Scientific Proof of God, A New and Modern Bible, and Coexisting Relations of God and the Universe

Friday, July 22, 2011

Yes, More On NEWS VI

My work at the U.S. Department of Justice on the crime problem for twenty four years has informed me that U. S. republicans and democrats hold different beliefs on the cause of crime.

U. S. republicans say that criminals are born.  So, they believe in evolutionary theory. To solve the  U.S. crime problem, U.S. republicans say that police must catch criminals; put the criminal into prison; and throw the keys away.

U.S. Democrats say that crime comes from social problems.  So, they believe that social factors, for example, poverty,  causes crime. To solve the U.S.  crime problem, U.S. Democrats say that all social problems must be eliminated.

In the late 1980s, I concluded that our national English language is flawed and affects negatively the development of human consciousness.  My conclusion was supported by Houston University but was not supported by the Bush republicans.

After I retired, I sought more proofs on crime causes. Eventually, I found that an active God exists; that evolutionary theory is false; that crime is caused by social flaws; and that human life continues after death.

Unless the U.S. republicans and democrats do something about the poor development of the U.S. human mind, the U.S. crime problem will never stop.

14 Comments:

  • At 8:48 AM, Anonymous David S. Wilkinson said…

    Crime will always exist, let's face it. Read the Bible, less than ten pages in you've had a murder.

     
  • At 9:28 AM, Anonymous David S. Wilkinson said…

    This grandiose notion that crime can be stopped is tragically naive. Civilization almost dictates that crime will occur as people inevitably fight over resources.Any study of history will quickly lead to a study of crime and/or war.
    All nations using many languages have had and will continue to have crime and war so the notion that language can cause or cure the problem doesn't hold up to historical analysis.

     
  • At 3:16 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    Response to David S. Wilkinson,

    Except for some thinkers such as Jesus Christ, the Bible is a poor source of scientific facts. Today people speak of the 'accepted level of crime.' Such people know nothing about moral laws of an active God.

    We can eliminate crime with a powerful symbolic language.

    George

     
  • At 9:53 AM, Anonymous David S. Wilkinson said…

    But George your belief of a pantheistic active God where He is everything dictates that He is the cause so hasn't your thinking devlved into an inescapable loop?

     
  • At 10:30 AM, Anonymous D said…

    I didn't say the Bible was a source of scientific facts (although many accounts in the Bible have scientific/archeological proof) Even if the Bible is an allegorical tale it is still a priceless source of inspiration.

     
  • At 4:08 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    Response to David S. Wilkinson,

    I do not believe in a pantheistic active God. I do believe in a panentheistic God. My thoughts are not in a a loop that limits my thoughts. This is why I am a follower of Plato, not Aristotle.

    George

     
  • At 8:23 AM, Anonymous D said…

    Pantheism-identification of God with the universe
    When you can't get your terminology straight it hurts your credibility.
    Or is panentheology part of the Shollenberger lexicon?

     
  • At 11:17 AM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    Response to David S. Wilkinson,

    Pantheism was destroyed by Abraham. My terminolog is correct. I accepted panentheism over deism and atheism. My website has ben taught the same way forr over five years. So I conclude that you are misinterpreting my work.

    George

     
  • At 8:28 AM, Anonymous David S. Wilkinson said…

    I apologize as I've been doing research on panentheism (quite a broad study, I can see why your research spans a large time frame).Your terminology is correct.
    I wouldn't say misinterpreting more than trying to fully grasp all of your concepts. I think where you lose me is when you try to interject your theology into politics. The founders did their best to respect religion but also to keep it out of government as they had studied and witnessed the consequences of this.

     
  • At 9:55 AM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    Response to David S. Wilkinson,

    I keep religion out of governmnet becaue religion, by definitioni, s the practice of a pariular theology.

    However, I do bring theology into government because I am unifying theology and science.So, when I bring theology into government, I attempt to unify mye 'theory of God' with 'political sccience.' The God tht I bring in is active. So, I want political scientists to deal with God's Intelligent Design, which the founders call the 'Lawa of Nature and Nature's God' ib the Declaration of Indepndence. So, I am trying to reinstall the Declaration of Independence as a 'natural rights' of the the People of the USA as a power against the federal government.

    George

     
  • At 8:13 AM, Anonymous David S. Wilkinson said…

    A noble cause to be sure but when you add the myriad religions and add the myriad political dynamics you exponentially increase the difficulty of ever having and unification.
    Maybe you're laying the groundwork for this to happen down the road. If so I'm all for it.
    As someone who studies human nature and tries to discern why people do what they do I just see a lot of roadblocks along the way.

     
  • At 12:57 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    Response to David S. Wilkinson,

    I am working as much as I can on many subjects related to an active God because macular degeneration will stop my writing soon.

    George

     
  • At 1:48 PM, Anonymous David S. Wilkinson said…

    A big attaboy and keep going. I think you're on to something. I may not understand all of it and may not agree with some of it but I appreciate the effort you're making.

     
  • At 2:19 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    The central credo of the Tanakh is:
    YHWH ECHAD.
    That is:
    GOD IS ALL THAT EXISTS.
    That is, as I see it panENtheology.
    This implies that there is no existance outside of YHWH.
    YHWH is not limited to a location in cosmos, but cosmos is contained in YHWH.
    Because man is limited in intelligence he (man) constructs mental images of God, varying from the advanced to the infantile, and ultimately in worship of images and in accepting semi-gods.

     

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home