Scientific Proof of God, A New and Modern Bible, and Coexisting Relations of God and the Universe

Wednesday, August 18, 2010

Why Congress Can Deny a Religion

The development of the United States of America in 1776 was a major political event. However, religious and language events occurred after the founding documents were signed. These events brought problems of interpreting the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution by all U.S. Courts. I do not believe that our Courts are aware of these religious and language problems.

The religious event was the initial appearance of panentheism in 500 B.C. Panentheism reappeared in the teaching of Jesus Christ at John 14:20. It reappeared in the 15th century through Nicholas of Cusa, in the 18th century through Gottfried Leibniz, and has grown fast worldwide in the 21st century. This new religion challenges the 18th century Enlightenment and today's Materialism. (click)

The language event occurred in the 1920s when the studies of Western linguists recognized that 'sensual data are primarily symbolic.' Interestingly, Nicholas of Cusa had announced the human problem of sensing with symbols in his 1440 book, 'On Learned Ignorance.'

Panentheism tells us that a monotheistic God is incomprehensive. But we can understand God's acts if we study the Creatures that God made, as Paul said at Rom. 1;20, and identify rights that God gave us. This is why the founders mandated in the Declaration of Independence the 'Laws of Nature' (science) and 'Laws of Nature's God' (morals). Some of the rights that God gave us are used to form a self-government that secures us. The self-government was defined by the founders as an amendable Constitution so that rights could be added, changed, or removed, as the Union becomes more perfect.

A nation should never develop an unchanging language or scripture because our rights come from God and are always changing and being perfected. For this reason, the U.S. government should work with religions that are dynamic and are improving.

Should Muslims be allowed to place a mosque near ground zero of the 9/11 event in New York City? I say that the U.S. government should deny this 'ground zero' place to Islam because of Islam's terrorism, religious fundamentalism, and arbitrary rites. While Congress can make no law respecting an establishment of religion, since the USA is a nation under God, Congress can make law that denies arbitrary rights.

Tuesday, August 17, 2010

How Religions Must Treat Their Thoughts Among the Dead at the 9/11 Event

In the Western world, Zoroastrianism, Judaism, Christianity, and Islam have scriptures:: Avesta (Zoroastrianism), Old Testament (Judaism), New Testament (Christianity), and Qur’an (Islam). Avesta was prepared by the Royal Scribes of King Vishtaspa of Iran after Zoroaster told the King what God (Ahura Masza) told him face to face. Jews say that the words in the Old Testament are inspired by God through the Holy Spirit. Christians say that God appeared in our world as the Son of God, who was Jesus Christ. And Muslims say that the Qur’an is written in God’s language and are messages that Muhammad received from the angel Gabriel.

Panentheism says that a plurality of words found in each of these four scriptures are not from God because only one word exists in a monotheistic God.

The gap that separates God and Creatures became clear in the 15th century when Nicholas of Cusa showed that a monotheistic God is incomprehensive and thus cannot be known with the languages that have awakened our minds. In Part IIc of 'The First Scientific Proof of God', I discuss the communication problem between God and man. There, I say that that only information can be exchanged between God and Creatures.

The language barrier between God and the Creatures prevents us from communicating with God and prevents us from knowing God perfectly. However, we can know God's attributes because, when contracted, they form our world. The existence of this barrier is thus ‘good news’ because it tells us that that God is 'one and infinite' and can give us an everlasting life. So, my messages to all religions are as follows: "Scriptures do not express God’s thoughts and acts. Scriptures can only express the thoughts and acts of the Creatures."

God thus gave humans a unique ability --- to create and use symbols. With symbols, we can think and talk discursively, communicate with each other, find relative truths about God’s creations, and use these relative truths to find unchanging or absolute truths about our world. With symbols, we conceive the Creatures around us. As the symbols become more precise, our conceptions of the realities in the world become more accurate. With relative and absolute truths, we continue to improve our consciousness. With symbols, we communicate with each other, build new knowledge, build new sciences, and build new technologies. This unique ability from God requires that we do have responsibilities to God.

