Remaking America by George Shollenberger, Idea XXXXXXIX (Economies for the USA, I)

In 1776, the USA became the first nation under God. To build our nation, the U. S. founders decided to use the social contract of John Locke. Thus, they rejected the social contracts offered by Thomas Hobbes and Jean- Jacques Rousseau. (Click) Locke’s social contract forms a two-party agreement. One party is Society, which is a Union of the people. The other party is Government, which is self-governing because it is operated of, by, and for the people.

Since Government has no rights, it must receive rights from the Society before it is able to secure the Society. Since all rights of humans come from the morals of God, the rights of Government must come from God through the Society. To build Locke’s social contract, the founders defined the Society in the first two paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence. The Declaration also gave Government the right to conduct war with England, if England began it. On 1776, the Continental Congress was Government until the founders defined Government with the Constitution in 1787. A Bill of Rights was then added to the Constitution on December 15, 1791. Thus, on 1776, U.S. economic activities began officially. However, building the U.S. economy became a highly confused political activity.

U.S. economic activities became confused immediately because Locke’s social contract has never been understood by economists and most U.S. citizens. Yet, Locke’s social contract is the key to establishing right economic activities and economic activities that secure the Union. Today, most political discussions and university arguments on the subject of economics are without any unification of rational thinking and Locke’s social contract.

Remaking America by George Shollenberger, Idea XXXXXXVIII (Reforming the Field of Religion, VII)

In order to understand religions, one must become a dialectician, a student of Plato, and a person who recognizes opposed concepts. For example, such concepts include Yin and Yang (found in the Far East) and the a continuum and discrete (found mostly in Europe). These opposing concepts are not non sequiturs. They are really opposing concepts that help people develop their minds and build the Spirit that God gives them.

An example of a God-made continuum is a number system made of the discrete numbers 1, 2, 3, ... etc. This continuum and its discrete numbers exist forever and can be used by all people who exist in God’s created world.

An example of a Man-made continuum is a religion and its discrete members. The members of a religion who die will never understand what happened to this Man-made religion. For instance, the people who believed in pantheism do not know what happened to its religion after they died. Since I live at a time when pantheism was destroyed, I know that pantheism was replaced by Abraham’s monotheism.

The Catholic church says that it is the last and only true church because it came from Jesus Christ through the man, Peter. But Jesus Christ was not God. He was merely a human being who found many truths in Greece. Since we know that Jewish people, Islam people, and modern scientists also found new truths about God and His universe, it is not possible that the Catholic church is the last and only true church.

Here, I have used a simple pair of opposites and found a falsity about the Catholic church, that it is not the last and true religion that ever exists. Since the Catholic church, or any other church, synagogue, or mosques do not hold all of the truths about God and the Universe, being a member of a religious organization must be based only on its development of knowledge.

Obviously, a person cannot become a member of a religious organization based only on past family or national behaviors. A person should only become a member of a religious organization that is developing truths about God and the His universe.

Remaking America by George Shollenberger, Idea XXXXXXVII (Reforming the Field of Religion, VI)

I am no longer a member of any religious organization because many if the teachings of these organizations are false. However, some of these religious organizations are also dishonest. One dishonest religion is the Catholic Church. This is the same organization that had people burned at the stake, imprisoned Galileo, and have molested children.

Before I published my book (The First Scientific Proof of God), the Catholic church, through the American Cusanus Society, requested a copy of my book for review. (click) I gave a copy of the book to Gerald Christianson. He is the President of the ACS today but never gave me a response. I never heard from Christianson again. Since Dr. Jasper Hopkins is the major translator of the writings of Nicholas of Cusa, he also agreed to review my book. But after I sent the book, I never heard from Hopkins again. In time, I learned that my book is very different compared to the teachings of the Catholic church. But I conclude that the ACS interpretations of Nicholas of Cusa are flawed.

After I published my book, the Baptist church began to study my book. Its theologians and scientists contacted me on my website. See4 blogs August 19, and 20, 2007 and their comments. In these blogs, I discussed negation V. logic. We could not agree on God or the universe. It was clear to me that a Baptist is an Aristotelian whereas I am a Platonist.

The teachings of the Catholic church and Baptist church are organized based on the logic of Aristotle. Some of these teachings align to atheism, because both think logically as criminals usually think. Logical thinking also creates the belief in Darwin’s evolutionary theory. Evolution was accepted by Pope John Paul. But I say that evolution is inconsistent with a monotheistic God.

