Scientific Proof of God, A New and Modern Bible, and Coexisting Relations of God and the Universe

Wednesday, November 26, 2008

Theological Science* and 'What Nature Makes'

Since I have had no response from any physical scientist on the subject of man-made things such as a grapefruit, a sun, a grape, an apple, a tree, a shiny stone, a planet, a dog that loves me, an economic system that works, a new challenge to the physical scientists seems appropriate. So, let me make a challenge, on behalf of theological science, to today’s physical scientists.

This challenge asks, ‘do physical science believe that a grapefruit, a sun, a grape, an apple, a tree, a shiny stone, a planet, a dog that loves me, an economic system that works’ can be made by Nature. If Nature can make these things, can physical scientists prove this making. If so, let’s hear from all of those ‘know everything’ physical scientists.

Hey, collect your best thoughts because my blogs will be routed to the White House in January.

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

Tuesday, November 25, 2008

Theological Science* and the Images of God

While I am on a thought project, I have time to write some short blogs. One short blog is the subject of God’s Images in our universe. The subjects of the images of God have been difficult to discuss among humans because our finite symbolic languages cannot handle an infinite thing and its content. But we can search for different images to see whether we can unify them as one.

The closest image of God is mind. Mind is the first thing God creates because it must measure all other created things. Mind is thus part of the content of each Spirit that God creates. Since all Spirits are different, some Spirits will measure other things better than other Spirits. This is why the Spirit of steel measures other things poorly and only using cause/effect measurements. However, God gave every human the most powerful mind because it must develop the images of all other created things.

So, why don’t humans develop their minds and measure other things as St. Paul suggested in Romans 1:20? When this question is answered by theological science, man will have changed each nation on this planet into the Kingdom of God.

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

Monday, November 24, 2008

Theological Science* Challenges the Field of Physical Science

When I offered ‘The Scientific Proof of God’ in 2006, too few responses were received from physical scientists for this important proof. With the second scientific proof of God, I again challenged the field of physical science to respond. No challenges were heard. So, the only remaining question for this field is, ‘How long will it be before the field of physics rejects all atheistic theories and considers the spiritual world under God?’

So, I must challenge this field of thought again by asking them to use physical matter to make a grapefruit, a sun, a grape, an apple, a tree, a shiny stone, a planet, a dog that loves me, an economic system that works, ... etc. When the mechanical engineer, Herbert Hoover, said that the 1930 depression will correct itself because economies follow ‘laws of nature,’ he was wrong about economics. Today the field of economics and the field of physics is a follower of Hoover and the physical theory of a godless world.

My advice to Barack Obama in January 2009 is to turn his thoughts away from the field of physical sciences and its mental control of many life sciences.

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

Saturday, November 22, 2008

Will Be Back Soon

I am currently working on an important thought project but will be back soon to cintinue the development of 'theological science.'


Tuesday, November 18, 2008

Theological Science* Leads to My Second Scientific Proof of God

In yesterday’s blog, I distinguish the wholes that man makes from the wholes that God makes. Since man cannot make suns and planets, I found my second scientific proof of God’s existence. This second proof is a general proof and confirms my earlier proof of God, which is found on page 6 of my book, The First Scientific Proof of God. The second proof shows that the atheistic reviews of my earlier proof on the amazon Internet bookstore are now shown to be silly and false. (Click)

Soon, the reviews and arguments of atheists against God will be outdated. As seen on Google (click) and Yahoo (click), the atheists attacked me. They also spent over forty years to replace God with evolutionary theory when the U.S. Supreme Court started to support atheism in 1967 with the ungodly thoughts of Madelyn O’ Hair.

I assume that many particular scientific proofs of God exist. Since my first and second scientific proofs of God are general or universal, particular proofs of the ‘finite things’ that God made should be found. To express one of God’s finite things with language, the chosen thing will be the subject. Its name is derived from one of its predicates, just as God’s name was derived from one of God’s infinity of predicates. To name God, man chose the predicate ‘good.’ A thing’s infinite number of predicates are functionally related to all each other as well as the predicates of all other finite things and God. Finite functional relations are expressed with verbs.

So, people will have fun in learning more and more about God and the things that God created. It should also be lots of fun to extract knowledge of God’s created things from scriptures.

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

Monday, November 17, 2008

Theological Science* Distinguishes the Whole Forming Mechanisms of Atheists from the Created Whole Forming Organisms of God

The subjects, physical science and theological science, have similar predicates because we are still ignorant about them and simply say that ‘physical science is whole forming’ and that ‘theological science is whole forming.’ To improve these sayings, we say more technically that the wholes formed by physical science are mechanisms and that the wholes formed by theological science are organisms.