Let me now discuss the early togetherness of Judaism and Islams. Nicholas’ book on 'The Peace of Faith' was a study for Pius II on the unification of different religions. It was written in two months after the Turks conquered Constantinople in 1453. Pius II concluded the Muslims would not stop their plundering. The Peace of Faith recommends ways to unify religions and eliminates conversions and missions. In this study Nicholas found two facts: (1) that the name of God in the different language is the same or has very similar meanings and (2) that differences between religions exist only because of different rites. So, religions could be unifies simply by developing common rites.

Nicholas visited Constantinople in 1437 while he was a member of the Council of Basel. During this visit, he examined the Qur'an and assisted thirteen Muslims who wanted to travel to Rome for instruction on the Christian faith. After the Turks sacked Constantinople, Nicholas wrote Sifting of the Qur’an. It was dedicated to Pius II. In this book Nicholas says that Muhammad prepared the Qur’an so that he can teach his highly ignorant followers in Mecca about Jesus Christ. Since sexual relations dominated the lives of his ignorant followers, Muhammad used sexual symbols (e.g., white virgins) to describe the nature of paradise.

According to Nicholas, three very crafty Jews attached themselves to Muhammad in order to avert him. After Muhammad’s death, these crafty Jews approached Alis, the son of Abitalip, to whom Muhammad had bequeathed his collection of writings. Abitalip was persuaded by these Jews to elevate himself to a prophet. They added and deleted what was necessary from the book of Muhammad and added passages so that Muhammad would appear as a prophet.

I conclude that the purpose of making the Qur’an was not to make a new religion called Islam. Islam began in order to unite many Muslims with Jews and divert the teaching of Jesus Christ and the teaching of panentheism, away from Islam. Jesus expressed panentheism at John 14:20. The togetherness of Jews and Muslims exists today through the God called deism. But deism produces only ungodly rites. I discussed this togetherness in my Aug. 12, 2010 blog. For the firs time, the term 'Judeo-Christian' has become troublesome in my mind. At this time, only Christianity is an advancing form of panentheism

The God of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam is common because a monotheistic God is incomprehensible. One might conclude that the rites will not differ in these three religions. This conclusion is wrong because panentheism is able to gain "understandings" about God. These understandings can change common rites drastically and change the world fast.

Based on the information in this blog, I conclude that it is inappropriate for any religion to express their rites at the place where the 9/11 event occurred in New York City. Only advancing religions should be allowed to express and record a new understandings there.

Sunday, August 15, 2010

If Used, Panentheism Can Correct Federal, State, and Local Governments and Book/Author Errors

Beyond correcting all Western world religions, panentheism is able to correct all governments, all books, and all authors. Panentheism has this power because it accepts God and distinguishes God from all Creatures precisely. This precision corrects the dictionary meanings of symbols used in any national language.

Panentheism suggests that Republicans and Democrats correct their ideologies and manifestos. For instance, in his book on 'Liberty and Tyranny' the conservative, Mark Levin, says that the liberty of humans is limited by a tyrannical government. This statement is wrong since all liberties are gifts to all humans from God. In the USA, many of these gifts are used to form the U.S. government in exchange for security. Thus, the U.S. government only appears to be tyrannical to conservatives, who do not consider God to prepare their manifestos. Levin seems to believe that human liberty is absolute (infinite in number). This is an error. Floods, hurricanes, earthquakes, etc. tell us that our liberty is not absolute. Instead, our liberties vary and differ over time.

Historians write about the liberty, equality, and power of Americans. The concept 'equality' is incorrect if panentheism is accepted. In his book 'On Learned Ignorance (Bk. I, Ch. 8),' Nicholas of Cusa identifies the first three attributes of God --- one, equality, and union. Nicholas of Cusa and panentheism thus tell us that the concept equality is found only in God and that in our world, we will only find qualities that differ. This means that no identical things will be found among the Creatures. Accordingly, in the Declaration of Independence, the statement, 'all Men are created equal,' cannot be interpreted as 'all Men are created identities.'

Today, conservatives and liberals are involved in ugly discussions only because they are not using symbols correctly. Since panentheism is correcting the meanings of many symbols, many books must be corrected. The symbols in my book on 'The First Scientific Proof of God' are corrected. The symbols iny blogs on this website are also corrected.