Christianity is a confused religion today after Plato and Aristotle divided Christians in the 3rd century. And the unification of Christians was unsuccessful at the 1439 Council of Florence, which Nicholas of Cusa attended. (Click). Eastern Christian thinking aligns people to Plato and his dialectical thinking. On the other hand, Western Christian thinking aligns people to Aristotle and his logical thinking. Since I am a Platonist, I agree with Eastern Christians who say that Jesus Christ is a created person.

As one of the students who mastered Plato and the writings of Nicholas of Cusa, I conclude that the Catholic and Baptist churches are not developing the Spirits of their members and are not developing new knowledge about God and His creation.

Remaking America by George Shollenberger, Idea XXXXXXVI (Reforming the Field of Religion, V)

Man’s symbolic languages are imperfect and can always be improved. Man must thus improve his symbolic languages continually because the human mind is formed with symbols, which make statements and lines of reasoning. So all documents formed with symbols can be misinterpreted.

For instance, people misinterpret the meanings of symbols found in Amendment I of U.S. Constitution. The symbols of interest say, ‘Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, ...’ People who misinterpret this amendment say that these symbols mean that ‘State and Church are separated.’ This new meaning can change the way one interprets Amendment I. (Click), (Click), and (Click)

Things in our Union can be related but cannot be separated because the USA is a Union of things. John Locke’s social contract theory was used by the founders to create the USA. In the first two paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence, the founders created Locke’s ‘Society.’ The remaining words in the Declaration authorize war against England. The founders created Locke’s ‘Government’ first, as the Continental Congress, and finally, as the Constitution. By creating Locke’s Society and Government, the Society had to give its self-governing Government Rights that it received from God. These human Rights were given to its Government in order to secure the Society in all ways.

The relations between State and Church are clearly defined by our founders The Declaration of Independence makes the Union a nation under God. Amendment I authorizes State and Church to develop one or more theologies but restricts the practice of theologies to Church. So State and God and State and Church are always related by our Union. Government can thus conduct research on God and share its research results with all religions. And all religions can also conduct research on God and share its results with Government.

Clearly, Society, Government, and Religion are unfamiliar with the nature of man’s symbolic languages and the way our minds develop different ‘persons, for instance, criminals. However, the U.S. government is not securing Sociery in all ways. Obviously our politicians do not understand Locke's social contract.

Remaking America by George Shollenberger, Idea XXXXXXV (Reforming the Field of Religion, IV)

When the Jews say that God inspired scribes to create scripture, this religion means that the Spirit of God is in the scribes, who then dictates messages to the scribes who produce the Old Testament. Christians accepted this cause and effect process and created the New Testament. Believing that the Old Testament and New Testament contain messages from the same God, the scripture known as the Bible was created. Muslims say that the angel Gabriel revealed the scripture known as the Qur’an to Muhammad.

The truths of all three scriptures can be challenged because we have more knowledge today about Abraham’s monotheistic God. For instance, we now know that God does not live among the stars we see in the evening sky.

We also know that our world and God’s world are very different. As finite things, we cannot enter God’s infinite world. And since God is infinite, God cannot appear in our finite world. So, today we know that God exists in a ‘higher world.’ Thus, if people go to Heaven after death, they cannot go to God’s world. But we are finding that higher stages of life exist in our finite world with Georg Cantor’s transfinite numbers. So better finite worlds seem to exist.

Further, since we found that a monotheistic God is both maximum and minimum in the 15th century, we found that our finite world is curved and protected by God. But this means that an astral world for angels does not exist in between God’s world and our finite world.

Furthermore, the word ‘in’ has gained a second meaning. The initial meaning was applied to ‘containers.’ For instance, a glass is a container in which water can be poured. The second meaning is new and can be applied to many different things that are functionally related.

The newness I bring to religions should not affect the current thinking of religious people. I am merely correcting and expanding the current scriptural material. Religious fundamentalists must thus now realize that they no longer have a foundation on which to impose their beliefs.

Remaking America by George Shollenberger, Idea XXXXXXIV (Reforming the Field of Religion, III)

When I was young, most families went to a religious service every Sunday. As I grew, I and most of my friends became a member of a religious service. I joined the Lutheran church. After high school, I served three years in the military, started college, became married, finished college at night, became a scientist, and became an atheist. I became an atheist because religious teachings were opposed to scientific facts.

However, by my fifties, I became sensitive to death and began to ask deep religious questions. After twenty-five years of continued research, in 2006, I self-published a book, ‘The First Scientific Proof of God,’ and opened this website to teach this book. Today, I recognize the importance of my high school education, my church membership, my life long development of self knowledge, my sound retirement, and my preparation for death.

