Scientific Proof of God, A New and Modern Bible, and Coexisting Relations of God and the Universe

Wednesday, July 16, 2008

Theological Science: Policies of Colleges and Universities

The new science, which I call ‘theological science,’ is a science only for people who believe that God created the world in which we live. Only atheists maintain the opposing science today. However, if people think clearly about the science of atheism and its negatives, only a few people will conclude that life under atheism is desirable and safe.

Theological science is developing but is not being practiced widely yet because atheism is dominating the sciences taught at colleges and universities. The new science is not taught there yet because potential students are told that the college or university is ‘nonsectarian.’ Nonsectarian is a symbol that means ‘religions are not taught at the college or university.’ This symbol agrees with governmental policy, which separates Religion from State. This symbol does not apply to God. The symbol that applies to God is ‘theology.’ Theology, the study of God, can produce many different theologies. These different theologies are ‘practiced’ by religions.

Thus, theologies can be taught and developed at colleges and universities without violating any laws or governmental policies on the separation of Religion and State. So, all colleges and universities must open their policies with respect to God and the teachings of theologies. Without new college and university policies on theological science, the new science will not develop.

With theological science, the future of any nation looks excellent. But, with atheistic science, I believe that any nation can degenerate and become a third-world nation. Policymakers should realize that foreigners do have free access to the Internet and my blogs on theological science.

10 Comments:

  • At 11:59 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    "With theological science, the future of any nation looks excellent. But, with atheistic science, I believe that any nation can degenerate and become a third-world nation."

    Do you have anything to back up this belief, or is it just a hunch?

     
  • At 11:54 AM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    response to aaron,

    There is considerable evidence that an atheistic nation will degenerate morally. Two sources of evidence are the rise of crime and the rise of immorals. Both began in the 1960s in the USA.

    George

     
  • At 7:14 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    So do you mean that the physical sciences are responsible for the downfall of the nation, or atheistic philosophy? Do you think that a belief in a deity is a prerequisite for a moral or social code?

     
  • At 8:33 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    response to aaron,

    I say that the atheistic phys9cal scientists are responsible for the downfall of 'all' nations.

    Yes, a belief in God is necessary to develop a moral and social code. This necessity is true because an God's essences guide our development of knowledge about every finite thing. Thus there is a scientific connection between God and all things in the universe.

    The universe needed a creator. Otherwise, a universe would not exist.

    George

     
  • At 9:58 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    It seems to me like you're more against secularism than atheism. Do you think atheists become physical scientists, or people who are more likely to understand physical science are also the ones who are most likely to question things, including their faith?

     
  • At 10:07 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    I've heard it argued that ethical behaviour due only to some kind of divine mandate is more like blind obediance than good behaviour.

    Have you heard of humanism?

     
  • At 3:20 AM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    response to aaron,

    I believe in monotheism. This means that I believe in one God and one religion. Today, a single religion is more possible than it was at the time of Jesus Christ, Moses, Abrham, Buddah, etc. This single religion was made possible by Nicholas of Cusa in the 15th century.

    I acceot many religions because my advances beyond Cusa must be taught before religions can be unified. This is what Ii am doing on this website..

    Physical scientists would accept God immediately if they understood Cusa and my advances. They seem to be afraid of losing their government funding.

    George

     
  • At 3:44 AM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    response to aaron,

    aaron: I've heard it argued that ethical behaviour due only to some kind of divine mandate is more like blind obediance than good behaviour.

    George: God has no mandates because God cannot speak to us and we cannot speak to God. But, God and man can exchange information. God gives us information by giving us the ability to know the things he created. (Bible at Rom. 1:20) When we investigate things we gain better and better understanding of God's thoughts. So, there is no blind obedience. One's interest in God cases people to enter the unknown that man can know.

    Cusa teaches that we can learn about our ignorance by learning what we can never know. For instance, I do not believe that man will ever know the spiritual atoms completely. I disagree with those physicists who say that the universe has an end that can be known.

    aaron: Have you heard of humanism?

    George: Yes. Its multiple meanings are found in my Collegiate dictionary. I agree with humanism.

     
  • At 10:46 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    You say you agree with humanism, but you also say that ethics and morals can't exist without a God. Isn't this a bit contradictory?

     
  • At 12:54 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    response to aaron,

    Every field of thought must begin with God because God is the foundation on which all other thoughts depend. If one builds a field of thought, this field of thought will be arbitrary. This is what is wrong with political systems.

    George

     

Post a Comment

<< Home