posted by George Shollenberger @ 10:01 PM
George D. Shollenberger was born on June 26, 1929 in Pine Grove, PA. He is a graduate of Johns Hopkins University as a scientist in engineering. He worked with telemetry on the space program and the spacecraft orbiting by John Glenn. In 1971, he joined the Department of Justice to solve the nation’s crime problem. He worked on the bulletproof vest for police, forensic sciences for crime laboratories, and community policing for communities. In the late 1990s, he concluded that crime has a root cause. After retiring in 1994, he began to unify science with all fields of thought. In 2006,, he wrote his first book,'The First Scientific Proof of God.' This is a proof of God's existence. In 2006, he became a blogger and wrote his second book, 'A New and Modern Holy Bible.' This book proves that God and the universe form one world that had no beginning and has no end. He also proves that God is panentheistic, that deism, theism, and atheism are false theories, and that God is active. He also shows that God gives us a new body after we die. Recently, he concluded that all nations and all families must become equal. He views the future as something very beautiful.
2 Comments:
At 7:43 AM,
Anonymous said…
Maybe you should look under "material fallacies" or "logical fallacies". By the way, logicians only use the term "non-sequitur"; the term "sequitur" is not common in their writings.
I wonder whether there are any books devoted entirely to the study of non-sequiturs. After all, they are just simple logical fallacies, albeit with possibly far-reaching consequences; only one non-sequitur is enough to render a complicated proof invalid.
At 8:41 AM,
George Shollenberger said…
max rosenberg,
Interesting because both are found in my 1977 Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary.
FYI, when I seek truths, I am thinking as a scientist and need precise meanings of every symbol. Otherwise, scientific laws remain hidden.
Your response is making things clearer to me.
I found the following words in my Encyclopaedia Britannica: 2006: CD
"As has been conceded by all competent philosophers of science and even by the greatest scientist- philosophers of the century --- Albert Einstein, Niels Bohr, Erwin Schröödinger, and others --- there is no straight logical path, no standard recipe, by which to move from the data of observation and arrive at scientific theories."
I found the following words in my Encyclopaedia Britannica: 2006: CD
"As has been conceded by all competent philosophers of science and even by the greatest scientist- philosophers of the century --- Albert Einstein, Niels Bohr, Erwin Schröödinger, and others --- there is no straight logical path, no standard recipe, by which to move from the data of observation and arrive at scientific theories."
Thanks.
Post a Comment
<< Home