Since many U.S. citizens are unable to finish high school, become a young member of a religion, develop self knowledge as a youth, develop a sound retirement, and prepare for death, I suggest that the U.S. government help expand the activities of today’s synagogues, churches, mosques, and other religions so that all humans can become part of local social units throughout the USA and the world.

Reason cannot organize these social units around the scriptures of synagogues, churches, or mosques because the scriptures of these religions were produced by humans and will contain errors. Since the organization of these social units must be based only on truths, all past and future scriptures must become new tools of science and its scientific method of proof.

My suggestion for developing social units emerged after I visited the region in which I was born in Pennsylvania. I was shocked at the many ghettos that have emerged during my single lifetime. I conclude that the performance of the U.S. economy is not as good as free market economists say.

Remaking America by George Shollenberger, Idea XXXXXXIII (Reforming the Field of Religion, II)

A symbolic language cannot be completed. Accordingly, a scripture cannot be completed because it uses a symbolic language. Thus, how long can a religion maintain itself with a scripture that contains outdated teachings? Not long because man has the natural desire to prove God’s existence. And once such a proof appears to a person, this person also wants to understand God and the created universe. I assert that no scripture, new or ancient, can satisfy these natural desires and wants of man. Thus, I conclude that a religion can be maintained only if new knowledge is added.

When I read Duwayne Anderson’s book on "Farewell to Eden: Coming to Terms with Mormonism and Science,’ I posted a review because Joseph Smith claimed wrongly that Jesus Christ’s knowledge was infinite, perfect, and complete. Since no finite human being can attain all knowledge, I suggested that Mormonism be maintained as a social unity so that Mormonism does not fail under the pressure of science. (Click)

My suggestion above on socialism applies to all religions. Socialism is needed because newly developed knowledge about God and the universe must be taught to the children of every new generation. My 115 blogs on ‘theological science,’ from 6/6/08 to 12/25/08, had the purpose of serving those religions that expand their synagogue, church, or mosque as ‘knowing social units’ and do not depend only on the knowledge available in a scripture.

On 1/23/09, I began to develop a series of blogs that could help President Obama remake America. Already more than seventy blogs have been posted by me. These posts can also help religions expand their teachings to knowing social units.

Remaking America by George Shollenberger, Idea XXXXXXII ( Reforming the Field of Religion, I)

The teachings in the field of religion have developed many unwanted human problems. These problems have been caused mostly by scriptures and the languages used by ancient scribes and those people who translate a scripture into a different language. After interpreting ancient scriptures for thousands of years, it became clear, in the 1920s that Western world linguistics would conclude that all sensual data are primarily symbolic.

In our modern time, mathematical scientists have found symbols that have precise meanings. With them, cause and effect events can be predicted. The symbols of scriptures are not coming from God, as if an infinite God can destroy himself and exist in our finite world, where God and man can communicate with each other. The symbols used by the field of religion are not precise and cannot predict any events. All scriptures are man-made and express different eras of man’s thoughts.

The life that God gave man is not well understood by any religion or person. But I believe that human life can be understood better and better if our thoughts about God and the universe become ‘consistent. For instance, it is consistent to distinguish the opposing concepts ‘infinite’ and ‘finite’ and give them different meanings.

One meaning would distinguish God and His universe. In this case, infinite would be an attribute of God and finite would be an attribute of each thing in His universe. The second meaning would treat infinite and finite as variables so that infinities and finites coexist. The second meaning would apply to Georg Cantor’s transfinite numbers. The second meaning allows us to view God and His universe as eternal partners. With this second meaning, human life never ends. With these two meanings, rebuilding America is a very rational human effort.

I believe that it is time for man to unify all religions.

Remaking America by George Shollenberger, Idea XXXXXXI (Changing the World from Mechanism to Holism, IX)

The Mechanists and Atheists cannot step out of the universe where they could measure its contents and predict its future. However, neither can believers in God step out of the universe where they could measure God, the contents of the universe, and predict the future of God and His universe.

The founders of the USA knew that such measures were not possible. So, they made two decisions. One decision applied John Locke’s social contract theory. The second decision was to build a nation under God rather than a godless nation. To record these decisions, they added the first two paragraphs to the Declaration of Independence.

When the founders defined the national government with the Constitution, they included the following words in the Preamble: ‘...in Order to form a more perfect Union, ...’ These words have two meanings. One meaning says that the Union is a togetherness of ‘the people.’The second meaning says that perfections of the Union can be measured only with a standard of perfection. This standard is God. So these two founding documents say that ‘the people’ and ‘its government’ must form a nation under God.

