Theological Science and the Quality of Things, II
US physical scientists do not study God. Instead, they reject the existence of God and study the universe as a physical process that, like a pair of shoes, wears out in time. So, time and
space are the major concepts in the study of the universe and the mind of a physical scientist.
An alternative to the current studies of the physical scientists above is the use of ontology, which is defined as the study of beings. I used ontology to develop my scientific proof of God. My ontological studies contribute to the development of a new science I named ‘theological science. Currently, theological science is the study of things, their qualities, and their acts or processes.
In this blog, I discuss God as a thing-in itself. Then, in the next blog, I will discuss the things-in-themselves that God creates. Since all things in the universe come from God, I will discuss the universe as a changing relationship of many things-in-themselves.
The study of any thing-in-itself requires one to identify the content of the thing. In a monotheistic God, the content has a single essence. On the other hand, in created things, the content has ‘essential’ and ‘non essential’ qualities.
Since a monotheistic God is a completed or perfect thing, the single essence of God is infinite. Thus, when we look at God’s intelligent design and act of creation, we realize that God has created all finite things in the universe out of his single infinite essence. Since God’s essence cannot be exhausted, one can conclude that God and the creation form the eternal partnership between God and the universe. This partnership has no end.
space are the major concepts in the study of the universe and the mind of a physical scientist.An alternative to the current studies of the physical scientists above is the use of ontology, which is defined as the study of beings. I used ontology to develop my scientific proof of God. My ontological studies contribute to the development of a new science I named ‘theological science. Currently, theological science is the study of things, their qualities, and their acts or processes.
In this blog, I discuss God as a thing-in itself. Then, in the next blog, I will discuss the things-in-themselves that God creates. Since all things in the universe come from God, I will discuss the universe as a changing relationship of many things-in-themselves.
The study of any thing-in-itself requires one to identify the content of the thing. In a monotheistic God, the content has a single essence. On the other hand, in created things, the content has ‘essential’ and ‘non essential’ qualities.
Since a monotheistic God is a completed or perfect thing, the single essence of God is infinite. Thus, when we look at God’s intelligent design and act of creation, we realize that God has created all finite things in the universe out of his single infinite essence. Since God’s essence cannot be exhausted, one can conclude that God and the creation form the eternal partnership between God and the universe. This partnership has no end.
posted by George Shollenberger @ 11:02 AM
14 Comments:
At 11:28 AM,
Quantum_Flux said…
I hope there are differential equations in it.
At 4:28 PM,
George Shollenberger said…
response to quantum_flux,
There will be many differential equations, so many that man will never be able to count them. The spiritual atoms are immortasl. Every spiritual atom is related to all other spiritual atoms, as Kant describes wholes. Each thing is in each thing functionally.
Thus, God's intelligent design of the creation is very complex and will never be known completely by any human..
I see that you are working with the Greek Golden geometries. I studied them early in my research on this project.
George
At 6:51 PM,
Quantum_Flux said…
Why use rate of change equations if you don't believe in conservation of numbers though? I believe that, if you through out conservation of numbers, then you've thrown out anything based on the number system (i.e. 5 pounds of fish and 2 pounds of bread cannot turn into 5000 pounds of fish and 2000 pounds of bread....unless you have a non-conservation of numbers. It is quite absurd though, unless you have a fish and bread particle accelerator in which your kinetic energy is converted to atomic mass, but even then, even though that would be a conservation of energy, nobody could possibly eat relativistic velocity fish and bread without exploding)
In short, though, you haven't proven "spiritual atoms" or that atoms are made in the image of the perpetual motion device that you call "the unmoving mover". Nobody has ever proved that, not even with the biggest particle accelerators at CERN. You are merely hypothesizing something absurd with no evidence of it.
At 8:52 PM,
George Shollenberger said…
response to quantum_flux,
When I stated that 'all finite things in the universe originate in an infinite thing,' I used the two-step scientific proof of and said that this statement is 'the first scientific proof of God.' I expect a second, third,.... proofs of God.
I haven't said that the spiritual atoms are proven. On the spiritual atoms, I have merely brought the thoughts of Gottfried Leibniz's' Monadology on the same stage that I am presenting my proof of God.
I am now moving my mind beyond my book and am developing my thoughts about Leibniz's monads. The new generations of theological scientists must go beyond my thoughts. Going beyond other person's is the true nature of man.
God is the unmoving mover, not the spiritual atoms. The spiritual atoms are the first things in the universe and are modeled by man as geometrical points and are the first things in God's intelligent design of the creation.
I do not understand the conservation of numbers. This is a strange idea to me. To me, a number is something in the content of my mind.
To me, all things (wholes) in the universe have a beginning, middle, and end. Our sun, thus has a beginning, middle, and end. 'Development' is a common concept in things in the universe.on development, I am following Friedrich Hegel and the Marxists.
