Scientific Proof of God, A New and Modern Bible, and Coexisting Relations of God and the Universe

Sunday, June 07, 2009

Remaking America by George Shollenberger, Idea XXXXXXXXXIX (A Nation Under God, XXV)

In my last blog, I show that the human sperm/egg thing is a whole and that the human soul can form a relation with it. This relation explains, in general, how spiritual things (or Spirits) can develop relations with physical things. This relation also explains why spiritual things are immortal, why physical things are mortal, and why the relations between immortal and mortal things are temporary. We can thus say that a living thing will eventually die but that its Spirit will never die.

The lives of spiritual things are based on the pair of opposites we call ‘rest’ and ‘motion.’ But the symbol ‘rest’ cannot be equated to zero motion. Coexisting opposites, such as rest and motion, have confused our atheists, logicians, and physicists. When Moses used the word ‘rest’ and said that God rested on the seventh day, Moses was telling us that an Intelligent Design exists and has different phases.

Religions must stop teaching that humans go either to Heaven or Hell after death. This teaching is inconsistent with a monotheistic God. Unfortunately, this ugly ancient teaching is still taught today. The development of new knowledge by man about Spirits and the universe created by God tells that this teaching is false. Today, we know that a relation exists between our souls and the human sperm/egg thing that gave us life. So, when a human dies, that human only comes to rest. The phrase ‘coming to rest’ means that the soul has entered a new phase of life. Today, this new phase of life is known as reincarnation.

The new phases of life are still unknown by man. Some researchers on birth marks are saying that some humans seem to return to planet earth. But other researchers are saying that humans appear at other places in the universe. Since human life on planet earth is becoming more godless and more irrational, unless life changes, I hope that God places me at another place.

You might understand Spirits better with geometry. A right triangle, for instance, is formed by two lines that form a 90-degree angle. See pic below. Both of these two lines can be shortened to the point where their finiteness is transformed into an infinitesimal thing. In math, they are said to approach zero length, but do not become zero length. When both become infinitesimal, both lines become Spirits. When man gives these Spirits some finite lengths, a triangle is formed. Thus, when God creates Spirits, many different finite things are formed.

4 Comments:

  • At 9:43 AM, Anonymous Otalp said…

    "The reviews of my book by atheists and logicians are nonsense. Their non sequiturs are also nonsense if applied to human life."

    "Their" non sequiturs? You still don't get it, do you? The reviews written by the atheists and logicians you refer to don't contain a single non sequitur. However, your book and blogs are teeming with them. Clinging to your mistakes is bad as it is, but distorting the truth is much worse.

     
  • At 1:13 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    response to Otalp,

    My statement 'Their non sequiturs are also nonsense if applied to human life' can be clarified.

    By this poor statement I mean that atheists and logicians require the use of logic to develop life sciences. Since I disagree with them on this point, they must be using many non sequiturs in their logical developments of life scieces and also in the development of thoughts for a review of a book on life science. There is no middle fense on which to stand.


    Please show me the misuse of some non sequiturs in my book. Don't merely say that they are there. The book reviewers never identified any non sequiturs. In science, this kind of book review is unaccepted.

    The atheists and logicians are the persons who are clinging onto something wrong --- logic. Limiting the development of life sciences to logic is the thought that is distorying the truth.

    George

     
  • At 2:36 AM, Anonymous Otalp said…

    By the way, you have got your Roman numerals all wrong. For example, 94 in Roman numerals is not, as you wrote, XXXXXXXXXIIV, but XCIV. Check out this website:
    http://www.onlineconversion.com/roman_numerals_advanced.htm

     
  • At 9:34 AM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    response to Otalp,

    Thanks for informing me about my error in the June 2 blog. I suffer from macular degeneration. I decided use this kind of number system hoping that it helps people who do not know Roman numerals. Thanks also for the website info.

    George

     

Post a Comment

<< Home