More on a Biologist’s Path to God

Before I read any book, I scan the Index. Since Time Magazine says that Harvard’s Steven Pinker is one of the "Hundreds Most Important People in the World Today," I scanned the Index of his 1994 book, "The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language."

In this scan, I found that Pinker does not cite history’s big thinkers, whose writings on the nature of languages are still available today. Nor does he cite Plato and Aristotle, the first big thinkers who formalized knowledge. Also, he does not cite the works of Suzanne Langer and those many 1920 linguists who found that ‘sensual data are primarily symbolic.’ Obviously, Pinker’s mind is not a thinking mind But, this implies that all evolutionists learn that the world began only when the evolutionist is born. They must also learn that the history of man is insignificant.

However, if a biologist believes in God, this biologist will eventually conclude that mind is a created thing-in-itself and that our languages create our minds. History is thus very important. To a God-loving biologist, Pinker is wrong to say that mind creates language. Pinker et al say that Nature has the power to create a mind that will produce all languages that solve mathematical problems, scientific problems, cancer problems, etc., But, if Nature has this kind of power, one should ask the question, "Why did Nature also create opposing concepts such as God?

Had Pinker studied the history of the big thinkers and the 1920 linguists, he would have found that we think and do think dialectically. He would have also learned that criminals are not born, that languages can create criminals, and that languages can be improved but not be perfected.
God-seeking biologists must reject Pinker’s work and the work of other evolutionary psychologists. Such works are diseasing our colleges, universities, and judges with Darwin’s evolutionary theory. How is this disease developing in a nation under God?