How Can We Prevent Another Civil War in the USA?, XVIII
Gottfried Leibniz's New System, which challenged Newton's universe and Locke's physical atoms in the early years of the 1700s, is the only rational world theory today that has an active God. (click) Unfortunately, the New System was not introduced in the USA until 1975. His New System and related subjects are found the book, 'Leibniz: Philosophical Writings.' which was translated by G.H. R. Parkinson. This book became popular immediately because the school of physics had not been able to develop any physical evidence about space, time, and matter. The Big Bang theory, string theory, and structureless physical particles are failing and can be expected to fail now that a geometrical world theory, with an active God, is drawing attention. The New System will actually be in full agreement with the God of China.
Since the school of physics has made very little progress on the development of a mechanical world theory over the past forty years, new ideas have been suggested by physicists. Two suggestions are appropriate to a geometrical world theory. For instance, Robert B. Laughlin suggests the development of an 'age of emergents.' An example is superconductors. See his book on 'A Different Universe: Reinventing Physics from the Bottom Down.' And Geoffrey F. Chew suggests the Bootstrap Hypothesis. (click) This project would connect the evidence from our telescopes (the infinitely large) to the evidence from our microscopes (the infinitely small). I conclude that these two suggestions align to Leibniz's New System and Monadology.
When Galileo said that wholes are built up of an infinite indivisible quantities, he could have predicted that a geometrical world theory would emerge. This theory did emerge soon in the work of Leibniz. In my book and on my website, their work of unifying the pair of opposites, indivisible and divisible, is expanded considerably.
Since the school of physics has made very little progress on the development of a mechanical world theory over the past forty years, new ideas have been suggested by physicists. Two suggestions are appropriate to a geometrical world theory. For instance, Robert B. Laughlin suggests the development of an 'age of emergents.' An example is superconductors. See his book on 'A Different Universe: Reinventing Physics from the Bottom Down.' And Geoffrey F. Chew suggests the Bootstrap Hypothesis. (click) This project would connect the evidence from our telescopes (the infinitely large) to the evidence from our microscopes (the infinitely small). I conclude that these two suggestions align to Leibniz's New System and Monadology.
When Galileo said that wholes are built up of an infinite indivisible quantities, he could have predicted that a geometrical world theory would emerge. This theory did emerge soon in the work of Leibniz. In my book and on my website, their work of unifying the pair of opposites, indivisible and divisible, is expanded considerably.
posted by George Shollenberger @ 11:28 AM
2 Comments:
At 3:44 AM,
Carole Merzenberger said…
"Robert B. Laughlin suggests the development of an 'age of emergents'".
There you go again. Just like you don't know the difference between "phenomenon' (singular)and 'phenomena' (plural), you are wrong about Mr. Laughlin. He isn't interested in the age of 'emergents' (which doesn't make sense), but in the age of 'emergence'. You see? Not 'emergents' but 'emergence'.
One more time: don't use words or talk about subjects that are way over your amateur head. And don't for a moment think that you expanded the ideas of philosophers like Leibniz. You are no more than a crackpot with hardly any education.
At 10:50 AM,
George Shollenberger said…
Carole Merzeberger,
You failed to respond to my last response to you because you were wrong. Unfortunately, you do not understand the difference between things,attributes, phenomena, adjectives, variables, etc.
Obviously, you have recently become aware of how your atheism is being challenged. This challenge is real and will ne successful..
Your continued attempts to assassinate my character is about as low as a person can go. Your jusgments of people is a behavior that I equate to criminal behavior.
However, you are showing your ignorance to my readers when you use symbols such as 'crackpot.' Such a psychological symbol has no reality. Such symbols are ignorant fabrications of physical psychologists who have not produced their first law or fact.
Your rejection of the symbol 'emergents' is just more evidence that you have no knowledge of 'things'.
One more such a comment will cause me to ban you. This website is godly. Only useful thoughts and challenges are accepted.
George
Post a Comment
<< Home