Thursday, August 12, 2010

Judaism, Christianity, and Islam vs. Panentheism

Panentheism is today's most powerful religion that is asking new questions about the old Western religions known as Judaism, Christianity and Islam. It has become powerful because it unifies the new studies of God ( theology) with the new studies of the soft and hard sciences. Together, they gain power because they seek common truths. So when I used science to compare Scientology with panentheism, I found that the God of panentheism is infinite whereas the God of Scientology is finite. Thus, I found that Scientology has falsities because it is scientifically different than panentheism. Below, I will also compare panentheism with Judaism, Christianity, and Islam.

Judaism and Islam have an inactive creator God who does not interfere with the laws of nature of a finite world. These laws force this world from a beginning (t = 0) to its end. This beginning and end means that all followers of Judaism and Islam are 'materialists.' The thoughts of materialists can never become similar to the panentheistic thoughts.

Christianity has an active creator God, who transcends, but is also in, a finite world that has a beginning (t = 0) and an end. Panentheism is like Christianity and differs from Christianity because a panentheistic finite world had no beginning and has no end. Christianity can become equivalent to panentheism if Christians accept the following beliefs:

1) Believe that God and all Creatures are one and eternal.
2) Believe that Son of God is in all human beings. (Jesus Christ is not the only Son of God because all humans received the ability to reason.)
3) Believe that God and all Creatures are functional (or purposive).
4) Believe that all Creatures have an Indivisible/Immortal Soul.

This comparison shows that a very different division exists among people in our world. It is clear that this division must be eliminated before peace will become possible.


Scientology vs. Panentheism

In Scientology, the concept of God is expressed as the Eighth Dynamic—the urge toward existence as infinity. This is also identified as the Supreme Being. As the Eighth Dynamic, the Scientology concept of God rests at the very apex of universal survival. As L. Ron Hubbard wrote in 'Science of Survival:'

Scientology says, "No culture in the history of the world, save the thoroughly depraved and expiring ones, has failed to affirm the existence of a Supreme Being. It is an empirical observation that men without a strong and lasting faith in a Supreme Being are less capable, less ethical and less valuable to themselves and society....A man without an abiding faith is, by observation alone, more of a thing than a man." (click)

The Church of Scientology has no set dogma concerning God that it imposes on its members. As with all its tenets, Scientology does not ask individuals to accept anything on faith alone. Rather, as one’s level of spiritual awareness increases through participation in Scientology auditing and training, One attains his own certainty of every dynamic. Accordingly, only when the Seventh Dynamic (spiritual) is reached in its entirety will one discover and come to a full understanding of the Eighth Dynamic (infinity) and one’s relationship to the Supreme Being.

The God of panentheism is different than the God of scientology because the panentheistic God and Creatures connect a single higher and lower world. Since God and Creatures exist forever, God and All Creatures are continuous and purposive. Since all attributes of God are absolute, --- God is, always was, and always will be infinite

Sunday, August 08, 2010

Why the Atheistic Mind Self-destroys

When I worked as a hard scientist at the National Institute of Justice in the U.S. Department of Justice, I became familiar with the 'soft sciences.' Eventually, I concluded that the symbols of y national language can create 'the criminal mind.' In yesterday's blog, I show that the symbol 'free' can create criminals if this symbol is not treated as a 'variable.' So, the words 'free' and 'freedom' must be used carefully in statements.

Since all human minds develop by using the symbols of a national language, the minds of people in a nation can develop differently. For example, atheists reject God. Thus, the mind of an atheist can develop differently compared to the development of the mind of a believer. This difference can occur if the mind of the atheist treats the word 'free' as an absolute and the mind of the believer treats the word 'freedom' as a variable.

When Madelyn Murray O' Hair rejected God in 1967, prayers had to be removed from the public schools. However, this Supreme Court ruling did not only stop these prayers. This ruling also influenced the developing minds of U.S school teachers, students, parents, workers, mathematicians, scientists, drug users, economists, politicians and businesses. As I show below, this ruling is the worst error a judge could make.

