Scientific Proof of God, A New and Modern Bible, and Coexisting Relations of God and the Universe

Sunday, April 01, 2007

The Muslim Scientific Proof of God


Last evening, I listened to a video presented by Professor Muhammad al Mahdi on the first Muslim scientific proof of God. Click Although the audio was bad, I could understand enough of the words used by al Mahdi. In general, this Muslim proof of God is based on Einstein’s relativity theory. For instance, if you are on a moving train and are walking in the same direction as the train, a person standing still outside of the train will say that you are moving faster than the train. But, if you are walking in the opposing direction , the person standing outside will say that you are moving slower than the train.

The Muslim proof deals with the motion of a particle of light (a photon) and its motion to our planet from the sun. If the photon has mass and moves from the sun to our planet at the speed of light, the mass of the photon would increase to infinity and destroy planet earth. Only if a photon has no mass, can light appear in our world. The truth is that each photon travels to planet earth in a fraction of a second.

Physicists identify a photon as a packet of light energy. But, if a photon has energy, Einstein’s famous equation, E = m c2, applies. If a photo has energy, at the speed of light the mass of the photon is approaching infinity and a photo would destroy our planet. Obviously, today’s physicists have made an error on defining a photon. The Muslim scientists correct this error by removing akk mass from the photon. When all mass is removed, the massless photon becomes an attribute of God where it is pure energy rather than physical light energy. So, biblical statements such as ‘let there be light’ have been correct.

My general scientific proof of God distinguishes God’s spiritual world from our physical world. I use a system of spiritual atoms to distinguish these two worlds. In this system of spiritual atoms, the massless photons proposed by the Muslims will fit in my general scientific proof of God and would form an ‘infinite set of massless photons.’ However, an infinite number of other infinite sets are needed by an infinite God to create a finite world in which we live. For this reason, the photon and its potential light energy is a specific, rather than general, proof of God

So, a new future is coming for the godly people of the world whereas only confusion will come to the world’s atheists. The pic above shows how man seeks knowledge of small things. This kind of knowledge eventually leads to knowledge of God.

20 Comments:

  • At 9:57 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    George, your post is filled with errors. I'm no physicist, but I know that photons DO NOT HAVE ANY MASS, and this fact renders your entire post irrelevant.
    Also, as any schoolkid knows, light does not travel from the sun to earth in a fraction of a second. It takes just over 8 minutes.

     
  • At 9:44 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    "When all mass is removed, the massless photon becomes an attribute of God where it is pure energy rather than physical light energy."

    Evidence please!
    And why don't you answer the other comment about the light of the sun not taking a fraction of a second, but 8 minutes to reach the earth? It hurts to be so wrong, doesn't it?

     
  • At 10:17 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    God is my freind and Prof Mohammad al mahdi was my freind. salam alaykum Mr Shollenberger and thanks to Allah for your blog. - amjessep@utas.edu.au

     
  • At 6:27 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Photons have a rest mass of zero. Im sorry but that means you and the prof are wrong. The prophet Muhammad said "One learned man is harder on the devil than a thousand ignorant worshippers." Learn before you teach, you spread ignorance like sand. You do more harm than good.

     
  • At 1:26 AM, Anonymous Patrick said…

    It seems like both you and the people who left you comments misunderstood the professor...

     
  • At 10:11 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    This comment has been removed by the author.

     
  • At 10:15 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    anonymous said;
    said...
    Photons have a rest mass of zero. Im sorry but that means you and the prof are wrong. The prophet Muhammad said "One learned man is harder on the devil than a thousand ignorant worshippers." Learn before you teach, you spread ignorance like sand. You do more harm than good.

    Response by George Shollenberger,

    Every thing-in-itself that has energy, also has mass. Since a photon has energy, it also has mass. This is my teaching.

    George

     
  • At 1:01 PM, Anonymous misalian said…

    I would only like to mention, the presenter in the video insisted that this explanation has nothing to do with Islam and I guess you should also not refer to it as "Muslim Scientific proof". Scientific explanation is equal for every religion. Newton's Law of motion are same for Christians as well as for Muslims or Jews or others.Therefore this explanation should be presented as "Scientific Proof of God". Wrong or right is a different question.

     
  • At 1:56 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    response to misalian,

    Wasn't the man on the video a Muslim.

    It would be nice if science would be the same in all nations. Since the national languages are often used to expressis a scientific statement (without mathematics), we must be careful. This is why I am pushing for a single world language.

    Thanks for the info.

