777. Innate Knowledge Is Now Defined Properly

Empiricism vs. Rationalism: Empiricists say that innate knowledge of humans does not exist. So, empiricists say that human knowledge is derived from experience via the five senses and reasoning. On the other hand, rationalists say that innate knowledge does exists. (See Blogs) I conclude that the meaning of 'innate knowledge' is not defined properly by empiricism and rationalism.

After I proved in my first book that God is the origin of all finite things in the evening, I learned that God is One and cannot be known. However, I concluded that God acts by identifying the souls of humans, animals, plants, and nonliving things. I identify these souls because I prove that 'a chicken comes before its eggs.' Once the souls are identified by God, God continues to act by giving orderly bodies to nonliving things, plants, animals and humans. These orderly souls and bodies form a continuum universe. Since the bodies of souls eventually pass on for many reasons, God acts immediately to give souls a new body. Since this act of God is natural, nations, humans, and human knowledge must be equal. To make nations, humans, and innate knowledge unequal is to reject God.

As seen, the meaning of innate knowledge is defined by human equalities. Scientists are not considering the acts of God.  This is why their minds are not working properly. 

My books about God and the Universe are presented below:

1. The First Scientific Proof of God (2006), 271 pages, (click)
2. A New and Modern Holy Bible (2012), 189 pages.
3. God And His Coexistent Relations To The Universe. (2014), 429 pages