Restudying the Field of Economics
Planet earth can be viewed as a life-supporting spacecraft that has been made either by God or by the nature of the Big Bang theory. Our astronomers know that earth will die as it and the other planets are absorbed by the sun as nuclear fuel. Jesus Christ confirms this knowledge at Matt.24:29 of the Bible. There, Jesus says that the sun dies when it darkens, the moon lost its light, and the positions of the evening stars change. At Matt. 24: 36, he also says that only God knows exactly when our solar system ends. But, at Matt. 24:39-51, Jesus says that the Son of man will come to save people from this death. But, He says that only people who have developed godly thoughts and behaviors are to be saved from thel death experience of 'weeping and gnashing of teeth.'
What does Jesus mean by distinguishing those people who are saved and those who will weep and gnash their teeth? 'With this blog, I offer a new speculation on this question.
Since human life is eternal, I conclude that people, who avoid these bad experiences of the death of a planet, develop godly thoughts and behaviors continually, elevate themselves continually to a higher life form on the path to Heaven perhaps on another planet, and continually avoid the kind of life that exists on a planet that is being absorbed by the sun. This kind of life would seem to develop new radiation diseases. I conclude that people who experience weeping and gnashing of teeth are eternal and thus are not hated and destroyed by God. Accordingly, I conclude that these people are not developing godly attributes and choose to live ungodly on the path to Hell continually. Based on this speculation, both reincarnation and resurrection seem to be possible to explain the after-life of humans. Resurrection would provide one an after-life on another planet whereas reincarnation would provide one an after-life on the same planet.
Currently, the US economy is inconsistent with this teachings of Jesus Christ and my scientific proof of God. How did the US economy become inconsistent with God? I can explain this inconsistency. The US government began as a government of believing people, by believing people, and for believing people. This beginning is confirmed by the Declaration of Independence and the Constitutions of all of the States. However, in time, the US government transformed itself into a government of, by, and for both believers and nonbelievers. This illegal transformation was made possible by the US Supreme Court because it (1) does not consider the US Declaration of Independence as a ‘law of the USA’ and (2) separates State and God. This illegal transformation has led to a laissez-faire US economy, which is inconsistent with God.
In the restudying of the US field of economics, the US Supreme Court and the US economy must be changed. The US Supreme Court must be changed so that the Declaration of Independence becomes the highest law of the USA. Such a highest law must also exist in all nations. The economy of all nations must be changed so that the present economy of a nation reflects the national goals and priorities of each nation.
What does Jesus mean by distinguishing those people who are saved and those who will weep and gnash their teeth? 'With this blog, I offer a new speculation on this question.
Since human life is eternal, I conclude that people, who avoid these bad experiences of the death of a planet, develop godly thoughts and behaviors continually, elevate themselves continually to a higher life form on the path to Heaven perhaps on another planet, and continually avoid the kind of life that exists on a planet that is being absorbed by the sun. This kind of life would seem to develop new radiation diseases. I conclude that people who experience weeping and gnashing of teeth are eternal and thus are not hated and destroyed by God. Accordingly, I conclude that these people are not developing godly attributes and choose to live ungodly on the path to Hell continually. Based on this speculation, both reincarnation and resurrection seem to be possible to explain the after-life of humans. Resurrection would provide one an after-life on another planet whereas reincarnation would provide one an after-life on the same planet.
Currently, the US economy is inconsistent with this teachings of Jesus Christ and my scientific proof of God. How did the US economy become inconsistent with God? I can explain this inconsistency. The US government began as a government of believing people, by believing people, and for believing people. This beginning is confirmed by the Declaration of Independence and the Constitutions of all of the States. However, in time, the US government transformed itself into a government of, by, and for both believers and nonbelievers. This illegal transformation was made possible by the US Supreme Court because it (1) does not consider the US Declaration of Independence as a ‘law of the USA’ and (2) separates State and God. This illegal transformation has led to a laissez-faire US economy, which is inconsistent with God.
In the restudying of the US field of economics, the US Supreme Court and the US economy must be changed. The US Supreme Court must be changed so that the Declaration of Independence becomes the highest law of the USA. Such a highest law must also exist in all nations. The economy of all nations must be changed so that the present economy of a nation reflects the national goals and priorities of each nation.
posted by George Shollenberger @ 10:25 AM
9 Comments:
At 1:15 PM,
Anonymous said…
And all those that agreed said "Amen"!
At 3:58 PM,
George Shollenberger said…
Yes, Jack the people must limit the production and services of laissez-faire producers and services so that national human goals can be made and implemented.
At 8:32 AM,
Anonymous said…
I have now seen your website, proof of deity.....hmmmm another person convinced of their own connection to god as if you are the only conduit. The pope thinks that way too.
At 10:47 AM,
George Shollenberger said…
The proof of God I found is scientific, not personal. When a scientific proof is found, it applies to all people because modern science and its scientific method applies to all people in all nations. For instance, the law of gravity applies to every man ,woman, and child.
Yes, past popes have taught that only they were infallible and had a private connection to God. However, Pope John, who apologized for the imprisonment of Galileo, and Pope Benedict are different because they are bringing modern science and the scientific method into the Catholic Church. This is more than most Protestent churches are doing today.
And, I am not a catholic.
The real God has now been found much like fire had been found long ago.
At 1:17 PM,
Anonymous said…
And, I am not a catholic.
You're also not a scientist. You're a retired electrical engineer who has way too high an opinion of himself and the validity of his own opinions (which are highly influenced by the evangelical culture he is immersed in).
