Scientific Proof of God, A New and Modern Bible, and Coexisting Relations of God and the Universe

Friday, June 01, 2007

The Ugly English Language, II


What are the signs of the degeneration of the English language? There are many signs of a degenerating a language. But, in the USA, I say that the English language began to degenerate with the rise of atheism and the absence of God in the affairs of the national government. This rise and absence began with the assassination of Abe Lincoln. Once this rise and absence appeared, other sins began to appear. One new sign was the appearance of British system of economics. This economy is godless and builds a rich class, a poor class, arbitrary laws, and an irrational two-party political system. The British economy also built this kind of nation in England and Mexico.

As a language degenerates, other words from other national languages begin to appear in the degenerating language. These ‘outside’ words do not compete with the words of the degenerating language, as evolutionists would probably say. They are new words and immediately become dominating words. Such ‘outside’ words began in the early years of the 20th century. Most of them were German words destined for the many fields of science, especially the field of physics. The ‘outside’ words from the German language increased following WWII when the US forced the best German rocket scientists to work on the US space program. I worked with some of them.

The English language is degenerating also because it never installed the 1920 linguistic discovery which says, ‘sense-data are primarily symbolic.’ This discovery impacts all sciences and especially impacts all life sciences. For instance, the English language, the US logicians, and the US evolutionists are forcing human life in the USA to be logical rather than godly. In other words, they are trying to destroy God and replace God with logical reasoning.

But, look at what the English language is doing to our brain. Instead of giving only one meaning to a symbol, the Oxford English Dictionary has 37 definitions of the symbol ‘horn.’ And, in Webster’s Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary, the symbol ‘work’ has 53 meanings. (See The Torch, Spring 2007, Vol.80, No. 3 by Ann St. Clair Burwell Lesman). Her information on the brain/language relations and geometry is telling me that the US brain is highly disorganized and is becoming a confused mess of neural networks.

Building a ‘melting pot’ nation of many different people who use many different languages is not political right. This kind of politics is irrational. So, Americans, please read my book and learn what is happening to man and what has happened in the USA since Lincoln’s death. By doing this, the reader will certainly fall in love with God. Then, they will correct the English language mess, which is quietly destroying the USA.

8 Comments:

  • At 11:01 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    The trouble with you is, you talk a lot about languages while only knowing one of them: English. What you say about English (many English words have many different meanings) is a common and well-known feature of all natural languages. Lots of Spanish, Russian, German, Dutch, Swedish, Portuguese words have a broad variety of different meanings, and the same was true of ancient Greek and Latin.

    As the English language is degenerating rapidly, you must be very pleased with the growing success of the beautiful Spanish language in the USA.

    And could you name ten of those German words that appeared in the English language and immediately became dominating words?

     
  • At 5:29 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    Kenneth brown,

    I do not have no trouble with you. So, why do you have trouble with me? When someone expresses himself or herself, do you have a problem with people who express their knowledge to other people?

    I work on the origin or cause of human languages abd their changes, conflicts, and degenerations. This research speciality might be new to you. It is certainly new to people who do not understand my scientific proof of God.

    I do not think that you know how to get into a Socratic dialogue. I concluded this inability when you stayed on the same subjects.

    The doscovery in the 1920s does not allow a symbol to have a multiplicity of meanings. That means that the English language is wrong according to the linguists of the 1920s. Are you aware of the people who made this discovery?

    A nation should not use a language only because other nations uses a multiplicity of meanings for each symbols.

    Just because the English language is degenerating does not mean that the Spanish language is any better off than the English language.

    I am not an expert on your question. But I could if I conducted research on your question. I will let the resesrch project to you.

    But, I'll give you a few examples to assist your researh effort.
    1. "gestalt" which means holistic in the USA 2. "falsch" which means wrong (completely wrong) in the USA. 3."ganz falsch" which means 'not even wrong." It is the German phrase created by the physicist, Wolfgang Pauli. it applies to a 'physical ststement' that is incomplete or ill-defined. Ganz falsch applies to the US government when a government employee says that his work 'is good enough for government work.'

    You do not seem to be aware of the language conflicts.

     
  • At 12:30 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    "ganz falsch" doesn't mean "not even wrong", it simply means "very wrong". That is very basic knowledge. "not even wrong in German" would be something like "nicht einmal falsch". Your error shows that you don't know what you are talking about.

    By the way, the word "falsch" hasn't become a dominating word in the English language, so it is a bad example to illustrate your claim. First think, then write.

     
  • At 2:08 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    kenneth brown,

    I am using my meanings from Peter Woit's book on Not Even GNORW. it will only time for the German language to control the English language because the intellectual power in the German language, not in the English.

    Tell me how ganz falsch can appear in the English language if the German falsch is not there? As ganz false??????

    Well, let me then also say that you do not know what yu are talking about because you do not know what I already know about the current changing nature of the German/English languages.

     
  • At 8:59 PM, Blogger MattP said…

    I had never heard the term "ganz falsch" before and a quick poll of a number of friends were also unfamiliar with it. It doesn't seem like it's that common in English. It only appears about 1,600 times in a English-language Google search, compared to 290,000 hits for the phrase "not even wrong". Only 30 pages include both phrases.

     
  • At 10:47 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    matt,

    There is no science on the flow of concepts from one language to another language.

    Apparently, the German, ganz faisch, is still found mostly in the US field of physics at this time. There, it is being used to describe the string theories. It is used by physicists who want the field of physics to return to basics.

    I might begin to use it to describe the string theories, the evolutionary theory, and the Big bang theory. The taxpayers must stop the awful waste of monies on godless theories in the field of science.

    Perhaps, a $4 per gallon will enlighten the taxpayers of this waste.

     
  • At 8:07 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Matt's google search proved you wrong. Again you wrote something totally outrageous and downright stupid - American physicists call the string theory 'ganz falsch', which is German and means 'not even wrong' - and again you refuse to admit your stupidity. Instead, you try to shift our attention to the taxpayers' monies.

    Btw, in cercles of real, bonafide scientists the phrase 'to do a shollenberger' is gaining popularity to describe an act of wilful logical stupidity.

     
  • At 8:37 AM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    carlos quinto,

    matt did not prove anything. matt was not even trying to prove anything. How do you see the right/wrong concept in the friently dialogue between matt and me? Grow up kid and find a job.

    I will not delete your stupid comment on this blog so other people can see your wasted life. But, you are now banned from this website.

     

Post a Comment

<< Home