Is Atheism Destroying the USA Unknowingly?
To prevent the fall of the USA from the ignorant activities of atheism, all sciences must be reformed so that real sciences, rather than pseudo sciences, are developed. Today, only the physical sciences are developing real sciences based on the scientific method of proof. These real sciences describe physical and chemical laws that support life on a planet. But, physicists became atheists when, like evolutionists, they claim that they will prove physical laws of the infinitely large (cosmology) and prove physical laws of the infinitely small (atoms). My proof of God says that these claims and evolutionary theory are false and can lead to the fall of the USA.
Going beyond the physical sciences, proven laws cannot be found. For instance, the social sciences are still seeking their first law of nature. They can’t find any because social laws are laws of life, which are governed by God. The same it true for all other life sciences such as economic science, political science, medical care, etc. So, to prevent atheism from destroying the USA unknowingly, reforms are required in all sciences. For instance, it is time to reform the medical care system by developing a proven science that prevents cancer and cures our cancer patients.
22 Comments:
At 10:10 AM, Rev. BigDumbChimp said…
Hi George. You think that atheists are destroying america but you claim to have the very proof that is needed to show how wrong the atheists are (proof of god). Why aren't you spreading the good word and not charging for your book?
Are you only interested in saving America if you get paid?
At 12:57 PM, Phlegm said…
Instead, most atheists are intellectuals who attended a college or university.
Naturally, since the point of higher education is to learn how to think.
At 5:34 PM, George Shollenberger said…
Response to phlegm.
Agree, learning how to think is the purposee of higher education. But, not all educational thinking is good thinking. For instance, the Schools of the Roman Church taugh Aristotle's method of logical reasoning. This form of reasoning hides God.
At 5:52 PM, George Shollenberger said…
Response to bigdumbchimp, a mathematician?
If you are the mathematician who gives comments on the Good Math / Bad Math web, the answer is that every American saves America by getting paid. Do you think writers are to write free and you get paid to go to work.
If you are not the mathematician who comments on the Good Math/Bad Math web, the answer is that a 300 page book is needed to present the proof of God minimally. A more convincing proof would go into the thousands of pages.
You can't buy my book from me. Go to a book store if you want to get it and pass judgment on it.
At 6:19 PM, Phlegm said…
Good thinking is continuously self-critical and self-adjusting, whereas bad thinking stagnates even in the face of overwhelmingly contradictory information. God has nothing to do with how we think.
At 6:33 PM, George Shollenberger said…
Response to phlegm.
God has everything to do with how we think because God created mind ontologically before any other thing so that we can measure everything that we will ever find in our world.
We are the measurer of the universe.
At 10:43 PM, Rev. BigDumbChimp said…
George, if you had the proof of god, the payout for that knowledge would be a million fold of what any sales of your self published book could ever hope to bring in (i'm guessing it's even a million fold of that). Hence, the only reason you would be withholding the most amazing truth every discovered by man (proof of God) is greed. That or your are a senile old man on the edge of your productive years yearning to actually mean something.
Which is it Mr. Schollenberger?
At 10:53 PM, Rev. BigDumbChimp said…
We are the measurer of the universe.
Is that supposed to be some enlightening statement? Who else might be measuring the natural world around us? Penguins? Baby Koala bears?
Of course we are the measurers of the Universe. We measure using terms and measurements that we, as humans, have discerned via observation, arbitrary need, experimentation and well frankly more measurement.
Good thinking is continuously self-critical and self-adjusting, whereas bad thinking stagnates even in the face of overwhelmingly contradictory information. God has nothing to do with how we think.
You owe me a new irony meter. I'm partial to the x-45T.
At 12:31 AM, George Shollenberger said…
Response to bigdumbshimp.
Hey bigdummychimp, not every person is as smart as you. I' m a dummy teacher of people who seek truths. Anything wrong with that?
I am sorry to inform you that God has erverything to do with how you think because He is the origin of all of your thoughts. Too bad that you do not understand that your flawed thinking is your error, not God's.
You and your mechanical, mathematical friends seem to be lost and cannot understnd my symbols. The ice might be getting too thin. So don't fall in accidently.
I heve no idea what is meant by a new irony meter. Nor do I care what an irony meter is. Is your partiality to the x-45T of concern to me. The answer is, NO, a big NOOOOOOOOO.......
What is your problem?
At 12:56 AM, George Shollenberger said…
Response to bigdumbchimp
I have the proof of God. The 'if question' is thus irrelevant.
I never had thoughts about the proof of God the way you are thinking monetarily about this proof. Nor do I feel any greed. I came upon it and merely tried to present my finding of the proof as best as I can. I am an old man but am not yearning for a meaning of my life I live from day to day and try to contribute to the world. I rxpect to do this forever.
I think that money is an error in man's mind.
At 8:06 AM, Rev. BigDumbChimp said…
I think that money is an error in man's mind.
Then publish the book online and prove me wrong. Until then you are a greed stricken old man with no proof and zero credibility.
What is your problem?
