Scientific Proof of God, A New and Modern Bible, and Coexisting Relations of God and the Universe

Wednesday, May 16, 2007

Opposing Forces That Hope to Stop the Development of the God-Universe System


The development of the God-Universe System encountered opposing forces soon after its birth. After Abraham identified monotheism, polytheism degenerated, and the work of Moses on the creation began. So, opposing forces will not appear until the works of Plato turns Socrates’ negatives into positives.

To create these positives, Plato rejected Aristotle’s categorical reasoning. He also limited Aristotle’s logical reasoning. With this rejection and limitation, Plato’s mind begins to move upwardly and above logic toward God’s wisdom. There, he found a new field of thought and called it ‘the intelligible.’ There, he also found the God-Universe System and named it Being and Becoming. In his Parmenides, Plato shows his new domain of thought. There, he shows that God must exist by proving (1) that One alone is false, (2) that if One is, it has others, and (3) that nothing exists if One does not exist. Since the God-Universe System is an open system and has no end, freedom is a basic human need. Plato recognized this natural need and taught Alexander the Great, who would free the people in many nations. However, the enemies of the God-Universe had Plato exiled to Egypt and Alexander the Great was poisoned. Some say that the logician and chemist, Aristotle, poisoned Alexander. Aristotle had a motive because he saw man as a social animal. He also associated with people who liked to rule people.

Next, the teachings of Jesus Christ were mostly about the God-Universe System. He also teaches that the universe has no end. But, his teachings led to oppositions. These oppositions led to his death on the Cross. Of course, no one knows who really murdered him. But, this is the way an enemy of the God-Universe System thinks and behaves.

Moving on, against many enemies, Constantine introduced the first Trinity in 325 AD. The Trinity is found only in the minds of people who rises above logic in order to think in the domain of intelligence. Constantine did not move the Church to Rome. Instead, his followers formed and became known as the Eastern Christians. Interestingly, they are Platonists. So, they are credited with introducing Plato to the Western Christians during the Renaissance. But, the Eastern Christians were chased out of Istanbul and finally had to move north, to Moscow.

Next, the works of Bishop Nicholas of Cusa bring an unbelievable number of new ideas to the God-Universe System, too many to discuss here. I mention only his 1440 book, On Learned Ignorance. In this book he shows that the universe has no center. Certainly, Galileo knew about Cusa because both were associated with the Padua University. So, when Galileo said that the earth is not the center of the universe and was imprisoned by the Roman Church, who was Galileo quoting, Copernicus (1473-1543) or Cusa (1401-1464)? Cusa shows that the God-Universe System is eternal and has no end. This eternity would probably disturb any Pope who teaches that the universe comes to an end.

Since the work of Cusa is huge and complex to understand, it was natural for his works to die in the Roman Church. However, his works are reappearing more than 500 years later in the USA through the American Cusanus Society. This society seems to be associated with the Roman Catholic Church. Now I ask, how can any Christian church reject the God-Universe System when they do not even know Nicholas and his great works on the God-Universe System? Today, it seems as though the Roman Catholic Church is the only Christian church that is supporting the development of the God-Universe System.

Moving on, Gottfried Leibniz was one of history’s greatest thinkers. He was known as a ‘walking encyclopedia.’ Since all of the works of Leibniz are focused on the God-Universe System, Leibniz was both feared and loved by scientists and mathematicians. Newton feared his intelligence. The British empiricists feared his intelligence. And the English Crown feared him politically. Yet, Leibniz died as a pauper. However, his followers could not propagate his works because Leibniz’s work on Monadology was too difficult to understand. I give his monads life in my book.

Next, the works of Georg Cantor produce the new numbers called the transfinite numbers. The God-Universe System would not develop properly without his new numbers. Yet, his transfinite numbers are not even being developed by our mathematicians. Again, logicians rejected Cantor’s work. Under stress from the logicians, he became a very sick man. Yet, mathematicians finally admitted that Cantor’s work is one of the greatest accomplishments in the field of mathematics.

Finally, atheists, logicians, and scientists associated with Darwin’s evolution theory, the American Museum of Natural History (NYC), and the scientists and mathematicians associated with the ScienceBlogs website are trying to destroy the God-Universe System. They are doing this by assassinating my character without even evaluating my work. Recently, they continued this assassiation by entering negative reviews of my books on Amazon.com. As my website shows, they began this activity within weeks after my book was published. To date, this destruction has been successful. My work consists of the first scientific proof of God, thescientific connection of God to the universe, and the use of Leibniz's monads as spiritual atoms of the universe. I also unify the fields of science and theology, show the root cause of crime, reinterpret some teachings of Jesus Christ, and organize Christ's teachings into a system.

Since the opposing forces against my works on the God-Universe System are growing in the USA, it is possible that my work on the God-Universe System will become lost, just as the works of Plato and Cusa were lost. This means that atheists will be able to weaken all religions politically and theologically. In June, I will become 78 years old and time is running out.

