Scientific Proof of God, A New and Modern Bible, and Coexisting Relations of God and the Universe

Tuesday, September 05, 2006

What Is Science?

Many people do not understand science. Usually, these people believe that science is a course one takes at high school to get a diploma and a job. Often, science is not taken by a student because it is thought to be too hard. Yet, too few students know that science is the only known path to find proven truths. Two groups of students take science. One group is formed of believers in God. They take science partly because they accept personal and social responsibilities to God. The second group is formed of nonbelievers, who accept no responsibilities to God.

In the work place, one thus expects to find these two groups of workers. Obviously, one also expects these groups to have different work motives. However, in the work place, the people in the believer group are divided because their motives divide. The work motives of the believer group divide because some people believe that life has no end because after death they believe that God puts them into spiritual places known as Heaven or Hell. However, many believers are changing and are accepting the theory of reincarnation. This means that Heaven and Hell are only different levels of human consciousness. Reincarnation says that life is continuous and has no end. As seen, the first group of believers is similar to the group of nonbelievers, who also believe that they have only one life in the universe.

My scientific proof of God says that reincarnation is consistent with a loving God. This mens that God does not punish. It also means that science is the most important course a believer can take in high school. This final statement tells one ''what science really is.'

4 Comments:

  • At 4:07 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Then there are other groups who don't believe in God but believe in reincarnation. And others who believe in God and in reincarnation. And many who started out studying science as "believers" who came to believe the evidence overwhelmingly shows there is probably not a God. Or if there is a god, then it's a meaningless concept that has nothing to do with the commonly accepted Abrahamic version of god. And some who believe in many gods. And so on.

    "science is the only known path to find proven truths"? Depends on what truths you want. If you want truths about literature, you should probably study English; if about art, then art is the way to go.

    Facts and accuracy, George. Try them some time.

     
  • At 9:13 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    To anonmous.
    Sorry, I do not plan to go outside my 25-year scientific research project and the scientific data ollected. My focus is on God, the univere, and life.

    Since my proof of God is sound, reincarnation without God is not possible.

    What is not factual or inaccurate in my writings? How can you make such a statement without allowing me to defend myelf? Try this some time.

     
  • At 8:40 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Reincarnation may be consistent with a loving god, but there is no scientific evidence to support reincarnation.

    Furthermore, your personality, memories and other characteristics that make you YOU are all shown to be located in the brain. Damage the brain and you change the personality or destroy the memories. (Was your wife the same person after she developed a brain tumor?)

    So if those aspects of YOU no longer exist, what is left? And WHO is left to care at that point? The part which is YOU is gone when your brain dies.

    If you have evidence that shows otherwise, I would be interested in hearing it. Please don't bother to pimp your book yet again. I think that it is reasonable to request evidence for a statement without being referred to a book, regardless of the topic.

     
  • At 7:01 AM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    To q.

    You tend to underestimate the power and wisdom of God. If you agree that finite things exist, then an infinite God must exist.

    People make many errors by not paying attention to symboils and their meanings. Finite and infinite give meaning to each other since they are opposing concepts. They can be used as adjetives or nouns. As adjectives, they become attributes of two maximally different nouns. An example is 'infinite God' and 'finite man.' Or, one can speak of 'God's infinity' and 'man's finitude.'

    God's infinity is one. Otherwise, God's infinity is incomplete, God becomes a verb, and confusion enters our minds.
    For instance, reincarnation without God is confusing but reincarnation with God is not confusing. This confusion is eliminated with spiritual atoms.

    People who found that there is no God have not studied the set theory of Cantor.

    A meaningles God is confusing. Abraham's infinite God did not receive its true meaning until Cantor's work. Believing in many gods will confuse any human mind.

    The truths I seek are truths about God, the uniberse, and life. But scientific truths also exist in literature, art, music, etc. Shakespeare's effort was an effort to teach people how to create and use symbols in writing, singing, art, etc. Math will eventually apply to all fields of thought.

    On truths related to both soft and hard topics, I suggest that you read the work of Lyndon Larouche and his members.

    Facts and accuracy are tough because our symbolic languages are highly flawed, anonymous. Try them some time.

     

Post a Comment

<< Home