Scientific Proof of God, A New and Modern Bible, and Coexisting Relations of God and the Universe

Tuesday, September 25, 2012

43. Making Natural Families

Based on God's Intelligent Design, my research says that natural families exist.  These natural families are made with a male, female, and God's children. My wife and I had four godly children and our godly four children had eight godly children. Thus, our family of six parents produced produced eight children.  Since great grandfathers or great grandmothers can,,the natural family has about four 25-year generations.  Thus, if larger families exist, the 'equality of man' has become unnatural and ungodly.

Dean Henderson tells us about the Federal Reserve Cartel and eight unnatural families. (click) , (click)  If you want to learn more about some of these unnatural families, such as the Morgan and Astor families, go to Google and type ---  big families,morgan,astor. Add morgan, aster, etc. to 'big families' to learn about all eight unnatural families.

How did these 'big unnatural families' emerge and take control of many people on planet earth?  I can give you some answers to this question.

(1)  Some people believe that they are absolutely free. This belief is false because only God is an absolute or unchanging thing. (2)  Some people believe that God does not exist. This belief is false because I prove scientifically that God is not a finite thing and is the origin of all finite things. (3) Some people believe that they have only one life. This belief is false because God gives every people a new life after their deaths. (4) Some people believe that they have two lives-- one in the universe and a second with God. This belief is false because God is One and has no parts. (5) Some people believe that their scriptures are completed, are perfect, and should not be reinterpreted.  This belief is false because a scripture are produced by symbols that can never be corrected completely.

 It is time to correct these false beliefs and remove all big families from the world. In the USA, it is time for the GOP to stop building the big unnatural families in the USA.


  • At 10:48 AM, Anonymous David S. Wilkinson said…

    So you're for genocide? Why is only the GOP building big families are there not large families that are in the DNC. Where do you draw the line for a "proper" size family. For someone that claims to have proven God you seem to want the job yourself

  • At 2:10 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    Response to David,

    Where do I promote genoicide? Never, would I support it.

    The proper size of families is based on the average period of life. Three phases: 25 years of growth, 50 years of work, and 25 years of retired life.

    The GOP(with Reagan, Father Bush, and George W. Bush) has been lowering taxes for the top rich classes. Thes 'big families' haven't developed anything useful for us. The GOP made the current national debt

    I have proven God in my first book. On my first book, I receive no more challenges. In my second book, I prove the Intelligent Design of an active God. Many people are beginning to acceptithe second proof. The second book could change the world greatly.


  • At 9:37 AM, Anonymous David S. Wilkinson said…

    George, we just keep going around in circles as you continue to promote your convoluted theories and say that people agree with you, yet I do not see any other comments on here except my own and no reviews on your books. You are becoming increasingly redundant and your grandiose notions increasingly pathetic

  • At 12:42 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    Response to David,

    Many people have accepted my first book on my scientific proof of God's existence. My second book, which is about God's works (or God's Intelligent Design) have also been accepted by many people.

    Have you read my books? If not, our discussions of my theories are ueless.


  • At 3:35 PM, Anonymous David S. Wilkinson said…

    Ah George, you old salesman you. You never miss a chance to peddle your wares. Yes, I have read your books and found them humorous as your grammatical errors and sentence constructs would have my sister the English teacher crying profusely.
    Your scientific method is flawed and your non sequiters and arrogance know no bounds. Anything that doesn't fit your theory is dismissed out of hand and your procrustean theory of having your desired result at the beginning and working backwards only using what fits your theory would get you kicked out of any research methodology class.
    Dropping bon mots from scientists and philosophers does not make you one by extension.
    I appeciate your efforts but do not accept your premise

  • At 10:59 AM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    Response to David,

    In science, You must prove flaws.

    My science is growing. See Scientific God Journal, Volume 1 Issue 4, June 2010.


  • At 10:40 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    What's in a name? That which we need cheap uggs a rose by means of any other notability would [url=]cheap uggs[/url] effluvium as sweet.


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home