Scientific Proof of God, A New and Modern Bible, and Coexisting Relations of God and the Universe

Saturday, June 14, 2008

Theological Science and Spiritual Atoms

In yesterday’s blog, I say that a theological scientist must conclude that all created things are wholes made by God with indivisible spiritual atoms. God must thus create spiritual atoms prior to the creation of things. Reason leads us to these conclusions because a monotheistic God and the essence of God are not partible. God is thus seen by us as a pure whole that has no parts. Yet, the wholes in the universe do have parts. So God had to include in the intelligent design a way to give all creatures independence and divisibility. Thus, spiritual atoms are necessary. Accordingly, any created whole or part that we find in the universe will be an organization of spiritual atoms. As seen, the appearance of the universe is well organized by the contraction of God’s wisdom and essence. This universe has no end

Many of today’s scientists say that the universe has no God. Instead, they say that the universe is purely physical. They say that the universe begins by chance. Chance causes the instant appearance of a hot physical whole. This whole is called a physical particle. The divisibility of this physical particle is said to appear when it explodes and forms orderly physical things that are based on laws of physics. However, this universe has an end.

A created universe and godless universe are opposed because one has no end and the other has an end. However, this opposition hides an important subject — the origin of the morals of life. When a person decides to believe in God, that person will find the morals of life only among the created things. So, a believer must develop self-knowledge as Paul says in Rom. 1:20. But, when a person decides to reject God, it is not necessary for that person to develop self-knowledge. In a godless universe, the morals of life will be found only in rulers.

The independence and divisibility that God gives to all creatures in the intelligent design were self-knowledge of the founders of the USA. With this founding, why has the US government turned itself away from God? Why are our school teachers teaching the godless theory of evolution? Why is Hollywood producing immoral movies? And why do people hoard money, natural resources, and land? This turning away, this teaching, this production and this hoarding will not find any rationality in any sound study of God.

9 Comments:

  • At 7:08 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    When you say this:

    "God must thus create spiritual atoms prior to the creation of things."

    I wonder how much you understand about the concept of probability wavepacket amplitudes, the significance of the double slit experiment and about how that relates to the probability regions that make up the electron shell orbital distributions in atoms. Or if you know about how the Pauli Exclusion Principle, related to spins in fermi particals (electrons), is what explains all about the electron bonding that occures in molecules, polymers, and crystal structures (FCC, BCC, Hexagonal structues). Come on now, there is nothing spiritual about atoms at all, just energies, momentums, and spins in equilibrium!

     
  • At 10:56 AM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    response to quantum_flux,

    I was only a physical scientist (electrical)for a period but expanded my thoughts. Today, I consider both spiritual and physical scientes because I see a larger world.

    You must make the same expansion if you want to understand my stuff.

    Physical science is stuck in the mud today because it cannot see the larger world.

    Physical science is stuck after finding the chemical atoms. But, the deeper searches into quarks, strings, and quantum mechanics will not reveal the true atom because it is spiritual rather than physical.

    I expect that your expansion into atheistic thinking rather than spiritual thinking will fail because energy, momentum, spin, etc. do have an origin --- God.

    The hope of reductionism is dying.

    George

     
  • At 8:17 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    response to trog69,

    Obviously, you are not a scientist. My proof of God is a scientific proof.

    Do you believe that scientists are going to follow you and such a foolish opinion after a scientific proof appears and can be falsified?

    Your commone is not of interest to me or any other person who knows what science is all about.

    George

     
  • At 12:55 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    So, do you believe in perpetual motion?

     
  • At 1:21 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    So, you think that science won't discover the material origins of the universe without invoking the supernatural as some sort of a low entropy catalyzing machine?

     
  • At 9:50 AM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    response to quantum_flux,

    Perpetual motion is not in my thoughts when I thinks of a universe that has no end. The way I think about a universe has no end, I think about the integers 1,2,3,4,5, ....., which have no end. The integers remind be that the infinity of God cannot be exhausted.

    Geore

     
  • At 10:05 AM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    response to quantum_flux,

    I do not believe that the physical scientists will ever reduce the world to physical atoms.

    Since the universe expands continually, the limit of energy is local, for instance, when a sun and its planets die.

    George

     
  • At 11:36 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    A burning bush that does not consume its own wood and leaves as a biocarbon fuel source is a perpetual motion device. Simply, Exodus has it that the burning bush that doesn't consume itself was God. If that was the case, then why can't scientists utilize God as a perpetual motion device? Or is it that God is all look and no touchy?

     
  • At 6:50 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    response to quantum_flux,

    Your words on perpetual motion are interesting. For instance, I interpret the burning bush event as a means through which God communicates with us. The burning bush is the result of the act of God and is not of the Essence of God. So, I view every created things as phenomena of God that man must investigate as Paul says at Rom. 1:20.

    If one makes perpetral motion a reality in the universe, then Aristotle was right to say that God acts as the Unmoving Mover. But this only means that God's acts are represented by God's intelligent design and that the universe has motions, which altogether form what we name perpetual motion.

    At this point in time, I would say that God is not all look and is touchy because I have studied Jesus Christ far enough to conclude that God must appear in our world. My work says that the teachings of Jesus Christ are of a divine origin. However, my thoughts on this 'must' is still seeking the means of an appearance through the spiritual atoms.

    As you might see, my path of thought on the appearance subject is exciting but also demanding.

    George

     

Post a Comment

<< Home