Scientific Proof of God, A New and Modern Bible, and Coexisting Relations of God and the Universe

Tuesday, September 11, 2007

Current Book Prices in Selected Book Stores

This book contains a scientific proof of God's existence and many discussions of the consequences of this proof. It also includes 165 citations. Most citations are on other books. The book citations will save the reader thousands of dollars.

authorhouse (click)
hardcover: $18.95
paperback: $14.95

Barnes&Noble (click)
hardcover: $27.95
paperback ($22.95) (20.65 member)

Amazon (click)
hardcover: $27.95
paperback: $22.95

10 Comments:

  • At 9:58 AM, Anonymous Kimberley Von Trier said…

    "The book citations will save the reader thousands of dollars."

    Surely you don't mean that your citations can replace the books you quote from?

     
  • At 3:39 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    Response to Kimberley Von Trier,

    I mean exactly what I said. A writer can save money for readers. If a writer does not save money for readers, the writer is not a good writer. I do not repacce books, I save money for my readers.

    Do you believe the alternative, for readers to read every written book?

     
  • At 4:49 PM, Anonymous Kimberley Von Trier said…

    So readers can save themselves some money if they don't buy your book but instead read an article (for instance a review on the science blogs website) which includes a few citations from your book.

    Thanks for the tip!

     
  • At 9:50 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    response to Kimberley Von Trier,

    I did not find scienceblogs useful because I believe in God. My book is godly and is thus highly systemic. You won't find much material in my book on websites other than on my website. Further, some of the books I cite are out of print.

    My home is filled with books. I conclude that buying books is normal fo a private researcher.

     
  • At 2:41 AM, Anonymous Kimberley Von Trier said…

    I know you have trouble processing new information, so please read more carefully and try to think coherently.

    By saying that "book citations will save the reader thousands of dollars", you imply that readers won't need to buy certain books if they can read quotes ("citations") from these books in another book or in an article.

    So following your line of reasoning, if I come across an article that includes quotes from your book, I won't have to buy your book anymore and can save myself at least $14.95. Do you understand this conclusion?

     
  • At 2:54 AM, Anonymous Katherine Knappenberger said…

    Mister Shollenberger,

    I am conducting research on the reception of religious publications in the scientific community and would like you to answer the following questions:

    1. Is this your first religious publication?

    2. Has your publication been peer-reviewed? If affirmative, how many times:
    - 0-10 times
    -10-20 times
    -20-30 times
    - more.

    3. Has your publication garnered attention in nation-wide scientific magazines?

    4. Has your publication been criticised by the scientific community? If so, on what grounds and have you learnt anything from this criticism?

    Thanks for your cooperation!

     
  • At 8:35 AM, Anonymous Ebenezer Brideshead said…

    Look George, advertising your book over and over again isn't going to help. Your book is dead. It has been demolished by the world's leading scientists, who had never seen so many non-sequiturs piled up between two covers.

    They tried to discuss your errors with you, but you constantly failed to address their questions and chose to call them members o a conspiracy destined to assassinate your character.

    Your book was dead-born. Bury it and get on with your life.

     
  • At 10:34 AM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    Response to Kimberley Von Trier,

    Either i am not explaining my self ot you do not understand what I am trying to teach.

    Cool it. We are wasting our time.

     
  • At 10:37 AM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    respone to Katherine Knappenberger,

    Your research project is silly.

     
  • At 10:46 AM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    Response to Ebenezer Brideshead,

    I have lots of patience. You and yourlogic are over-emphasized. Stop selling this trash. And your sequiturs/non sequiture are limited in a real world.

     

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home