More on Hegel, July 9, 2007
A Google search on, hegelian, tells me that Americans are confused on Hegel's work. One reason is th
at Hegel gives only one meaning to any symbol. This is the key to understanding the 1920 discovery of the meaning of sense data. Thus, I do not believe that the ugly English language and Hegel's thoughts will ever get together. Click , Click ,Click , Click , Click . Some websites say that Hegel's dialectics are a way to control our minds. Click and Click. If you expect to study Hegel, I suggest that you read my book first (The First Scientific Proof of God) because Hegel can be linked to my detailed words on Plato and Nicholas of Cusa and my use of Spirits (spiritual atoms) in Part IV.
at Hegel gives only one meaning to any symbol. This is the key to understanding the 1920 discovery of the meaning of sense data. Thus, I do not believe that the ugly English language and Hegel's thoughts will ever get together. Click , Click ,Click , Click , Click . Some websites say that Hegel's dialectics are a way to control our minds. Click and Click. If you expect to study Hegel, I suggest that you read my book first (The First Scientific Proof of God) because Hegel can be linked to my detailed words on Plato and Nicholas of Cusa and my use of Spirits (spiritual atoms) in Part IV.
posted by George Shollenberger @ 5:58 PM
8 Comments:
At 11:11 AM,
Anonymous said…
First read the works of Hegel yourself, preferably in German, then give us advice on how to study him.
At 5:26 PM,
George Shollenberger said…
melany katchaturian,
My way of developing my self-knowledge and sharing it with other people is obviously not at all like yours. Why don't you keep your methods to yourself unless people ask you for it?
At 12:47 AM,
Anonymous said…
Your way is reading two or three pages about Hegel and then posing as the all-time expert of this philosopher. You are an amateur with an inflated ego. Be humble, be very humble.
At 6:18 AM,
Anonymous said…
"Thus, I do not believe that the ugly English language and Hegel's thoughts will never get together."
Why the double negative? Why don't you simply say: I believe that the ugly English language and Hegel's thoughts will get together? Or are you trying to be a dialectician?
At 11:34 AM,
George Shollenberger said…
melany katchaturian,
I am a teacher and am not a person who works at a university and wants to become known. I am 78 years ols and could pass on at any time. You judge me and my interests wrong.
I am communicating to people who have my book. I am not interested in people who do not. I teach Hegel's material immediately as I read and find relations to material in my book.
At 11:50 AM,
George Shollenberger said…
kathy mahler,
Yes, I must change that statement. The word 'never' should have been 'ever'.
I teach that symbols should never be given more than one meaning. The English languages allows a symbol to heve many meaning. Hegel rejected double meanings. He was criticized. Obviously, Hegel and I agree on meanings of words.
At 1:07 PM,
Anonymous said…
"The English languages allows a symbol to have many meanings."
I guess by 'symbol' you mean 'word'. What you say is not exclusively true of English - in every modern and ancient language large amounts of words have all kinds of different meanings. A few examples: the Spanish word 'poder' means 'power' and 'to be able to', the French word 'frais' means 'fresh' and '(financial) costs', the Swedish word 'komma' means 'comma' and 'to come', the Latin word 'liber' meant 'free' and 'book'.
You see? So if you call the English language ugly because 'it allows a symbol to have many meanings', then you should call every language spoken on earth ugly.
At 5:56 PM,
George Shollenberger said…
kathy mahler,
First, I do not believe that languages come from DNA, and other biological processes. Instead, I believe that man's mind makes languages. I also believe that man must develop or else degenerate. In this development, i believe that languages are not perfect. So, I believe that languages must be improved
Since science is the field of truth, I believe that science must build the stage on which social activities take place.
Todays's languages are not made this way. So, I believe that the languages of all nations are ugly. Since I live in the USA, my focus is only on the ugly English language. If the ugly English language is corrected, perhaps other nations will follow us.
My view of the ugly English language seems to be selfish. But, the way Ii view life is to lead thgose other people who follow leaders.
Post a Comment
<< Home