusa also found that man's knowledge, which is 'relativistic,' changing, and has relative maximums and minimums

Atheistic scientists argue that God does not exist because they cannot sense God. But it is not possible to sense God because God exist in a world where things cannot be sensed. Thus, God can neither be known nor sensed.

Why are atheistic making this error? In his writings "On Learned Ignorance," Nicholas of Cusa also teaches that man must learn his ignorance. So Cusa is saying that man must seek intelligence but must also learn what he cannot know. The atheists are rejecting God and making this error because they have not learned their ignorance.

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

God is the Absolute Maximum and the Absolute Minimum and Unifies Them

In Bk. I, at Ch.4 of his book 'On Learned Ignorance,' Nicholas of Cusa makes the greatest discovery on the subject of knowledge. He discovered that our knowledge can not reach a maximum. If maximum exists, it cannot become less otherwise it is no longer maximum. So the maximum is also minimum. Here we notice that the maximum is absolutely maximum and absolutely minimum.

Thus, a maximum that does not become less is known as an absolute maximum, which is also an absolute minimum. Then, any maximum that can become less is known as a relative maximum. And any minimum that can be more is known as a relative minimum. In summary, if there is a absolute maximum and absolute minimum, God must exist. And if there are relative maximum and relative minimums, God created a world that has an intelligent design.

Nicholas of Cusa did not hesitate to model God and His creation using a geometrical circle. God is the circle's center and circumference and all created are inside the circle. As you can see, no other things exist. The rejection of God is thus a false thought.

Monday, November 09, 2009

A New Partnership That Is Dividing the USA

Today’s U.S. physical scientists and biologists do not seem to understand the founding documents of the USA. Instead of developing an understanding of our self-Society and self-Government, they have created a new partnership that would change our Society and Government. This new partnership would limit all of our sciences to ‘a science of mechanisms.’

This partnership has deep roots in our colleges and universities. Collegiate statements about ‘nonsectarianism’ stopped religious studies. But these statements also stopped the ‘studies of God’ (theology) in all educational institutions. When I told this error to my university (John Hopkins), President Brody only scratched his head. His head scratching was useless because he retired.

How can scientists and biologists study the universe without considering theologies? Whether God is passive or active, this new partnership cannot remove God from its studies unless it rejects the existence of God. So this new partnership is an unlawful organization because both the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution say that the USA is a nation under God.

My theological studies show that God is active and functional and cannot be removed from any scientific study. My studies also inform me that many popular personalities of the past did not remove God from their studies of the universe. But, I learned that most members of the new partnership do not even consider the work of those past personalities who did consider God.

In 1999, the National Academy of Science reported the debate between evolutionary theory and creation theory to the federal government. This report is dishonest because theologies were not considered in this debate. The result is that Darwin’s evolutionary theory is taught nationally.

Had the working members of this partnership studied those personalities, who did considered God during their studies of research, these members would have found the real gold --- that God exists and is active. They would have also learned that Darwin’s ancestral theory is false. Instead, all genera are fixed on a continuum by God. Thus, our biologists might be asked soon to do a more important job --- to identify the infinite number of numbered species that God made possible. And our sciences might be asked soon to distinguish physical science from the life sciences.

Huge amounts of time and money are thus being wasted by our atheistic scientists and biologists.

Friday, November 06, 2009

Making My First Scientific Proof of God Clearer, V

I show scientifically that only one world exists. In this single world, we find the things we call God and creatures. The two different parts of this world can be modeled with a geometrical circle. God is found at the circle's center (the absolute minimum). God is also found in circumference (the absolute maximum). This is a close model because we know that God is the absolute maximum and the absolute minimum. Inside the circle we find the creatures. My science says that creatures appear when God contracts some of His essential attributes. When these attributes are contracted, phenomenal attributes appear in creatures. These phenomenal attributes form God's intelligent design of creatures and their functional relations. To find new essential attributes that God contracted, the process is reversed by using Plato's negative. His negative will seek the origin of any phenomena. Since all knowledge of these attributes can never be completed, this world has no end.

Many scientists reject God. However, they do not seem to know the above contraction process and its reversal. If they are unaware of the contraction process, they are assuming that all phenomena in the universe originated from a physical thing that exploded billions of years ago. Based on this assumption, these scientists are saying that God does not exist and is not functional in the universe. With this sayings, they assume that the universe is a mechanical thing. They must also assume (1) that all living things come from nonliving things, (2) that Darwin's evolution theory is true, and (3) that cause-effect relations govern all human behaviors. To them, suicide is neither right or wrong because this world has an end.

These two views above are the causes that divide the United States of America today. Only one of these views is true. Action is necessary now if the rights of citizens are to be defended from arbitrary rights and laws.

Thursday, November 05, 2009

Today's Event at Fort Hood, Texas

Today,, the nasty event at Fort Hood could be a 'going to school event' for our military experts. In the late 1970s, I worked on a project that would computerize the U.S. Army. Since the development of the computer system had to consider future war possibilities, our project was allowed to view the war threats identified by the CIA. One of the war threats was the continuation of the View Nam war.