How did ‘the people and ‘its government’ of the USA become aligned to mechanistic and atheistic thoughts?

In his 1966 book "The Symphony of Life," Donald Andrews writes a ‘Dear Reader’ letter saying ‘... My primary objective is to give you a broad vista of the new and truly revolutionary unity of science and religion that is emerging today.’ He also cites the New Science of Leibniz and the work of Nicholas of Cusa. One can thus ask, ‘Why were the fields of science and religion not unified after Andrews’ book was published. I offer three answers as follows: (1) religions do not want their teachings to be challenged by scientists; (2) scientists do not want their teachings to be challenged by religions; and (3) the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of atheism in 1967, only one year after Andrews published his book.

In 1967, in order to build atheism into a political power, as Nazism was built, the young Atheists might have decided to gain this political power by assassinating the character of godly authors such as Andrews. I came to this opinion when young Atheists assassinated my character on the Amazon Internet bookstore after I published my godly book in 2006. For more than forty years, the rise of atheism has been promoting evolutionary theory and destroying the mind of many Americans. The lack of unifying science and religion the last forty years has been a costly period to the USA.

On my website, I wrote 115 blogs (from 6/6/08 to 1/18/09) on the subject ‘theological science.’ I defined theological science as the unification of science and religion.‘ Beginning on 12/9/08, fifteen of these blogs discuss the theological scientific teachings of Jesus Christ.

Obviously, U.S. life has become highly abnormal because ‘the people’ do not know the history of the founding of the USA. The growth of power and greed in the USA is evidence of this lack of knowledge.

Remaking America by George Shollenberger, Idea XXXXXX (Changing the World from Mechanism to Holism, VIII)

The concepts, space and time are abstracts of the Mechanists and Atheists. Thus, they say that an infinite world can produce a multiplicity of different universes. Each universe begins at time = 0, with a ‘Big Bang’ explosion, and ends at a time = n, with a heat death. But why do we see a dark background in the evening sky? And what is the cause of red color every direction we look into the sky? And if our sunlight bends when our sun is eclipsed, isn’t space really curved?

When Nicholas of Cusa sought the meaning of the concept ‘maximum,’ he found that this concept cannot be less than maximum, otherwise it would not be maximum. So he found that maximum is also minimum. Interestingly, one can distinguish God from our universe using the concepts maximum and minimum. Let me show them.

Note. A circle contains a maximum and minimum. The circumference is maximum and the center of the circle is minimum. In the pic of the circle below, the circumference and the center of the circle are found in God. Now, change the circle into a sphere. All things created by God will be found in the space between the surface of the sphere, which is God, and the center of the sphere, which is also God. The pic of the rough sphere below shows an example of our universe if we could step out of the universe.

Kepler used the circle to define the least energy orbits of the planets. He found the least energy orbits of the first five planets by using Plato’s five nested solids. The five solids and their nesting are shown in the two pics below. Of course, the Mechanists and Atheists are not interested in the works of Cusa or Kepler because they might find God.

In Donald Andrews’ book on "The Symphony of life," the last four chapters discuss ‘The Nature of the Universe.’ In these chapters, the infinite world, space, and time of the Mechanists and Atheists are destroyed. Instead, Andrews proposes a single world. This world includes God and His creation. The creation is filled with structured things that are found with the transfinite numbers of Georg Cantor. Thus, my book and Andrews’ book have no disagreements.

Remaking America by George Shollenberger, Idea XXXXXIX (Changing the World from Mechanism to Holism, VII)

The view of the universe held by the Mechanists and Atheists is different from the view held by the Holists. Their views differ because the meanings of the concepts ‘space’ and ‘time’ are different.

To the Mechanists and Atheists, space is something abstract in many orderly universes, which come to an end and which come into existence as a result from a Big Bang process. And time is something real in each new universe. A universe comes into existence from the explosion of a high temperature physical particle at time = zero. This universe ends at a later time, when all energy has been reduced to heat energy. Thus, the Mechanists and Atheists say that life has a beginning and end.

To a Holist, space and time are attributes of all things created by an infinite God. These created things form one universe. In this universe, Leibniz’s New System says that ‘space’ is the order of existing things whereas ‘time’ is the succession of existing things. Holism parts time into the concepts past, present, and future. Since our minds cannot define the past or future completely, holism says that God and the created universe have no beginning or end. So, holism rejects the Big Bang process and verse 8 of Chapter 1 in The Revelation of the Bible.