Today’s physical and life scientists define the wholes of all nonliving and living things as mechanisms. To confirm this statement, look at a few of today’s published papers in the physical and life sciences. These papers always mention ‘mechanisms.’ This word also fills the papers of the National Institutes of Health. So, ever since the 1970s, many physical scientists, life scientists, and federal researchers have rejected God and do not distinguish nonliving and living things and call both of them mechanisms. I say that this rejection of God explains why many health care human problems cannot be solved.

Let’s think a bit deeper on the subjects of mechanisms and organisms. For some time, a mechanism has been defined as ‘a thing in which the whole is equal to the sum of its parts.’ Since the parts of a mechanism are finite in number, the parts of a mechanism can be counted. To test this statement, take any man-made thing (e.g., a car) apart and you can count its parts. So, this definition seems to apply only to man-made things. However, theological science defines an organism as ‘ a thing in which the whole is more than the sum of its parts.’ Before my scientific proof of God, the meaning of the words ‘more than’ was vague. But my proof of God gives these words a new meaning. With my proof, ‘more than’ means infinite. With this new meaning, every God-made thing has an infinite number of parts, which cannot be counted.

Interestingly, man learned that God-made and man-made things are different. For instance, in Ch. 6, p. 53 of "Galileo Galilei, His Life and Work" by R. J. Seeger, Galileo tells us that a geometrical line can be extended only with an infinite number of empty spaces and that gold is made up of an infinite number of indivisible parts. Did the Roman Church imprison Galileo for reasons other than challenging the Church teaching that earth is the center of the universe? Apparently, the Inquisition and the Roman Church have done considerable damage to the progress of man on the Continent.

In summary, this blog shows that the science of mechanisms applies only to man-made things whereas theological science applies only to God-made things. Since man has never made a sun or planet, it is clear in this blog that atheism is false and that my scientific proof of God is true.

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

Sunday, November 16, 2008

Theological Science* Reveals the Truths About Evolution Facts and Religious Facts

In my blog yesterday, I discussed The Reason Project. As I said, I believe that this new foundation is supporting the theory of evolution and atheism, which reject God. Sam Harris, who has spearheaded this new project, has debated with a number of religious personalities. These debates did not produce any winners because both the evolutionists and the religious debaters argue with ‘facts’ rather than scientific proofs. Since the development of scientific proof is the only path to truth, facts can never produce a winner in such a debate.

Instead of developing scientific proofs, evolutionists say that all evolution facts are true because all metaphysical statements are false. However, my scientific proof of God is a true metaphysical statement. On the other hand, religions say that all scriptural facts are true because they are dictated to scribes by God. However, my scientific proof of God says that God is infinite and cannot communicate facts to any scribes. So, evolutionists and religions cannot teach any true facts.

Today, only the physical sciences can teach true facts. Such facts can be taught because physical statements were proven scientifically. These proofs revealed hundreds of physical laws. But life scientists, which include evolutionists and religions, have not presented any scientific proofs before I presented a scientific proof of God. My proof indicates that the life scientists can find scientific proofs and laws. Thus, life scientists must reject the belief of the physical scientists that all living things are purely physical and have no spiritual thing.

I believe that religions must get into the ‘attack mode of thought’ if they want to win debates with Sam Harris and other members of The Reason Project. This attack mode would develop metaphysical thoughts about life from the statements found in the scriptures. Just as many four-year-old children ask ‘why kind of questions,’ scriptural research must search for ‘higher thoughts’ that will unify scriptural data, scientific data, and moral data. I believe that children become atheists because they never ask ‘why’ questions.

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

Saturday, November 15, 2008

Theological Science* and The Reason Project

A group of people have formed a new foundation. Its name is The Reason Project and is a U.S. charitable 501(c)3 organization devoted to spreading scientific knowledge and secular values in society. This project was spearheaded by Sam Harris, the author of "The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason" and "Letter to a Christian Nation." Some major personalities are Richard Dawkins, Bill Maher, and Christopher Hitchens. (click)

Since this group of people seem to be a group of atheists, the purpose of this project might have purposes beyond the purpose of spreading scientific knowledge and secular values. Thus, one might ask Sam Harris and the other founders of this foundation whether the purpose is also to promote atheism and to teach evolutionary theory in all high schools.

