A Third Report to Believers on My Defense of God
First, an evolutionist is not a physical scientist who must take lots of mathematics and real science classes. Evolutionists are biologists who probably took a biology class in high school so that he or she could dissect frogs. Thus, most evolutionists never become real scientists who have the necessary mathematical skills to do real science. They are unfamiliar with the basic principles of science and are unable to understand the spiritual science that I use in my book. Those biologists who attain PhD levels can become biological research scientists. However, even these biologists will not be able to understand the spiritual science that I use because they do not consider spirits in their research. This is why medical research is developing medicines that have killer side effects and why health problems, such as cancer and diabetes, are not being solved.
My spiritual science begins with God. God is defined with three precisely defined symbols. These three symbols must then lead to other symbols that define the whole universe. In my book, I identify the first three symbols in the universe. I also identified other precise symbols in the universe. A single and endless symbolic language is proposed.
The ignorance of evolutionists about a spiritual science can be seen in the review of my book by Mark Chu-Carroll, the blogger of the Good Math, Bad Math website. His followers urged him to do a review because they could not review my spiritual science. But his review was a failure. His review was called lousy in one comment. But, this poor review was expected by me because he could not understand my spiritual science when I tried to explain this new science to him and his followers. I could not retrain them via the Internet.
Instead of learning the new spiritual science, the evolutionists decided to destroy the new science by assassinating my character. These assassinations can be seen in the blogs created by Carroll. See my blog dated May 1, 2007. This assassination continues in Carroll’s book review when he copies text from my book and makes changes to the text. What was Carroll’s intent?
The spiritual science found in my book is a real science. A real science cannot be developed with the highly flawed English language and with books written with a poetic-style as Richard Dawkins uses. The evolutionists expected me to write this way. Never would I write this way to describe a real science. Evolutionists think this way because evolutionary theory is a religion, not a science. This is why they do not understand a spiritual science, the scientific method of proof, and symbols. This is also why evolutionary theory will eventually fail.
In my book, I discuss Darwin’s evolutionary theory. I conclude that his research was not intended to be godless.