Scientific Proof of God, A New and Modern Bible, and Coexisting Relations of God and the Universe

Monday, August 21, 2006

The USA Is Creating Many Hidden Nests of Atheists

When physical scientists separated themselves from the field of religion after modern science emerged, most physical scientists also separated themselves from a theology, which is the study of God. The separation of Science from Religion was appropriate and the US Constitution secured this separation for its citizens. However, my first scientific proof o God says that it was inappropriate to separate Science and Theology, that is, unless atheism rules a nation. In the USA, the separation of Science and Theology is unlawful because the USA is a nation under God. However, US Supreme Court rules are separating State and Theology. These rulings gave the ACLU its power to remove God from government and thus transform the USA into an atheistic nation. However, the separation of Science and Theology has long term negative consequences. Let me explain these consequences.

When the physical scientists separated themselves from Theology, they essentially became atheists. The general separation of Science and Theology in the USA had a negative consequence because US life scientists became followers of the physical scientists and essentially became atheists. I believe that most scientists do not know that they became atheists with this separation. This leader-following structure in science today is seen most clearly in the fields of medicine and economics. For instance, US medica research does not distinguish life from non-life, mind from body, and mind from brain. And, US economic research is insensitive to human equity and the future of new generations. The laissez-faire or free market economy of the US is atheistic.

In my book on The First Scientific Proof of God, I prove that Science and Theology are inseparable thoughts. These two fields of thought must thus use the same symbolic language in their expressions of truths. Science and Theology are thus one. My scientific proof of God shows this oneness.


  • At 4:20 PM, Blogger Phlegm said…

    Fact Check:

    "Under God" was not an official part of this country's creed until many years after its founding:

    Wiki Link

  • At 6:58 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    Hi phlegm,

    Such papers are weak in truths and usually based on useless facts. Let me show you some real truths that are not based on arbitrary facts or on the words of people who have become questionable authorities and who can twist the human mind of people as the Sophists did in ancient Athens.

    In my book, I show that US lawyers do not include the US Declartation of Independence in the body of laws of the USA. This exclusion can be judged as an action of treason by 'the lawyers against 'the people' of the USA. This treasonous act is inconsistent with the school of philosophy. My book also shows that the US Declaration of Independence was always the highest law in the USA. Thus, the lawysrs who maintain this treasonous act today could either end up in jail or without a lawyering income.

    The words in the Declaration say that the people of the USA accept a Creator until creation is proven to be false. Thus, the Declaation says that the people of the USA and its government are under God.

    Thus, in the Declaration, no religion is specified or can be established in the USA. As you will see, my book covers considerable territory and many walks of life. My research expanded my thoughts to be
    sure that my proof of God would be widely accepted.

  • At 7:59 PM, Blogger Phlegm said…

    I hardly find concrete records of our very own government to be "weak in truths" or "useless facts".

    In any case, here is the beginning of our Declaration of Independence, the only part that has the word "God" in it:

    When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

    There is no "Under God" as you can see, though I can see how one might imagine so.

  • At 8:54 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    Phelegm, the word Creator comes into the Declaration in the second paragraph. A Creator is God.

    But the two laws --- "Laws of Nature and (Laws of) Nature's in the first paragraph are inherent to any Creator. As seen, our founders were very intelligent.

    The words 'Under God' means that God is infinite and we are finite.

    You will enjoy my book and your mind will rise unbelievably to higher and higher levels of thought.

  • At 9:08 PM, Anonymous Beelzebub said…

    My mind rises unbelievably every time I visit this blog. How can you crank out such an enormous volume of material every day? It's unbelievable.

    Maybe you should change this blog's name to I Hate Atheists. Since that seems to be the main thrust of the posts. Still no evidence, not even an inkling of proof.

  • At 9:42 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    To beelzebub.

    As a deep believer in God, I cannot and do not hate any person. A symbol like 'atheist,' has a meaning that I determine. I do not know your meaning of the word 'atheist.' But, people are usually close with respect to meaning.

    To me an atheist, like other nameable people, are ignorant of something. Thus, I am trying to help atheists to understand something that I believe is important. Always, some atheists do not have time or do not want to learn of their ignorance. That is their choice. Since I believe that God is va ery important subject for all people, I am often pushy and impatient.

    I can crank it out because I am retired but also because my subjects are narrow and very consistent.

  • At 11:15 PM, Blogger Rev. BigDumbChimp said…

    In my book, I show that US lawyers do not include the US Declaration of Independence in the body of laws of the USA. This exclusion can be judged as an action of treason by 'the lawyers against 'the people' of the USA. This treasonous act is inconsistent with the school of philosophy. My book also shows that the US Declaration of Independence was always the highest law in the USA. Thus, the lawysrs who maintain this treasonous act today could either end up in jail or without a lawyering income.

    This is such a load of crap I can't even believe you typed it..well yes I can. The Constitution is the law of the land. The declaration was a document drawn up to deal with a foreign entity imposing it's will upon the colonies. The Constitution was drawn up as the document addressing as a whole the creation of this nation and its laws. I'd love to hear you make this argument in front of constitutional lawyers... you know, the ones that were actually well educated and have a clue about this issue. So which lawyers are not going to jail as you so boastfully claim? My guess is that these are the same lawyers that are already not practicing law at any level.

    You do know that Jefferson was a deist and did not subscribe to the Christian god don't you? You know Jefferson, the one who wrote the Declaration you are so mistakenly trying to use as a tool of your version of god?

    You really hold yourself in high esteem George don't you? Not only have you disproven the massive weight of science for hundreds of years you've now also re-written the history of our nation and are better suited to make constitutional arguments than the very people who are the most learned on the subject. What a piece of work you are.

    Is it that you have too much time on your hand and you need to feel important? No ones paying attention to you at home so you have created this fantasy world?

  • At 11:29 PM, Blogger Rev. BigDumbChimp said…

    Further on the DoI issue. Do you not think that the wise fathers of our country would not have included the DoI when writing the Constitution? Sure there are ideals that are built upon from the DoI, but it was not included in the constitution. Are you doubting the constitutional congress and all that were apart of writing the constitution? I've heard of crazier interpretations, but that one is pretty out there.

  • At 8:50 AM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    Response to Bigdumbchimp. If you study the social contract of John Locke and recognize that the colonists installed Locks social contract, you will learn that the Declaration is the highest law of the USA. Apparently, the early Supreme Court judges did not understand social contract thery and made bad rulings. With the installation of presidenceAnd, today's judges play 'follow the leader.' I cover this subject in detain in my book.

    My jail is not like the jails we use today. My jail would be an educational unit the teaches people to correct their errors of thought.

    Jefferson was a deist and this is why many founders did not trust him. Study about the Society of Cincinatus.

    Without conducting research on my writings, you cannot argue against my arguments. You speak mostly with guesses, which i do not consider very intellectual. and

  • At 9:14 AM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    Response to Bigdumbchimp's further thought.

    No man is infallible. The founders made errors and so do today's lawyers and judges. But the founders were correct by not incliding the Declaration in the Constitution because the Constitution defines the limited US government, which governs 'the people.' The 'one people' in the opening statement of the Declaration means 'the people.' It is 'the people' who give the government its rights. 'The people' can also take them back. The people is sovereign,not the government.

    My book is comprehensive and unifying. Its proof of God is only a small part. This is why reading small parts of my book is inappropriate. My book is like a stage that has many, many personalities who are arguing this point or that point. One reviewer in Pittsburgh already recognized the tremendous research that was necessary to present this stage.


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home