Questioning All Sciences and Religions
The comments and discussions in the blog of July 21 and blog of July 26 tell me that the scientific method of proof is not being used properly by scientists. This improper use explains why sciences do not recognize God as a part of science.
And, the blog of August 08 tells me that religions do not use language systems properly because they don’t use the scientific method of proof at all. This improper use explains why religions do not recognize sciences as a part of religion.
These improper uses tell me why Science and Religion are separated and that the fields of science and religion are major causes of today’s human conflicts, wars, and terrorism. Unless the physical sciences, the many sciences that follow the physical sciences, and all religions apply the scientific method of proof correctly, human problems can arise but cannot be solved.
And, the blog of August 08 tells me that religions do not use language systems properly because they don’t use the scientific method of proof at all. This improper use explains why religions do not recognize sciences as a part of religion.
These improper uses tell me why Science and Religion are separated and that the fields of science and religion are major causes of today’s human conflicts, wars, and terrorism. Unless the physical sciences, the many sciences that follow the physical sciences, and all religions apply the scientific method of proof correctly, human problems can arise but cannot be solved.
posted by George Shollenberger @ 9:55 AM
3 Comments:
At 6:37 PM,
Phlegm said…
How about the simple difference that:
1. Religion appeals to Faith.
2. Science appears to Logic.
3. Faith and Logic are incompatible.
At 11:17 PM,
Rev. BigDumbChimp said…
The comments and discussions in the blog of July 21 and blog of July 26 tell me that the scientific method of proof is not being used properly by scientists
Mr. Schollenberger, are you so egotistical to suggest that all of the scientists working now are ignorant to the scientific method? Do you hold yourself in such high esteem that you believe you are more knowledgeable and experienced than the combined members of all of the recognized scientific institutions?
At 9:06 PM,
George Shollenberger said…
Response to phlegm and bigdumbchimp.
For phlegm.
1. Disagree, Religion is the practice of a specific theory of God. Faiths identify with the different practices of the theory of God.
2. Disagree, Science appears to logic and reasoning.
3. Disagree, faith,logic, and reasoning are compatible because the universe cannot be completed. All unknowns are not knowable.
For bigdumbchimp.
I do not place myself above any person because I agree tht God created all people equal. I have no respect for ranks, titles, idols, etc.
My mind considers newideas as the measure of progress. So,I do believe that new ideas can be developed by a person but are unknown by other people can be ahead of other people. New ideas appear in people who work on 'leading edge' projects.
For sure, i believe I have new ideas that are unknown by all scientists. This is the nature of new ideas and inventions. If you study the teaching of Jesus Christ, you will find that all of his teaching are new ideas that are unknown by all people.
If mathematicians remain 'in the box of finites' they will not be of help, for example, to biologists who are ready to apply transfinite numbers on cell theories.
If scientists are using the scientific method properly, they would have discovered the first scientific proof of God. The invariant equations was hiding God from our physical scientists.
Post a Comment
<< Home