Donald Andrews worked on body radiations during WWII. He found that humans emit radiations and radio waves. These radiations and waves become weaker and weaker as they move outwardly and communicate to all things in the universe. But the energy of these waves never become zero. Andrews says that we also have an aura of gravity. This aura links our acts and thoughts to every atom in our body and to the trillion of tons of matrix rock in the core planet earth. Since this aura oscillates like the waves oscillate when you drop a stone is a lake, this aura is transmitted into space where its energy never becomes zero. So the space for life, things, and the communications of things in a holistic universe is un limited.

On pages 220-225 of my book, "The First Scientific Proof of God," I introduce Georg Cantor and his transfinite numbers. These numbers are necessary to identify new boundaries that distinguish higher forms of life from the lower form of life we are presently developing. Leibniz, Andrews and I are saying that these boundaries identify the true Heaven in which we hope to live after each death we experience. Andrews believes that these higher forms of life will reveal the increasing and real truths and beauty that God has prepared for us to see, hear, feel, taste, touch, and smell at each stage.

Obviously religions must reconsider their teachings and government leaders must reconsider their laws. However, the Mechanists and Atheists must reject their definitions of space and time.

Remaking America by George Shollenberger, Idea XXXXXVIII (Changing the World from Mechanism to Holism, VI)

To every believer in God, the ego of humans is a living force. On page 221 of Rene Dugas’ book on "A History of Mechanics," Leibniz compares living forces with dead forces. He says that ‘the living forces is born of an infinity of impressions of the dead force.’ He expresses the living force with the equation, F = m dv/dt.

Now pick up a stone from the ground. Such a stone is at rest if no external force is acting on it. Since a stone has weight and thus has mass (m), the stone has inertial energy (E). Inertial energy is expressed by Einstein’s famous law, E= m c2. Now, use your ego to throw the stone at a window to prove that you are a living force. To throw the stone, you can use some your body’s energy and add this energy to the stone’s inertial energy. The energy you added to the stone is called kinetic (or moving) energy.

Note,. If the stone breaks the window, the broken window parts will fall downward and will appear as group of wavess. Some parts might fall on the window pane whereas others will fall to the ground. But, your ego did not use your living force morally. So living forces can produce good or evil. Obviously, God expects living forces to produce more and more good work as time passes.

Mechanists and Atheists say that this stone throwing act can be predicted. They also say that they can predict crimes, free market economies, etc. after their mathematicians have completed their field of thought and have identified all logical causes and all effects. So when President Hoover said that the 1929 depression would recover itself, his ego was quiet and was acting more like the zero ego of a Mechanist.

Today, the Mechanists and Atheists do not believe that our planetary system is at rest, as Kepler says. This rest means that planets are moving in relatively force-free orbits. Instead, Mechanists and Atheists believe that all things in the universe interact like the balls interact on a pool table. At rest, our planetary system is organized based on the least action principle because Nicholas of Cusa found that the maximum and minimum is an attribute only of God. (See De Docta Ignorantia, Bk. I, Ch. 4.) (Click) The least action principle produces the greatest performances for the least expenditures. Moses also expected God to do other work after God rested on the seventh day. Since only God is maximum and minimum, we must expect our sun to darken, as Jesus taught in Matthew, Ch. 24. So, humans must go to Mars and beyond.

Like the rejection of Kepler, the atheists also reject my book. But they never read my book. Instead, their reviews are general merely statements saying that my book is filled with non sequiturs. This means that they expect authors to limit human life to mechanistic activities based on logic alone.

U. S. citizens must reread the Declaration of Independence and see that the USA was actually founded as a nation under God. With this reread, the U.S. government can be changed to a government of, by, and for ‘the people and God.

Remaking America by George Shollenberger, Idea XXXXXVII (Changing the World from Mechanism to Holism, V)

The mechanists are also atheists. Both thus reject God and also reject the soul as an independent thing. So they have a different view of the world compared to the view of believers. In this blog, I discuss this different view of believers.

In my April 7th blog, I say that believers view God as a creator who chose the best of all possible worlds based on three divine numbers. The Oneness of God thus forms a Twoness and Threeness in order to create the best world. In Bk. I, Ch. 8 of his "On Learned Ignorance"(Click), Nicholas of Cusa tells us that these numbers can be given precise scientific meaning with the concepts One, Equality, and Union. To connect God and the creation permanently, I connected God and the creation with a logical mechanism in Part II, Ch. 3 of my book. Thus, the creation must contain the following opposing concepts: many, difference, and relations.