If these other purposes are hidden from us, theological science says that this new project will destroy the field of metaphysics, the sufficient reasoning of Leibniz, the Declaration of Independence, and God? And if this foundation is basically a project in support of atheism, then theological science also says that this project violates the U.S. Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution.

I have problems with foundations in general because they can cause economic problems if foundational money flows are not aligned to the future of the USA, as a free nation under God. Some foundations also seem to exist only for the purpose of sustaining the rights of rich people after they pass on. I conclude that such foundations are irrational things in the USA.

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

Friday, November 14, 2008

Theological Science* and Gottfried Leibniz

Since books on Gottfried Leibniz can be found only in used bookstores today, I summarize Leibniz’s Monadology in Part IV of my book, "The First Scientific Proof of God." To study Leibniz, I suggest that one begins such a study with "Leibniz: Philosophical Writing" by G. H. R. Parkinson. This book shows Leibniz’s thoughts that began to question Isaac Newton’s universe that has absolute space. Newton’s Universe would then be questioned by Germany’s Bernhard Riemann paper, "On the Hypotheses Which Lie at the Foundations of Geometry.’ When Riemann became the immediate predecessor of Albert Einstein, the relativity theory of space would cause a wide rejection of Newton’s Universe.

In order to develop theological science, I use Leibniz’s theory of ‘a best world of all possible worlds.’ This theory says the universe is an organism and thus cannot be explained as a mechanism. So, Leibniz would not accept the mechanical world of today’s physicists. I also use Leibniz’s monads, which I call spiritual atoms. Each spiritual atom is in all other spiritual atom in a way so that each spiritual atom is different and complete.

In Parkinson’s book, Leibniz fails to prove that man’s choices are free and that God knows these choices a prior. However, knowing our choices a priori does not mean that God is choosing our choices for us. When God perceives our choices, this does not mean that God exists in our world. Perceiving infinitely by God or perceiving finitely by us differ maximally. So, when God perceives, he merely knows why we made a choice. So, God also knows why we make good or evil choices. Thus, we must guess the answers to many questions. But God makes no guesses. Leibniz also fails to prove his theory that the mind-body relation forms a whole. I say that the mind-body relation forms a whole because each created spiritual atom has a different and an unchanging principle of organizing wholes.

As long as the school of physics continues to reject God, it will continue to assume that the universe is a mechanism. And this assumption will continue to lure life scientists to the physical sciences. But why are cancer and other human ills not being solved?

With today’s growth of mechanical science by atheism, man has come to a critical period of time when we must make new choices. If our new choices are in favor of God, I predict that mechanical science will reform, atheism will fall, and new Unions will develop throughout this planet.

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

Thursday, November 13, 2008

Theological Science* Can Detect Misleading Thoughts

Theological science can detect errors in human thoughts because it uses the unlimited reasoning abilities of our mind after phenomena have appeared to our limited senses of the brain. Thus, some believers in God cannot be misled because they are rationalists, distinguish mind from brain, and use their unlimited reasoning abilities that God gave them. As rationalists, they will thus use the principle of sufficient reason and the principle of contradiction. Both of these principles were identified by the German rationalist, Gottfried Leibniz.

Thus, today’s atheists and empiricists can mislead you because they seek only ‘phenomena of the universe.’ Cosmologists can also mislead you because they seek only ‘mathematical theories of the universe.’ Evolutionists can also mislead you because they seek only ‘empirical facts of Nature.’ Particle physicists can mislead you because they seek only ‘free physical particles.’ Life scientists can also mislead you because they use only the ‘knowing stuff’ sought by atheists, empiricists, cosmologists, evolutionists, and particle physicists. These people can mislead you because they do not use the unlimited reasoning that God gave them.

However, many other people can mislead you because they also use the ‘knowing stuff’ sought by atheists, empiricists, cosmologists, evolutionists, and particle physicists. Some of these other people, for instance, are parents of growing children, politicians and political scientists, song writers, scripture interpreters, Hollywood stars and movie producers, the press, U.S. Supreme court judges, Congressional persons, and U.S. presidents. The misleading of religions and song writers, about Heaven and about meeting of related people in Heaven after your death, is the worst misleading that affected man. These people can mislead you because they do not use the unlimited reasoning that God gave them.

The problem of misleading people by other people can be solved in any nation by accepting God and accepting the theological science that is under development by me.

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

Theological Science* Gives 'Space' and 'Time' New Meanings

Although Aristotle is known as the Father of logic, today’s logicians do not seem to recognize that Aristotle was a logician and a dialectician. Against the belief of Heraclitus, who says that the concepts, permanence and change, do not coexist, Aristotle believes that something permanent underlies all changes. He called this permanent thing ‘substance.’ Today, the symbol, substance, is used to explain God, the universe, and life.

