God, Freedom, and Immortality are Scientific Concepts

In my last blog, I say that God, Freedom, and Immortality can be proven scientifically. To help understand such proofs, I used Plato’s negative thinking. Negative thinking is a new form of reasoning that rises above the logical principles used today.

So, in my proof of God, I begin by assuming that all things in the universe are finite. With this assumption, I can conclude that the origin of all finite things is ‘not finite.’ To bring logic with me, I move my mind into a higher level of thought and say that a ‘not finite thing’ actually identical to an ‘infinite thing,’ which seems to be a contrary thing of all finite things. But, an infinite thing is not the contrary of finite things.

By negating all finite things, a new logical principle has been revealed. This principle says those opposing concepts, such as infinite and finite, can ‘coexist.’ With this ne principle, I also found that the opposing concepts, infinite and finite, connect the higher world of God permanently to the lower world we call ‘the universe.’ Since God has no end, it is thus clear that the universe had no beginning and has no end. I also found that many opposing concepts also coexist in living things in the universe because opposing differences are never absolutely maximum. Opposing concepts, which are absolutely different, will be found only in the God-Universe connection. Accordingly, I expect to find non sequiturs associated only with nonliving things.

Since infinite things and finite things can coexist. I negate them and reveal the origin of all oppositions. This origin is a monotheistic God. With this simple proof of God, I also find that Freedom and Immortality are necessary concepts. Accordingly, I say that these necessary concepts are scientific

In my book, nonliving and living things are distinguished completely. So, I say that living things do not originate in nonliving things. But, I say that the freedom of living things is relative rather than absolute. So, I believe, that even though some behaviors of living things are complex, that they are still predictable. My belief is supported by the work of Kenneth Burke. On pages 191-220 of his book, The Philosophy of Literary Form, (click) Burke analyzes Hitler’s book, Mein Kampf. Burke predicts that Hitler’s psychological mind will use a scapegoat in order to build political power in Germany. Hitler’s scapegoat was the Jewish culture. Burke’s analysis was available in 1941. But, many Jews did not believe that the Holocaust would happen.

So, although many life scientists believe that human freedom denies predictions of human behavior. I say that human freedom is relative and is thus predictable. The mathematics and measurements of human behavior might be difficult to predict human behavior. But, I believe that a wise creator does not allow irrational thinking in any human being. So, man’s determinations of complex lines of reasoning and sensual data of human behavior can be expected to become more difficult as time passes.