This Supreme Court ruling has changed science '180 degrees' away from God. Logic has become the false god of atheism. Today, atheists have raised logic, evolution, facts, and materialism to completed and godless sciences. Thus, excluded middle opposites (e.g., cold and hot) rule all sciences. Yet the opposites, cold/hot, were transformed into a 'variable' when the thermometer was discovered. In my proof of God's existence, I identify three forms of opposites as follows: all opposites in God are one; all opposites in the Creatures are variables; and, all opposites, which connect God and the Creatures, coexist.

I say that atheism, as a false theory, is developing minds that the people of the U.S. can't afford. The degenerating mind of an atheist might be detected when an atheist challenges your use of non sequiturs.

Saturday, August 07, 2010

More on Unnatural and Natural Economies

More can be said about the unnatural and natural economies that I discussed in my July 19, 2010 blog. In that blog, I showed that the word 'free' in the 'free market economy' is not absolute. Accordingly, the word free is a variable. Thus, the features of a free market economy can be compared with the features of other economies.

Thus, the features of a free market economy can be compared with the features of the 'non free market economy.' One non free market economy is known as Marxism. However, the features of the free market economy can also be compared with the features of any natural economy, such as the natural economy developed by Lyndon LaRouche. Some undesired features of the free market economy is its periodic rise of unemployment, inflation, taxing, and the creation of money by banks rather than Congress.

The comparison of different economies is the responsibilities of our colleges and universities. My responsibility was only to inform these institutions and economists about God's absoluteness and the variables that must be considered in these analyses. Those people and organizations who promote economies, such as the free market economy without using the word 'freedom' as a variable, should be ashamed because they help to weaken and destroy the human mind.

Thursday, August 05, 2010

More on the Scientific God Institure and Scientific God Journal

After reading some of the material of the Scientific God Journal, I believe that the Scientific God Institute will deal with two different theologies and one science. The two theologies are known as 'deism' and 'theism.' Deism has an inactive God whereas theism has an active God. The inactive God is the God of Judaism whereas the active God is the God of Christianity. It is unclear whether the Institute will deal with the God of Islam, which holds both Jewish and Christian beliefs.

I conclude that the Institute will deal only with one science. --- materialism. Materialism aligns to Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. This science of these religions says that God is eternal and the Creatures have a beginning and end. This single science uses Newton ism, Einstein ism, and Euclidean ism. This science also assumes that concept '0' is a real number.

My theology and science are different than the two theologies and the science above. First, since my God is maximum and minimum, the concept 'nothing' does not exist in our world. My theology has a ponentheistic and infinite God connected functionally to and an infinite number of finite Creatures. This God enfolds and unfolds all indivisible and divisible Creatures. The indivisible Creatures cannot be reduced because they are immortal, purposive, and reincarnated. The divisible Creatures are functional and temporal. Thus, God and the Creatures form a single world. This single theology and science had no beginning and has no end. If mind is developed properly by independent man, only truths and beauties will be experienced forever. The fireworks of God are always great.

Tuesday, August 03, 2010

Scientific God Institure and Scientific God Journal

Scientific God Institute (SGI) is a new organization that began in March 1, 2010. It is not about a particular religion nor is it focused on religious debates. Rather, it is an institution (and publication) where scientists, philosophers, theologians and other learned scholars publish their research results and express their views on the issues outlined herein. In doing so, we hope that one day we will be able to answer scientifically the questions concerning us the most - who are we, where did we come from, where are we going, and, is there a Scientific GOD?

In June 2010, Vol. 1, Issue 4, pps. 296-298, the Scientific God Journal published a book review of my boob, "The First Scientific Proof of God: Reveals God's Intelligent Design and a Modern Creation Theory." (click)

About my book, also see amazon Author Central (click). There, I provide more detailed information about my work. My new work on my book is found in this website.

Monday, August 02, 2010

Author Central (in Amazon Bookstore)

My Author Page at is presenting modern information on God and the way I am reveallig new facts about a panentheistic and active God. My information is the most advandcd that will be found anywhere in the world.

I. General Histoty About Panentheism.
2. My 'Big Thinkers' and Their Thoughts.
3. Containers. Wholes, and Indivisibles. (click)