When U.S. physicists rejected God in the 1970s and became atheists, they viewed ‘substance’ as ‘matter.’ However, they have never found any permanent ‘matter.’ Without permanent matter, these physicists became logical thinkers because they had to reject the coexisting symbols ‘permanence’ and ‘change.’ With this rejection, the mind of these physicists became aligned immediately to thoughts of the ancient, Heraclitus, and the modernist, Karl Marx. This atheistic alignment will cause physicists to produce many chimeras. One is known as spacetime.

Theological science accepts many coexisting symbols such as permanence and change because many opposing symbols explain how a panentheistic God and our created universe are connected with a particular intelligent design. In my book, for instance, I connect God to our universe with an intelligent design using opposites such as permanent/change, infinite/finite, one/many, identity/difference, union/relation, and indivisible/divisible. Man’s endless life will find that these opposites will also be endless.

Since God’s intelligent design of our universe produces the best world of all possible worlds, theological science says that God had to place a plurality of finite substances in the universe. This finite infinity of substances can be known only by an infinite God. As Aristotle says, every substance has predicates. In my book, I call these subject/predicate things ‘spiritual atoms.’ These spiritual atoms, which are completed things created by God, are permanent things that underlie all bodies ever to found in the universes by man. All spiritual atoms are thus immortal. However, all bodies are mortal. So, all spiritual atoms must shed their bodies from time to time by passing on. So, there is life after death in a best world.

In a best world, theological science gives very different meanings to space and time compared to the meanings given by physicists. These meanings were developed by Leibniz. He defines space as the order of coexistencies and time as the order of suceessions. So when a spiritual atom is embodied, space becomes an attribute of that body. And time is the sequence of each spiritual atom. So, the universe has no physical atoms and no vacuums.

As seen, theological science is very different compared to all current sciences. But, the failures of the school of physics to prove its theories since the 1970s has become a serious world economic problem.

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

Theological Science on Veteran’s Day

Veteran’s Day is a great day for hearing the experiences of our veterans. They help to fill the sensual data for theological science. Today, I am a member of the VFW and enjoyed many stories at Post 3432 of the VFW at Pine Grove, PA. I also support the Disabled Veterans with regular donations.

I enlisted in the US Army in June 1947 and was discharged in May 1950, one month before President Truman froze all military discharges because of the Korean War. In 1948, I had been assigned to the Army Security Agency, an intelligence agency on a German Air Force Unit outside of Nuremberg, Germany. We had thousands of antennas on the Air Force base to intercept radio communications.

As an honored basketball player in the State of Pennsylvania in 1947, I played basketball on our base basketball team. The purpose of our basketball team was to entertain our base personnel. Eventually, our team was invited to participate in an entertaining tournament for the U.S. military forces in Berlin. We flew into Berlin on a U.S. airlift coal airplane which was landing every few minutes to heat many homes and feed more than two million Germans. My Berlin experience impressed me because it is typical of how the people of the USA and its military help other people in need.

Theological Science* Investigates the Empiricists and Rationalists

Empiricists and rationalists have fought for centuries. Empiricists say that knowledge comes from sense-experience. On the other hand, rationalists say that sense-experience is an inferior kind of knowledge and that a superior knowledge originates in our ability to reason. Today, most empiricists have become atheists and most rationalists have become believers in God.

Since these two different fields of thought define knowledge differently, they are now beginning to divide the people of the USA. For instance, in politics, the people are becoming either ‘liberals’ or ‘conservatives.’ However, these two political factions are not well defined because believers and atheists are found in both factions. So, the debates between the liberals and conservatives are often confusing because the contents of any debate must depend on a person’s own knowledge. As a rationalist and believer in God, I no longer enjoy political debates.

The division of people in the USA is also occurring in our governments because they cannot establish any religion. But no U.S. laws separate our governments from God. However, if I approach government as a theological scientist and ask for research funds, they would deny my request. Yet, if an atheist asks for funds from our governments, the request of the atheist will be satisfied. So, the division of people by the empiricists and rationalists is affecting our governments negatively.

The pic below will be found on page 222 of my book, "The First Scientific Proof of God." This pic explains how an electrical engineer uses reason to design better electronic devices. The bottom plane and upper plane displays a filter and oscillator respectively. The engineer sees ‘real versions of these devices,’ on the real number lines, and ‘an imaginary version of these devices’ in the rest of the two planes.. The mountains in both planes are infinities, which God put there. Our reason had to find this geometrical mathematical imaginary number system before we could see the mountains and their infinities. Obviously, metaphysics is a necessary mental activity.

