Scientific Proof of God, A New and Modern Bible, and Coexisting Relations of God and the Universe

Monday, November 05, 2007

Another Scientific Proof of God Has Been Found

Tonight, ABS-TV announced a major breakthrough for breast cancer patients who are pregnant. Prior to this breakthrough, the cancer patient had to abort the child before chemotherapy is used. Now, the patient can use chemotherapy if the child’s growth has passed a specific phase.

This breakthrough implies that the placenta protects the child, which means that the child and the placenta form a new thing-in itself. This new thing is not a part of the Mother. In the placenta, the child consists mostly of positive phenomena. The placenta functions ass negative phenomenon to both the Mother and the child, that is, after conception. But, the negativity of the placenta protects the child from the negative chemotherapy of the Mother. At birth, the placenta is removed and no longer presents the placenta's negativity to the Mother and child. Apparently, the production of a new child is protected by God's intelligent design.

My own scientific proof of God is generalized for all created things in my book, The First Scientific Proof of God. , However, as I said before on this website, a proof of God should be found in every created thing.


  • At 10:39 PM, Blogger Matt said…

    Um, George... the womb is the woman's uterus. It is part of her body. It's an organ. It is not removed at childbirth unless there are really horrible complications. What in the world are you talking about?

  • At 8:50 AM, Blogger George Shollenberger said…

    Hi Matt,

    Thanks for the input. I will change the blog.

    My wife corrected my ignorance this morning. The child is protected by the placenta, not the womb, and is removed at birth. It is the placenta that adds negativity to the positiviies of the Mother and the child. As seen, some negativities do function properly. It is negative thinking that is damaging to us.

    An important message in this breakthrough is that logical positivism is not science.



Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home