At 3:47 PM,
Anonymous said…
Science is not ignorant religious dogma passed off as fact. Here's a comment by "Chiefley" in the pandasthumb thread that you trolled:
Posted by Chiefley on July 17, 2006 03:22 PM (e)
Some Christian Nationalist who cares little about truth. wrote:
The US government began as a government of believing people, by believing people, and for believing people.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH.
Thomas Jefferson:
In a letter to Peter Carr, 10 August 1787, he wrote, “Question with boldness even the existence of a god.”
In a letter to Ezra Stiles Ely, 25 June 1819, he wrote, “You say you are a Calvinist. I am not. I am of a sect by myself, as far as I know.”
Yes, and he wrote his own Bible for his sect of one in which he denied the divinity of Jesus.
John Adams:
“The United States of America have exhibited, perhaps, the first example of governments erected on the simple principles of nature; and if men are now sufficiently enlightened to disabuse themselves of artifice, imposture, hypocrisy, and superstition, they will consider this event as an era in their history…. It will never be pretended that any persons employed in that service had interviews with the gods, or were in any degree under the influence of Heaven, more than those at work upon ships or houses, or laboring in merchandise or agriculture; it will forever be acknowledged that these governments were contrived merely by the use of reason and the senses.”
or
“… Thirteen governments [of the original states] thus founded on the natural authority of the people alone, without a pretence of miracle or mystery, and which are destined to spread over the northern part of that whole quarter of the globe, are a great point gained in favor of the rights of mankind.”
James Madison:
“During almost fifteen centuries has the legal establishment of Christianity been on trial. What have been its fruits? More or less in all places, pride and indolence in the Clergy, ignorance and servility in the laity; in both, superstition, bigotry and persecution.”
“What influence, in fact, have ecclesiastical establishments had on society? In some instances they have been seen to erect a spiritual tyranny on the ruins of the civil authority; on many instances they have been seen upholding the thrones of political tyranny; in no instance have they been the guardians of the liberties of the people. Rulers who wish to subvert the public liberty may have found an established clergy convenient auxiliaries. A just government, instituted to secure and perpetuate it, needs them not.”
Benjamin Franklin:
“… Some books against Deism fell into my hands… It happened that they wrought an effect on my quite contrary to what was intended by them; for the arguments of the Deists, which were quoted to be refuted, appeared to me much stronger than the refutations; in short, I soon became a through Deist.”
In an essay on “Toleration,” Franklin wrote:
“If we look back into history for the character of the present sects in Christianity, we shall find few that have not in their turns been persecutors, and complainers of persecution. The primitive Christians thought persecution extremely wrong in the Pagans, but practiced it on one another. The first Protestants of the Church of England blamed persecution in the Romish church, but practiced it upon the Puritans. These found it wrong in the Bishops, but fell into the same practice themselves both here [England] and in New England.”
Thomas Paine:
“I do not believe in the creed professed by the Jewish church, by the Roman church, by the Greek church, by the Protestant church, nor by any church that I know of. My own mind is my church. “
“Of all the systems of religion that ever were invented, there is no more derogatory to the Almighty, more unedifiying to man, more repugnant to reason, and more contradictory to itself than this thing called Christianity. “
Jefferson on the Establishment Clause:
Thomas Jefferson interpreted the 1st Amendment in his famous letter to the Danbury Baptist Association in January 1, 1802:
“I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should ‘make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,’ thus building a wall of separation between church and State.”
James Madison on The Establishment Clause:
“And I have no doubt that every new example will succeed, as every past one has done, in shewing that religion & Govt will both exist in greater purity, the less they are mixed together.”
And years later as observed by de Tocqueville:
“They all attributed the peaceful dominion of religion in their country mainly to the separation of church and state. I do not hesitate to affirm that during my stay in America I did not meet a single individual, of the clergy or the laity, who was not of the same opinion on this point”
-Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America, 1835
Chiefley on The Establishment Clause:
The roots of our Constitution is based in Common Law that predates Christianity’s influence on law, and also on subsequent Enlightenment principles which favor empiricism. Ironically, in adhering to these principles, the US has become the most religous nation, and the most religiously diverse nation on the planet.
Anyone who wants to criticize The Establishment Clause has a perfect right to do so, but they should keep in mind that in so doing, they become an enemy of liberty. Why do these people hate America so much?
At 9:07 AM,
George Shollenberger said…
The comments by 'truth machine' shows that truth machine does not understand the founding of the USA and does not understand the philosophical difference between 'theory' and 'practice.'
There is a difference between the theory of God and the practice of a religion. This difference is defined by the field of philosophy. This definition is the cause of the many religions we see today. By philosophical definition, a specific religion is thus the practice of a specific theory of God.
The founding of the USA follows the philosophical meanings of the terms, theory and practice. For instance, the US Constitution does not allow the US government to establish a religious practice.
But the Constitution does not prohibit the government from thinking and working on the theory of God. For instance, the US government is constitutional when it supports the Big Bang theory, which is a theory that assumes that God does not exist. But, the US government is unconstitutional when it says that it cannot support theories that assume that God exists.
When the US Declaration of Independence is seen to be the highest law in the USA, the US government will no longer be able to support theories that assume that God does not exist.
The statements made by 'truth machine'of many founders are useless because they have no legal status in the USA.
At 10:14 PM,
Anonymous said…
MvMdfF The best blog you have!
At 2:26 AM,
Anonymous said…
Tc3fI2 write more, thanks.
Post a Comment
<< Home