As seen, empiricism and atheism are false theories. And isn’t it time to unify the people of the USA and change our governments so they are fair?

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

Monday, November 10, 2008

Theological Science* Identifies Other World Class Teachers

In yesterday’s blog, I identified Jesus Christ as one of God’s world class teachers. I said that such teachers produce new and turbulent teachings about God, the universe, and life. Common to all of these teachers is that they challenge the teachings of current religions. This is why a world class teacher is either murdered or imprisoned by the challenged religion. I thus conclude that Jesus Christ was murdered.

In today’s blog, I identify other people who I have studied and can classify as world class teachers or special teachers. A special teacher focuses on a special new and turbulent teaching.

Following Jesus Christ, my next world class teacher is Nicholas of Cusa (1401-1464). Cusa removed God from the seemingly unmoving stars in the sky of our world and put God beyond our world and thus placed God into an infinite world. Cusa also found that the universe has no center. Thus, the work of Copernicus (1473-1543), Galileo (1564-1642), and Kepler (1571-1630) must credit Cusa. Cusa was imprisoned, but only a short period, by the Roman Church. But one must ask, "How many followers of Cusa were burned at the stake by The Inquisition after Cusa challenged the outdated teachings of the Roman Church?’ Our historians must enlighten us better on this period prior to the Reformation.

My next world class teacher is Gottfried Leibniz (1646-1716). Leibniz can be connected to Cusa partly through a working group (Descartes, Pascal, et al, click) formed by Marin Marsenne (1588-1648) in Paris. Leibniz contacted the work of this group during his four-year visit to Paris that began in 1672.

Leibniz’s work is on mind and the kingdom of God. Thus, he views God’s intelligent design as the best of all possible worlds. Leibniz uses his Monadology to build this intelligent design. I apply this in my book. However, his development of the infinitesimal calculus was necessary in his work on the intelligent design. This calculus will lead to many new tools of reasoning that can rationalize all things that God created. Cusa shows us that, in God, a geometrical line and geometrical triangle are identical and that, in God, a triangle is also identical to a circle and sphere.

Leibniz finds such identities in the universe, which is the best of all possible worlds. But different things in the universe can approach identities. For instance, an ellipse can be transformed into a circle with an infinite series of steps. If we develop infinite geometries that can transform different things into near identities, we will eventually be able to explain why our continuous lives are happier after many of our deaths. Will we soon know what happens to us after death? The answer is ‘yes.’ Once these geometries develop, the evils of man should virtually become nonexistent.

Currently, I recognize three special teachers. One is Friedrich Hegel (1770-1831). His speciality is dialectical thinking. Another is Georg Cantor (1845-1918). His specialty is transfinite numbers. Another is a USA citizen, Lyndon LaRouche. His speciality is economics and common sense.

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

Sunday, November 09, 2008

Theological Science* Classifies the Teachings of Jesus Christ

In Part IIb, Ch.3 of my book, ‘The First Scientific Proof of God,’ I call Jesus a world class teacher. This means that many of the teachings of Jesus are new and turbulent. By new, I mean that the teaching was never taught before by man. By turbulent, I mean that the teaching will generate an infinite number of new teachings by other humans.

If we accept the theory that God created the best world of all possible and the spiritual atoms, we can expect the appearances of ‘world class teachers’ from time to time. These appearances can be explained either by reason or by miracles (intervention). So, in Part IIb I discuss how we might detect the appearance of a world class teacher.

In Part IIb, I conclude that all of Jesus’ teachings fall into three categories, common sense, mind, and the kingdom of God. The common sense of people differs from culture to culture and deals with ‘what is right and wrong.’ From common sense man can find moral laws. Mind deals with truths and falsities and the way we think using our senses and reason. The kingdom of God deals with the universe as a changing whole. This whole must deal with things that we know exist and the things that are still unknown to us.

Since the best world of all possible worlds is the creation of God, the best world has an intelligent design and is eternal. Since many of today’s scientists and mathematicians have rejected God and the intelligent design of God. I try show them that God is necessary being in the universe. But their minds are closed. So, religions must move forward with scriptural evidence and that scientific evidence that support God. Eventually, these scientists and mathematicians might read the scriptures and even read my book.