My Problem is that you refuse to prove me wrong. If you have the proof, show it. Shed some light and bask in it's wonderful glory. For surely if you do have this proof (and yes thats is one big giant IF) it would be the most wonderful discovery in the history of man. But as is increasingly obvious you are nothing but a fraud like many before you and many to follow you.
I'll be awaiting the delivery of my new irony meter.
At 10:28 AM, George Shollenberger said…
Resdponse to bigdumbchimp.
Obviously, you are unfamiliar with self-publishing. Self-publishing is a business and has contract agreements tha cannot be violated. Self publishing is great for writers who can't get published or writers who have written their first book.
Read the story again about Georg Cantor and how his peer reviewers nearly murdered him. Also, I still hear about inventions that are lost in big corporations.
Self-publishing has a role in all fields of thought.
Sorry, thi is the best I can do for you.
At 4:11 PM, George Shollenberger said…
Response to beaming visionary.
The great thinkers that I follow in the Western world --- Abrahan, Moses, Plato, Nicholas of Cusa, Kepler, Leibniz, Cantor, Cassirer, and Langer--- think about God and the universe similarly. Thus, there is a great consistency among them and me.
As aligned thinkers, all of us would never think about rejecting God because we accept the personal and social responsibilities that God has given to all people. Without a solid proof of God the members of this group have always hads considerable faith in God.
Since the US was founded under God and every US citizen has these personal and social responsibilities, how can a melting pot of people work in the USA? Already, the US melting pot is troublesome.
When I found the first scientific proof of God, with lots of confidence, I concluded that the great thinkers above were on the right path of thought and I joined their efforts.
I doubt that US citizens would be willing to live like the melting pot of people who live in the Middle East and fight daily.
If one views athism as a power, I don't believe that this person will undrstand my book. With my book only God has power.
When I conducted research on crime, I found the fundamental origins of all crime. Melting pots are one source of crime. I discuss crime and its root cause in my book.
Good comments
At 4:10 PM, Phlegm said…
Melting pots are one source of crime.
GG, Hitler.
At 7:01 PM, George Shollenberger said…
Again, phlegm, you do not understand symbolic languge ahd their effects.
At 8:04 PM, Phlegm said…
I understand communication is based on symbols, but is transmitted by syntax. Communication between two conscious individuals is achieved when two inviduals share the same symbols. The symbols are separate from syntax, yet dependent on it.
If I am failing to understand your so-called symbols, then you are failing to manipulate the correct syntax.
At 9:04 PM, George Shollenberger said…
To phlegm
In my book I speak of two basic languages -- talking language and scientific languages. Syntax applies to the customs of a national talking language whereas scientific language is applied to laws of nature and law of nature's God
At 9:42 AM, Anonymous said…
I can't believe the comments coming out of the mouths of "chimp" and "plegm"!!!! Who made any of you self-appointed censors who have decided to mete out their own brand of literary criticism to an author??? If you all are so literate,go write your own book or quit being penny pinching spongers asking for "freebies"!!!!!!!!! 'nuff said!
At 1:06 PM, Phlegm said…
Anon, every comment I've made on this blog has been in regards to the material in the blog, not the book that I haven't seen.
At 1:09 PM, Anonymous said…
This sounds like nonsense to me. George sounds like a nice old man who is losing his marbles. Anyone can make such a claim, and many do. The proof is in the pudding. If George knows something, it will be recognized when his book is published. Most likely it will simply fade away like all other false prophets.
At 3:29 PM, George Shollenberger said…
For phlegm. My book has been published in late June. Why are you waiting? Go to it so you can hunt for my marbles.
At 12:19 AM, Anonymous said…
I find it interesting how much of a backlash this man is getting for voicing his beliefs.
I am going 2 come right out and say it, I am agnostic. I think and know that under Christian control, learning and technology stopped progressing and even regressed during the Dark ages. It was only when bright minds started the way of thinking "less to the glory of god and more to the glory of man" during the renaissance that we started moving forward again.
"Instead, most atheists are intellectuals who attended a college or university." and you also mentioned how hard workers (I assume like yourself) are the one who believe in god. So basically Christian god is for the uneducated? (I do realize that many bright minds like Newton believed in god and I think just like them, "god as a clockmaker")
I see a pattern... some who believe in god are blind to it. A Christian Friend - "If im miserable god is testing me. If im happy or something went right, god did it." seems like chance to me and my other friends. Whenever we get something done its the educated atheists that do it.
Then in the blog you say “I' m a dummy teacher of people who seek truths. Anything wrong with that?” You don’t give yourself enugh credit, I think your very well spoken, however when you say you are a “teacher of people who seek truths”. I do see something wrong with that. That sounds reflective of L Ron Hubbard … he clambs to be the same thing, to be a teacher of truths. You don’t want 2 be like Hubbard do u? lol
Anyway, I just want to say that I have nothing against Mr. Shollenberger and that I respect him for voicing his thoughts, not unlike what I just did.
Behold the voice of youth.
Post a Comment
<< Home