10 Comments:

  • At 9:54 AM, Anonymous J.R. McDonogh said…

    "They are doing this by assassinating my character without even evaluating my work"

    You are a liar! They have evaluated your work. Mark Chu-Carroll dedicated an entire review to your book. The conclusion of his evaluation was that your book is worthless, incoherent and very badly written. And he didn't assassinate your character, he was only talking about your freaky ideas. Just like you weren't assassinating the character of your old friend Genni when she dared to be a little critical of your book. Remember?

     
  • At 10:04 AM, Anonymous Jack B. Delaney (mathematician) said…

    "Since the opposing forces against my works on the God-Universe System are growing in the USA, it is possible that my work on the God-Universe System will become lost, just as the works of Plato and Cusa were lost. This means that atheists will be able to weaken all religions politically and theologically. In June, I will become 78 years old and time is running out."

    1. How incredibly arrogant to compare yourself to Plato and Cusanus, who were actually very intelligent
    2. You flatter yourself. There are millions and millions of websites, and only one or two of them criticize your book. If your book was really as good as you imagine it to be, it would be famous by now. Why do you think the American Cusanus Society hasn't reviewded it? Not because of some conspiratory intervention of the Vatican, as you suggested. They probably just didn't think that your book could be for real and thought it was a prank.

     
  • At 2:48 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    jr mcdonogh,

    You are kidding. Mark never reviewed my book and one commenter told Mark that he is a lousy reviewer. Mark did not deal with any of my works. In his review, Mark focused only on my writings in two paragraphs of my book. Other people have found nothing wrong with these two paragraphs. But Mark even changed three words from my text. So, Mark also seems to be a criminal.

    You know nothing about Ginni and me. Why do you talk about other people's relations when you know nothing about them? Grow up and get true facts before you make negative charges.

     
  • At 3:04 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    jack b.delaney,

    How are you comparing my works with the works with Plato and Cusa when you don't know my works. What in my works are not intelligent?

    They wanted to review the book but didn't because my book questions the Vatican. Your theories about the relations between ACS and me stink. In fact, the ACS send me it newsletters. And they want me to rejoin the ACS.

    Your comment indicates that you are just be another follower of Mark Chu-Carroll. You and Mark must enjoy assassinating the character of people. It will not work.

     
  • At 3:34 PM, Anonymous jack b. delaney said…

    "What in my works are not intelligent?"

    1. The appalingly bad grammar. For instance, any schoolboy would have written: "What in my works IS not intelligent". Your 'works' are rife with these shameful errors.

    2. Your total ignorance of the rules of logical reasoning, which you cover up by claiming that you have risen above logic.

    You are a man of below average intelligence with a hugely inflated ego. Plato and Cusanus were intellectual giants.

     
  • At 3:49 PM, Anonymous jack b. delaney said…

    "one commenter told Mark that he is a lousy reviewer"

    Only one, George. The vast majority agreed with Mark that those two paragraphs reflected a deranged mind.

    "You know nothing about Ginni and me."

    I know more than enough. I know that she made some negative remarks about you and your book and that you subsequently blocked her and deleted her posts. You are a very nice friend indeed.

    I don't assassinate your character, I am critical of your ideas. Remember George? Just like you weren't assassinating the character of your old friend Genni when she dared to be a little critical of your book.

     
  • At 5:42 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    jack b. delaney,

    I guess if google had a grammar program on its websites, we could also do much better. I have a grammar program on my computer and it was used to write my book. So don't equate Internet traffic to books.

    You seem to be a person who became perfected as a schoolboy and have added nothing to you mind-brain complex ever since. You know nothing about the intelectual domain of the mind. In fact, you must have an atheistic mind that is enslaved to your brain.

     
  • At 5:53 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    jack b.delaney,

    Only one person is needed to tell truth.

    Your theories about Ginni and I are stupid and ugly. How can you judge people you don't even know? If this is how atheists talk in social interactions, they will not be around long.

    You are hitting my character not my ideas. So, you are a assassin of characters and not a scientist.

    Have fun with your junk stetements. I want people to read your talk. Then I will remove your stupid words from this website.

     
  • At 6:19 AM, Anonymous William Van Zant said…

    Two more non-sequiturs from George Shollenberger:

    "Since the God-Universe System is an open system and has no end, freedom is a basic human need."

    "Aristotle had a motive [to poison Alexander the Great] because he saw man as a social animal."

    By the way, that Alexander was poisoned is just speculation. Nobody really knows what happened.

     
  • At 8:56 AM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    Hi William van zant,

    Now, I might be getting the problem of logicians. They believe that science languages and talk languages must meet logical reasoning. This belief is not true unless the talk language becomes scientific.

    This wrong belief eliminates all dialogues and reduces dialectical thinking to logic.

    Talk languages allow two people, for instance, to 'give and take' the thoughts in their statements until all statements are understood by both persons.This understanding is not logical reasoning. It is simply social relations.

    The statements you included in your comment are my opinions. Do you want to eliminate all of my opinions?

    Are the logicians becoming irrational with respect to human life?

     

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home