Restudying the Field of Medical Care

The First Scientific Proof of God shows that a major portion of the work in the field of medical care is inconsistent with God. On the other hand, the work of alternative medicine is becoming consistent with God and the holistic things He created. The inconsistent medical work was originated in the field of physics and those atheistic physicists who say that life is originated among the nonliving things. These non-living things are called physical things or mechanisms.

Although the inconsistent work in the field of medical care can be called a practice of atheism, some medical therapies are very successful because a medical therapy can be almost totally mechanical. For instance, open-heart surgery is a highly successful and highly mechanical therapy. But, many other medical therapies are neither mechanical nor successful. Examples are cancer, mental illness, and AIDS.

The field of medical care must be restudied but not only because of its inconsistency with the first scientific proof of God. Restudy is required also because many medical therapies are essentially unsuccessful or introduce undesirable side effects in the patient. The field of medical care might argue that the development of alternative medicine will satisfy my requirement for a restudy of the field of medical care. I disagree with this argument because the current effort to extract alternative medicine therapies from other nations in the Far East is not consistent with the kind of God that I discovered when I was developing the ‘first scientific proof of God' world. Instead, I argue that the alternative medicine program of the National Institutes of Health will not produce the fundamental ideas that would be produced by a basic restudy of the medical care system, which must be independent of mechanical thought.