The World’s Scientists have Led the People Away from Symbolism and Monotheism and to Many Different Theologies

Yesterday, I showed that signs and symbols are different. Symbols give us access to godly matters whereas signs are limited to communication among all animals. I believe that Nicholas of Cusa was the first to recognize the uniqueness of symbols. Nicholas opens his first book saying, ‘Therefore, every inquiry proceeds by means of comparative relation, whether an easy or difficult one. Hence, the infinite, qua infinite, is unknown, for it escapes all comparative relation.’ Thus, Cusa recognized that finite things can be compared with each other but cannot be compared with a monotheistic God, who is one and infinite. He found that such a god is the ‘coincidence of all opposites.’ This means that a monotheistic God enfolds all created things and unfolds them through opposing symbols according to His Intelligent Design. It is thus through symbols that we get to know God better and better as time passes. Although Cusa found this symbolism in the 15th century nothing would happen in science until the 1920s when a widely accepted group of linguistics discovered that sensual data are primarily symbolic. These linguists made a major discovery because they found that our senses are the instruments of new symbols that guide our minds to God though the discovery of the laws of Nature that God placed in the universe with His Intelliegen Design. Earlier, St. Paul taught this symbolism in Rom. 1:20.

Today’s scientists are unaware of these events and mislead people throughout the world. Do anthropologists recognize that we walk upright so that our vocal tracts can develop symbolic languages to know God better? Since atheism is dominating all sciences today, I doubt that anthropologists think this way. Most scientists do not recognize the development of symbols from 1440 to the 1920s. Instead, many mathematicians and scientists have returned to Aristotle’s logic because they do not develop symbols and reject God. Yet, in the 14th century Aristotle logic was found to be impotent with respect to knowing God. How can one know God better if logicians become the evaluators of all new knowledge? With Aristotle’s logic, finite things and relations in the universe have no God and no Intelligent Design. The logicians of today are already replacing God and God’s Intelligent Design with the Big bang theory. This theory states that all finite things and all finite relations come from one finite thing. Yet, this statement is illogical.

We need to correct and develop symbols. In my book, The First Scientific Proof of God, I use and discuss many symbols. I show that a symbolic language can unify science and theology. I also say that a single religion can never be attained because God, the universe, and life have no end. So, it was correct for the Constitution to prevent a particular religion from being established. But, it was incorrect for the US Supreme Court to prevent government from working on proofs of God and propagating them. Authorizing government to prove the Big Bang theory seems unfair. Funding this theory by government is also wasteful because this theory has a contradiction.