Unfortunately, the USA has a new President-Elect and many socioeconomic problems. With the rejection of God by scientists and mathematicians, other new and unexpected problems will appear. So, all religions must act now and rationally.

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

Saturday, November 08, 2008

Theological Science* Brings Good News

In yesterday’s blog, I showed that all humans are Sons of God and Sons of Man. This means that humans belong to a special species that can develop rational knowledge about God, the universe, and life. One member of this specie was Jesus Christ. This fact raises the question, ‘Was Jesus created naturally or unnaturally? The Eastern Christian Church says that Jesus was created naturally. However, the Western Christian churches say that Jesus was created unnaturally by God through the Virgin Mary.

Theological science aligns to the Eastern Christian Church on this question because all finite things for the universe must be unfolded necessarily from God through a system of indivisible and immortal Spirits. These Spirits are completed but are related orderly to each other so that ‘each Spirit is in each Spirit.’ These orderly relations were actually taught by Jesus as I said yesterday. These orderly relations form the many different things we find in our single universe. Theological science thus says that Jesus Christ is not the only Son of God.

This new view of Jesus Christ will be a shock to many Western world Christians. But this new view is ‘good news’ because it tells us that God is really infinite and that God does not appear in our finite world. If God could appear to our world, He would be neither omniscient nor omnipotent and could not give us eternal lives. So, theological science brings happiness.

But theological science brings many other goodies. For instance, since God can have no experiences in the best of all worlds, God alone knows all contingent truths in our world a priori. Only an infinite God can know an infinite series of human events. So, when your will chooses one rational course of action out of an infinite number of possibilities, God knows a priori what your choice is and that it is purposive and will produce a better world. The atheist says that our wills are indifferent, rather than rational.
This is why atheism is false and rejects God.

If religions accept theological science, they and their scriptures will be more advanced scientifically than today’s atheists in the physical sciences and life science. With theological science, it is time for religions to stand up and be counted politically against the Democratic and Republican parties. As an independent USA voter, I call for the development of a new Unionist Party.

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

Friday, November 07, 2008

Theological Science* Reveals New Ways to Interpret Scriptures, IV

As I said in yesterday’s blog, all scriptures are man-made. This means that a monotheistic God is not talking in the Old Testament, the New Testament, and the Qur an. In these scriptures, we will only find the prophesyings of humans, who gained respect widely enough to include in a book or document. And St. Paul taught at his time what I am teaching here in the Bible at I Thess. 4:20. Paul says that no one should despise prophesying or prophesyings. What we find in any scripture is thus not different from books and documents that have made by humans and gained respect today on the subjects of God, Universe, and Life.

However, the Old Testament, New Testament, and Qur’an are not merely history books. Man’s scriptures are similar to modern science in that they contain powerful theories. Scriptures create and build religions that create social relations, study groups, and a spiritual togetherness of a nation under God. Scriptures also help to prove that the art of prophesying, or the art of conjecture, is a continuous human process that has no end.

All human beings are Sons of God and Sons of Man. They are Sons of God because they are Spirits (or spiritual atoms), which are completed, immortal, and intelligent. Thus, Spirits never die. These Spirits can be popularized by calling them ‘persons.’

Human Spirits are also the Sons of Man because each human Spirit is embodied by male and female physical Spirits. These physical bodies pass on at death to give new births to the dead Sons of God.

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

Thursday, November 06, 2008

Theological Science* Reveals New Ways to Interpret Scriptures, III

Too many people do not realize that man had to develop languages before man could write and that man had to develop writing before man could make scriptures. Those people who do not realize that this sequence of human development is necessary, they will still not understand why an infinite God did not make any scripture or dictate a scripture to any scribe because God exists in a higher world and cannot even appear in our world. We are now living in the 21st century. Isn’t it time for all people to understand that every scripture is man-made?

When one studies scriptures, that person must realize that our languages today are more advanced compared to the older languages that man used to develop scriptures. This is why a religion might say that scriptures must be interpreted literally. I agree. But such interpretations can be flawed if the interpreter does not recognize the use of metaphors. For instance, Jesus Christ was an excellent communicator and used many different metaphors to teach very complex ideas that would not be understood by man for centuries. In this blog, I want to discuss three teachings of Jesus Christ that are still do not understand today. Our inability to understand them is dividing us, impeding our progress, and causing failures in our economic systems.

