My Response to Lee Smolin's Book, "The Trouble With Physics"

I made a book review on Lee Smokin's book on "The Trouble With Physics." He is telling us that the string teeory could not be tested and cannot be proven. I made a statement in 2005 that string theory would fail because a string is not an atom, which is modeled by geometrical point. As seen in my response, a major effort in particle physics will be necessary before my scientific proof of God can be disproved. This effort could be "forever" because I say that the 'infinitely small' world of the universe is filled with worlds upon worlds that have no end.

Since in 1776 because the USA was a nation under God, the early colonists knew the future path of the USA. Then, after the assassinationr, the people of the USA had no idea of the future. Today, the purpose if the USA is still unknown. Thus, the lives of people are oscillating as if they were living on a see saw, which is moved by the liberals and conservatives. In my response to Smolin, I identify the way God can be tested with data open to our eyes. So, there is a scientific project that government must fund to get it people off of this political see saw. I identify this scientific project in my response to Smolin.

Response
Many thanks must go to Lee Smolin for informing non physicists of the truth about problems in the school of physics. Workers in all fields ought to be able to express such truths. I also read about the string theory problem in Peter Woit’s book on "Not Even Wrong." Smolin tells us that the string theory cannot be tested or proven to be false. If this is true, the string theory can be classified with the Big Bang theory and the biological evolutionary theory. Thus, three new scientific theories have created three new belief systems. If so, they can be classified with the theological belief in God, which cannot be tested. However, I found that the belief in God can be proven scientifically and can be falsified if any absolutely free physical particles can be found beyond the ‘asymptotically free particles’ observed in the Yang-Mills theory.

Accordingly, beyond returning to basic physics, as Smolin suggests, it is now clear that particle physicists must dig deeper into the ‘infinitely small’ before the US Declaration of Independence and the Constitution can be amended to remove the belief in God from the founding documents of the USA. The apparent failure of these three theories and the bravery of people, such as Smolin and Woit, will likely be judged by historians as a significant US event. For this reason, this book is an important book to read and own.