Scientific Proof of God, A New and Modern Bible, and Coexisting Relations of God and the Universe

Thursday, April 12, 2007

Mark Chu-Carroll and the Law of Evolution

Mark wants to change the theory of evolution to the law of evolution. click His change means that he wants Congress to make a law saying that the theory of evolution is true. He wants this law so that the Discovery Institute can be arrested and put into jail. Since Mark is an employee of the Google Corporation does this mean that Google also wants this congressional law? Who has this answer?

Why would Mark want Congress to make a law of evolution when the theory of evolution has never been proven scientifically? Further, all scientists agree that the theory of evolution must be rejected if God's existence is proven scientifically. Mark, God has been proven scientifically by me. Are you afraid to challenge my proof? The more research I do on your writings, the thinner the ice is getting on which your writings stand. On the theory of evolution and the existence of God, you are beginning to show irrational thoughts that any person cannot answer with numbers. You might be reaching thoughts well beyond your mathematical abilities. I conclude that your writings certainly do not deserve the atheistic followers you seem to get.

For instance, the founders of the USA mandated in the Declaration of Independence that 'the people' will build a nation under God. They also mandated the Laws of Nature and Nature's God. Don't you read the founding documents, Mark? Even the Constitution mandates a nation under God. This mandate will be effective until God's nonexistence is proven. No one has ever proven God's nonexistence.

When you call for a law of evolution without changing the founding US documents, you are moving the minds of many people and can be stimulating the second US civil war. Your call for this change is a very dangerous act. Mark's research is very weak. Perhaps, Mark should stick closer to his mathematics. Wrong political idea can be explosive. Hitler developed wrong political ideas too. The late Kenneth Burke predicted Hitler's Holocaust or did you not know that?

5 Comments:

  • At 4:09 PM, Blogger MattP said…

    Um, wow. Mark was being sarcastic there. He wasn't advocating for an actual law, he was making fun of the DI for their silly rhetoric.

     
  • At 4:10 PM, Blogger MattP said…

    "Even the Constitution mandates a nation under God."

    Would you care to quote that portion of the Constitution?

     
  • At 9:56 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    Matt,

    Mark's words do not tell a person that he is fooling. His support of evolutionary theory is clear.

    What does DI stand for?

     
  • At 10:12 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    matt,

    In the Preamble, the meaning of the phrase 'In Order to form a more perfect Union' can be known only with the idea of a perfect thing. The only perfect thing is God. God thus becomes the perfection standard that one must use to measure 'more perfect.' i cover this problem in my book

    No member of the Supreme Court has given this phase its true meaning yet. I am not impressed with the field of law. It is sloppy.

     
  • At 12:07 PM, Blogger Rev. BigDumbChimp said…

    It is sloppy


    You owe me a new Irony Meter.

     

Post a Comment

<< Home