Scientific Proof of God, A New and Modern Bible, and Coexisting Relations of God and the Universe

Wednesday, February 25, 2009

Remaking America by George Shollenberger, Idea XXIX (A self-government and a free market economy)

Most U.S. citizens do not know the self-government that the founders created because they don’t know John Locke’s social contract theory. This lack of knowledge explains why many of our economists and politicians believe that a free market economy is the true economy of a free nation. Yet, last evening, in his speech to Congress, President Obama disagreed with this belief because the free market economy of the USA has failed and must be saved. So, a free market economy must depend on a savior. Plato would say that this savior is derived from a higher idea. But what is this higher idea? Do we even know it?

Using dialectical thinking, the concepts ‘knowing’ and ‘not knowing’ coexist. This means that we can know some things but cannot know other things. For instance, we cannot know God other than He exists. Nor can we know that we lived before or that we will live after death. In his book "On Learned Ignorance,’ in Bk.II, Ch. 2, Nicholas of Cusa identifies many unknowns. Since a free market economy fails, it must be an unknown and can be organized only with guesses. Thus, Herbert Hoover thought wrongly when he said that a free market economy will recover from the economic depression in the 1930s. Thus, a free market economy cannot predict itself because the future on Man is an unknown.

The higher idea or savior of a free market economy is a self-government, which is a government of, by, and for its people. To build a self-government in the USA, the founders applied the social contract theory of John Locke. Like a business, Locke’s social contract theory has two parties, ‘Society’ and ‘Government.’ Society was defined by our founders in the Declaration of Independence. Then they defined Government, as a self-government, in the Constitution.

Clearly, the continuous demand for a ‘limited government’ by the Republican party is irrational. Last evening, the response to Obama’s speech by Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindel was also irrational. Society must rule over Government in a free nation because the Society must save itself, not only against economic failures, but also to secure all rights that God gave to every human being.

Obviously, President’s Obama’s concern of education in his speech was very important.

8 Comments:

  • At 4:06 PM, Blogger Quantum_Flux said…

    I do not agree that murder is wrong when the thing being murdered is an idea.

     
  • At 4:31 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    response to Q_f,

    Before I respond, can you make your disagreement clearer for me. I am not sure what you mean. Perhaps, you might cite the statement you are addressing.

    I am glad that you are challenging me because our symbolic lanuage are soo poor.

     
  • At 5:36 PM, Blogger Quantum_Flux said…

    My apologies, my comment wasn't relevent other than to say it relates to my own beliefs about evolution. In science, the ideas that don't hold up under experimental scrutiny and logical rigor are "shot down" and I believe that to be rightly so. Jesus even taught, metaphorically, that 'when a tree doesn't bear fruit, kill it'. That, to me, is what evolution does do. That is why the mind has evolved as a result of evolution, mainly because it is more efficient to kill an idea that doesn't work than it is to kill a living creature that doesn't work. Also why the mind went a step further and developed the computational methods to simulate models as opposed to building expensive material models. The future of evolution is all in the minds of people and in the tools that the mind has wrought.

     
  • At 6:26 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    response to Q_F,

    You have presented very deep thoughts. However when a person receive such thought, an immediate response is innapropriate because deep houghts require other deep thoughts. So I will be back.

     
  • At 11:43 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    response to Q_F,

    Q_F: My apologies, my comment wasn't relevent other than to say it relates to my own beliefs about evolution. In science, the ideas that don't hold up under experimental scrutiny and logical rigor are "shot down" and I believe that to be rightly so. Jesus even taught, metaphorically, that 'when a tree doesn't bear fruit, kill it'. That, to me, is what evolution does do. That is why the mind has evolved as a result of evolution, mainly because it is more efficient to kill an idea that doesn't work than it is to kill a living creature that doesn't work. Also why the mind went a step further and developed the computational methods to simulate models as opposed to building expensive material models. The future of evolution is all in the minds of people and in the tools that the mind has wrought.

    George: I can’t find where Jesus said 'when a tree doesn't bear fruit, kill it'? But I can rationalize such a statement under God because cremation has become increasingly popular compared to being buried because the Spirit develop a new body when a body dies. But under God, nothing can be killed because lifr-death-life-death, etc is a continuous process for all things.

    If one kill ideas, many books must be destroyed. Had Plato’s writings not been saved by the Eastern Christians, Plato’s great ideas would have never been known in the Western workd and our mind would be stuck with Aristotle’s concept definition and logic, as Kant became stuck, and dialectical thinking would not exist today. Evolution and logic are impeding the development of the human mind in the USA today because the images of the senses limit a person to empirical data and sciences. This is why our life scientists are lost today.

    Russians are still using the dialectical thinking of Marx. This is why their education is on the tops in the world ande evolutionary theory is reducing the USA to a third world nation.

     
  • At 1:16 AM, Blogger Quantum_Flux said…

    You wish to see an example of a Russian Scientist? I'm going to show you their ignorance here:

    Oil Is Mastery....these guys even deny gravitation, they pass things falling downwards off as electricity. Dialectical thinking is rubbish.

     
  • At 1:34 AM, Blogger Quantum_Flux said…

    http://oilismastery.blogspot.com/2008/09/new-gravity-hypothesis.html

     
  • At 1:42 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    response to Q_F.

    First, At Matt. 3:18, John the Baptist was the talking person. It is correct to cut a tree down when it is dead and is no longer bearing fruit. Killing is a symbol whose meaning can be interpreted as an evil act or a good act.

    Second, flowing oil is like wind and can do work to produce electricity. When the oil flow stops, it has no more potential energy. Since they search for 'things in themselves', they might be combining the concepts of science with the concepts of scientific applications. I am not familiar with their symbolic languages.

    If dialectical thinking is rubbish, then Feynman’s ‘not-knowing’ is rubbish. U.S. scientists seem to be close-minded to dialectics. For instance, see any book written by Friedrich Hegel on Amazon.com and note the many negative comments that atheists make, even though they do not understand dialectical thinking. Hegel is a dialectician and today’s Russians are returning to Hegel’s material that Marx had rejected. In the 1990s my son had to hire Russians to build a big computer program because U.S. computer programers could not.

    As our political competition, Russians do not duplicate American events. They look for more Sputnik opportunities in order to lure more nations into their political system.

    Third, thanks for the website material.

     

Post a Comment

<< Home