Sequiturs and Non-Sequiturs

If you are a life scientist and a person tells you that you use too many non-sequiturs in your writings, walk away from this person because this person’s ignorance of the reality of life is showing. Atheists charge me continually with using too many non-sequiturs in my book. The chargers are made mostly by atheists who do not understand the true reality of life. Instead, they understand the false reality of life because they believe that our physical scientists will prove that life originates in those nonliving things that form a purely physical universe. Well, the physical scientists have not produced this proof. In fact, attempts to produce this proof have failed. More recently, the physicist’s string theories have failed. And, I would bet heavily that the physicist’s Big Bang theory will fail next. What is wrong with the field of physical science? This field spends lots of taxpayer money but is not effective.

A relation between nonliving things and living things has never been found by the physical scientists. I argue that such a relation will never be found because living things possess different degrees of knowing whereas nonliving things have no ability to know. In my book, I use knowing to distinguish living things from nonliving things. Their differences allow me to say that nonliving things function as an infrastructure for life. Thus, there is a togetherness between nonliving and living things. But, there is no relation between them. Gottfried Leibniz called this togetherness ‘a preestablished harmony.’ This togetherness becomes clearer in my book.

While waiting for physicists to prove a relation between nonliving and living things, the atheistic life scientists make the assumption that life is a machine. This living machine is a reduced version of the physical universe. As a reduced machine, atheists expect us to believe that human life is explained by laws of physics. Based on these laws, atheists demand that we use sequiturs to explain life. A sequitur means ‘a conclusion that follows from an inference.’ Using scientific words, a sequitur means ‘cause is followed by effects’ or ‘ effects are followed by a cause.’ A sequitur is thus a circular argument that is used to explain a machine or a nonliving thing. If one could go inside any machine, one could not find its initial cause or its last effect. As seen, sequiturs are used by God and engineers only to make machines.

Physicists have not been able to make living things because only God can make living things. Since, living things are not machines, they cannot be explained with sequiturs. Living things must be explained by non-circular arguments and non-sequiturs. They reveal the different functions or purposes that God gave to all living things. Life is thus filled with non-sequiturs and non-circular arguments because living things are not machines. In the real life of humans, a human cause cannot predict its effects. Nor can human effects be explained by a root cause.

In the USA, 2% of the people are atheists and 98% of the people are believers that God created everything. As long as the 98% of the people remain silent, the atheists will maintain their wrong political demands and will maintain their wrong scientific demands. With these demands, the development of human life will suffer. For instance, problems such as cancer, diabetes etc. will not be solved. Isn’t it time to tell the atheists that their political and scientific demands are ‘not even wrong?’ We now know that such demands are ‘completely wrong.’