On My Proof of God

The comment from Len Clements of Las Vegas, NV below was posted today on my blog "Debating With Atheists, Evolutionists, or Sam Harris "( March 2, 2008). Can you answer Clements’ question? If you cannot devalue my proof of God, I will continue to expose the ugly English language and American mind with the hopes of improving American science and developing a beautiful mind for all Americans.

Is this comment by Lee Clements another sign that the book reviews of my book, The First Scientific Proof of God, on Amazon.com form a conspiracy against the US Declaration of Independence?

LEN CLEMENTS' COMMENT
I originally came into this blog for the purpose of offering a rebuttal to Mr. Shollenberger's "proof of God" claim. However, after reading the other responses he has received I am now compelled to defend him!

I recall being taught in a college debate class (a long, long time ago) a technique that is to be used only as a "last resort" when it appears, the argument is lost. That is: If you can't diminish the credibility of your opposition's point, try to diminish the credibility of your opposition.

So far, this tactic is ALL that I have seen in response to Mr. Shollenberger's position. Are we really so desperate for a counter-point that this tactic needed to be employed here? Is our position so weak that we need to resort to petty semantic games and ironic grammatical attacks (considering the number of typos by his opposition). It's clear what his actual position is, regardless of how he has stated it.

Seriously. Can anyone here devalue George's point without devaluing George?

Len Clements
Las Vegas, NV