These forgotten teachings of Jesus are found in the New Testament at John 10:30 (I and my Father are one), John 10:38 (Father is in me, and I in him), and John 14:20 (I am in my Father, and ye in me, and I in you). In the 15th century, Nicholas of Cusa tells us that similar teachings are found in the writings of Anaxagoras (500-428 BC) in Turkey. Anaxagoras said that 'Each thing is in each thing.' Cusa agrees with both Jesus and Anaxagoras and says that ‘God is in all things in such a way that all things are in Him.’ Cusa concludes that ‘all is in all’ and ‘each in each. (See ‘On Learned Ignorance’ in Bk. II, Ch. 5.)

The teachings of Jesus, Anaxagoras, and Cusa become very clear in the work of Gottfried Leibniz in the 17th century. (See "Leibniz: Philosophical Writings" by G. H. R. Parkinson, Introduction, p.xvi). Leibniz says that God creates completed substances. In my book, I call these substances spiritual atoms. Leibniz says that completed substances must express the whole universe. Each completed substance is thus a mirror of the universe.
So, Leibniz says that ‘one thing expresses another when there is a constant and ordered relation between what can be said of the one and of the other.’ For instance, he says that ‘an ellipse can express a circle.’ Accordingly, we must find the exact functional relation that transforms a circle into an ellipse.

Today, functional relations form a scientific field of thought known as functionalism. (click) Unfortunately, many US sciences have turned away from God, have become atheists, and thus reject the teachings of Jesus, Anaxagoras, Cusa, and Leibniz. I say that these sciences are developing a disaster far greater than the recent failure of the U.S. economy.

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

Wednesday, November 05, 2008

Theological Science* Investigates the U.S. Landslide of Barack Obama’s Presidential Election

The new theological science accepts only an infinite God and God’s panentheistic attribute. Theological science says: (1) that God cannot be exhausted; (2) that God is greater than the world he created; and (3) that God created the best of all worlds for us.

In God’s best of all worlds, we can thus conclude that God did not find it ‘necessary’ to make George W. Bush and Barrack Obama U.S. sequential presidents. But God had a ‘reason’ for making these two sequential presidents. God’s reasons can explain President Bush’s choices and God’s reasons will explain President Obama’s choices. We cannot know God’s reasons otherwise we would be able to find all truths about ‘the infinite series of all human events.’ Only with faith can we believe that our world is eternal and has no end.

In an earlier blog, I said that I saw major changes in the Republican party after President Nixon was forced to resign. The landslide win of Barack Obama will cause the Republican party to change. But I believe that the Democratic party must also change, not because Obama has moved to the center of liberalism and conservatism, but because Obama has discovered a new political party.

I expect this new Obamaian party to develop the concept ‘the people.’ This concept was identified by the founders in the first statement of the U.S. Declaration of Independence. And since the U.S. Supreme Court became dysfunctional, I expect the new Congress to legislate a law that says: The USA is a nation under God.

With President Barack Obama every person should expect many, many new and good changes. So, let’s move on.

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

Tuesday, November 04, 2008

Theological Science* Reveals New Ways to Interpret Scriptures, II

I have used the new science, theological science, to reinterpret many teachings of Jesus Christ in the Bible. One reinterpretation is the teaching Jesus in the Bible at Matthew at Chapter 24. Currently, the interpretation of this chapter is twofold. One old interpretation is that ‘Jesus Christ will come a second time when the sun darkens.’ The other old interpretation is that ‘Jesus Christ will save believers, just as Noah built a boat and saved many humans and animals.’ Today, new interpretations have appeared on God and this chapter in Matthew.

Reinterpretations of any scripture are normal because human languages are not perfect and can always be improved. But, such linguistic improvements are necessary so that we can understand ourselves and why God created the best of all worlds in which we live.

Chapter 24 tells us that people must be transported to other planets. Jesus also tells us that we can learn when the sun will darken by understanding the seasons of the fig tree. And just like Noah built a boat to save people and lower animals, the Son of Man, must build many spacecrafts that will save all people on planet earth. So why did the USA lower its space research priority in 1970 in exchange for immoral activities such as the use of drugs, committing crime, hoarding wealth, wasting gambling money, creating poverty pockets, murdering children by abortion, etc.?

Casting scriptures into concrete with fixed interpretations is one of the greatest errors that man can record. Join me to improving theological science as much as we can in our lifetime. Let others add new improvements after they are born and prepare their life for this national duty in the USA.

