Theological Science* and the Life Sciences

On several past blogs, I made the statement that the life sciences have not found their first scientific law yet. I made this statement because today’s life sciences have changed and follow atheism and the new field of physical sciences that began in the 1970s after atheism gained U.S. Supreme Court in 1967. In this change, the life scientists began to view human wholes as mechanisms. In such a whole, the whole is the sum of its parts.

I have changed my position about the life sciences because I found a scientific law in the field of economics, which is one of many life sciences. This law unifies the concepts ‘profit’ and ‘loss’ and creates a higher related concept known as ‘income.’ The opposites, profit and loss, are related logically and thus conform to the thought known as ‘thesis-antithesis-synthesis.’

Since profits and losses can be counted, income is a man-made thing that can be improved by producing more profits with fewer and fewer losses. Man cannot make a perfect income, that is, by producing profits without losses. Only an infinite God can produce profits without losses. Thus, a national economy is never fixed or obeys a law of nature, as Herbert Hoover thought and many economists and mathematicians believe today. This finding is more evidence that atheism is false.

With this new finding, the meaning of the symbols ‘sequitur’ and ‘non sequitur,’ which are used by logicians, must be limited to opposites that do not coexist and have different meanings.

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.