     
  • At 5:25 PM, Anonymous risaleinur said…

    You can read risale-i nur books online www.gencnur.com/read.htm

     
  • At 6:39 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    The Lord Almighty will not give any mercy to those who seek knowledge by deception. To all overthere do not have the nerve to expect graciousness from him. Let us thank him for the life and enjoy his sweetness and kindness and not beyond.
    Please ask for forgiveness for such extrapolation.

     
  • At 12:09 PM, Blogger Justin said…

    absurd, once again we see very smart people are capable rationalizing self-deceit and emotional inclinations. There is no scientific evidence for any kind of creator or god.

     
  • At 12:42 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    Jusin

    Your comment is unclear to me. What is absurd and I will try to response.

    There is lots of scientific evidence for a creator and God. More recently, I taught a PhD about the inability of scientists to 'learn what the will never know.' See the comments in my blog dated 11/11/09 on the subject On "Learning One's Ignorance'

    Your problem as an atheist is that you are not learning what you cannot know.

    George

     
  • At 1:47 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Gals
    You have got to see this. Obama playing on XBox. Funniest video ever. http://bit.ly/bllhx1

     
  • At 6:34 AM, Blogger Matthew said…

    Physics is perfectly capable of describing a photon. The definition you used for Eisenstein's law of mass-energy conservation is a simplified form for the rest mass of a particle only.

    For the full equation please see

    http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/relativ/relmom.html#c4

    This point alone makes the rest of your article entirely pointless.

    The tiniest amount of research on your part would have yielded the above explanation, and prevented you from making nonsensical statements like "If the photon has mass and moves from the sun to our planet at the speed of light, the mass of the photon would increase to infinity and destroy planet earth". This is insulting to the vast body of theoretical knowledge that we now have in modern physics.

     
  • At 12:32 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    Comment to Matthew,

    Thanks. Like many other scientists, I do not erase my work because our minds are improving as time passes. This post is old and might be outdated. But I still have many problems with Einstein's work.

    Did CERN find that the neutrino moves faster than the photon?

    George

     
  • At 6:15 PM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    Comment to Matthew,

    I fnally went to Google and searched on the address you gave me below:

    http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/relativ/relmom.html#c4

    This address don't tell me what to study.. Could you tell me what address I should study?

    Do you know that a photon was made by God and has an infinite number of parts according to the work of Galileo,.

    George
    George

     
  • At 6:50 AM, Blogger Matthew said…

    With regards to CERN and the superluminal neutrinos, no other experiment has been able to replicate the results, including another experiment at Gran Sasso. It is likely, in my opinion only of course, that the results are due to an experimental error.

    The equations on hyperphysics should explain how the energy of a photon arises; essentially E=mc^2 is the rest mass energy of a particle, in the case of a photon, with zero mass, there is no rest mass energy at all.

    All the energy carried by a photon can be attributed to it's frequency, from the equation E=hf, where h is Plancks constant and f is the frequency.

    Using Einstein's energy equation,
    E = sqrt( p^2 c^2 + m^2 c^4 ),
    where p is momentum. When taking the case of a photon, with no rest mass, the entire energy must come from the p^2 c^2 term. A consequence of this is that a photon can actually exhibit a pressure! Equating energies,
    E = hf = pc,
    and rearranging, you can find the momentum carried by a photon,
    p = hf/c.
    As the momentum is multiplied by h (a very small number) and is divided by c (a large number) the amount of momentum really is very tiny. Despite this it has been considered for propulsion in space (see solar sails), and is very important when you are looking at how stars act, as there are so many photons inside them!

    I hope that helps understanding of how a photon acts, and why it wouldn't destroy the earth!

    Although Galileo was a notable scientists, our understanding of light and matter has changed entirely since the introduction of modern physics. The nature of a photon was not even understood until Einstein published his papers early in the 20th century.


    Matthew

     
  • At 6:23 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    [url=http://www.cheaptimberlandboot1973.com]timberland boots sale[/url] qanhtg http://www.cheaptimberlandboot1973.com [url=http://www.cheaptimberlandbootssale.com]cheap timberland boots[/url] ijmtcm http://www.cheaptimberlandbootssale.com [url=http://www.cheaptimberlandbootsmen.com]cheap timberland boots[/url] rltdvz http://www.cheaptimberlandbootsmen.com [url=http://www.cheaptimberlandbootoutlet.com]cheap timberland outlet[/url] idnllz http://www.cheaptimberlandbootoutlet.com [url=http://www.saletimberlandboots.org]cheap timberland boots[/url] jtzbqx http://www.saletimberlandboots.org e

     
  • At 5:48 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your weblog and wanted to say that I have truly
    enjoyed browsing your blog posts. After all I will be
    subscribing to your rss feed and I hope you write again very soon!
    Feel free to surf my blog :: surgically removing stretch marks

     

Post a Comment

<< Home