Scientific Proof of God, A New and Modern Bible, and Coexisting Relations of God and the Universe

Saturday, July 09, 2011

NEWS II

In Chapter 5 of Part I of my book,'The First Scientific Proof of God,' I spoke of the problem of knowledge in the physical and life Sciences.  In Table I.2 on p. 53, I came to the conclusion that that supply-side economics (Reaganonics)  is ungodly and does not work. In the zFacts, an Internet newspaper (click), my conclusion is verified with sound facts.

14 Comments:

  • At 7:02 AM, Anonymous David S. Wilkinson said…

    George, be very careful with on line sites and use a variety of sources. When it comes to economics remember what Twain said," there are lies, damned lies and statistics."

     
  • At 11:44 AM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    Response to David S. Wilkinson,

    I am strongly against the supply-side economy because this theory is related to today's awful theory of money. Today's money and supply-side theoies will always lead to increasing national debts.

    George

     
  • At 7:24 AM, Anonymous David S. Wilkinson said…

    I am in agreement that different theories of the economy from supply side to Keynsian to Malthsian simply turn a blind eye to the fact that the best economy is one where outlays are in accordance to intake. The kitchen table approach that we normal Americans use is the model governments should try to follow.

     
  • At 9:59 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    Response to David S. Wilkinson,

    Ben Franklin said--- when the People need money, money must be printed by Congress and given to the People. Lincoln also had Congress print money to industrialize the South after the Civil War.

    Why can the People of all nations get money only from banks?

    George

     
  • At 9:59 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    This comment has been removed by the author.

     
  • At 9:25 AM, Anonymous David S. Wilkinson said…

    Franklin also said, "This Republic will last only as long as people don't discover that they can vote themselves tribute from the public largesse."
    Lincoln also said, "This country will only be sustained as long as government does not do what people can and should do for themselves."

    Printing money and not controlling spending is what put the US on this disaterous track and it was all of them not just one party or the other. The Fed should be abolished because the US has nothing to back it's currency and people are losing faith in the US as a whole.
    Watching them trying to create a budget and deal with the bebt is like watching two blindfolded guys trying to make a circle on an etch a sketch.
    The main problem is the people that freated the problem are the ones trying to fix it. It's the theater of the absurd and we are the poor audience that not only has to watch it but we also pay for it.

     
  • At 2:06 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    Response to David S. Wilkinson,

    My thoughts are deeper about the USA problems. I see thhe deepest problem as 'the People' and their ignorance of an acive God. I believe that only the developmnt of human intelligence about an active God will solve the USA politicl and money problems.

    George

     
  • At 2:04 PM, Anonymous David S. Wilkinson said…

    Sorry George but your panacea of increasing human intelligence will not happen. As Ron White so eloquently says, "you can't fix stupid"

     
  • At 4:45 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    Response to David S. W ilkinson,

    I disagree with you and Ron White. Only republicans say that criminals are born. If one believes in an active God, there are no blodlines and intelligence of all kinds are open to all humans.

    George

     
  • At 5:53 PM, Anonymous David Wilkinson said…

    How do you come up with no bloodlines? I was just in Williamsburg where they were able to trace DNA from a person living today back to their ancestor that arrived at Jamestown in 1607.I don't believe there is a corrolation between bloodlines and intelligence. While I am a registered independent and generally side with Republicans I believe in a combination of nature/nuture and don't believe that criminals are born and that there are many socioeconomic and physiological factors that result in someone becoming a criminal

     
  • At 5:56 PM, Anonymous David Wilkinson said…

    Once again you make these broad generalizations and attempt to stereotype those with whom you disagree. As Jefferson said, "a difference of opinion is not difference of principle.

     
  • At 9:17 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    Response to David Wilkinson,

    Spirits are indepndent things. They are also indivisible things, which are embodied by all other indivisibles. So, how could any Spirit be in a bloodline of indivisibles?

    DNA seems to be something created by man. DNA also sems to be something like a fingerprint or a voiceprint.

    George

     
  • At 9:43 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    Rsponse to David S. Wilkinson,

    I disagree with Roy White's crude statement --- 'you can't fix stupid.'

    Many times I have said that the Englishh language is ugly because it is based on the logic of Aristotle. The word 'stupid' is an ugly word because the English language accepts this word, when it has no precise meaning of the human mind.

    The logic of Aristotle ruined England, sttopped the development of the Middle Ages, and destroyed Cicero's Roman court.

    George

     
  • At 7:39 AM, Anonymous David S. Wilkinson said…

    He's a comedien he's paid to make funny comments. It's not an ugly statement because all humor has an element of truth.Unfortunately we all meet "stupid" people in the course of our daily lives. Many of the stupid people I meet have numerous letters after their names and are so smart they're stupid.

     

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home