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

Sunday, November 02, 2008

Theological Science* Reveals New Ways to Interpret Scriptures, I

The new science, theological science, is rejecting all current scientific theories based on atheism. Examples of these theories are the Big Bang theory and evolutionary theory. Eventually, this new science will also reject all e scientific theories of life, such as psychology, sociology, criminology, and medical care. This new science will reject these theories because new facts about God are appearing every day. Since the new science will also change the way scriptures have been interpreted. A religious voter in the USA must thus be careful next Tuesday because theological science shows that the two presidential candidates are very different from a religious standpoint.

One of the new facts is that God’s infinity has a new meaning. Earlier, religious leaders taught people that God exists among the heavenly stars and that believers would go there after death. Theological science found that God exists in a world in which we cannot exist.. We must always live in a ‘finite’ world because we cannot exist in God’s ‘infinite’ world. However, God gave us life after death. The way God gives new lives changes. Since we are able to exist only in a finite world, God gives new lives either on this planet or on some other planet. So, the UFOs that we hear about could be real. Soon, we might confirm the existence of UFOs.

As an independent voter, I listened to the sayings of John McCain, Sarah Palin, Barack Obama, and Joe Biden. I found that the sayings of McCain/Palin and Obama/Biden are very different. I conclude that the sayings of McCain/Palin are opposed to the new facts and the new God. But, I conclude that the sayings of Obama/Biden are in harmony with the new facts and the new God.

With the economic problems we are experiencing today, good voters will be needed on Tuesday.

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

Saturday, November 01, 2008

Theological Science* Investigates the U.S. Gun Machine v. the U.S. Butter Machine

My work on the nation’s crime problem at the U.S. Department of Justice from 1971- 1094 gave me a clear view of the interests of the Republican and Democratic parties. I want to share this experience with you.
I was hired by the Nixon administration and represented the Justice Department at a White House discussion on President Nixon’s domestic initiatives. These great initiatives told me that Nixon viewed the founding of the USA as a social democracy. These broad initiatives would benefit all citizens. One initiative would solve our nation’s crime problem. I was hired by government to use high technology I learned on the space program to solve this crime problem.

President Ford (1974-1977) did nothing about Nixon’s initiatives. Instead, his interest was on the problem of inflation. He created the WIN button for people to wear. It meant ‘Win Inflation Now.’ President Carter (1977-1981) had interest in peace and economies because inflation was increasing to double digits. During his tenure, I was asked how to measure the performance of the U.S. government. My final report said, ‘ only relativistically.’ This report turned my mind firmly to God.

President Reagan (19812-1989) focused his interest initially on inflation. He used the trickle-down economic system by funding Savings and Loan banks. After this intervention failed, Reagan turned his interest to communism and the USA/Soviet Union Cold War. President Reagan produced a political success because the Soviet Union fell. Today, the Eastern Christian Church at Moscow and Vladmir Putin seem to be turning Russia away from the ugly Bolshevik version of communism and replacing it with a social democracy.

President George Herbert Walker Bush (1989-1993) ended the Cold War with the Soviet Union. When Iraq invaded and occupied Kuwait, President Bush started the Persian Gulf War, against those, who favored restraint. Iraq's armies were defeated and Kuwait's independence was restored.
With the huge debts created by Presidents Reagan and Bush, President Clinton (193-2001) focused his interest on the US economy. Using the trickle-up intervention, which was used by President Roosevelt, Clinton reduced inflation and reduced the Reagan/Bush debts to zero. Of interest to Clinton’s tenure is his effort with England’s Tony Blair to prove that every free nation is a social democracy.

George Walker Bush (2001-2009) started the second Persian Gulf War after terrorist attacks on the USA on September 11, 2001. Even though Iraq could not be linked to these attacks, Bush’s interest was ‘security.’ He argued as follows: the attacks demonstrated USA vulnerability and that this vulnerability, combined with Iraq's antipathy for the USA, its desire to obtain or manufacture WMD (weapons of mass destruction), and its record of supporting terrorist groups. Bush made the complete disarming of Iraq a priority. After WMDs were not found, Bush shifted the purpose of the Iraq War to ‘Operation Freedom.’

The information above identifies the general interests of the presidents of the USA beginning with President Nixon. Since John McCain is a military person, a follower of President Bush, has considerable wealth, and seems to have little knowledge of economics, I expect him to use the trickle-down system to fix the U.S. economy. I don’t expect it to fix any economy. So, I expect that his interest will be focused primarily on the ‘gun machine,’ as Reagan did. Since Barack Obama is interested primarily in the socio-economics of people, I expect him to use the Roosevelt/Clinton trickle-up economic system. As a working engineer, I expect this system to be successful. So, I expect that his interest will be focused primarily on the ‘butter machine.’

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.