God’s idea of Twoness can be explained with the general concepts, unity and multiplicity. These concepts distinguish and identify all atoms formed by God. God’s atoms are spiritual atoms. They are not chemical atoms as mechanists argue. The Twoness reveals many different dualisms to us. For instance, the unity of a person’s perceptions can guide that person’s development of human knowledge. Dualism also explains our ego, which can be modeled by the geometrical vector. This vector is a geometrical line that has a direction. Consider, for example, the infinite dimensional space of David Hilbert. The whole life of a vector can inform God about your functional history, your potentials, and the activity of your ego. Or you can recognize the reality of Beethoven in his Ninth Symphony. See the pics below in no space and in 2-D and 3-D spaces.

Finally, God’s idea of Threeness is explained when all of God’s atoms become related functionally, are embodied, and unfold things in the universe orderly, that is, based on God’s intelligent design.

As seen the four-dimensional space-time used by mechanists and atheists can only explain nonliving things. It cannot explain us or any lower animal.

Remaking America by George Shollenberger, Idea XXXXXVI (Changing the World from Mechanism to Holism, IV)

On April 7, 2009, a bible, the Secular Bible, appeared on the website, The I-Rational Theorist. This bible is for Mechanists and is produced by its blogger, Quantum_Flux. (Click) An atheistic website, which serves the world’s Mechanists, is the website, ScienceBlogs (Click) Its mathematical website is Good Math/Bad Math. (Click) Its blogger is Mark Chu Carroll, who is employed by Google. As seen, the growth of atheism, which began in the 1970s, has been powered mostly by intelligent U.S. citizens who work in science, technology, and mathematics. Most of this work is being funded by many different U.S. government agencies.

Within the ScienceBlogs website is the Channel Surfing. It has categories such as Life Science, Physical Science, etc. This is where mechanistic life scientists are "Living the Scientific Life" by identifying birds, studying the earth from pole to pole, obtaining photos of cheetahs, and identifying new species in the stratosphere. Thus, their work is based on Darwin’s evolutionary theory. But, in Part III, Ch. 3 of my book, I show that members of the U.S. National Academy of Science became criminals with their rigged evaluations of evolutionary theory in 1999. The victims were the people of the USA.

Other mechanistic life scientists work at the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Recently, I emailed the NIH librarian and asked for information on the fundamental theory of the mechanisms used by our life scientists. I never received a response. Yet the NIH and the FDA are murdering patient after patient by developing mechanistic medicines and pills that merely add time to dying patients. The NIH is not finding cures because it believes that all things, including living things, are mechanistic. This belief is false.

It is time for the U.S. government to reveal the awful thoughts of atheists and their purpose to destroy the human soul. Those politicians who also say that a free market will recover a free market economy are also atheists who will destroy any effort to rebuild America based on the activity of human souls.

Remaking America by George Shollenberger, Idea XXXXXV (Changing the World from Mechanism to Holism, III)

In the mid-1960s, Donald Andrews, who was a chemist and author of "The Symphony of Life," was saying that the universe has a god, that the universe is filled with wholes that communicate to each other, and that the humans have souls. Andrews lists the names of many others (e.g., Weyl, Whitehead, Goethe, Niebuhr), who were also saying similar words. In the 1960s, some physicists were also saying that the fundamental stuff of the universe is filled with organizations, rather than filled with physical atoms.

However, after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled favorably on behalf of the atheism of Madelyn Murray O’ Hair in 1967, physicists and life scientists began to reject God. So, by the 1970s, atheism was growing, the number of drug sellers and users were increasing, crime was increasing, inflation was increasing, President Nixon was reducing the space program, and I was employed by the U.S. Department of Justice to help solve the rising crime problem.

By the late 1980s, I concluded that the criminal mind is developed by flawed symbolic languages. After reviewing Andrews work again, I now conclude that the criminal mind begins to develop with poor social communications. This mind becomes increasingly permanent when the criminal’s ideas are communicated energetically to the other wholes of the body. Thus, when a criminal shoots a person, the energy disrupted in the person’s body came from a reinforced idea of the criminal and not from the gun of the criminal.

With personal and social responsibilities, the people of a self-government should be able to eliminate the development of criminals, However, without social responsibilities, a democracy can become a nation of many criminals. Isn’t this what the USA has become since the 1970s?