George
At 10:34 PM,
Quantum_Flux said…
You seem to be saying, that with God, the whole is greater than the sum of the parts. Speaking in terms of mathematical equations, numbers are conserved. It is basic arithmetic that 2+2=4, and nowhere will 2+2=3 or 2+2=5 because numbers are conserved.
At 4:55 AM,
George Shollenberger said…
response to quantum_flux,
Yes,, a wholes created by God are more than the sumof its parts. See my recent blog.f on June 13.
Thanks on the example of conservative numbers. I agree that all numbers must be conserved.
Question: How do physicists determine the clocking rate of atomic clocks? Is time defined by some standard, as the meter bar is the length standard held in Paris?
George
't
At 1:37 PM,
Anonymous said…
Well, the speed of light is constant in every reference frame (as empirically derived by Maxwell's equations). The meter has been more precisely defined as "the distance light travels through a vacuum in 1/299,792,458 of a second" in 1983.
Where the second has been defined as "the duration of 9,192,631,770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine states of the ground state of the cesium-133 atom".
... according to answers.com
At 2:08 PM,
George Shollenberger said…
response to quantum_flux,
I believe that the speed of light is the same in all massive things (due to E=mc2). But, the intelligent design of God has no vacuums.
My age is showing on the cesium-133 clock. Thanks.
Is there any ground on which the field of physics is standing? Standing on the six primary measures, when time and angle seem questionable, is not as firm as the ground on which I stand. In my blogs, I require that all symbol must stand on the foundation of God.
George
At 3:19 AM,
Anonymous said…
Hmmmm....charge, temperature, mass, length, time duration, and angle
I think you are right about angle, time duration, and length.
I think charge falls out of the quantum states of angle (angular momentum, aka "spin" since it is originator of the EM-field, and hence the photon when in motion).
Temperature is the same as energy, it is the statistical average of the heat of the individual particles. I think that entropy follows, as that is related to the statistical deviation of the particles within a system.
Mass is energy as well, bound up in a probability region.
I think that it all comes down to 3-space and 1 time dimension....all orthogonal in a "fiber bundle" where time is the fiber and 3-space is the bundle.
energy is a dot product of
U=int[(dp/dt)*(dx), x=a,c]
angular momentum is the cross-product of
L=[(p)^(x)]
The probability wave-function is the dot product of
psi = exp(-[p,U]*[X,t]/L)
Where L is defined as Heisenburgs uncertainty constant (momentum uncertainty cross-times position uncertainty) in Quantum Mechanics.
L=H= (dp)^(dX)
At 2:59 PM,
George Shollenberger said…
response to quantun-flux,
Thanks. You offer lots of stuff here for me to think about.
In the meantime, if there were six basic dimensions of the laws of physics some time ago and these six basic dimensions have been reduced today, I assume that the school of physics is trying to reduce space and time to a single dimension called spscetime.
If this reduction is accomplished would this mean that spacetime would be the only dimension of the Big (exploding particle) of the Big Bang theory?
George
At 4:38 PM,
Anonymous said…
I simply do not know for sure what kind of revelations will be coming out of physics since I am just a student of nature. (If God=nature, then I could say "I am a student of God")....maybe God is the Big Bang event, or maybe the Big Bang event is only a small part of the whole of the universe of many Big Bang events.
If God=all that encompasses nature
Then God would have to be bigger than our universe, God would have to encompass the multiverse that contains all the universes.
But if that is the case, then I can claim, as Godel has, that there is always something outside of God and hence God is always being redefined as the new all encompassing entity.
At 9:26 PM,
Quantum_Flux said…
Misconceptions About The Big Bang
At 8:46 AM,
George Shollenberger said…
response to quantum_flux,
Since I agree with Nicholas of Cusa that God is the coincident of all opposites, then the opposite, infinite and finite, coexist. We cvannot live as finite things without God or live with symbolic languages that have no oppositions. So, I agree with Godel.
Bill Clinton and Tony Blair are thus on the right path to form a middle political system between socialism and democracy.
If God unifies opposites, the opposites are one. When God unfolds a pair of opposites, they coexist. This is why I say that God's one infinite and our many finites are relatd logically.
However, when one uses opposites that coexist only in our finite world, the opposites have a 'middle' region and the opposites are not related logically. Instead, these coexisting opposites are related as variables. These variables are seen only by our minds. So, I say that Clinton and Blair are on the right path and that today's laissez-fair economists should stom their dumbness over natural resources such as oil. With a God, the land below the surface of planet earth, the natural resorces there cannot be owned by any human being. These natural resources are the resources that God made for all humans. Nixon was thus a better thinker than people say.
George
At 8:48 AM,
George Shollenberger said…
response to quantum_flux,
Thanks for the website info on the Big Bang.
George
Post a Comment
<< Home