The View Nam war became a ghetto war. Such a war was new. Prior to such a war, the military planners used the Forward Edge of the Battle (FEB). With the FEB, friends are on one side of it and enemies are on the other side. Since a ghetto war does not have the FEB, the enemy is everywhere. This ghetto war is thus filled with uncertain events of the enemy and can confuse the mind of any human.

The Iraq and Afghanistan wars are ghetto wars. And we notice that more military men and women are coming home with mental problems. Perhaps, the event at Fort Hood has a known cause.

Wednesday, November 04, 2009

Making My First Scientific Proof of God Clearer, IV

In my book on 'The First Scientific Proof of God" I discussed Leibniz's work on monadology and applied his monads to the phenomena of divisible, which is an attribute of all things in the universe and its negative, Indivisible, which is an attribute of God. It is with this pair of coexisting opposites that we identify the souls (or functional principles) of all things in the universe.

For a monotheistic God to create a different world, two two phases are necessary. In the first phase, God's attributes of One, Equality, and Indivisible are contracted by finitude and plurality. In this phase, we find many, indivisible inequalities. They are all souls, which I call spiritual atoms and Leibniz calls monads or true atoms. Then, in the second phase, God's attribute of Union must be contracted to relation. In this phase we find many-divisible-inequalities. They are all bodies.

The two phases are necessary because God's intelligent design makes all souls immortal and all bodies mortal. These two phases tell us that God's intelligent design has made life a continuum, life after death, or reincarnation realities. Note. Space and time will appear in the third phase in which all created things become dynamic.

Tuesday, November 03, 2009

Making My First Scientific Proof of God Clearer, III

Our system of symbolic languages cannot attain the complete knowledge of an incomprehensive God. However, out symbolic languages can gain understandings of such a God. We gain such understandings by using negative thinking. In the fists two blogs on making my proof of God clearer, I used the negative thinking of Plato. Plato describes his negative thinking in his Sophist dialogue at 257b. There, Plato says, "When we speak of `that which is not,' it seems that we do not mean something contrary to what exists but only something that is different." In the last two blogs, universal phenomena of the universe are negated and reveals the origin of these phenomena. These origins are really attributes of God.

This negation also tells us that God created our universes by contracting those of his own attributes that form his intelligent design of the universe. For instance. when God creates, his One is contracted to many, his Equality is contracted to difference, his Union is contracted to relation, and his Infinite is contracted to finite. Thus, God, who lives in a higher world, creates our lower world by using a contraction process.

The contraction process is not limited to a God who can creates worlds. humans can also apply the contracting process. I played with friends in the local forest when I was a young boy. There, we made our own bows and arrows. To make a bow we would use the straight stem of a hickory tree, remove its branches, bend the stem, and hold the curved bow stem with a string at both ends of the stem As little creators, we created a curved bow by contracting the straight stem of a hickory tree.

When a person's mind uses Plato's negative, the mind is not seeking the contrary of phenomena in order to create a pair of excluded middle opposites. Today's logicians do not understand negative thinking. They don't understand, for instance, that the atom bomb was created only by negating a form of different and dirty radiation material that we can't destroy today.

To learn more about 'contraction' see the book "On Learned Ignorance" by Nicholas of Cusa. This book can be copied out the Internet. (click)

Sunday, November 01, 2009

Making My First Scientific Proof of God Clearer, II

In my blog on my proof of God yesterday, I identified four pairs of coexisting opposites that participate in the formation of a single world in which God is a functional thing who acts to create all things. These created things are functional in the creation of the universe that participates in the formation of the single world. These four coexisting opposites, which distinguish God from the universe and are as follows: finite/Infinite, many/One, inequality/Equality, and relation/Union. The capitalized words are unchanging attributes of God. The other words are contracted words (of the capitalized words) and form God's intelligent design of the universe. In this blog, I will use Rom. 1:20 again to introduce a fifth pair of coexisting opposites. These opposites are 'divisible/Indivisible.'

In this fifth pair of coexisting opposites, the word 'Indivisible' becomes the fifth attribute of God and the word 'divisible,' which is a contraction of the word Indivisible, becomes an attribute of all things in the universe. The Indivisible word tells us that God is a pure whole, which has no parts. On the other hand, the divisible word tells us that all created things are wholes, which has parts.

After my study of this fifth pair of coexisting opposites, I concluded that the monadology and New System of Leibniz fit in the development of these attributes. The Indivisible word, which is the fifth attribute of God, is in God. When God acts, the word ‘Indivisible’ is contracted and forms a plurality of indivisible/related things. . I call the indivisible/related things 'related spiritual atoms.' Leibniz would call them 'related true atoms' or 'related monads' when he was working on his monadology.

Since God does not exist in time, God and the universe of things were always single world. God and the universe of things thus had no beginning and will never have an end. As the only knowing beings in the universe, we use time to study the dynamics of the universe and the lives of man and other living things.