The Godless Research by the US National Institutes of Health
Recently, the US Nati onal Institutes of Health reported that its huge study of Type
II diabetes failed. Failure of the National Institues can be expected because the US governmnet does not allow US funded researchers to use God and a created universe.
If God and a created universe is used in research, one must treat God as a unity of all true opposites and the universe as a whole of man different, independent, and related things. If a godless universe is used in research, the focus is on processes of change. The difference between godly research and godless researchis is thus as different as night and day.
It it thus expected that this National Institutes of Health research on diabetes killed many patients unnecessarily.
II diabetes failed. Failure of the National Institues can be expected because the US governmnet does not allow US funded researchers to use God and a created universe.If God and a created universe is used in research, one must treat God as a unity of all true opposites and the universe as a whole of man different, independent, and related things. If a godless universe is used in research, the focus is on processes of change. The difference between godly research and godless researchis is thus as different as night and day.
It it thus expected that this National Institutes of Health research on diabetes killed many patients unnecessarily.
posted by George Shollenberger @ 4:34 PM
10 Comments:
At 10:33 AM,
Rev. BigDumbChimp said…
George,
I've found your soulmate. He's almost as paranoid and quickly proving himself nearly as delusional as yourself.
Find Edward here
At 11:30 AM,
George Shollenberger said…
response to bigsumbchimp,
I see that you continue to express yourself using the psychological crap that comes out of the scienceblogs.com. Get lost. You and other atheists have no ability to even comment on my scientific material. Try politics where character assassinations are the common way to argue political science.
Like your goofy pronouncements, I am also having a good laugh over the junk produced by Sam Harris and his new gang on the Reason Project.
George
At 2:43 PM,
Rev. BigDumbChimp said…
There's no science going on here to comment on.
At 8:21 PM,
George Shollenberger said…
response to rev.bigdumbchimp,
My book and this website contain the only bases on which science can develop any further. You and your friends are developing pseudosciences and are driving the USA and other nations into stinky sewers.
George
At 10:13 AM,
Anonymous said…
I agree with rev bigdumbchimp. Your incredible paranoia prevents you from accepting any criticism of your delusional writings. A while ago some president a national network of colleges very clearly explained to you that your beloved 'Plato's negative' doesn't amount to anything. Your only reaction was to accuse him of assassinating your character, as you always do in response to critique.
Face it, George. Your book is dead. It only received five well-deserved demolishing reviews. It sold only a few copies. And people only visit your weblog
out of a psychological fascination: day after day you offer them a glimpse of how the delusional mind of an arrogant paranoid idiot works.
At 12:41 PM,
George Shollenberger said…
response to anonymous,
Your research is very poor. This wasn't a network of national colleges. It was a group of scientists associated with the
the Babtist church. Instead of investigating my work, they tried to find the falsities in my work so I would not affect their members They knew nothing about Plato's negtive or Hegel and neither do you or the atheistic reviewers of my book.
Only time will tell how well my book will do. I have patience.
Using anonymous and your comment is a sign to me that you are not a scientist and know nothing about my material. So, don't waste my time.
George
At 2:44 PM,
Anonymous said…
"they tried to find the falsities in my work"
There is your paranoid mind going at it again! They (all PhD's) wanted to use your book in their curricula, but had a few legitimate questions about what you call Plato's negative. They had to ask their questions six or seven times before you stopped pontificating about religion and science and Nicholas de Cusa. And when you finally tried to address their questions it became clear to them and to the readers of your blog that you couldn't and that your Plato's negative is no more than a cheap party trick. They even showed you that it could be used to show that you're a homosexual.
So no, they weren't trying to find the falsities in your work, but nonetheless they ended up exposing your dishonesty.
At 3:40 PM,
George Shollenberger said…
response to anonoymous,
You are not reading my dialogue with the Baptist scientists. Instead, you are reading a dialogue that I had with a person who said that he wanted to buy 30,000 copies of my book for students of many colleges. That person acted fradulently.
Get to the truth. You are playing a children's game and know nothing about my work and know nothing at all about negative philosophy.
I have four children and eight grandchildren. I lost a wife to brain cancer in 1999 and am happily remarried to a WOMAN. Calling people homosexual without knowing the truth means that your mind is not working properly.
At 12:47 PM,
Rev. BigDumbChimp said…
George you wouldn't know a falsity if it jumped up and bit you in the ass. You have been shot down and proven wrong so many times by so many people yet you still chose to refine language to suit your own fantasies.
Seriously whatever meds you should be taking, up the dosage.
At 2:24 PM,
George Shollenberger said…
response to bigdumbchimp,
The Newtonians did the same to Einstein as you are doing to me. People like you did the same to Jesus Christ, Plato, Nicholas of Cusa Gottfried Leibniz, Friedrich Hegel, Georg Cantor, and Lyndon LaRouche.
Noone has shot me down yet. You can't, the logicians can't, physical scientists can't, and the atheists can't. And, you can't. Name one person who shot me down. Stop generalizing. get specific.
The language I am refining is flawed. I am refining it with science and the two-step scientific method. You don't even know about this true scientific method of proof.
So, who are you trying to convince? Only yourself.
I take one pill daily. It is a blood pressure pill. And that is all. Your psychology is filled with illusions of people.
George
Post a Comment
<< Home