Remaking America by George Shollenberger, Idea XXXXXIV (Changing the World from Mechanism to Holism, II)

Donald Andrews, the author of "The Symphony of life," taught for thirty-six years at Johns Hopkins University. After he retired in Florida, he wrote his book and tossed away the four dimensional ‘space-time’ Universe used by today’s atheistic physicists. His book replaces this four dimensional universe with a multidimensional universe, which can be known with Georg Cantor’s transfinite numbers.

Andrews thus rejects the principle of indeterminacy, which says that the position and momentum of the electron in chemical atoms cannot be known precisely. Today’s atheist supports the indeterminacy principle and thus gives life to quantum mechanics and its development of imprecise knowledge about how the ‘parts’ of a whole function. However, Andrews wants to use quantum mechanics to find the determinacy of the waves found by Louis de Broglie. Earlier, Plato called these waves ‘forms.’ Such waves (or forms) give us a way to determine how all ‘wholes’ function.

For instance, drop a whole stone into a calm lake and watch this whole interact with the whole of a lake’s water. The interaction of this whole stone with the whole of the lake creates a circular wave, which moves away from the point of interaction. This wave becomes larger and larger and eventually interacts with the shore. Such waves are also created when the antenna of a radio broadcasting station creates an electromagnetic wave which interacts with your home antenna if your radio is on. These waves are found everywhere, even throughout your body. This is why some prescribed pills can have side effects. So, a new form of medical care will emerge in the near future if atheism is removed from the USA.

But I must disagree with Andrews when he says that the existence of God and the human soul cannot be proven. I have proven God scientifically. In my proof of God, I consider God as a pure whole (without parts), which is the origin of all finite things in the universe. Leibniz proves the existence of’ monads, which I speak of as spiritual atoms in my book. Leibniz’s monads are the necessary atoms of the universe because each different ‘unity within a multiplicity’ gives every thing in the universe an identity. This unity within a multiplicity is a twoness. This twoness is spoken of as ‘permanence and change’ in things by dialecticians. So, the concepts Oneness, Twoness, and Threeness must be viewed as divine numbers.

In this blog, I am rejecting the atheist idea that a whole is the sum bof the parts. Instead, I am saying (1) that all wholess in the universe are more than the sume of the partsome wholes and (2) that pure whols are immortal and exist in God and and all spiritual atoms.

Remaking America by George Shollenberger, Idea XXXXXIII (Changing the World from Mechanism to Holism, I)

The three books in the last three blogs could change man’s view of things in the world drastically. With this change, mechanical things would become holistic. This change would reveal different realities to all people. Making this change must thus become the highest priority in every nation after holism was rejected by the Western world scientists forty years ago. Unfortunately, today’s Western religions follow the mechanical world theory because a mechanical world has an end.

Today, our high school, college, and university teachers are atheistic because they must teach the principles of the mechanist world or the ‘billiard-ball’ universe of Newton. Thus, many teachers must be retrained before holism can be applied nationally. So I urge President Obama and other national leaders to act now. Once holism is understood, I expect terrorism, different religions, wars, greed, hatred, and crime will fade away from the life of humans quickly.

A mechanistic world and a holistic world are as different as night and day. Both scientists accept things as wholes. But they define the wholes differently, A mechanist defines a whole as the sum of its parts. But a holist defines a whole as more that the sum of its parts. I discuss the difference between man-made and God-made wholes at 11/18/08. The parts of a mechanistic whole are known by their causes and effects. But the parts of a holistic whole form a structure of the togetherness. These parts communicate with other parts and other wholes.

Many proofs of holism can be found today. For example, human crime cannot be explained with causes and effects. And the inability of mechanists to solve the problem of cancer is proof that cancer is an unwanted holistic thing.

I cannot overstate the problem in science today. I believe that today’s economic problem is small compared to today’s problem in the field of science.

Idea XXXXXII: Three Scientific Books for Remaking America, Book III, "Leibniz: Philosophical Writings."Papers by Gottfried Leibniz (1679-1716)

Edited from German into English by G. H. R. Parkinson (1934). First published in the USA, 1973

TABLE OF CONTENTS of the Papers by Leibniz

Of an Organum or Ars Magna of Thinking (1679)
An Introduction to a Secret Encyclopaedia (1779)
Of Universal Synthesis and Analysis (1683)
Discourse on Metaphysics (1686)
Correspondence with Arnauld (1686-7)
A Specimen of Discoveries (1686)
Primary Truths (1686)
The Nature of Truth (1686)
Necessary And Contigent Truths (1686)
On Freedom (1689)
A Letter on Freedom (1689)
New System, and Explanation of the New System (1695-6)
On the Principle of Indiscernibles (1696)
On the Ultimate organization of Things (1697)
A Résumé of Metaphysics (1697)
New Essays, Preface (1704)
Metaphysical Consequences of the Principle of Reason (1712)
Monadology (1714)
Principles of Nature and of Grace (1714)
Correspondence with Clark (1715-16)

Idea XXXXXI: Three Scientific Books for Remaking America, Book II, "The Symphony of Life" by Donald Hatch Andrews (1966)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Nature of the Universe

1. The Unseen and Unheard
2. The Universe of Particles
3. The Universe of Music
4. The Quest for Meaning

The Nature of Music

1. The Music of the String
2. The Music of the Drum
3. The Music of the Bell
4. The Meaning of Music

The Nature of Life

1. The Structure of Life
2. The Dynamism of Life
3. The Unity of Life
4. The Meaning of Life

The Nature of Man

1.The Structure of Man
2. The Dynamism of Man
3. The Unity of Man
4. The Meaning of Man

The Nature of the Universe

1. The Structure of the Universe
2. The Dynamism of the Universe
3. The Unity of the Universe
4. The Meaning of the Universe

Idea XXXXX: Three Scientific Books for Remaking America, Book I, "The First Scientific Proof of God" by George Shollenberger (2006)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part I - A New Story on Knowledge

Chapter 1:The First Scientific Proof of God’s Existence
Chapter 2:Two Basic Tools of Knowledge
Chapter 3:Knowledge Begins With Mythical Cultures
Chapter 4:Knowledge Becomes Formal
Chapter 5:The Problem of Knowledge in the Physical and Life Sciences
Chapter 6:Seeking Truths
Relative and Absolute Truths
Using Opposites (or Dipolar Concepts)
Are Absolute Truths Found in Scriptures?

Part IIa - Nicholas of Cusa: The First Modern Scientist

Chapter 1:The False Good/Evil Religious Dualism
Chapter 2:The True Religious Dualism
Chapter 3:An Introduction to Nicholas of Cusa
Chapter 4:A Critique of Positive Theology
Chapter 5:Two Major Ideas in Negative Theology
God Is Maximum and Minium
Images of God
Chapter 6:The Art of Conjecturing
Conjecture on Numbers
Conjecture on Actual/Possible
Conjecture On the Not-Other
Chapter 7:The Aftermath of Nicholas of Cusa

Part IIb -The Trinity, Holy Ghost and Jesus Christ

Chapter 1:The Trinity: A Tool of Our Minds
Chapter 2:The Holy Ghost
Chapter 3: Jesus Christ
A World Class Teacher
The Cycles of Christ’s Work
Christ’s Mind is Divine
Scientific Evidence of the Divinity of Christ
Jesus Taught the Cause of Crime
\
Part IIc - God and Man Communications

Chapter 1:The Problem of Communications
Chapter 2:Three Ways God and Man Communicate

Part III - On World Theories

Chapter 1:Introduction to World Theories
Chapter 2:World Theories in the Field of Physics
Chapter 3:Biological Evolutionary Theory

Part IV - God’s Intelligent Design

Chapter 1:Moses, Plato, Leibniz, and Georg Cantor
Moses
Plato
Gottfried Leibniz and Monadology
Georg Cantor and the Transfinite Numbers
Chapter 2:Man’s Past Is a Path to Hell
Chapter 3:Conceiving God’s Intelligent Design
Chapter 4:Adjusting All Nations to God’s Intelligent Design

Remaking America by George Shollenberger, Idea XXXXIX (How to solve an economic crisis)

Currently, world leaders are meeting in England to discuss today’s economic crisis, which is growing after U.S. unemployment began to grow. President Obama’s answer is a stimulus. Some other world leaders agree with Obama’s stimulus whereas other world leaders favor welfare instead of a stimulus.

A stimulus was recently rejected in the USA when the U.S. Republican party tarred President Obama and his allies as ‘socialists.’ But the S-word can mean anything that Republicans want it to be. I view a Republican as a person who wants to make things that can be purchased or sold in a free market. So making bridges, police and fire departments, parks, lakes, flood control systems, sewage systems, reservoirs, highways, new educational facilities, and free health care are signs of socialism, Yet a socialist magazine says that President Obama is not a socialist and might not even be a liberal.

I say that President Obama thinks of the USA as a social democracy because every free nation must provide a free market and necessary services for every community. These free markets and services must expand because a nation must develop continuously based on long term national goals. Such goals are necessary because the sun will darken. We must develop continuously because we must learn how to transport all people to a new home on another planet.

So, our leaders and politicians must rise to a higher level of thought.